能见度观测同化对天津地区雾霾低能见度数值预报影响研究

杨旭, 樊文雁, 蔡子颖, 朱玉强, 唐颖潇, 董琪如

中国环境科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11) : 5959-5968.

PDF(2927 KB)
PDF(2927 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11) : 5959-5968.
大气污染与控制

能见度观测同化对天津地区雾霾低能见度数值预报影响研究

  • 杨旭1,2, 樊文雁1,2, 蔡子颖1,2, 朱玉强1,2, 唐颖潇1,2, 董琪如3
作者信息 +

Impact on numerical forecast of low visibility during haze/fog episodes in Tianjin based on visibility data assimilation

  • YANG Xu1,2, FAN Wen-yan1,2, CAI Zi-ying1,2, ZHU Yu-qiang1,2, TANG Ying-xiao1,2, DONG Qi-ru3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

以天津地区两次典型雾霾低能见度过程为例,通过发展适用于雾霾能见度观测的资料同化方法,实现PM2.5浓度、相对湿度及雾水含量等影响要素的模拟优化,提升模式能见度数值预报效果.研究表明,典型霾过程能见度变化主要受PM2.5浓度影响,最低值1km左右,随相对湿度日变化幅度为2~3km,雾霾混合过程相对湿度高,夜间雾显著影响导致局地能见度低于50m,能见度日变幅大、过程极值低是其典型特征;通过能见度观测资料同化应用,雾霾低能见度模拟效果有显著提升,两次过程的能见度均方根误差分别由7km和4km减小至2km左右,间隔6h同化可以及时修正模拟偏差,部分时段提升效果更优;通过同化实现PM2.5浓度和相对湿度模拟优化,霾能见度模拟偏差下降幅度最大达到6~8km;通过增加雾水含量修正,结合相对湿度同化改进,能够进一步改善雾霾混合过程夜间雾水含量考虑不足的问题,能见度模拟偏差由1~2km减小至300~500m,低能见度影响程度、影响范围均有明显提升;一个月模拟试验显示,低于10km的能见度模拟均方根误差由4.4km减小至3.2km.

Abstract

The present study took the two typical haze/fog low visibility episodes in Tianjin as a point of departure for the following investigation, developed data assimilation methods applicable to visibility observations, in order to improve the numerical forecast effect of visibility through the simulation optimization of PM2.5 concentration, relative humidity and fog water content. Theresults showed that the visibility change of typical haze episode was primarily influenced by PM2.5 concentration, the minimum value of visibilitywas approximately 1km, with the daily change about 2~3km in the result of relative humidity change. The relative humidity of the haze-fog mixing episode was high, and visibility was lower than 50min localities due to the significant influence of fog during nighttime. The typical characteristic of the haze-fog episode were largedaily change and extreme value being low in visibility. The simulation of haze-fog low visibilitywas significantly enhanced with assimilation of visibility observation, root mean square error of the two episodes reduced from 7km and 4km to approximately 2km. Furthermore, the simulation deviation was corrected in time with 6-hour interval assimilation, with an enhancement effect observed to be more pronounced during specific time periods. Through the assimilation to achieve the optimization of the PM2.5 concentration and the relative humidity simulation, the deviation of the haze visibility simulation was reduced by a maximum of 6~8km.By adding fog water content correction, combined with relative humidity assimilation improvement, the underestimate of fog water content was reduced during nocturnal periods, the visibility simulation deviation was reduced from 1~2km to 300~500m and the degree and range of the low visibility was significantly improved. One-month simulation showed that the root mean square error of visibility below 10 km was reduced from 4.4 km to 3.2 km.

