宁夏回族自治区生态系统服务时空变化及其权衡研究

杨强强; 章翩; 邱小琮; 赵增锋; 赵睿智; 周瑞娟

PDF(4636 KB)

中国环境科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 5453-5465.

环境生态

宁夏回族自治区生态系统服务时空变化及其权衡研究

杨强强¹, 章翩², 邱小琮³, 赵增锋¹, 赵睿智¹, 周瑞娟⁴

作者信息 +

Spatiotemporal changes and trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

YANG Qiang-qiang¹, ZHANG Pian², QIU Xiao-cong³, ZHAO Zeng-feng¹, ZHAO Rui-zhi¹, ZHOU Rui-juan⁴

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

综合土地利用、高程及降水等多源数据，采用InVEST模型、PLUS模型及相关性分析、热点分析等方法，探究2000~2020年宁夏生态系统服务（水质净化、土壤保持、碳存储及生境质量）时空特征及其权衡/协同关系，并进行2030年生态系统服务的模拟.结果表明：研究期内，近10年土地利用类型变化相对较大，且人类活动为其主要驱动因素；2000~2020年，除土壤保持服务外，宁夏的水质净化、碳存储及生境质量均呈下降趋势；相关性分析表明，氮输出与土壤保持及碳存储之间呈协同效应，土壤保持与碳存储之间存在协同关系，生境质量与氮输出及碳存储之间存在权衡关系；热点分析显示，水质净化服务与生境质量之间热点重叠区相对较高（均值达6.5%），但单位面积能够同时提供多种生态系统服务的区域占比较低且呈下降趋势；除土壤保持服务外，生态保护情景下更有利于生态系统功能的改善.研究结果凸显了生态保护在土地利用管理中的重要性，可为区域土地格局优化及资源的有效配置提供基础参考.

Abstract

Based on the multi-source data such as land use, elevation and precipitation, this paper adopted methods such as InVEST model, PLUS model, correlation analysis and hotspot analysis, investigated the spatio-temporal characteristics of ecosystem services (water purification, soil conservation, carbon storage, and habitat quality) in Ningxia from 2000 to 2020 as well as their trade-off/synergies, and simulated ecosystem services in 2030. As shown by results, during the research period, land use types changed relatively greatly in the past decades, and human activities were the main driving factor. From 2000 to 2020, except for soil conservation services, water purification in Ningxia, carbon storage and habitat quality all presented a declining trend. According to correlation analysis, there was a synergistic effect between nitrogen export and soil conservation and carbon storage. In addition, there was a synergistic relationship between soil conservation and carbon storage, as well as a trade-off between habitat quality and nitrogen export and carbon storage. As shown by hotspot analysis, hot spots overlapping areas between water purification services and habitat quality were relatively high (average value of 6.5%), but the proportion of regions that can simultaneously provide various ecosystem services per unit area was relatively low and showed a declining trend. In addition to soil conservation services, the ecological protection scenario was more favorable to improve ecosystem function. Research results, which highlight the importance of ecological protection in land use management, can provide a basic reference for the optimization of regional land patterns and the effective allocation of resources.

导出引用

杨强强, 章翩, 邱小琮, 赵增锋, 赵睿智, 周瑞娟. 宁夏回族自治区生态系统服务时空变化及其权衡研究[J]. 中国环境科学. 2023, 43(10): 5453-5465

YANG Qiang-qiang, ZHANG Pian, QIU Xiao-cong, ZHAO Zeng-feng, ZHAO Rui-zhi, ZHOU Rui-juan. Spatiotemporal changes and trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. China Environmental Science. 2023, 43(10): 5453-5465

