忻州市生态系统服务时空变化及城镇化响应

解铭威, 冉藜, 贾文贞, 周慧荻, 王向荣

中国环境科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8) : 4557-4566.

PDF(7019 KB)
PDF(7019 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8) : 4557-4566.
环境生态

忻州市生态系统服务时空变化及城镇化响应

  • 解铭威, 冉藜, 贾文贞, 周慧荻, 王向荣
作者信息 +

Spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services and their response to urbanization in Xinzhou City

  • XIE Ming-wei, RAN Li, JIA Wen-zhen, ZHOU Hui-di, WANG Xiang-rong
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为探究忻州市生态系统服务(ESs)的时空变化情况,分析ESs对城镇化的响应,以1995~2020年6期土地利用数据为基础,选取3项城镇化指标和4项ESs指标,借助InVEST模型和修正通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)等评估ESs,并使用K-均值聚类识别生态系统服务簇,采用皮尔逊相关性分析ESs间权衡协同关系及其对城镇化的响应.结果表明:忻州市土地利用类型以草地、耕地和林地为主,1995~2020年建设用地扩张280.7km2,林地增加1201.4km2,草地增加511.4km2,耕地和水域面积减少.有较多耕地向草地、草地向林地转移.建设用地、GDP和人口持续增长,2005~2015年是城镇化较快的时期.1995~2020年食物供给能力稳步提升,碳储量在2015年以后明显提升,生境质量先升后降,水土保持量先降后升.以草地为主的功能复合型服务簇面积占比达51.4%,各ESs间主要呈协同关系,生境质量、土壤保持与城镇化指标间存在负相关.研究结果为忻州市土地管理与生态保护提供决策依据.

Abstract

In order to investigate the spatial and temporal changes of ecosystem services (ESs) in Xinzhou City and analyze the response of ESs to urbanization, three urbanization indicators and four ESs indicators were selected based on six periods of land use data from 1995 to 2020, while ESs were assessed with the help of the InVEST model and the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Moreover, K-means clustering was used to identify ecosystem services bundles (ESB). Besides, Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the trade-offs and synergies among ESs and their responses to urbanization. The results showed that: (1) Land use types in Xinzhou City were dominated by grassland, arable land and forest, with construction land expanding by 280.7km2, forest increasing by 1201.4km2, grassland increasing by 511.4km2, and arable land and water area decreasing in the period from 1995 to 2020. There was a greater shift from arable land to grassland and from grassland to forest. (2) Construction land, GDP and population continued to grow, and 2005~2015 was a period of rapid urbanization.1995~2020 the food provision steadily improved, carbon stock significantly increased after 2015, habitat quality firstly increased and then decreased, soil retention firstly decreased and then increased. (3) The area of grassland-based functional complex ecosystem services bundles accounted for 51.4%, with mainly synergistic relationships among ESs, and negative correlation between habitat quality-urbanization and soil retention-urbanization. The results of this study can provide scientific basis for land management and ecological protection in Xinzhou City.

关键词

城镇化 / 生态系统服务 / 生态系统服务簇 / 土地利用变化 / 忻州市

Key words

ecosystem services (ESs) / ecosystem services bundle (ESB) / land use change / urbanization / Xinzhou City

引用本文

导出引用
解铭威, 冉藜, 贾文贞, 周慧荻, 王向荣. 忻州市生态系统服务时空变化及城镇化响应[J]. 中国环境科学. 2024, 44(8): 4557-4566
XIE Ming-wei, RAN Li, JIA Wen-zhen, ZHOU Hui-di, WANG Xiang-rong. Spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services and their response to urbanization in Xinzhou City[J]. China Environmental Science. 2024, 44(8): 4557-4566
中图分类号: X171.1   

