生态环境民生理论与新时期发展任务探究

王金南; 张晓婧; 薛强; 路路; 李宏伟; 胡熠; 张杰; 秦昌波

PDF(759 KB)

中国环境科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8) : 4700-4708.

环境影响评价与管理

生态环境民生理论与新时期发展任务探究

王金南¹, 张晓婧^2,3, 薛强^2,3, 路路^2,3, 李宏伟⁴, 胡熠⁵, 张杰⁴, 秦昌波^2,3

作者信息 +

The theory of the people's livelihood of Eco-environment and the task of development in the new era

WANG Jin-nan¹, ZHANG Xiao-jing^2,3, XUE Qiang^2,3, LU Lu^2,3, LI Hong-wei⁴, HU Yi⁵, ZHANG Jie⁴, QIN Chang-bo^2,3

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

生态环境作为一项基本公共服务已经成为我国民生体系中的重要组成部分,但目前为止,生态环境民生概念的内涵尚不清晰,理论逻辑、任务路径等研究要点分散,未能形成学界共识.为建立生态环境民生从理论框架、战略路径到任务体系的整体架构,本文开展理论溯源分析,厘清了其在人文社科、自然科学、经济学等多个领域的相关概念、发展路线和研究方向,总结了生态环境民生与中国传统文化及马克思主义自然观的传承关系、与环境正义的演化关系和与人类福祉研究、生态产品价值实现的验证关系.文章结合生态系统服务供给研究和马斯洛需求层次理论初步解析了生态环境民生理论内涵,给出了生态环境与民生福祉的内在联系与时代特征等理论要点,根据新时期对生态环境民生建设的需求建立了以数量、质量、效率三个维度为核心的生态环境民生发展途径,并提出以人民为中心的生态环境质量改善、设定生态产品价值供给区、生态福祉效益释放等主要任务,以期促进生态环境民生研究的系统性发展,并对新时期生态环境民生建设方向提供参考.

Abstract

As a basic public service, ecological environment has become an important part of the people's livelihood system in China. However, so far, the connotation of the concept of the people's livelihood of Eco-environment is not clear, and the research points such as theoretical logic and task path are scattered, and academic consensus has not been formed. In order to establish the overall framework of the people's livelihood of Eco-environment from theoretical framework, strategic path to task system, this paper carries out theoretical traceability analysis, clarifies its related concepts, development routes and research directions in many fields such as humanities and social sciences, natural sciences and economics. and summarizes the relationship between the people's livelihood of Eco-environment and the inheritance of Chinese traditional culture and Marxist view of nature, the evolutionary relationship with environmental justice, and the verification relationship with human welfare research and the realization of the value of ecological products. This paper initially analyzes the connotation of the people's livelihood of Eco-environment theory by combining research on ecosystem service supply and Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory. This paper summarizes the theoretical points such as the internal relationship between ecological environment and people's well-being and the characteristics of The Times. According to the needs of the people's livelihood of Eco-environment construction in the new era, the development approach of the people's livelihood of Eco-environment has been established with the three dimensions of quantity, quality and efficiency as the core. This paper puts forward the main tasks such as people-centered improvement of the ecological environment quality, setting up value supply zones for ecological products, and releasing ecological welfare benefits. In order to promote the systematic development of the people's livelihood of Eco-environment research, and provide a reference for the direction of the people's livelihood of Eco-environment construction in the new era.

导出引用

王金南, 张晓婧, 薛强, 路路, 李宏伟, 胡熠, 张杰, 秦昌波. 生态环境民生理论与新时期发展任务探究[J]. 中国环境科学. 2024, 44(8): 4700-4708

WANG Jin-nan, ZHANG Xiao-jing, XUE Qiang, LU Lu, LI Hong-wei, HU Yi, ZHANG Jie, QIN Chang-bo. The theory of the people's livelihood of Eco-environment and the task of development in the new era[J]. China Environmental Science. 2024, 44(8): 4700-4708