中图分类号： X171

参考文献

[1] Wei W, Nan S X, Xie B B, et al. The spatial-temporal changes of supply-demand of ecosystem services and ecological compensation:A case study of Hexi Corridor, Northwest China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2023,187:106861.
[2] Sun X, Li F. Spatiotemporal assessment and trade-offs of multiple ecosystem services based on land use changes in Zengcheng, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,609:1569-1581.
[3] Li Y G, Liu W, Feng Q, et al. The role of land use change in affecting ecosystem services and the ecological security pattern of the Hexi Regions, Northwest China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 855:158940.
[4] Xu Z H, Peng J. Ecosystem services-based decision-making:A bridge from science to practice[J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2022, 135:6-15.
[5] Caballero C B, Ruhoff A, Biggs T. Land use and land cover changes and their impacts on surface-atmosphere interactions in Brazil:A systematic review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022,808:152134.
[6] Xia H, Yuan S F, Prishchepov A V. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions and their social-ecological drivers:Implications for spatial planning and management[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2023,189:106767.
[7] Huang C B, Zhao D Y, Liao Q P, et al. Linking landscape dynamics to the relationship between water purification and soil retention[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2023,59:101498.
[8] 李桂娥,李杰,赵冲,等.生态系统服务时空演化的非线性影响因子——以钱塘江流域为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022,42(12):5941-5952. Li G E, Li J, Zhao C, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem services and their nonlinear influencing factors-A case study in the Qiantang River Basin[J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(12):5941-5952.
[9] Chen G Z, Li X, Liu X P, et al. Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways[J]. Nature Communications, 2020,11:537.
[10] Yin D Y, Yu H C, Shi Y Y, et al. Matching supply and demand for ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin, China:A perspective of the water-energy-food nexus[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 384:135469.
[11] 杨强强,徐光来,李爱娟,等.青弋江流域生态系统服务评估与权衡研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(23):9315-9327. Yang Q Q, Xu G L, Li A J, et al. Evaluation and trade-off of ecosystem services in the Qingyijiang River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(23):9315-9327.
[12] Huang Z X, Qian L Y, Cao W Z. Developing a novel approach integrating ecosystem services and biodiversity for identifying priority ecological reserves[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2022, 179:106128.
[13] Zhang J, Li S N, Lin N F, et al. Spatial identification and trade-off analysis of land use functions improve spatial zoning management in rapid urbanized areas, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2022,116:106058.
[14] Gay E T, Martin K L, Caldwell P V, et al. Riparian buffers increase future baseflow and reduce peakflows in a developing watershed[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023,862:160834.
[15] Zhang K L, Tang X H, Zhao Y T, et al. Differing perceptions of the youth and the elderly regarding cultural ecosystem services in urban parks:An exploration of the tour experience[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2022,821:153388.
[16] Xue C L, Chen X H, Xue L R, et al. Modeling the spatially heterogeneous relationships between tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services and potential drivers considering geographic scale in Bairin Left Banner, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023,855:158834.
[17] Chen X, Yu L, Du Z R, et al. Distribution of ecological restoration projects associated with land use and land cover change in China and their ecological impacts[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 825:153938.
[18] Huang Y, Gan X Y, Niu S F, et al. Incorporating ecosystem service multifunctionality and its response to urbanization to identify coordinated economic, societal, and environmental relationships in China[J]. Forests, 2022,13:707.
[19] Yang Q Q, Zhang P, Qiu X C, et al. Spatial-temporal variations and trade-offs of ecosystem services in Anhui Province, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023,20:855.
[20] Nie W B, Xu B, Yang F, et al. Simulating future land use by coupling ecological security patterns and multiple scenarios[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023,859:160262.
[21] Liang X, Guan Q F, Clarke K C, et al. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model:A case study in Wuhan, China[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2021,85:101569.
[22] Wei Q Q, Abudureheman M, Halike A, et al. Temporal and spatial variation analysis of habitat quality on the PLUS-InVEST model for Ebinur Lake Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,145:109632.
[23] Chen L H, Ma Y. Exploring the spatial and temporal changes of carbon storage in different development scenarios in Foshan, China[J]. Forests, 2022,13:2177.