参考文献

[1] 赵先超,田一豆,张潇湘.长株潭城市群土地利用碳排放与生态系统服务价值时空关系分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023,37(5):215-225. Zhao X C, Tian Y D, Zhang X X. Spatio-temporal relationship between land use carbon emissions and ecosystem service value in Changzhutan urban agglomeration [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(5):215-225.
[2] Jiang W, Wu T, Fu B. The value of ecosystem services in China: A systematic review for twenty years [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2021,52.
[3] 曲艺,丁建丽,包青岭,等.多情景模拟下的新疆生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2023,46(4):195-204. Qu Y, Ding J L, Bao Q L, et al. Valuation of ecosystem service value with multi-scenario simulation in Xinjiang [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023,46(4):195-204.
[4] Zhao Q J, Shao J F. Evaluating the impact of simulated land use changes under multiple scenarios on ecosystem services in Ji'an, China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023,156:111040.
[5] 夏楚瑜,国淏,赵晶,等.京津冀地区生态系统服务对城镇化的多空间尺度动态响应[J]. 生态学报, 2023,43(7):2756-2769. Xia C Y, Guo H, Zhao J, et al. Dynamic responses of ecosystem services to urbanization at multi-spatial scales in the Beijing-Tianjin- Hebei region [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(7):2756-2769.
[6] Zhang Y L, Hu X J, Wei B J, et al. Spatiotemporal exploration of ecosystem service value, landscape ecological risk, and their interactive relationship in Hunan Province, Central-South China, over the past 30years [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023,156.
[7] 李康玮,曾贤刚.煤炭资源型城市煤炭开发与生态系统服务协调发展演变及驱动机制——以淮南市为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(3):460-469. Li K W, Zeng X G. Coordinated development evolution and driving mechanism of coal development and ecosystem services in Huainan City [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(3):460- 469.
[8] Jiang W J, Guo P P, Lin Z M, et al. Factors influencing the spatiotemporal variation in the value of ecosystem services in Anxi county [J]. Heliyon, 2023,9(8):e19182-e19182.
[9] Fatemeh M, Mohsen T, Ardavan Z, et al. Optimization land use based on multi-scenario simulation of ecosystem service for sustainable landscape planning in a mixed urban - Forest watershed [J]. Ecological Modelling, 2023,483:110440.
[10] Uta S, Erich T, Stefan B, et al. Past and future impacts of land-use changes on ecosystem services in Austria [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023,345:118728.
[11] Luísa F, Manuela R M. Assessing the ecological suitability of land-use change. Lessons learned from a rural marginal area in southeast Portugal [J]. Land Use Policy, 2022,122:106381.
[12] 朱春霞,钟绍卓,龙宇,等.黄河流域生态系统服务的时空演变及其驱动力[J]. 生态学杂志, 2023,42(10):2502-2513. Zhu C X, Zhong S Z, Long Y, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of ecosystem services and their drivers in the Yellow River Basin, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023,42(10):2502-2513.
[13] Huang Z N, Chen Y B, Zheng Z H, et al. Spatiotemporal coupling analysis between human footprint and ecosystem service value in the highly urbanized Pearl River Delta urban Agglomeration, China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023,148.
[14] Liu C H, Liu Y B, Giannetti B F, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and mechanism of anthropogenic factors affecting ecosystem service value in the Urban Agglomeration around Poyang Lake, China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023,154.
[15] 李子辉,张亚,巴永,等.云南省植被固碳能力与产水、土壤保持服务冷热点识别[J]. 中国环境科学, 2024,44(2):1007-1019. Li Z H, Zhang Y, Ba Y, et al. Cold and hot spots identification for carbon sequestration capacity, water yield and soil conservation services of vegetation in Yunnan Province [J]. China Environmental Science, 2024,44(2):1007-1019.
[16] Zuo L Y, Cao J B, Du F J. The pairwise interaction of environmental factors for ecosystem services relationships in karst ecological priority protection and key restoration areas [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,131:108125.
[17] Zhou S Y, Li W, Lu Z Y, et al. An ecosystem-based analysis of urban sustainability by integrating ecosystem service bundles and socio-economic-environmental conditions in China. Ecological Indicators, 2020,117:106691.
[18] Zhao J, Shao Z, Xia C Y, et al. Ecosystem services assessment based on land use simulation: A case study in the Heihe River Basin, China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,143:109402.
[19] 何颖,马松梅,张林,等.玛纳斯河流域NPP时空变化及其生物多样性维护功能重要性评价[J]. 生态学报, 2023,43(11):4664-4673. He Y, Ma S M, Zhang L, et al. Spatio-temporal change of net primary productivity and the evaluatation of the importance of biodiversity maintenance functions in Manas River Basin [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(11):4664-4673.
[20] 康帅直,穆琪,赵永华,等.黄土高原神府资源开采区生态环境质量时空格局特征[J]. 生态学报, 2023,43(7):2781-2792. Kang S Z, Mu Q, Zhao Y H, et al. Temporal and spatial pattern characteristics of ecological environmental quality in Shenfu mining area of Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(7):2781- 2792.
[21] 陈俊辰,贺淑钰,薛晶,等.多尺度生态系统服务的权衡关系及其对景观配置的响应——以湖北省为例[J]. 生态学报, 2023,43(12): 4835-4846. Chen J C, He S Y, Xue J, et al. Exploring ecosystem service trade-offs and their response to landscape configuration at multi-scales: a case study of Hubei Province [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(12): 4835-4846.