中图分类号： X32

参考文献

[1] Wang B, Zhang Q, Cui F. Scientific research on ecosystem services and human well-being: A bibliometric analysis [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,125:107449.
[2] 高玉娟,石娇.基于CiteSpace的生态系统服务与人类福祉的关系研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2024,45(1):202-211. Gao Y J, Shi J. Research on the relationsip between ecosystem services and human well-being based on citespace[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2024,45(1):202-211.
[3] 黄小珍.习近平生态民生观研究[D]. 广州:中共广东省委党校, 2020.
[4] 王鲁玉.马克思恩格斯生态正义思想研究[D]. 长春:东北师范大学, 2023.
[5] 张也,俞楠.国内外环境正义研究脉络梳理与概念辨析:现状与反思[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,33(3):108-116. Zhang Y, Yu N. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018,33(3):108-116.
[6] Schlosberg D. Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature [J]. Oxford University Press, 2007,21(1):173-177.
[7] 沈静,王玉银,魏成.基于环境正义的城市空间治理研究和实践进展[J]. 现代城市研究, 2024,(3):103-109. Shen J, Wang Y Y, Wei C. A Literature Review on the Environmental Justice via Urban Space Governance [J]. Modern Urban Research, 2024,(3):103-109.
[8] 陈子怡,童莺歌,赖善缘,等.环境与健康素养评估工具的研究进展[J]. 医学与哲学, 2023,44(16):44-47,52. Chen Z Y, Tong Y G, Lai S Y, et al. Research Progress on Assessment Tools for Environmental Health Literacy [J]. Medicine & Philosophy, 2023,44(16):44-47,52.
[9] 杨武,陶俊杰,陆巧玲.基于生态系统服务视角的人类福祉评估技术方法体系[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(2):730-736. Yang W, Tao J J, Lu Q L. Methodologies of human well-being assessment from the ecosystem service perspective [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(2):730-736.
[10] 李昂,杨琰瑛,师荣光,等.居民福祉及其与生态系统服务的关系研究进展[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022,39(5):948-957. Li A, Yang Y Y, Shi R G, et al. Research progress on human well-being and its relationship with ecosystem services [J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2022,39(5):948-957.
[11] 程宪波,陶宇,欧维新.生态系统服务与人类福祉关系研究进展[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021,37(7):885-893. Cheng X B, Tao Y, Ou W X. Ｒesearch Progress on the Relationship between Ecosystem Service and Human Well-being [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2021,37(7):885-893.
[12] 黄甘霖,姜亚琼,刘志峰,等.人类福祉研究进展——基于可持续科学视角[J]. 生态学报, 2016,36(23):9. Huang G L, Jiang Y Q, Liu Z F, et al. Advances in human well being research: a sustainability science perspectiv [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(23):9.
[13] 毛萍,赵鹤凌,张轶佳,等.生态环境中的人类福祉研究热点问题分析[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2022,44(6):799-812. Mao P, Zhao H L, Zhang Y J, et al. Analysis of hot topics of human well-beings in ecological environment [J]. World Sci-Tech R&D, 2022,44(6):799-812.
[14] Marcello Hernández-Blanco, Costanza R, Chen H, et al. Ecosystem health, ecosystem services, and the well-being of humans and the rest of nature [J/OL]. Global Change Biology, 2022:5027-5040.
[15] Wang B, Zhang Q, Cui F. Scientific research on ecosystem services and human well-being: A bibliometric analysis [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,125:107449.
[16] 胡双庆,曹燕.生态环境与健康管理探索及展望[J]. 健康教育与健康促进, 2021,16(1):44-46,74. Hu S Q, Cao Y. Exploration and prospect of ecological environment and health management [J]. Health Education and Health Promotion, 2021,16(1):44-46,74.
[17] Fuller R, Landrigan P J, Balakrishnan K, et al. Pollution and health: a progress update [J]. The Lancet Planetary Health, 2022:e535-e547.
