鄱阳湖典型洲滩湿地植物根系对水分垂向通量的影响

鲁建荣; 张奇; 李云良; 谭志强; 郭玉银

PDF(3109 KB)

中国环境科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5) : 2180-2189.

环境生态

鄱阳湖典型洲滩湿地植物根系对水分垂向通量的影响

鲁建荣^1,2, 张奇¹, 李云良¹, 谭志强¹, 郭玉银³

作者信息 +

Impact of typical plant roots on vertical soil water movement in Poyang Lake Wetland: a numerical study

LU Jian-rong^1,2, ZHANG Qi¹, LI Yun-liang¹, TAN Zhi-qiang¹, GUO Yu-yin³

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为了定量揭示湿地植物根系的水文效应，采用全物理机制的土壤水分运移数值模型，以鄱阳湖吴城湿地国家自然保护区的茵陈篙群落为例，模拟分析根系引起的水文效应.结果表明，根系将增加土壤饱和含水量与土壤进气值，显著改变土壤水分特征曲线（SWRC）与土壤蓄水能力；在考虑根系影响SWRC下模拟率定的土壤含水量与观测数据的时空变化一致：模型10和50cm观测值与拟合值相关系数由不考虑根系效应下的0.83提高至0.85，10和50cm深度土壤含水量的实测值与模拟值的均方根误差分别减少61%和83%.同时这种率定方法下的模拟相比以往的研究地下水补给根系层水量提高34%；考虑典型的根系效应蒸散发量和累积地下水边界向上通量分别增加10%和150%.而在气候极端干旱条件下地下水向上补给量在根系效应下增加7%~56%，累计差异可达38~312cm，同时蒸散发量增加13%.在植被生长旺季时若地下水埋深较深，则根系效应对蒸散发量的影响会放大.因此在进行相关的湿地生态水文过程和湿地水与物质平衡研究中，建议充分评估湿地植物根系的水文效应，并视计算的工况条件，考虑其水文效应在整个水文过程中的影响.

Abstract

Soil water retention curve (SWRC) governs soil water transport. Plant roots significantly change SWRC, thus affecting the dynamic conditions of soil moisture. In order to quantitatively reveal the hydrological effects of wetland plant roots, this paper used the physical model HYRUS-1D to simulate soil water movement of the Artemisia capillaris community in the Wucheng Wetland National Nature Reserve of Poyang Lake. Roots increased the soil saturated water content and air entry potential, which leads to an increase of soil water content and soil water storage capacity. The calibrated spatial and temporal changes of the observed data of soil water content at different depths are more consistent when considering the root effects on SWRC. The correlation coefficient of the fitting on the with and without considering the root effects were 0.83and 0.85, respectively. The root mean square error of the measured and simulated soil water content at 10cm and 50cm depths decreased by 61% and 83%, respectively. At the same time, the simulation under this calibration method has a difference of up to 34% in groundwater recharge compared with previous studies. Considering the typical root effects under field conditions, the evapotranspiration and cumulative groundwater flux were increased by 10% and 150%, respectively. Under extreme drought conditions, it improved upward flux of the groundwater by 7%~56% with cumulative difference of 38~312cm. Meanwhile, root effects increased evapotranspiration by 13%. Moreover,root effects on evapotranspiration would be amplified if deeper groundwater during the growing season. In the relevant wetland eco-hydrological processes, wetland water and material balance studies, it is recommended to fully assess the hydrological effects of wetland plant roots and consider it throughout the hydrological process based on the calculated working conditions.

导出引用

鲁建荣, 张奇, 李云良, 谭志强, 郭玉银. 鄱阳湖典型洲滩湿地植物根系对水分垂向通量的影响[J]. 中国环境科学. 2020, 40(5): 2180-2189

LU Jian-rong, ZHANG Qi, LI Yun-liang, TAN Zhi-qiang, GUO Yu-yin. Impact of typical plant roots on vertical soil water movement in Poyang Lake Wetland: a numerical study[J]. China Environmental Science. 2020, 40(5): 2180-2189