[22] 李春莹,李桂娥,李杰,等.长江三角洲城市群生态系统服务协同权衡的时空异质性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2024,44(2):992-1006. Li C Y, Li G E, Li J, et al. Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in Yangtze River delta urban agglomeration: A spatiotemporally heterogeneous analysis approach [J]. China Environmental Science, 2024,44(2):992-1006.
[23] 杨强强,章翩,邱小琮,等.宁夏回族自治区生态系统服务时空变化及其权衡研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023,43(10):5453-5465. Yang Q Q, Zhang P, Qiu X C, et al. Spatiotemporal changes and trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region [J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(10):5453-5465.
[24] 田一聪,田明,李鹏,等.西藏自治区城镇化与生态系统服务协调发展研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023,42(10):1947-1960. Tian Y C, Tian M, Li P, et al. Coordinated development of urbanization and ecosystem services in Tibet Autonomous Region [J]. Progress in Geography, 2023,42(10):1947-1960.
[25] 凌云,杨宜男,许迦龙,等.京津冀地区城市化对典型生态系统服务供需关系的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2023,43(13):5289-5304. Ling Y, Yang Y N, Xu J L, et al. Impacts of urbanization on the supply and demand relationship of typical ecosystem services in Beijing- Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(13):5289- 5304.
[26] 段维利,余新晓,陈丽华,等.京津冀城市群城镇化与生态建设对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023,30(4):404-411. Duan W L, Xu X X, Chen L H, et al. Impact of urbanization and ecological construction on the ecosystem services value in the Beijing Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(4):404-411.
[27] 任胤铭,刘小平,许晓聪,等.基于FLUS-InVEST模型的京津冀多情景土地利用变化模拟及其对生态系统服务功能的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2023,43(11):4473-4487. Ren Y M, Liu X P, Xu X C, et al. Multi-scenario simulation of land use change and its impact on ecosystem services in Beijing- Tianjin-Hebei region based on the FLUS-InVEST Model [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(11):4473-4487.
[28] 王晓峰,尧文洁,冯晓明,等.青藏高原生态系统服务供需变化及其驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2023,43(17):6968-6982. Wang X F, Yao W J, Feng X M, et al. Changes and driving factors of ecosystem services supply and demand on the Tibetan plateau [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(17):6968-6982.
[29] 彭立,邓伟,黄佩,等.四川盆地多重生态系统服务景观指数评价与服务簇识别[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(23):9328-9340. Peng L, Deng W, Huang P, et al. Evaluation of multiple ecosystem services landscape index and identification of ecosystem services bundles in Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(23): 9328-9340.
[30] Kareiva P, Watts S, McDonald R, et al. Domesticated nature: Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare [J]. Science, 2007, 316(5833):1866-1869.
[31] Raudsepp H C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010,107(11):5242-5247.
[32] 张纹嘉,付勇勇,王晓军.基于生态系统服务价值评价的忻州市生态安全格局构建[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023,30(4):355-364. Zhang W J, Fu Y Y, Wang X J. Construction of ecological security pattern in Xinzhou City based on evaluation of ecosystem service value [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(4): 355-364.
[33] Yang J, Huang X. The 30m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13(8):3907-3925.
[34] 赵庆建,吴晓珍.基于InVEST模型的岷江流域土地利用变化对生境质量的影响研究[J]. 生态科学, 2022,41(6):1-10. Zhao Q J, Wu X Z. Research on the impact of land use change on habitat quality in Minjiang river basin based on InVEST Model [J]. Ecological Science, 2022,41(6):1-10.
[35] 赵博轩,李淑杰,马剑,等.基于InVEST模型的吉林省生境质量评价[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2022,54(2):132-141. Zhao B X, Li S J, Ma J, et al. Evaluation of habitat quality in Jilin Province based on InVEST model [J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2022,54(2):132-141.
[36] 王琳,卫伟.黄土高原典型县域生态系统服务变化特征及驱动因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023,32(6):1140-1148. Wang L, Wei W. Characteristics and driving factors of ecosystem services changes in a typical county of the Loess Plateau [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023,32(6):1140-1148.
[37] 刘珺,俞博云,杨文府.多尺度地理加权回归模型支持下的汾河流域生态系统服务关系演化机理研究[J]. 遥感学报, 2023,27(7): 1667-1679. Liu J, Yu B Y, Yang W F. Evolution mechanism of ecosystem service relationship in the Fenhe River Basin based on multiscale geographically weighted regression [J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2023,27(7):1667-1679.
[38] 曹鹏辉,齐晓明,杨雯,等.内蒙古土地利用多情景模拟与碳储量预测分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023,37(9):83-90. Cao P H, Qi X M, Yang W, et al. Multi scenario simulation and prediction of carbon storage for land use types in Inner Mongolia [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023,37(9):83-90.
[39] 孙欣欣,薛建辉,董丽娜.基于PLUS模型和InVEST模型的南京市生态系统碳储量时空变化与预测[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023,39(1):41-51. Sun X X, Xue J H, Dong L N. Spatiotemporal change and prediction of carbon storage in Nanjing ecosystem based on PLUS model and InVEST model [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(1):41-51.

基金

国家重点研发计划课题(2022YFC3800203)

PDF(7019 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/