闸控入海河流DO时空分布特征及其驱动因素

金晓玥, 黄菊, 范中亚, 黄露, 罗千里, 王振

中国环境科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 3311-3320.

PDF(1987 KB)
PDF(1987 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 3311-3320.
环境生态

闸控入海河流DO时空分布特征及其驱动因素

  • 金晓玥1,2, 黄菊2, 范中亚2, 黄露2, 罗千里2, 王振1
作者信息 +

Spatiotemporal distributions of dissolved oxygen and its driving factors in gate-controlled seagoing rivers

  • JIN Xiao-yue1,2, HUANG Ju2, FAN Zhong-ya2, HUANG Lu2, LUO Qian-li2, WANG Zhen1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文以广东省黄江河为研究对象,基于沿程3个水质自动监测站数据,分析枯水年(2021年)、丰水年(2023年)黄江河挡潮闸闸上与闸下河段DO的时空分布特征,并采用统计学方法,研究了DO变化的驱动因素及相对贡献.结果表明:闸上河段因水环境相对稳定,西闸断面DO呈现枯水年((8.02±0.10) mg/L)>丰水年((7.26±0.08) mg/L)特征;而闸下河段因水质改善,DO呈现枯水年((4.45±0.10) mg/L)<丰水年((7.33±0.09) mg/L)特征;枯、丰水年年内全河段DO均呈现汛期高、非汛期低的周期性变化规律.受闸坝作用及外源输入差异影响,闸上河段DO变化的主要驱动因素为降雨和水温,贡献度达到44%~87%;闸下河段DO变化的主要驱动因素则是氨氮和高锰酸盐指数,贡献度达到53%~75%.闸上“湖泊化”缓流河段DO更易受气候变化影响,尤其是暴雨径流引起的浮游植物流失是导致枯、丰水年DO差异的直接原因.而枯水年闸下感潮河段DO受外源污染输入及滞留影响显著,丰水年闸下河段耗氧物质的减少是DO提升的重要原因.

Abstract

This study analysed the spatiotemporal characteristics of dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations upstream and downstream of sluices during dry and wet years, using data from three automated water quality monitoring stations and field measurements along the Huangjiang River in Guangdong Province. Multiple statistical methods were employed to identify the relative contributions of key influencing factors to DO variability across years under different precipitation conditions. Upstream DO concentrations were generally higher in dry years ((8.02±0.10) mg/L) than in wet years ((7.26±0.08) mg/L). In contrast, DO levels in the downstream tidal section increased from (4.45±0.10) mg/L (dry year) to (7.33±0.09) mg/L (wet year), primarily due to improved water quality. Periodic fluctuations were observed in both years, with higher DO levels during the flood season and lower levels during the non-flood season throughout the river channel. Influenced by the gate control and different external inputs, DO fluctuations upstream and downstream were driven by different factors. Rainfall and water temperature explained 44% to 87% of the DO variability upstream. While ammonia nitrogen, and CODMn were the most influential factors downstream, accounting for 53% to 75% of the variability. Furthermore, the “lacustrine” upstream section was especially sensitive to climate variations. In this area, the loss of phytoplankton biomass caused by stormwater runoff was a major factor contributing to DO difference during dry and wet years. While DO downstream is more easily influenced by water pollutants, especially the significant decrease in oxygen-demanding substances.

