基于盒子模型的挥发性有机物(VOCs)氧化过程的碳平衡研究

叶芹文, 袁斌, 杨晓韵, 彭钰雯, 刘思利, 杨素霞, 宋永欣, 邵敏

中国环境科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10) : 5399-5409.

PDF(3645 KB)
PDF(3645 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10) : 5399-5409.
大气污染与控制

基于盒子模型的挥发性有机物(VOCs)氧化过程的碳平衡研究

  • 叶芹文1, 袁斌1, 杨晓韵1, 彭钰雯1, 刘思利1, 杨素霞2, 宋永欣1, 邵敏1
作者信息 +

Study on carbon balance of oxidation process of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) based on box model

  • YE Qin-wen1, YUAN Bin1, YANG Xiao-yun1, PENG Yu-wen1, LIU Si-li1, YANG Su-xia2, SONG Yong-xin1, SHAO Min1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

作为大气二次污染的关键前体物,挥发性有机物(VOCs)大气氧化机理十分复杂,目前模型模拟普遍存在VOCs转化过程的总碳质量难以闭合的问题.为了对VOCs氧化机理有更全面的认识,本研究基于零维盒子模型构建了拉格朗日模拟体系,采用6种广泛应用的大气化学机理,选取4种代表性VOCs物种和56种光化学评估(photochemical assessment monitoring station, PAMS)组合气团,系统开展了逐代氧化过程的碳平衡模拟与评估.研究结果表明,6种化学机理模拟均存在显著的碳质量缺失现象(7.5%~76%),且不同机理和不同组分间呈现明显差异.其中,MCMv3.3.1机理碳缺失程度最低且总碳质量开始缺失对应的OH暴露量最高.在单个物种氧化的碳平衡情况中,正戊烷的氧化过程中碳缺失最为严重,其次是甲苯的氧化过程.总碳质量缺失的发生主要与第一代产物的化学消耗和第二代产物的生成有关.本研究结果为完善有机物种氧化机理、提升化学机理完整性提供了重要科学依据.

Abstract

As a key precursor to secondary air pollution, the atmospheric oxidation mechanism of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is very complex, and the current model simulation generally has the problem that the total carbon mass of VOCs conversion process is difficult to close. Aiming for a more comprehensive understanding of the oxidation mechanism of VOCs, this study constructed a Lagrangian simulation system based on the zero-dimensional box model, using 6 widely used atmospheric chemical mechanisms, selecting 4 representative VOCs species and 56 PAMS (Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station) combined air masses, and systematically carrying out the carbon balance simulation and evaluation of the generational oxidation process. The results showed that there was a significant carbon mass loss phenomenon (7.5%~76%) in the simulation of the six chemical mechanisms, and there were obvious differences between different mechanisms and components. Among them, MCMv3.3.1 had the lowest degree of carbon deletion and the highest OH exposure corresponding to the loss of total carbon mass. In the oxidized carbon balance of a single species, the carbon loss was the most serious during the oxidation of n-pentane, followed by the oxidation process of toluene. The occurrence of total carbon mass loss is mainly related to the chemical consumption of the first generation products and the generation of the second generation products. The results of this study provide an important scientific basis for improving the oxidation mechanism of organic species and improving the integrity of chemical mechanism.

关键词

盒子模型 / 碳平衡 / 化学机理 / 挥发性有机物氧化机理

Key words

box model / carbon balance / chemical mechanism / oxidation mechanism of volatile organic compounds

引用本文

导出引用
叶芹文, 袁斌, 杨晓韵, 彭钰雯, 刘思利, 杨素霞, 宋永欣, 邵敏. 基于盒子模型的挥发性有机物(VOCs)氧化过程的碳平衡研究[J]. 中国环境科学. 2025, 45(10): 5399-5409
YE Qin-wen, YUAN Bin, YANG Xiao-yun, PENG Yu-wen, LIU Si-li, YANG Su-xia, SONG Yong-xin, SHAO Min. Study on carbon balance of oxidation process of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) based on box model[J]. China Environmental Science. 2025, 45(10): 5399-5409
中图分类号: X511   