[24] Xu J, Wang S, Xiao Y, et al. Mapping the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service relationships and bundles in Ningxia, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,294:126216.
[25] Xu J, Xiao Y, Xie G D, et al. How to coordinate cross-regional water resource relationship by integrating water supply services flow and interregional ecological compensation[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 126:107595.
[26] Li R, Shi Y, Feng C C, et al. The spatial relationship between ecosystem service scarcity value and urbanization from the perspective of heterogeneity in typical arid and semiarid regions of China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,132:108299.
[27] Peng S Z, Ding Y X, Liu W Z, et al. 1 km monthly temperature and precipitation dataset for China from 1901 to 2017[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2019,11:1931-1946.
[28] 谢云,刘宝元.中国30m分辨率的降雨侵蚀力图(1981~2010年)[EB/OL]. 地球系统科学数据共享平台-黄土高原科学数据共享平台, 2013. Xie Y, Liu B Y. Graphs of rainfall erosivity with 30m resolution on the Loess Plateau (1981~2010)[EB/OL]. Data Sharing Infrastructure of Earth System Science_Data Sharing Infrastructure of Loess Plateau, 2013.
[29] 刘宝元,梁音,曹龙熹,等.中国土壤可蚀性因子K栅格数据集[DB/OL]. 2018. Liu B Y, Liang Y, Cao L X, et al. Grid data on soil erodibility in China[DB/OL]. 2018.
[30] Wang W X, Deng X Z, Wang Y F, et al. Impacts of infrastructure construction on ecosystem services in new-type urbanization area of North China Plain[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2022, 185:106376.
[31] Guo M, Ma S, Wang L J, et al. Impacts of future climate change and different management scenarios on water-related ecosystem services:A case study in the Jianghuai ecological economic Zone, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,127:107732.
[32] Liang J, Li S, Li X D, et al. Trade-off analyses and optimization of water-related ecosystem services (WRESs) based on land use change in a typical agricultural watershed, southern China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,279:123851.
[33] 郭珊珊.黄河流域生态系统健康与城镇化耦合协调研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学, 2022. Guo S S. Research on the coupling and coordination of ecosystem health and urbanization in the Yellow River Basin[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology, 2022.
[34] Ma B R, Zeng W H, Xie Y X, et al. Boundary delineation and grading functional zoning of Sanjiangyuan National Park based on biodiversity importance evaluations[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 825:154068.
[35] Fang L L, Wang L C, Chen W X, et al. Identifying the impacts of natural and human factors on ecosystem service in the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,314:127995.
[36] Xu C, Jiang Y N, Su Z H, et al. Assessing the impacts of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services in Jinghe River basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,137:108757.
[37] Li X Y, Huang C S, Jin H J, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns of carbon storage derived using the InVEST model in Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022,10:846456.
[38] Jan J V D, Cristino L T J, Narumasa T, et al. Carbon stock estimation of selected watersheds in Laguna, Philippines using InVEST[J]. Philippine Journal of Science, 2021,150(2):501-513.
[39] Zhai T L, Zhang D, Zhao C C. How to optimize ecological compensation to alleviate environmental injustice in different cities in the Yellow River Basin? A case of integrating ecosystem service supply, demand and flow[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021,75:103341.
[40] Tang X L, Zhao X, Bai Y F, et al. Carbon pools in China's terrestrial ecosystems:New estimates based on an intensive field survey[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018,115(16):4021-4026.
[41] Wang J F, Li L F, Li Q, et al. The spatiotemporal evolution and prediction of carbon storage in the Yellow River Basin based on the major function-oriented zone planning[J]. Sustainability, 2022,14:7963.
[42] Yang J, Xie B P, Tao W Q, et al. Ecosystem services assessment, trade-off, and bundles in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Diversity, 2021,13:308.
[43] Yang Y W, Tian Y C, Zhang Q, et al. Impact of current and future land use change on biodiversity in Nanliu River Basin, Beibu Gulf of South China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,141:109093.
[44] Gu Y Y, Lin N F, Ye X, et al. Assessing the impacts of human disturbance on ecosystem services under multiple scenarios in karst areas of China:Insight from ecological conservation red lines effectiveness[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,142:109202.
[45] Ma R M, Lü Y H, Fu B J, et al. A modified habitat quality model to incorporate the effects of ecological restoration[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2022,17:104029.
[46] Zhang D K, Wang J P, Wang Y, et al. Is there a spatial relationship between urban landscape pattern and habitat quality? Implication for landscape planning of the Yellow River Basin[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022,19:11974.