关键词

环境要素 / 枯丰水年 / 溶解氧 / 入海河流 / 闸控

Key words

dissolved oxygen / dry and wet year / gate-controlled / key environmental parameter / seagoing river

引用本文

导出引用
金晓玥, 黄菊, 范中亚, 黄露, 罗千里, 王振. 闸控入海河流DO时空分布特征及其驱动因素[J]. 中国环境科学. 2025, 45(6): 3311-3320
JIN Xiao-yue, HUANG Ju, FAN Zhong-ya, HUANG Lu, LUO Qian-li, WANG Zhen. Spatiotemporal distributions of dissolved oxygen and its driving factors in gate-controlled seagoing rivers[J]. China Environmental Science. 2025, 45(6): 3311-3320
中图分类号: X522   

参考文献

[1] 付雅君,曹升乐,杨裕恒.基于溶解氧平衡法的南四湖生态需水量研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2018,40(4):79-82.Fu Y J, Cao S L, Yang Y H. Study on water demand for the lake ecosystems based on dissolved oxygen balance method [J] Yellow River, 2018,40(4):79-82.
[2] Kirk J T. Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1994:26-45.
[3] Bernhardt E S, Savoy P, Vlah M J, et al. Light and flow regimes regulate the metabolism of rivers [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022,119(8), e2121976119.
[4] 余欣欣,郑国栋,陈杰,等.低氧胁迫对鱼类影响的研究进展[J]. 水产科学, 2024,43(2):333-340.Yu X X, Zheng G D, Chen J, et al. Advance in research on effects of hypoxic stress in fish [J]. Fisheries Science, 2024,43(2):333-340.
[5] 林峰艺,陈兴伟,刘继辉,等.闽江水口水库溶解氧的时空分布规律[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2023,18(3):63-70.Lin F Y, Chen X W, Liu J H, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of dissolved oxygen in Shuikou reservoir of Min River [J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2023,18(3):63-70.
[6] 黄炜惠,马春子,李文攀,等.我国地表水溶解氧时空变化及其对全球变暖的响应[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021,41(5):1970-1980.Huang W H, Ma C Z, Li W P, et al. Spatial-temporal variations of dissolved oxygen and their response to global warming in China [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2021,41(5):1970-1980.
[7] 杨艾琳,杨芳,李少斌,等.福建省流域-近海溶解氧时空格局与低氧调控机制[J]. 环境科学, 2022,43(11):4950-4960.Yang A L, Yang F, Li S B, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics of dissolved oxygen and control mechanism of hypoxia (low oxygen) in the watershed-coastal system in Fujian Province [J]. Environmental Science, 2022,43(11):4950-4960.
[8] 李文攀,张亚捷,谭伟,等.我国地表水溶解氧现状及其标准研究[J]. 环境保护, 2023,51(15):46-51.Li W P, Zhang Y J, Tan W, et al. Status of dissolved oxygen in surface water in China and related standard research [J]. Environmental Protection, 2023,51(15):46-51.
[9] 黎睿,汤显强,胡艳平,等.四湖总干渠溶解氧季节性异常特征与成因分析[J]. 中国环境科学: 1-9.doi:10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923. 20250227.001.Li R, Tang X Q, Hu Y P, et al. Seasonal abnormal characteristics and cause analysis of dissolved oxygen in Sihu Main Channel [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science: 1-9. doi:10.19674/j.cnki. issn1000-6923.20250227.001.
[10] 吴林妮,韦钦胜,冉祥滨,等.南黄海-长江口海域溶解氧分布和低氧、酸化特征及其控制因素[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021,41(3):1311-1324.Wu L N, Wei Q S, Ran X B, et al. Distribution of dissolved oxygen and characteristics of hypoxia and acidification and their control factors in the South Yellow Sea - Yangtze River Estuary area [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2021,41(3):1311-1324.
[11] 吴青梅,罗慧东,孙国萍,等.典型感潮内河涌水质污染特征调查研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2011,31(10):2210-2216.Wu Q M, Luo H D, Sun G P, et al. Investigation on polluted water quality of the typical tidal urban river [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2011,31(10):2210-2216.
[12] 龚松柏,高爱国,倪冠韬,等.中国部分河口及其近海水域缺氧现象研究[J]. 水资源保护, 2017,33(4):62-69.Gong S B, Gao A G, Ni G T, et al. Progress in research of hypoxia in estuaries and coastal areas in China [J]. Water Resources Protection, 2017,33(4):62-69.
