我国焦化场地地下水污染修复技术筛选方法及应用

吴汾奇; 张伟红; 董军; 祝凯; 马偲尧; 王林; 胡伟; 李燕

PDF(1347 KB)

中国环境科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8) : 4709-4718.

环境影响评价与管理

我国焦化场地地下水污染修复技术筛选方法及应用

吴汾奇^1,2, 张伟红^1,2, 董军^1,2, 祝凯^1,2, 马偲尧¹, 王林^1,2, 胡伟^1,2, 李燕^1,2

作者信息 +

Screening method and application of groundwater pollution remediation technology for coking sites in China

WU Fen qi^1,2, ZHANG Wei-hong^1,2, DONG Jun^1,2, ZHU Kai^1,2, MA Si-yao¹, WANG Lin^1,2, HU Wei^1,2, LI Yan^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

如何科学地为焦化地下水污染场地选择合适的修复技术是一项巨大的挑战,为解决这一难题,构建了“我国焦化场地污染修复数据库”,提出了焦化场地地下水污染修复技术筛选流程,并从技术可应用性、社会和环境、修复费用及修复时长4个维度构建了修复技术筛选体系,基于遗传算法的层次分析法和熵权法计算修复技术筛选体系指标权重,并应用蒙特卡洛算法模拟了场地信息,减少了场地信息获取的不确定性,使评价结果更为科学.将该模型应用于我国某焦化场地地下水污染修复技术的筛选,结果表明,抽取-处理技术在四个维度的得分排名均在前两名且总分排名第一(21.6680),推荐采用抽取-处理技术进行修复,与实际场地应用情况一致.

Abstract

The selection of appropriate remediation technologies for groundwater pollution of coking-contaminated sites is a huge challenge. To address this problem, the "China Coking Site Pollution Remediation Database" was constructed in this study and a screening process for groundwater pollution remediation technology for coking sites was proposed. The screening system was constructed from four dimensions: technical applicability, society and environment, remediation cost, and remediation duration. Besides, the analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight methods based on a genetic algorithm were adopted to calculate the indicator weight of the remediation technology screening system, and the Monte Carlo algorithm was applied to simulate site information to reduce the uncertainty of the obtained site information and make the evaluation results more scientific. Finally, the model was applied to the screening of groundwater pollution remediation technology of the coking site in China, and the results showed that the scores of pump and treat technology ranked the top two in four dimensions and the total score ranked the first (21.6680). Thus, pump and treat technology was recommended for the remediation which was consistent with the actual site application. In all, this study provided a methodological basis and theoretical reference for the selection of groundwater pollution remediation technologies for coking sites in China.

导出引用

吴汾奇, 张伟红, 董军, 祝凯, 马偲尧, 王林, 胡伟, 李燕. 我国焦化场地地下水污染修复技术筛选方法及应用[J]. 中国环境科学. 2024, 44(8): 4709-4718

WU Fen qi, ZHANG Wei-hong, DONG Jun, ZHU Kai, MA Si-yao, WANG Lin, HU Wei, LI Yan. Screening method and application of groundwater pollution remediation technology for coking sites in China[J]. China Environmental Science. 2024, 44(8): 4709-4718