[47] Zhang X R, Song W, Lang Y Q, et al. Land use changes in the coastal zone of China's Hebei Province and the corresponding impacts on habitat quality[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020,99:104957.
[48] 滕雅丽,谢苗苗,王回茴,等.资源型城市土地利用转型及其对生境质量的影响——以乌海市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022,42(19):7941-7951. Teng Y L, Xie M M, Wang H H, et al. Land use transition in resource-based cities and its impact on habitat quality:a case of Wuhai city[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(19):7941-7951.
[49] Li T, Lü Y H, Ma L Y, et al. Exploring cost-effective measure portfolios for ecosystem services optimization under large-scale vegetation restoration[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023,325:116440.
[50] Bai Y, Zhuang C W, Ouyang Z Y, et al. Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2011,8:177-183.
[51] Egoh B, Reyers B, Rought M, et al. Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa[J]. Biological Conservation, 2009,142:553-562.
[52] Wu J Y, Luo J G, Zhang H, et al. Projections of land use change and habitat quality assessment by coupling climate change and development patterns[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022,847:157491.
[53] Gao J, Bian H Y. The impact of the plains afforestation program and alternative land use scenarios on ecosystem services in an urbanizing watershed[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019,43:126373.
[54] 胡影,冯晓明,巩杰.基于生态系统服务的宁夏回族自治区自然-社会经济协调性分析[J]. 生态学报, 2022,42(16):6523-6533. Hu Y, Feng X M, Gong J. Coordination analysis of the nature and social-economic system of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region based on ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(16):6523-6533.
[55] 张文静,孙小银,周俊.南四湖流域关键生态系统服务的时空权衡关系[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(20):8003-8015. Zhang W J, Sun X Y, Zhou J. Spatio-temporal dynamics of tradeoffs between crucial ecosystem services in Nansihu Lake Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(20):8003-8015.
[56] Sun D, Zhang W X, Lin Y B, et al. Soil erosion and water retention varies with plantation type and age[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018,422:1-10.
[57] 白雪莲,郑海颖,王理想,等.砒砂岩黄土区植被盖度对土壤侵蚀的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2020,40(11):3776-3784. Bai X L, Zheng H Y, Wang L X, et al. The influence of vegetation coverage on soil erosion in sand stone loess area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(11):3776-3784.
[58] 付乐,迟妍妍,于洋,等.2000~2020年黄河流域土地利用变化特征及影响因素分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022,31(10):1927-1938. Fu L, Chi Y Y, Yu Y, et al. Characteristics and driving forces of land use change in the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2020[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022,31(10):1927-1938.
[59] Xu S N, Liu Y F, Wang X, et al. Scale effect on spatial patterns of ecosystem services and associations among them in semi-arid area:A case study in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,598:297-306.
[60] Liu X P, Wang S J, Wu P J, et al. Impacts of urban expansion on terrestrial carbon storage in China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019,53:6834-6844.
[61] 邓元杰,姚顺波,侯孟阳,等.退耕还林还草工程对生态系统碳储存服务的影响——以黄土高原丘陵沟壑区子长县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020,35(4):826-844. Deng Y J, Yao S B, Hou M Y, et al. Assessing the effects of the Green for Grain Program on ecosystem carbon storage services by linking the InVEST and FLUS models:A case study of Zichang county in hilly and gully region of Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(4):826-844.
[62] Zhang Y S, Lu X, Liu B Y, et al. Spatial relationships between ecosystem services and socioecological drivers across a large-scale region:A case study in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,766:142480.
[63] Feng X R, Zhang T, Feng P, et al. Evaluation and tradeoff-synergy analysis of ecosystem services in Luanhe River Basin[J]. Ecohydrology, 2022,15(8):e2473.
[64] 张静静,朱文博,朱连奇,等.伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020,75(5):975-988. Zhang J J, Zhu W B, Zhu L Q, et al. Multi-scale analysis trade-off/synergy effects of forest ecosystem services in the Funiu Mountain Region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(5):975-988.
[65] 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1):116-134. Wang J F, Xu C D. Geodetector:Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(1):116-134.
[66] Ma Z J, Chen Y, Melville D S, et al. Changes in area and number of nature reserves in China[J]. Conserv Biol, 2019,33(5):1066-1075.
[67] Zhang X Y, Li S S, Yu H. Analysis on the ecosystem service protection effect of national nature reserve in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau from weight perspective[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,142:109225.
[68] Huang Y Z, Fu J, Wang W R, et al. Development of China's nature reserves over the past 60years:An overview[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019,80:224-232.