乌拉特矿山废弃地植被恢复斑块格局对土壤侵蚀的影响

张馨予, 查同刚, 张晓霞, 王冬, 张泽宇, 裴益乐

中国环境科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10) : 5627-5638.

PDF(1089 KB)
PDF(1089 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10) : 5627-5638.
土壤污染与控制

乌拉特矿山废弃地植被恢复斑块格局对土壤侵蚀的影响

  • 张馨予1, 查同刚1,2, 张晓霞1,3, 王冬4, 张泽宇1, 裴益乐1
作者信息 +

Impact of vegetation restoration patterns on soil erosion in the wasteland of Urat mining area

  • ZHANG Xin-yu1, ZHA Tong-gang1,2, ZHANG Xiao-xia1,3, WANG Dong4, ZHANG Ze-yu1, PEI Yi-le1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

以乌拉特前旗矿山废弃地为研究区域,基于人工冲刷试验,探究了植被恢复格局(空白对照、棋盘状、横条状与斜条状)与冲刷流量(3,4.5, 6L/min)对坡面土壤侵蚀特征及植被水土保持效益的影响.结果表明:径流量与泥沙量在植被恢复坡面降低,但随冲刷流量提高而增加.横条坡面径流量与泥沙量随冲刷流量提高增加幅度最小,总体坡面减流率(34.36%)与坡面减沙率(79.50%)最大,总体植被减沙量[35.09g/(min·m2)]最高.随冲刷进行,坡面产流率整体上升,不同格局坡面产沙率具有差异.植被斑块产沙率均显著低于坡面平均产沙率,且多数情况下为负值.横条坡面产沙率较为稳定,植被斑块产沙率最低[-13.02g/(min·m2)].除横条坡面外,坡面产沙率与产流率呈线性正相关.冲刷流量对径流量与产流率具有决定性作用,贡献率分别达79.37%与66.21%.植被斑块格局对侵蚀的影响高于径流.综上,横条格局是最适宜矿山废弃地水土保持的植被斑块格局,设计排水对该地土壤侵蚀防治极为重要.

Abstract

This study investigated the impacts of vegetation restoration patch patterns (blank control, checkerboard, horizontal strip, and diagonal strip) and scouring flow rates (3, 4.5, and 6L/min) on slope soil erosion characteristics and vegetation conservation benefits in a mining wasteland of Urat Front Banner. Key findings include: Runoff and sediment yield decreased on vegetation- restored slopes but increased with higher souring flow rates. The horizontal strip pattern slope exhibited the smallest increase in runoff and sediment yield with rising flow rate, achieving the highest overall runoff reduction rate (34.36%) and sediment reduction rate (79.50%), and sediment reduction capacity [35.09g/(min·m2)]. Runoff rates generally increased during scouring, while sediment yield rates varied across patterns. Sediment yield rate within vegetation patches were significantly lower than the slope average and often negative. The horizontal strip slope exhibited stable sediment yield rate, with the lowest patch sediment yield rate [-13.02g/(min·m2)]. Except for the horizontal strip slope, sediment yield rates correlated linearly with runoff rates. Scouring flow rates dominated runoff and runoff rates, contributing 79.37% and 66.21%, respectively. Moreover, vegetation patch patterns exerted stronger effects on erosion than runoff. In conclusion, the horizontal strip pattern is optimal for soil and water conservation in mining wastelands, and drainage design is crucial for erosion control in these areas.

关键词

矿山废弃地 / 生态修复 / 模拟冲刷 / 植被斑块格局 / 产流产沙

Key words

mining wasteland / ecological restoration / scouring test / vegetation patch pattern / runoff and sediment yield

引用本文

导出引用
张馨予, 查同刚, 张晓霞, 王冬, 张泽宇, 裴益乐. 乌拉特矿山废弃地植被恢复斑块格局对土壤侵蚀的影响[J]. 中国环境科学. 2025, 45(10): 5627-5638
ZHANG Xin-yu, ZHA Tong-gang, ZHANG Xiao-xia, WANG Dong, ZHANG Ze-yu, PEI Yi-le. Impact of vegetation restoration patterns on soil erosion in the wasteland of Urat mining area[J]. China Environmental Science. 2025, 45(10): 5627-5638
中图分类号: X171.4   