中图分类号： X523

参考文献

[1] Tanachaichoksirikun P, Seeboonruang U. Groundwater vulnerability of thailand's lower chao phraya basin [J]. International Journal of Geomate, 2020,18(69):88-96.
[2] Cao W, Yin L, Zhang D, et al. Contamination, sources, and health risks associated with soil PAHs in rebuilt land from a coking plant, Beijing, China [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 2019,16(4).
[3] Li X, Li J, Sui H, et al. Evaluation and determination of soil remediation schemes using a modified AHP model and its application in a contaminated coking plant [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018,353(5):300-311.
[4] 邢涛,吴云波,黄娟,等.基于PROMETHEE法的焦化废水处理技术评估与应用[J]. 环境工程, 2014,(7):5. Xing T, Wu Y B, Huang J, et al. Assessment and application of coking wastewater treatment technology based on promethean [J]. Environmental Engineering, 2014,(7):5.
[5] 谷庆宝,郭观林,周友亚,等.污染场地修复技术的分类、应用与筛选方法探讨[J]. 环境科学研究, 2008,(2):197-202. Gu Q B, Guo G L, Zhou Y Y, et al. Classification, application and selection of contaminated site remediation technology: an overview [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2008,(2):197-202.
[6] 赵勇胜.地下水污染场地风险管理与修复技术筛选[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012,42(5):1426-1433. Zhao Y S. Risk management and screening of remediation technologies for contaminated groundwater site [J]. Journal of JiLin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012,42(5):1426-1433.
[7] 张旭.污染地下水修复技术筛选与评估方法[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2015. Zhang X. Screening and evaluation methods of contaminated groundwater remediation technologies [M]. Beijing: China Environment Science Press, 2015.
[8] Li W, Zhang M, Wang M, et al. Screening of groundwater remedial alternatives for brownfield sites: a comprehensive method integrated MCDA with numerical simulation [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018,25:15844-15861.
[9] An D, Xi B, Ren J, et al. Sustainability assessment of groundwater remediation technologies based on multi-criteria decision making method [J]. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 2016: S0921344916301951.
[10] 张倩,蒋栋,谷庆宝,等.基于AHP和TOPSIS的污染场地修复技术筛选方法研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2012,49(6):1088-1094. Zhang Q, Jiang D, Gu Q B, et al. Selection of remediation techniques for contaminated sites using AHP and TOPSIS [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012,49(6):1088-1094.
[11] 鄂佳楠.污染场地地下水修复技术筛选方法[D]. 吉林:吉林大学, 2017. E. Contaminated site groundwater remediation technology screening approach [D]. Jilin: JiLin University, 2017
[12] Jensen R E. An alternative scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures [J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1984,28(3):317-332.
[13] Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill:Resource Allocation, 1980.
[14] 刘锋平,孙宁,呼红霞,等.基于AHP-TOPSIS的在产企业地下水铁锰污染修复技术比选[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022,12(5):1572-1579. Liu F P, Sun N, Hu H X, et al. AHP-TOPSIS-based technology comparison for remediation of iron and manganese contaminated groundwater for operating enterprises [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022,12(5):1572-1579.
[15] 李忱昊.基于AHP和熵权法的东北区域土壤修复技术筛选研究[D]. 辽宁:辽宁工程技术大学, 2022. Li Z H. Screening of soil remediation technology in Northeast China based on AHP and entropy weight method [D]. Liaoning: Liaoning Technical University, 2022.
[16] 陶欢,廖晓勇,阎秀兰,等.应用多属性决策分析法筛选污染场地土壤修复技术[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017,11(8):4850-4860. Tao H, Liao X Y, Yan X L, et al. Application of multiple attributes decision analysis to selection of soil remediation technologies for contaminated sites [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017,11(8):4850-4860.
[17] 王欣,赵其华,张朝俊,等.基于组合权重的金阳县生态地质环境承载力评价[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2019,17(6):29-35. Wang X, Zhao Q H, Zhang C J, et al. Ecological geological environment carrying capacity evaluation of Jinyang county based on combined weight method [J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2019,17(6):29-35.
[18] 张小琳.基于修正层次分析法的我国石油贸易风险问题研究[D]. 北京:对外经济贸易大学, 2014. Zhang X L. Study on risks of China’s international oil trade based on revised AHP [J]. Beijing: University of International Business and Economics, 2014.
[19] Gu Z. A Multi-Objective Decision Making System (MDMS) for a Small Agricultural Watershed Based on Meta-Heuristic Optimization Coupling Simulation [J]. Water, 2021,13.
[20] Zhang M, Zhou J, Zhou R. Interval Multi-Attribute Decision of Watershed Ecological Compensation Schemes Based on Projection Pursuit Cluster [J]. Water, 2018,10(9).
[21] Sadeghfam S, Hassanzadeh Y, Khatibi R, et al. Groundwater Remediation through Pump-Treat-Inject Technology Using Optimum Control by Artificial Intelligence (OCAI) [J]. Water Resources Management, 2019,33(3):1123-1145.
[22] Singh A, Minsker B S. Uncertainty-based multiobjective optimization of groundwater remediation design [J]. Water Resources Research, 2008,44(2):1-10.
[23] Yang Y, Wu J, Luo Q, et al. An effective multi-objective optimization approach for groundwater remediation considering the coexisting uncertainties of aquifer parameters [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 609:127677.
[24] Zare M, Nikoo M R, Nematollahi B. Progressive improvement of DRASTICA and SI models for groundwater vulnerability assessment based on evolutionary algorithms [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022,(37):29.
[25] Mirzaee M, Safavi H R, Taheriyoun M, et al.Multi-objective optimization for optimal extraction of groundwater from a nitrate- contaminated aquifer considering economic-environmental issues: A case study [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2021,(5):103806.
[26] Al-Aomar R. A combined ahp-entropy method for deriving subjective and objective criteria weights [J]. The International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 2010,17(1):12-24.
[27] Ren L, He L, Yao L, et al. A Hybrid Decision Support Model Using a Trapezoidal Fuzzy-Based Multi-Attribute Preference Model with AHP-Entropy for Groundwater Remediation Selection [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2022,233(11):1-15.
[28] Libiao B, Hailing W, Ning H, et al. An Environmental Management Maturity Model of Construction Programs Using the AHP-Entropy Approach [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 2018,15(7):1317.
[29] 白贵琪,傅开彬,谌书,等.建设用地重金属污染修复技术筛选模型构建[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023,43(8):4147-4153. Bai G Q, Fu K B, Chen S, et al. Construction of screening model for remediation of heavy metal pollution in construction land [J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(8):4147-4153.
[30] 杜新月,张晓然,张玉玲,等.地下水污染修复技术评价方法研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2023,41(11):26-40. Du X Y, Zhang X R, Zhang Y L, et al. Research progress in evaluation methods of groundwater remediation technologies [J]. Science & Technology Review, 2023,41(11):26-40.
[31] 李玮,王明玉,韩占涛,等.棕地地下水污染修复技术筛选方法研究——以某废弃化工厂污染场地为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2016, 43(3):131-140. Li W, Wang M Y, Han Z T, et al. Screening process of brownfield site groundwater remedial technologies: a case study of an abandoned chemical factory contaminated site [J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2016,43(3):131-140.