参考文献

[1] Mellouki A, Wallington T J, Chen J. Atmospheric chemistry of oxygenated volatile organic compounds: Impacts on air quality and climate [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2015,115(10):3984-4014.
[2] Williams J. Organic trace gases in the atmosphere: An overview [J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2004,1(3):125-136.
[3] Kansal A. Sources and reactivity of NMHCs and VOCs in the atmosphere: A review [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 166(1):17-26.
[4] Goldstein A H, Galbally I E. Known and unexplored organic constituents in the earth's atmosphere [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007,41(5):1514-1521.
[5] Aumont B, Camredon M, Mouchel-Vallon C, et al. Modeling the influence of alkane molecular structure on secondary organic aerosol formation [J]. Faraday discussions, 2013,165:105-122.
[6] Han D M, Wang Z, Cheng J P, et al. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during non-haze and haze days in Shanghai: Characterization and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation [J]. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 2017,24:18619-18629.
[7] Robinson A L, Donahue N M, Shrivastava M K, et al. Rethinking organic aerosols: Semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging [J]. Science, 2007,315(5816):1259-1262.
[8] Hunter J F, Day D A, Palm B B, et al. Comprehensive characterization of atmospheric organic carbon at a forested site [J]. Nature Geoscience, 2017,10(10):748-753.
[9] Zhao Y L, Hennigan C J, May A A, et al. Intermediate-volatility organic compounds: A large source of secondary organic aerosol [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014,48(23):13743-13750.
[10] Sinha V, Williams J, Crowley J, et al. The comparative reactivity method–a new tool to measure total OH reactivity in ambient air [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2008,8(8):2213-2227.
[11] Kovacs T A, Brune W H. Total OH loss rate measurement [J]. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2001,39:105-122.
[12] Di Carlo P, Brune W H, Martinez M, et al. Missing OH reactivity in a forest: Evidence for unknown reactive biogenic VOCs [J]. Science, 2004,304(5671):722-725.
[13] Yang Y D, Shao M, Wang X M, et al. Towards a quantitative understanding of total OH reactivity: A review [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2016,134:147-161.
[14] Heald C L, Goldstein A H, Allan J D, et al. Total observed organic carbon (TOOC) in the atmosphere: a synthesis of North American observations [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2008,8(7): 2007-2025.
[15] De Gouw J A, Middlebrook A M, Warneke C, et al. Budget of organic carbon in a polluted atmosphere: Results from the New England Air Quality Study in 2002 [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research- Atmospheres, 2005,110(D16):1-22.
[16] Safieddine S A, Heald C L, Henderson B H. The global nonmethane reactive organic carbon budget: A modeling perspective [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017,44(8):3897-3906.
[17] Whitten G Z, Hogo H, Killus J P. The carbon-bond mechanism: A condensed kinetic mechanism for photochemical smog [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1980,14(6):690-700.
[18] Horowitz L W, Liang J, Gardner G M, et al. Export of reactive nitrogen from North America during summertime: Sensitivity to hydrocarbon chemistry [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998,103(D11):13451-13476.
[19] Brasseur G P, Hauglustaine D A, Walters S, et al. MOZART, a global chemical transport model for ozone and related chemical tracers: 1. Model description [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1998,103(D21):28265-28289.
[20] Stockwell W R, Kirchner F, Kuhn M, et al. A new mechanism for regional atmospheric chemistry modeling [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997,102(D22):25847-25879.
[21] Wolfe G M, Marvin M R, Roberts S J, et al. The Framework for 0-D Atmospheric Modeling (F0AM) v3.1 [J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2016,9(9):3309-3319.
[22] Jenkin M E, Young J C, Rickard A R. The MCM v3.3.1degradation scheme for isoprene [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2015, 15(20):11433-11459.
[23] Carter W P L. Development of the SAPRC-07 chemical mechanism [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010,44(40):5324-5335.