关键词

雾霾 / 能见度 / 资料同化 / 三维变分 / 数值预报

Key words

haze/fog / visibility / data assimilation / 3-DVAR / numerical forecast

引用本文

导出引用
杨旭, 樊文雁, 蔡子颖, 朱玉强, 唐颖潇, 董琪如. 能见度观测同化对天津地区雾霾低能见度数值预报影响研究[J]. 中国环境科学. 2025, 45(11): 5959-5968
YANG Xu, FAN Wen-yan, CAI Zi-ying, ZHU Yu-qiang, TANG Ying-xiao, DONG Qi-ru. Impact on numerical forecast of low visibility during haze/fog episodes in Tianjin based on visibility data assimilation[J]. China Environmental Science. 2025, 45(11): 5959-5968
中图分类号: X51   

参考文献

[1] Kunke1, Bruce A. Parameterization of droplet terminalvelocity andextinction coefficient in fog models [J]. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 1984,23(1):34-41.
[2] 周 鑫,丁菊丽,田 伟,等. 能见度参数化方案概述 [J]. 气象研究与应用, 2009,30(3):22-25. Zhou X, Ding J L, Tian W, et al. Introduction of visibility parameterization scheme [J]. Journal of Meteorological Research And Application, 2009,30(3):22-25.
[3] Bott A, Trautmann T. PAFOG—a new efficient forecast model of radiation fog and low-level stratiform clouds [J]. Atmospheric Research, 2002,64(1):191-203.
[4] 尹 球,许绍祖.辐射雾生消的数值研究(Ⅰ)—数值模式 [J]. 气象学报, 1993,51(3):351-360. Yin Q, Xu S Z. A numerical study of the formation and dissipation of radiation fog(Ⅰ)—the numerical model of radiation fog [J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 1993,51(3):351-360.
[5] 尹 球,许绍祖.辐射雾生消的数值研究(Ⅱ)—生消机制 [J]. 气象学报, 1994,52(1):60-67. Yin Q, Xu S Z. A numerical study of the formation and dissipation of radiation fog(Ⅱ)—the physical mechanism of radiation fog [J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 1994,52(1):60-67.
[6] 张利民,李子华.重庆雾的二维非定常数值模拟 [J]. 大气科学, 1993,17(6):750-755. Zhang L M, Li Z H. A two-dimensional time-integral numerical model of Chongqing fog [J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 1993,17(6):750-755.
[7] Shi C, Sun X, Yang J, et al. 3D model study on fog over complex terrain - Part I: Numerical study [J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 1996,10(4):493-506.
[8] 石春娥,曹必铭,李子华,等.复杂地形上三维局地环流的模拟研究 [J]. 南京气象学院学报, 1996,19(3):58-66. Shi C E, Cao B M, Li Z H, et al. Numerical simulation of 3D local circulation over a complicated terrain [J]. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Meteorology, 1996,19(3):58-66.
[9] Jaberi P, Sabetghadam S, Ghader S. Visibility prediction during fog and precipitation using the WRF model over Tehran [J]. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazarts, 2020,7(3):107-124.
[10] Lin C, Zhang Z, Pu Z, et al. Numerical simulations of an advection fog event over Shanghai Pudong International Airport with the WRF model [J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2017,31(5):874-889.
[11] Ezber Y, Sen O L. WRF sensitivity simulations of a dense advection fog event in Istanbul [J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022,148(1/2):617-641.
[12] Pithani P, Ghude S D, Chennu V N, et al. WRF model prediction of a dense fog event occurred during Winter Fog Experiment (WIFEX) [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2019,176(4):1827-1846.
[13] Zong P, Zhu Y, Wang H, et al. WRF-Chemsimulation of winter visibility in Jiangsu, China, and the application of a neural network algorithm [J]. Atmosphere, 2020,11(5):520-537.
[14] 赵秀娟,李梓铭,徐 敬.霾天能见度参数化方案改进及预报效果评估 [J]. 环境科学, 2019,40(4):1688-1696. Zhao X J, Li Z M, Xu J. Modification and performance tests of visibility parameterizations for haze days [J]. Environmental Science, 2019,40(4):1688-1696.
[15] 蔡子颖,姚 青,韩素芹,等.天津地区霾天气特征研究 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(1):50-60. Cai Z Y, Yao Q, Han S Q, et al. Research on characteristics of haze weather in Tianjin [J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(1): 50-60.