[18] 黄炳昭,韦正峥,蒋玉丹,等.我国生态环境部门环境与健康管理现状及展望初探[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2019,44(5):5-8. Huang B Z, Wei Z Z, Jiang Y D, et al. Study on the progress and prospect of environmental and health work carried out by environmental departments in China [J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2019,44(5):5-8.
[19] 王勇,秦书静,孙雅文.生态系统核算的发展历程、国际标准及国家经验——以联合国官方文本的演进与实施为主线[J]. 统计研究, 2023,40(7):148-160. Wang Y, Qin S J, Sun Y W. Development history, international standards and national experience of ecosystem accounting: taking the evolution and implementation of official UN texts as a thread [J]. Statistical Research, 2023,40(7):148-160.
[20] 张林波,陈鑫,梁田,等.我国生态产品价值核算的研究进展、问题与展望[J]. 环境科学研究, 2023,36(4):743-756. Zhang L B, Chen X, Liang T, et al. Research progress, problems and prospects of ecosystem products value accounting in China [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2023,36(4):743-756.
[21] 欧阳志云,朱春全,杨广斌,等.生态系统生产总值核算:概念、核算方法与案例研究[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(21):6747-6761. Ouyang Z Y, Zhu C Q, Yang G B, et al. Gross ecosystem product: concept, accounting framework and case study [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(21):6747-6761.
[22] 石敏俊,陈岭楠.GEP核算:理论内涵与现实挑战[J]. 中国环境管理, 2022,14(2):5-10. Shi M J, Chen L N. Theoretical connotation and practical challenges of GEP accounting in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2022,14(2):5-10.
[23] 王金南,马国霞,於方,等.2015年中国经济-生态生产总值核算研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018,28(2):1-7. Wang J N, Ma G X, Yu F, et al. Study on China’s gross economic-ecological product accounting in 2015[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018,28(2):1-7.
[24] 王金南,王志凯,刘桂环,等.生态产品第四产业理论与发展框架研究[J]. 中国环境管理, 2021,13(4):5-13. Wang J N, Wang Z K, Liu G H, et al. A framework research of theory and its practice of the fourth industry of ecological products [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2021,13(4):5-13.
[25] 严岩,朱捷缘,吴钢,等.生态系统服务需求、供给和消费研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(8):2489-2496. Yan Y, Zhu J Y, Wu G, et al. Review and prospective applications of demand, supply, and consumption of ecosystem services [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(8):2489-2496.
[26] Aldana-Domínguez J, Palomo I, Arellana J, et al. Unpacking the complexity of naturexs contributions to human well-being: lessons to transform the Barranquilla Metropolitan Area into a BiodiverCity [J]. Ecosystems and People, 2022:430-446.
[27] Milner-Gulland E J, Mcgregor J A, Agarwala M, et al. Accounting for the Impact of Conservation on Human Well-Being [J]. Wiley- Blackwell Online Open, 2014,28(5):1160-1166.
[28] Riechers M, Loos J, Balázsi, et al. Key advantages of the leverage points perspective to shape human-nature relations [J]. Ecosystems and People, 2021,17:205-214.
[29] 万军.持续深入打好污染防治攻坚战建设天蓝地绿水清的美丽中国[J]. 环境保护, 2023,51(18):31-33. Wan J. Further Promoting the nationwide battle to prevent and control pollution and build a beautiful China with blue sky, green land and clear water [J]. Environmental Protection, 2023,51(18):31-33.
[30] Shihui Zhang, Chi Zhang, Wenjia Cai, et al. The 2023 China report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: taking stock for a thriving future [J]. Lancet Public Health, 2023,8(12):978-995.
[31] 尹彩春,赵文武.应对气候和生态环境危机促进全球可持续发展——UNEP与自然和谐共处报告简述[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(23): 9536-9542.
[32] 王金南等著.生态产品第四产业:理论与实践[M]. 北京:中国环境出版社, 2022.
[33] 马国霞,孙艳芝,王志凯,等.生态产品第四产业的演化逻辑及其特征分析[J]. 环境保护, 2024,52(Z1):26-30. Ma G X, Sun Y Z, Wang Z K, et al. Evolutionary logic and characteristics analysis about the quaternary industry of ecological products [J]. Environmental Protection, 2024,52(Z1):26-30.