[24] Goliff W S, Stockwell W R, Lawson C V. The regional atmospheric chemistry mechanism, version 2 [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 68:174-185.
[25] Yarwood G, Rao S J, Yocke M, et al. Updates to the carbon bond chemical mechanism: CB05. Final report for US Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC.
[26] Yarwood G, Jung J, Whitten G Z, et al. Updates to the carbon bond mechanism for version 6 (CB6). proceedings of the In 9th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC.
[27] Bey I, Jacob D J, Yantosca R M, et al. Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2001,106(D19):23073-23095.
[28] Yang X, Yuan B, Peng Z, et al. Inter-comparisons of VOC oxidation mechanisms based on box model: A focus on OH reactivity [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2022,114:286-296.
[29] Lantz K O, Shetter R E, Cantrell C A, et al. Theoretical, actinometric, and radiometric determinations of the photolysis rate coefficient of NO2 during the Mauna Loa Observatory Photochemistry Experiment 2 [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996,101(D9): 14613-14630.
[30] Madronich S, Flocke S. The role of solar radiation in atmospheric chemistry [J]. Environmental photochemistry, 1999,2(2):1-26.
[31] Tang J H, Chan L Y, Chan C Y, et al. Characteristics and diurnal variations of NMHCs at urban, suburban, and rural sites in the Pearl River Delta and a remote site in South China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007,41(38):8620-8632.
[32] Barletta B, Meinardi S, Simpson I J, et al. Ambient mixing ratios of nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) in two major urban centers of the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region: Guangzhou and Dongguan [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2008,42(18):4393-4408.
[33] Liu Y, Shao M, Lu S H, et al. Volatile organic compound (VOC) measurements in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, China [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2008,8(6):1531-1545.
[34] Guenther A, Karl T, Harley P, et al. Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature) [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2006,6(11):3181-3210.
[35] 孙溢华,皇甫宜博,袁 斌,等.深圳市春夏BVOCs浓度变化、来源及影响因素研究 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2025,45(7):3604-3613. Sun Y H, Huangfu Y B, Yuan B, et al. Study on concentration variation, sources, and influencing factors of BVOCs in Shenzhen during spring and summer [J]. China Environment science, 2025,45(7):3604-3613.
[36] Li L F, Wang X M. Seasonal and diurnal variations of atmospheric non-methane hydrocarbons in Guangzhou, China [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2012,9(5): 1859-1873.
[37] 刘展芸,龚元均,陈云波,等.昆明市人为源大气污染物排放清单研究 [J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2025,61(2):301-313. Liu Z Y, Gong Y J, Chen Y B, et sl. Emission Inventory Study of Anthropogenic Air Pollutants in Kunming, China [J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2025,61(2):301-313.
[38] Yuan B, Koss A R, Warneke C, et al. Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry: Applications in atmospheric sciences [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2017,117(21):13187-13229.
[39] Wu C H, Wang C M, Wang S H, et al. Measurement report: Important contributions of oxygenated compounds to emissions and chemistry of volatile organic compounds in urban air [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2020,20(23):14769-14785.
[40] Mao J, Ren X, Brune W H, et al. Airborne measurement of OH reactivity during INTEX-B [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009,9(1):163-173.
[41] Aumont B, Szopa S, Madronich S. Modelling the evolution of organic carbon during its gas-phase tropospheric oxidation: development of an explicit model based on a self generating approach [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2005,5(9):2497-2517.
[42] Jenkin M E, Saunders S M, Pilling M J. The tropospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds: a protocol for mechanism development [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1997,31(1):81-104.
[43] Lu K D, Rohrer F, Holland F, et al. Observation and modelling of OH and HO2 concentrations in the Pearl River Delta 2006: a missing OH source in a VOC rich atmosphere [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2012,12(3):1541-1569.

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3706200)

PDF(3645 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/