[16] 梁爱民,张庆红,刘开宇,等.华北地区一次大雾过程的三维变分同化试验 [J]. 气象学报, 2007,65(5):792-804. Liang A M, Zhang Q H, Liu K Y, et al. 3D variation data assimilation experiments on a dense fog event over North China [J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2007,65(5):792-804.
[17] Zhang C, Zhang L, Wang B, et al. Analysis and modeling of a long-lasting fog event over Beijing in February 2007 [J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2010,24(4):426-440.
[18] Li Z, Zang Z, Li Q, et al. A three-dimensional variational data assimilation system for multiple aerosol species with WRF/Chem and an application to PM2.5 prediction [J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2013,13(8):4265–4278.
[19] Jiang Z Q, Liu Z Q, Wang T J, et al. Probing into the impact of 3DVAR assimilation of surface PM10 observations over China using process analysis [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2013,118(12):6738–6749.
[20] Feng S Z, Jiang F, Jiang Z Q, et al. Impact of 3DVAR assimilation of surface PM2.5 observations on PM2.5 forecasts over China during wintertime [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2018,187:34–49.
[21] 靳璐滨,臧增亮,潘晓滨,等.PM2.5和PM2.5~10资料同化及在南京青奥会期间的应用试验 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(2):331-341. Jin L B, Zang Z L, Pan X B, et al. Data assimilation and application experiments of PM2.5 and PM2.5~10 during Nanjing Youth Olympic Games [J]. China Environmental Science, 2016,36(2):331-341.
[22] Zang Z L, Li Z J, Pan X B, et al. Aerosol data assimilation and forecasting experiments using aircraft and surface observations during CalNex [J]. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 2016,68(1):29812.
[23] Cheng X H, Liu, Y L, Xu X D, et al. Lidar data assimilation method based on CRTM and WRF-Chem models and its application in PM2.5 forecasts in Beijing [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,682: 541–552.
[24] Liu Z Q, Lin Q H, Hui C, et al. Three-dimensional variational assimilation of MODIS aerosol optical depth: Implementation and application to a dust storm over East Asia [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2011,116(D23):D20206.
[25] 冯 沁,鲍艳松,闵锦忠,等.卫星气溶胶光学厚度资料同化对灰霾预报改进个例研究 [J]. 气象学报, 2018,76(1):104-116. Feng Q, Bao Y S, Min J Z, et al. A study on effects of satellite based AOD assimilation on numerical forecast of haze [J]. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 2018,76(1):104-116.
[26] 蔡子颖,杨 旭,吕 妍,等.基于环境模式PM2.5的渤海及其西岸能见度预报技术优化研究 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2022,42(6):260-273. Cai Z Y, Yang X, Lv Y, et al. The research on improving visibility forecast in Bohai Sea and West Coast of Bohai Sea based on environmentalmodel PM2.5 [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2022, 42(6):260-273.
[27] Clark P A, Harcourt S A, Macpherson B, et.al. Prediction of visibility and aerosol within the operational Met Office Unified Model. I: Model formulation and variational assimilation [J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2008,134(636):1801–1816.
[28] Kim M, Lee K, Lee Y H. Visibility data assimilation and prediction using an observation network in South Korea [J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2020,177(2):1125-1141.
[29] Li M, Liu H, Geng G, et al. Anthropogenic emission inventories in China: Areview [J]. National Science Review, 2017,4:834-866.
[30] 杨 旭,唐颖潇,蔡子颖,等.基于气溶胶三维变分同化天津PM2.5数值预报研究 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2021,41(12):5476-5484. Yang X, Tang Y X, Cai Z Y, et al. Impact of aerosol data assimilation with 3-DVAR method on PM2.5 forecast over Tianjin [J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(12):5476-5484.

基金

国家自然科学基金资助项目(42130513);天津市气象局科研项目(202424ybxm17)

PDF(2927 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