中图分类号： X143

参考文献

[1] Acreman M C, Fisher J, Stratford C J, et al. Hydrological science and wetland restoration:some case studies from Europe[J]. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences, 2007,11(1):158-169.
[2] Bradley C, Clay A, Clifford N J, et al. Variations in saturated and unsaturated water movement through an upland floodplain wetland, mid-Wales, UK[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2010,393(3/4):349-361.
[3] Hupet F, van Dam J C, Vanclooster M. Impact of within-field variability in soil hydraulic properties on transpiration fluxes and crop yields:a numerical study[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2004,3(4):1367-1379.
[4] 陈喜,宋琪峰,高满,等.植被-土壤-水文相互作用及生态水文模型参数的动态表述[J]. 北京师范大学学报, 2016,(3):362-368. Chen X, Song Q F, Gao M, et al. Vegetation-soil-hydrology interaction and expression of parameter variations in ecohydrological models. Journal of Beijing Normal University, 2016,(3):362-368.
[5] Logsdon S D. Root effects on soil properties and processes:synthesis and future research needs. In:Timlin T, Ahuja LR(eds) Enhancing understanding and quantification of soil-root growth interactions. Advanced in Agriculture System Modelling 4, 2013.doi:10.2134/advagricsystmodel4.c8.
[6] Bengough A G. Water dynamics of the root zone:rhizosphere biophysics and its control on soil hydrology[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2012,11(2):460-460.
[7] Whalley W R, Riseley B, Leeds-Harrison P B, et al. Structural differences between bulk and rhizosphere soil[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2005,56(3):353-360.
[8] Li Y, Ghodrati M. Preferential transport of nitrate through soil columns containing root channels[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994,58(3):653-659.
[9] Scanlan C. Processes and effects of root-induced changes to soil hydraulic properties[D]. University of Western Australia, 2009.
[10] Scholl P, Leitner D, Kammerer G, et al. Root induced changes of effective 1D hydraulic properties in a soil column[J]. Plant Soil, 2014,381(1/2):193-213.
[11] Gao Z, Niu F, Wang Y, et al. Root-induced changes to soil water retention in permafrost regions of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2017,18(3):791-803.
[12] Bodner G, Leitner D, Kaul H P. Coarse and fine root plants affect pore size distributions differently[J]. Plant & Soil, 2014,380(1/2):133-151.
[13] Leung A K, Garg A, Ng C W W. Effects of plant roots on soil-water retention and induced suction in vegetated soil[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015,193:183-197.
[14] Yu Y, Loiskandl W, Kaul H-P, et al. Estimation of runoff mitigation by morphologically different cover crop root systems[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016,538:667-676.
[15] Leung A K, Garg A, Coo J L, et al. Effects of the roots of Cynodon dactylonandSchefflera heptaphyllaon water infiltration rate and soil hydraulic conductivity[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2015,29(15):3342-3354.
[16] Simunek J, Saito H, Sakai M, et al. The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media[M]. Department of EnvironmentalSciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA,USA, 2005.
[17] Simunek J, Bradford S A. Vadose zone modeling:introduction and importance[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2008,7(2):581-586.
[18] Ramos T B, Šimůnek J, Gonçalves M C, et al. Field evaluation of a multicomponent solute transport model in soils irrigated with saline waters[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2011,407(1):129-144.
[19] Feddes R A, Kowalik P, Kolinska-Malinka K, et al. Simulation of field water uptake by plants using a soil water dependent root extraction function[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1976,31(1):13-26.
[20] Genuchten M T V. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980,44(44):892-898.
[21] Xu X, Zhang Q, Li Y, et al. Evaluating the influence of water table depth on transpiration of two vegetation communities in a lake floodplain wetland[J]. Hydrology Research, 2016,47(S1):293-312.
[22] 谭学进,穆兴民,高鹏,等.黄土区植被恢复对土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 39(2):267-276. Tan X J, Mu X M, Gao P, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on changes to soil physical properties on the loess plateau. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(2):267-276.
[23] 闵骞,闵聃.鄱阳湖区干旱演变特征与水文防旱对策[J]. 水文, 2010,30(1):84-88. Min Q, Min D. Drought change characteristics and drought protection countermeasures for Poyanghu Lake Basin. Journal of China Hydrology, 2010,30(1):84-88.
[24] 九江新闻网.江西81天无雨鄱阳湖提前进入枯水期[EB/OL]. http://www.szcgjgd.com/snrd/10799.html,2019-11-02.
[25] Xu X, Zhang Q, Li Y, et al. Evaluating the influence of water table depth on transpiration of two vegetation communities in a lake floodplain wetland[J]. Hydrology Research, 2016,47(S1):293-312.
[26] Beven K, Germann P. Macropores and water flow in soils[J]. Water resources research, 1982,18(5):1311-1325.
[27] 李盼盼,王兵,刘国彬,等.茵陈蒿群落垂直结构对坡面产流产沙过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017,31(2):43-47. Li P P, Wang B, Liu G B, et al. Effects of Artemisia capillaries Vertical Structures on the Processes of Runoff and Sediment Production[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,31(2):43-47.
[28] Zhao Z, Jin G, Hua G, et al. Root-induced hydraulic changes of soil matrix-an in-situ experimental study in the wetland of Poyang Lake[C]. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2013.
[29] 由政,姚旭,景航,等.不同演替阶段群落根系分布与土壤团聚体特征的协同变化[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016,23(6):20-25. You Z, Yao X, Jing H, et al.Coordinated variation between root distributions and soil aggregate characteristics at different successional stages[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016,23(6):20-25.
[30] Yuge K, Shigematsu K, Anan M, et al. Effect of crop root on soil water retentivity and movement[J]. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2012,03(12):1782-1787.
[31] Leung A K, Boldrin D, Liang T, et al. Plant age effects on soil infiltration rate during early plant establishment[J]. Géotechnique, 2018,68(7):646-652.
[32] Bardgett R D, Mommer L, De Vries F T. Going underground:root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes[J]. Trends Ecol Evol, 2014,29(12):692-699.
[33] Hillerislambers R, Rietkerk M, Bosch F V D, et al. Vegetation pattern formation in semi-arid grazing systems[J]. Ecology, 2001,82(1):50-61.
[34] 许秀丽,李云良,谭志强,等.鄱阳湖湿地典型植被群落地下水-土壤-植被-大气系统界面水分通量及水源组成[J]. 湖泊科学, 2018, 30(5):1351-1367. Xu X L, Li Y L, Tan Z Q, et al. Water fluxes in the groundwater-soil-plant-atmosphere continuum and water sources oftypical wetland vegetation communities in Poyang Lake[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2018,30(5):1351-1367.
[35] 陈敏建,张秋霞,汪勇,等.西辽河平原地下水补给植被的临界埋深[J]. 水科学进展, 2019,30(1):24-33. Chen M J, ZHANG Q X; Wang Y, et al. Critical depth of recharge of the vegetation by groundwater in the West Liaohe Plain[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2019,30(1):24-33.