参考文献

[1] Worlanyo A, Jiangfeng L. Evaluating the environmental and economic impact of mining for post-mined land restoration and land-use: A review [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021,279:111623.
[2] Kincey M, Warburton J, Brewer P. Contaminated sediment flux from eroding abandoned historical metal mines: Spatial and temporal variability in geomorphological drivers [J]. Geomorphology, 2018,319: 199-215.
[3] Feng Y, Wang J, Bai Z, et al. Effects of surface coal mining and land reclamation on soil properties: A review [J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2019,191:12-25.
[4] Zhang L, Wang J, Bai Z, et al. Effects of vegetation on runoff and soil erosion on reclaimed land in an opencast coal-mine dump in a loess area [J]. Catena, 2015,128:44-53.
[5] 黄元仿,张世文,张立平,等.露天煤矿土地复垦生物多样性保护与恢复研究进展 [J]. 农业机械学报, 2015,46(8):72-82. Huang Y, Zhang S, Zhang L, et al. Research progress on conservation and restoration of biodiversity in land reclamation of opencast coal mine [J] Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015,46(8):72-82.
[6] 陈思思,董 滨,徐祖信.矿山生态修复及市政污泥稳定化产物应用潜力 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2022,42(12):5734-5747. Chen S, Dong B, Xu Z. Mine land ecological restoration and application potential of sewage sludge stabilization products [J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(12):5734-5747.
[7] 丁 琳,许海超,秦 伟,等.不同坡面草被格局下的侵蚀产沙量及其连通性指数表征 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2022,38(9):119-128. Ding L, Xu H, Qin W, et al. Erosion and sediment yield under different grass cover patterns and its characterization of connectivity index [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022,38(9):119-128.
[8] 中华人民共和国自然资源部.中国矿产资源报告2024 [M]. 2024, 北京:地质出版社. Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China. China Mineral Resources 2024 [M]. 2024, Beijing: Geology Press.
[9] 李海东,沈渭寿,司万童,等.中国矿区土地退化因素调查:概念、类型与方法 [J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2015,31(4):445-451. Li H, Shen W, Si W, et al. Survey of land degradation factors in mining areas in China: Concepts, types, and methods [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2015,31(4):445-451.
[10] 毕银丽,彭苏萍,杜善周.西部干旱半干旱露天煤矿生态重构技术难点及发展方向 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2021,46(5):1355-1364. Bi Y, Peng S, Du S. Technological difficulties and future directions of ecological reconstruction in open pit coal mine of the arid and semi-arid areas of Western China [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021,46(5):1355-1364.
[11] Martin M, Martin D, Nicolau I, et al. Effects of topography and surface soil cover on erosion for mining reclamation: The experimental spoil heap at El Machorro Mine(Central Spain) [J]. Land Degra-dation & Development, 2016,27(2):145-159.
[12] 闫帅旗,朱冰冰,边 熇.不同覆盖位置下草地坡面水流路径长度变化特征 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2021,37(3):116-123. Yang S, Zhu B, Bian H. Variation characteristics of flow length of grass slope under different grass strip positions [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2021,37(3):116-123.
[13] 赵 阳,曹文洪,王向东,等.北京山区植被恢复建设对流域径流量影响研究 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(12):3771-3778. Zhao Y, Cao W, Wang X, et al. Effect of vegetation rehabilitation and construction on runoff of watershed in Beijing Mountain Area [J]. China Environmental Science, 2015,35(12):3771-3778.
[14] Zhang W, Yi S, Chen J, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of alpine grassland vegetation patch patterns on the central Qinghai- Tibetan plateau [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,125(107570).
[15] 张金茜,柳冬青,钱彩云,等.流域景观格局对土壤保持服务的影响 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(3):1164-1172. Zhang J, Liu D, Qian C, et al. Influence of watershed landscape pattern on soil conservation service [J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(3):1164-1172.
[16] Seitz S, Goebes P, Zumstein P, et al. The influence of leaf litter diversity and soil fauna on initial soil erosion in sub-tropical forests [J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2015,40(11):1439-1447.
[17] Ghimire C, Bruijnzeel L, Lubczynski M et al. Rainfall interception by natural and planted forests in the Middle Mountains of Central Nepal [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2012,475:270-280.
[18] Nagase A, Dunnett N. Amount of water runoff from different vegetation types on extensive green roofs: Effects of plant species, diversity and plant structure [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 104(3/4):356-363.
[19] Wang D, Yuan Z, Cai Y, et al. Characterisation of soil erosion and overland flow on vegetation-growing slopes in fragile ecological regions: A review [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 285:112165.
