基于非参数统计方法估算青藏高原臭氧背景浓度

谢民生; 吉东生; 殷秀峰; 辛金元; 万欣; 李健军; 张强弓; 布多; 丛志远

PDF(1832 KB)

中国环境科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8) : 4274-4281.

大气污染与控制

基于非参数统计方法估算青藏高原臭氧背景浓度

谢民生¹, 吉东生², 殷秀峰³, 辛金元², 万欣⁴, 李健军⁵, 张强弓⁴, 布多¹, 丛志远¹

作者信息 +

Estimation of ozone background concentration on the Tibetan Plateau based on nonparametric statistical technique

XIE Min-sheng¹, JI Dong-sheng², YIN Xiu-feng³, XIN Jin-yuan², WAN Xin⁴, LI Jian-jun⁵, ZHANG Qiang-gong⁴, BU Duo¹, CONG Zhi-yuan¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

基于Kolmogorov-Zurbenko (KZ)滤波和Robust Extraction of Baseline Signal (REBS)方法处理了青藏高原纳木错站和珠峰站多年连续的近地面臭氧原始观测数据.通过合理选择KZ滤波器和REBS滤波窗口与带宽,成功去除了臭氧时间序列中的短期变动,提取了代表两站近地面臭氧背景浓度信号.结果表明,KZ滤波法得到的纳木错站和珠峰站臭氧年平均背景浓度分别为89.71μg/m³和88.98μg/m³;REBS方法得到的分别为89.62μg/m³和88.52μg/m³.两种方法得到的背景臭氧浓度一致性较好,都呈现出相似的季节变化规律.4~5月臭氧浓度较高,而季风期间则较低.KZ滤波更侧重反映长期趋势和季节周期性变化,而REBS在局部污染时段的表现更好.两种非参数统计方法均可有效应用于背景区域臭氧时间序列分析,为监测和防治臭氧污染提供重要依据.

Abstract

The atmospheric background concentration can reflect the degree of pollution and long-term trends on a regional scale. This work was based on the Kolmogorov-Zurbenko (KZ) filtering and Robust Extraction of Baseline Signal (REBS) methods and processed multiple years of continuous near-surface ozone raw observational data from Nam Co Station and Qomolangma Station on the Tibetan Plateau. By optimizing the KZ filter and REBS filtering window and bandwidth, short-term fluctuations in the ozone time series were successfully removed, and signals representing the background concentration of near-surface ozone at both stations were extracted. The results showed that the annual average background ozone concentrations at Nam Co Station and Qomolangma Station were 89.71μg/m³ and 88.98μg/m³ respectively according to the KZ filtering method, and 89.62μg/m³ and 88.52μg/m³ respectively according to the REBS method. The background ozone concentrations obtained by both methods demonstrated good consistency and exhibited similar seasonal variation patterns. The ozone concentration was higher in April-May and lower during the monsoon period. KZ filtering focused more on reflecting long-term trends and seasonal cyclical changes, while REBS performed better during local pollution periods. Both non-parametric statistical methods were effectively applied to the analysis of ozone time series in background regions, providing an important basis for monitoring and controlling ozone pollution.

导出引用

谢民生, 吉东生, 殷秀峰, 辛金元, 万欣, 李健军, 张强弓, 布多, 丛志远. 基于非参数统计方法估算青藏高原臭氧背景浓度[J]. 中国环境科学. 2024, 44(8): 4274-4281

XIE Min-sheng, JI Dong-sheng, YIN Xiu-feng, XIN Jin-yuan, WAN Xin, LI Jian-jun, ZHANG Qiang-gong, BU Duo, CONG Zhi-yuan. Estimation of ozone background concentration on the Tibetan Plateau based on nonparametric statistical technique[J]. China Environmental Science. 2024, 44(8): 4274-4281