[13] 熊津晶,余香英,杜顺韬,等.广东榕江地都断面溶解氧变化规律及其影响因素研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2024,46(9):1251-1257.Xiong J J, Yu X Y, Du S T, et al. Study on the variation of dissolved oxygen and its influencing factors in Didu section of Rongjiang River, Guangdong [J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2024,46(9):1251- 1257.
[14] 于洪贤,王尚,马成学.夏季大兴凯湖(中国一侧)沿岸带浮游植物群落的动态变化[J]. 水产学杂志, 2014,27(3):1-5.Yu H X, Ma W S, Ma C X. The Dynamic Variations in Phytoplankton Community in Daxingkai Lake (on Chinese Side) Coastal Zone in Summer [J]. Chinese Journal of Fisheries, 2014,27(3):1-5.
[15] Tomaso D J, Najjar R G. Long-term variations in the dissolved oxygen budget of an urbanized tidal river: The upper Delaware Estuary [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2015,120(6):1027- 1045.
[16] Wilding T K, Brown E, Collier K J. Identifying dissolved oxygen variability and stress in tidal freshwater streams of northern New Zealand [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2012,184(10): 6045-6060.
[17] 马克,涂新军,陈晓宏.闸控河网区水闸运行的水流水质响应模拟[J]. 水文, 2021,41(6):66-72.Ma K, Tu X J, Chen X H. Simulation of water quantity and quality response of sluice operation in sluice-controlled river network area [J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 2021,41(6):66-72.
[18] 米庆彬,窦明,郭瑞丽.水闸调控对河流水质—水生态过程影响研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2014,32(5):29-32.Mi Q B, Dou M, Guo R L. Research on impact of sluice regulation on river's water quality and water ecological process [J]. Water Resources and Power, 2014,32(5):29-32.
[19] Descy J-P, Darchambeau F, Lambert T, et al. Phytoplankton dynamics in the Congo River [J]. Freshwater Biology, 2017,62(1):87-101.
[20] 胡俊,舒卫先,韦翠珍,等.基于浮游植物群落的纵向连通性初步研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018,27(1):79-86.Hu J, Shu W X, Wei C Z, et al. Study on the longitudinal connectivity based on community structure of phytoplankton [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2018,27(1):79-86.
[21] 王钟.闸控重污染小流域水文水质及污染物通量变化特征研究[D]. 宜昌:三峡大学, 2019.doi:10.27270/d.cnki.gsxau.2019.000310.Wang Z. Study on the variation characteristics of hydrology water quality and pollutants fluxes in small heavily polluted watersheds with gate control [D]. Yichang: Sanxia University, 2019.doi:10.27270/d. cnki.gsxau.2019.000310.
[22] 徐智健,罗千里,黄露,等.华南中小型闸控入海河流氮磷化学计量学特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2025,38(2):304-317.Xu Z J, Luo Q L, Huang L, et al. Stoichiometric characterization of nitrogen and phosphorus and its response of small-to-medium-sized sluice-controlled rivers entering the sea in South China [J]. Research of Environmental Science, 2025,38(2):304-317.
[23] 李丹,范中亚,罗千里,等.华南中小型闸控入海河流DOM特征及藻源影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2024,44(2):911-922.Li D, Fan Z Y, Luo Q L, et al. Characteristics and algal source effects of dissolved organic matter in small and medium-sized gate- controlled seagoing rivers in South China [J]. China Environmental Science, 2024,44(2):911-922.
[24] 徐婷婷,郑锐滨,班远冲,等.汕尾市海丰县黄江河流域水环境综合治理研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2023,39(22):137-143.Xu T T, Zheng R B, Ban Y C, et al. Research on comprehensive management of water environment in Huangjiang River Basin of Haifeng County, Shanwei City [J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2023, 39(22):137-143.
[25] 张晓芒.汕尾:“黄江河模式”打通“两山”转化新路径[J]. 环境, 2024, (7):41-42.Zhang X M. Shanwei: "Huangjiang River model" opens a new path of "two mountains" transformation [J]. Environment, 2024,(7):41-42.