[20] Liu J, Gao G, Wang S, et al. The effects of vegetation on runoff and soil loss: Multidimensional structure analysis and scale characteristics [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018,28(1):59-78.
[21] 秦 伟,曹文洪,郭乾坤,等.植被格局对侵蚀产沙影响的研究评述 [J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(14):4905-4912. Qin W, Cao W, Guo Q, et al. Review of the effects of vegetation patterns on soil erosion and sediment yield [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(14):4905-4912.
[22] 张 鹏,李 龙,李 艳,等.植被斑块格局对砒砂岩坡面土壤侵蚀强度的影响 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(5):58-65. Zhang P, Li L, Li Y, et al. Effect of vegetation patch pattern on soil erosion intensity on arsenic sandstone slope [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(5):58-65.
[23] Wei W, Pan D, Feng J. Tradeoffs between soil conservation and soil-water retention: The role of vegetation pattern and density [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2022,33(1):18-27.
[24] Sun R, Ma L, Zhang S, et al. Study on Landscape Patches Influencing Hillslope Erosion Processes and Flow Hydrodynamics in the Loess Plateau of Western Shanxi Province, China [J]. Water, 2020,12: 320111.
[25] Ludwig J A, Tongway D J, Marsden S G. Stripes, strands or stipples: modelling the influence of three landscape banding patterns on resource capture and productivity in semi-arid woodlands, Australia [J]. Catena, 1999,37(1):257-273.
[26] 王恒星,张建军,孙若修,等.晋西黄土区不同植被格局坡面产流产沙特征 [J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021,43(3):85-95. Wang H, Zhang J, Sun R, et al. Effects of different vegetation slope patterns on infiltration and characteristics of runoff and sediment production in the loess area of western Shanxi Province, northern China [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021,43(3):85-95.
[27] Su Y, Zhang Y, Wang H, et al. Effects of vegetation spatial pattern on erosion and sediment particle sorting in the loess convex hillslope [J]. Scientific Reports, 2022,12:141871.
[28] Lou Y, Gao Z, Li Y, et al. Effects of distributions of grass strips on soil erosion in spoil tips [J]. Water, 2022,14(6):913.
[29] Callegaro C, Ursino N. Connectivity of niches of adaptation affects vegetation structure and density in self-organized (Dis-Connected) vegetation patterns [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2018,29(8): 2589-2594.
[30] Zhang G, Liu G, Zhang P, et al. Influence of vegetation parameters on runoff and sediment characteristics in patterned Artemisia capillaris plots [J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2014,6(3):352-360.
[31] 张 霞,李 鹏,李占斌,等.不同植被格局下凸型坡径流流速时空变化及产沙研究 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(6):16-21. Zhang X, Li P, Li Z, et al. Study on temporal and spatial variation of runoff velocity and sediment in the convex hillslope under different vegetation patterns [J] Journal of Soil and Water Conservation., 2018, 32(6):16-21.
[32] 赵 明,杨晓楠,陈攀宇,等.灌木斑块格局对产流及产沙过程的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020,31(3):735-743. Zhao M, Yang X, Chen P, et al. Effects of shrub patch pattern on runoff and sediment yield [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020,31(3):735-743.
[33] 赵炯昌,潘岱立,卫 伟,等.植被格局对土壤入渗和水沙过程影响的模拟试验研究 [J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(4):1373-1380. Zhao J, Pan D, Wei W, et al. Simulation experiment on the influence of vegetation pattern on soil infiltration and water and sediment process [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(4):1373-1380.
[34] Shi P, Li P, Li Z, et al. Effects of grass vegetation coverage and position on runoff and sediment yields on the slope of Loess Plateau, China [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2022,259:107231.
[35] 郭星星,吕春娟,陈 丹,等.降雨强度和坡度对裸露铁尾矿砂坡面产流产沙的影响 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(2):23-29. Guo X, Lv C, Chen D, et al. Effects of rainfall intensities and slope gradients on runoff and sediment yield on bare iron tailings sand slope [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,33(2):23-29.
[36] 吕春娟,张 徐,毕如田,等.间歇降雨对铁尾砂重构坡面侵蚀水动力学特性的影响 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2020,36(11):74-85. Lyu C, Zhang X, Bi R, et al. Effects of intermittent rainfall on hydrodynamics characteristics of erosion on reconstructed slopes of iron tailings [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020,36(11):74-85.
[37] 张馨予,查同刚,张泽宇,等.乌拉山废弃矿区坡长对客土坡面产流产沙与沟蚀特征的影响 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(6):8-15. Zhang X, Zha Tg, Zhang Z, et al. Effects of slope length on the characteristics of runoff and sediment yield and gully erosion on alien soil slopes in the abandoned mining area of wula mountain [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(6):8-15.