中图分类号： X511

参考文献

[1] Worden H M, Bowman K W, Worden J R, et al. Satellite measurements of the clear-sky greenhouse effect from tropospheric ozone [J]. Nature Geoscience, 2008,1(5):305-308.
[2] IPCC. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis [M/OL]. 2021[2021-08-09]. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter_07.pdf.
[3] Van Dingenen R, Dentener F J, Raes F, et al. The global impact of ozone on agricultural crop yields under current and future air quality legislation [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2009,43(3):604-618.
[4] Yue X, Unger N, Harper K, et al. Ozone and haze pollution weakens net primary productivity in China [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2017,17(9):6073-6089.
[5] Agathokleous E, Feng Z, Oksanen E, et al. Ozone affects plant, insect, and soil microbial communities: A threat to terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity [J]. Science Advances, 2020,6(33):eabc1176.
[6] US EPA, (2014-08-01) [2020-05-06]. Health risk and exposure assessment for ozone (Final Report): EPA/452/R-14-004a [R/OL]. https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/ozone-o3-standards-risk-and-exposure-assessments-current-review.
[7] 栾天,方双喜,周凌晞,等.龙凤山站大气CO₂浓度2种筛分方法对比研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(2):321-328. Luan T, Fang S X, Zhou L X, et al. Comparison of two flagging approaches to the observed CO₂ mole fractions at the Longfengshan WMO/GAW Regional Station in China [J]. China Environmental Science, 2015,35(2):321-328.
[8] 傅伯杰,欧阳志云,施鹏,等.青藏高原生态安全屏障状况与保护对策[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2021,36(11):1298-1306. FU B J, OUYANG Z, SHI P, et al. Current Condition and Protection Strategies of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Ecological Security Barrier [J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021,36(11):1298-1306.
[9] 陈德亮,徐柏青,姚檀栋,等.青藏高原环境变化科学评估:过去、现在与未来[J]. 科学通报, 2015,60(32):3025-3035,1-2. Chen D L, Xu B Q, YaoT D, et al. Assessment of past, present and future environmental changes on the Tibetan Plateau [J]. China science bulletin, 2015,60(32):3025-3035,1-2.
[10] Xu W, Lin W, Xu X, et al. Long-term trends of surface ozone and its influencing factors at the Mt Waliguan GAW station, China-Part 1: Overall trends and characteristics [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016,16(10):6191-6205.
[11] 孙鸿烈,郑度,姚檀栋,等.青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J]. 地理学报, 2012,67(1):3-12. Sun H, Zheng D, Yao T D, et al. Protection and Construction of the National Ecological Security Shelter Zone on Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(1):3-12.
[12] Ding A, Wang T. Influence of stratosphere-to-troposphere exchange on the seasonal cycle of surface ozone at Mount Waliguan in western China [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2006,33(3).
[13] Ma J, Lin W L, Zheng X D, et al. Influence of air mass downward transport on the variability of surface ozone at Xianggelila Regional Atmosphere Background Station, southwest China [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2014,14(11):5311-5325.
[14] Zhang J, Ye C, Xuan Y, et al. The Earth Summit Mission-2022: Successful ozone soundings contribute to source identification in the north Mt. Qomolangma region [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2024,136:412-421.
[15] Wang Y, Zhang J, Bai Z, et al. Background concentrations of PMs in Xinjiang, West China: An estimation based on meteorological filter method and Eckhardt algorithm [J]. Atmospheric Research, 2019,215:141-148.
[16] 李云婷,程念亮,张大伟,等.2013年北京市不同方位PM_2.5背景浓度研究[J]. 环境科学, 2015,36(12):4331-4339. LI Y T, CHENG N L, ZHANG D W, et al. PM_2.5 Background Concentration at Different Directions in Beijing in 2013[J]. Environmental Science, 2015,36(12):4331-4339.
[17] 马志强,徐敬,张小玲,等.北京PM_2.5背景值定值方法及其变化特征研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(1):7-12. Ma Z Q, Xu J, ZHANG X L, et al. Definition and characteristics of PM_2.5 background concentration in Beijing [J]. China Environmental Science, 2015,35(1):7-12.
[18] Wang Z, Li X, Wang Z, et al. Application status of Models-3/CMAQ in environmental management [J]. Environ. Sci. Technol, 2013,36: 386-391.
[19] McKendry I G, Stahl K, Moore R D. Synoptic sea-level pressure patterns generated by a general circulation model: comparison with types derived from NCEP/NCAR re-analysis and implications for downscaling [J]. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2006,26(12):1727-1736.
[20] 赵域圻,杨婷,王自发,等.基于KZ滤波的京津冀2013~2018年大气污染治理效果分析[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2020,25(5):499-509. ZHAO Yi, YANG T, WANG Z, et al. Effectiveness of Air Pollution Control Efforts in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region during 2013~2018 Based on the Kolmogorov-Zurbenko Filter [J]. Climatic and Environmental Research (in Chinese), 2006,26(12):1727-1736.
[21] Wise E K, Comrie A C. Extending the Kolmogorov-Zurbenko filter: application to ozone, particulate matter, and meteorological trends [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2005,55(8): 1208-1216.
[22] 张洁琼,王雅倩,高爽,等.不同时间尺度气象要素与空气污染关系的KZ滤波研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(10):3662-3672. Zhang J Q, Wang Y Q, Gao S,et al. Study on the relationship between meteorological elements and air pollution at different time scales based on KZ filtering [J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(10).
[23] Ruckstuhl A F, Henne S, Reimann S, et al. Robust extraction of baseline signal of atmospheric trace species using local regression [J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2012,5(11):2613-2624.
[24] Yi L, An M, Yu H, et al. In Situ Observations of Halogenated Gases at the Shangdianzi Background Station and Emission Estimates for Northern China [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023,57(18):7217-7229.
[25] Shan M, Xu H, Han L, et al. Temporal Variation and Source Analysis of Atmospheric CH4at Different Altitudes in the Background Area of Yangtze River Delta [J]. Atmosphere, 2022,13(8):1206.
[26] Fang S, Luan T, Zhang G, et al. The determination of regional CO₂ mole fractions at the Longfengshan WMO/GAW station: A comparison of four data filtering approaches [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2015,116:36-43.
[27] Li L, Lu C, Chan P W, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the observed vertical distributions of PM_2.5, NO_x, and O₃ from a tower in the Pearl River Delta [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 2021:1-32.
[28] Rao S, Zurbrnko G, Neagu R, et al. Space and time scales in ambient ozone data. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, 1997,78,10: 2153-2166.
[29] Pelletier J D. The power spectral density of atmospheric temperature from time scales of 10-2 to 106yr [J]. Earth and planetary science letters, 1998,158(3/4):157-164.
[30] Riml J, Campeau A, Bishop K, et al. Spectral decomposition reveals new perspectives on CO₂ concentration patterns and soil-stream linkages [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2019, 124(10):3039-3056.
[31] Hies T, Treffeisen R, Sebald L, et al. Spectral analysis of air pollutants. Part 1: elemental carbon time series [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2000,34(21):3495-3502.
[32] Sebald L, Treffeisen R, Reimer E, et al. Spectral analysis of air pollutants. Part 2: ozone time series [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2000,34(21):3503-3509.
[33] Cristofanelli P, Bracci A, Sprenger M, et al. Tropospheric ozone variations at the Nepal Climate Observatory-Pyramid (Himalayas, 5079m asl) and influence of deep stratospheric intrusion events [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010,10(14):6537-6549.
[34] Yin X, Kang S, de Foy B, et al. Surface ozone at Nam Co in the inland Tibetan Plateau: variation, synthesis comparison and regional representativeness [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2017, 17(18):11293-11311.