[38] 孟铖铖,张会兰,杨坪坪.模拟植被类型及空间配置对坡面流水动力学特性的影响 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2017,31(2):50-56. Meng C, Zhang H, Yang P. Effects of simulated vegetation types and spatial patterns on hydrodynamics of overland flow [J] Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,31(2):50-56,78.
[39] 康宏亮,王文龙,薛智德,等.冲刷条件下黄土丘陵区浅沟侵蚀形态及产流产沙特征 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2016,32(20):161-170. Kang H, Wang W, Xue Z, et al. Erosion morphology and runoff generation and sediment yield on ephemeral gully in loess hilly region in field scouring experiment [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016,32(20): 161-170.
[40] 邓龙洲,张丽萍,范晓娟,等.不同雨强和坡度下侵蚀性风化花岗岩母质坡地产流产沙特征 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2018,34(17):143-150. Deng L, Zhang L, Fan X, et al. Characteristics of runoff and sediment yield under different rainfall intensities and slope gradients in erosive weathered granite area [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2018,34(17): 143-150.
[41] 彭梦玲,吴 磊,乔闪闪.不同雨强下黄土裸坡水-沙-氮磷流失耦合模拟 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(3):1109-1116. Peng M, Wu L, Qiao S. Coupling simulation of runoff-sediment- nutrient loss on loess bare sloping land under different rainfall intensities [J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(3):1109-1116.
[42] 陈 鹏,张铁钢,董 智,等.灌草格局对砒砂岩区产流产沙特征的影响 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020,34(9):116-121. Chen P, Zhang T, Dong Z, et al. The influence of shrub grass pattern on the characteristics of runoff and sediment production in arsenic sandstone areas [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020,34(9):116-121.
[43] Anderson R L, Rowntree K M, Le Roux J J. An interrogation of research on the influence of rainfall on gully erosion [J]. Catena, 2021,206:105482.
[44] Issa O M, Valentin C, Rajot J L, et al. Runoff generation fostered by physical and biological crusts in semi-arid sandy soils [J]. Geoderma, 2011,167-68:22-29.
[45] Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, et al. The assessment of soil loss by water erosion in China [J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2020,8(4):430-439.
[46] Lann T, Bao H, Lan H, et al. Hydro-mechanical effects of vegetation on slope stability: A review [J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2024,926:171691.
[47] Mayor A G, Bautista S, Small E E, et al. Measurement of the connectivity of runoff source areas as determined by vegetation pattern and topography: A tool for assessing potential water and soil losses in drylands [J]. Water Resources Research, 2008,44:W1042310.
[48] 陈利顶,傅伯杰,徐建英,等.基于“源-汇”生态过程的景观格局识别方法——景观空间负荷对比指数 [J]. 生态学报, 2003,(11):2406- 2413. Chen L, Fu B, Xu J, et al. Landscape pattern recognition method based on "source sink" ecological process-Landscape spatial load comparison index [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003,(11):2406-2413.
[49] 张乐涛,高照良,李永红,等.黄土丘陵区堆积体边坡对上方来水的侵蚀响应 [J]. 水科学进展, 2015,26(6):811-819. Zhang L, Gao Z, Li Y, et al. The Erosion Response of Accumulated Slope in Loess Hilly Area to Upstream Water [J]. Advances in Water Science, 2015,26(6):811-819.
[50] Gomi T, Sidle R C, Miyata S, et al. Dynamic runoff connectivity of overland flow on steep forested hillslopes: Scale effects and runoff transfer [J]. Water Resources Research, 2008,44:W084118.
[51] Maetens W, Poesen J, Vanmaercke M. How effective are soil conservation techniques in reducing plot runoff and soil loss in Europe and the Mediterranean? [J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2012,115(1/2): 21-36.
[52] Borges N, Xavier R A, de Souza B I, et al. Preliminary experimental data on surface runoff and soil loss in the Caatinga [J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2023,48(9):1712-1723.
[53] Tang C, Liu Y, Li Z, et al. Effectiveness of vegetation cover pattern on regulating soil erosion and runoff generation in red soil environment, southern China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,129:107956.
[54] Bai L, Shi P, Li Z, et al. Effects of vegetation patterns on soil nitrogen and phosphorus losses on the slope-gully system of the Loess Plateau [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022,324:116288.
[55] Liu Y, Liu Y, Shi Z, et al. Effectiveness of re-vegetated forest and grassland on soil erosion control in the semi-arid Loess Plateau [J]. Catena, 2020,195:104787.
[56] Fu B, Liu Y, Meadows M E. Ecological restoration for sustainable development in China [J]. National Science Review, 2023,10(7):033.
[57] Yu W, Jiao J, Chen Y, et al. Seed Removal due to Overland Flow on Abandoned Slopes in the Chinese Hilly Gullied Loess Plateau Region [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2017,28(1):274-282.

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF130300204);中建股份科技研发计划项目(CSCEC-2020-Z-5)

PDF(1089 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/