[26] 徐闯,余香英,许泽婷,等.潭江干流溶解氧时空格局及其调控因素研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2024,44(7):222-230.Xu C, Yu X Y, Xu Z T, et al. Study on the spatiotemporal pattern of dissolved oxygen and its control factors in the mainstream of Tanjiang River [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2024,44(7):222-230.
[27] 薛弘涛,余香英,陈晓丹,等.深圳河口溶解氧变化规律及其影响因素研究[J]. 环境生态学, 2023,5(11):88-94.Xue H T, Yu X Y, Chen X D, et al. Research on the variation of dissolved oxygen and its influencing factors in Shenzhen River estuary [J]. Environmental Ecology, 2023,5(11):88-94.
[28] Blaszczak J R, Delesantro J M, Urban D L, et al. Scoured or suffocated: Urban stream ecosystems oscillate between hydrologic and dissolved oxygen extremes [J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2019, 64(3):877-894.
[29] Wenner E, Sanger D, Arendt M, et al. Variability in dissolved oxygen and other water-quality variables within the national estuarine research reserve system [J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2009, (10045):17-38.
[30] Williams R J, White C, Harrow M L, et al. Temporal and small-scale spatial variations of dissolved oxygen in the Rivers Thames, Pang and Kennet, UK [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2000,251:497-510.
[31] 余香英,王刚,邹富桢,等.基于逐4h尺度的粤西典型流域降雨径流污染特征分析[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2023,45(7):910-916,922.Yu X Y, Wang G, Zou F Z, et al. Pollutant characteristics of rainfall runoff in a typical basin in Western Guangdong based on a 4h time step resolution [J]. Environmental Pollution & Control 2023,45(7): 910-916,922.
[32] 薛芮芸,苏营营,方鹿跃,等.基于网格化水质自动监测的平原河网区汛期水污染特征研究与成因解析[J]. 环境工程技术学报:1-11.Xue R Y, Su Y Y, Fang L Y, et al. A study on characteristics and causes of flood season water pollution in a plain river network area based on grid online monitoring of water quality [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology:1-11.
[33] Paerl H W, Hall N S, Hounshell A G, et al. Recent increases of rainfall and flooding from tropical cyclones (TCs) in North Carolina (USA): implications for organic matter and nutrient cycling in coastal watersheds [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2020,150:197-216.
[34] Meerhoff M, Audet J, Davidson T A, et al. Feedback between climate change and eutrophication: revisiting the allied attack concept and how to strike back [J]. Inland Waters, 2022,12(2):187-204.
[35] Irvine K, Richey J, Holtgrieve G, et al. Spatial and temporal variability of turbidity, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, temperature, and fluorescence in the lower Mekong River–Tonle Sap system identified using continuous monitoring [J]. International Journal of River Basin Management, 2011,9(2):151-168.
[36] Julian J, Doyle M, Stanley E. Empirical modeling of light availability in rivers [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2008, 113(G3).
[37] Izagirre O, Agirre U, Bermejo M, et al. Environmental controls of whole-stream metabolism identified from continuous monitoring of Basque streams [J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2008,27(2):252-268.
[38] 陈仲晗,徐娟,刘帅帅,等.城市感潮河流溶解氧收支及调控的模拟研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2022,42(4):204-213.Chen Z H, Xu J, Liu S S, et al. Numerical analysis of dissolved oxygen budgets and hypoxia mitigation strategies for an urban tidal river [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2022,42(4):204-213.
[39] He T, Li J, Xie L, et al. Response of chlorophyll-a to rainfall event in the basin of the South China Sea: Statistical analysis [J]. Marine Environmental Research, 2024,199:106576.
[40] 夏威,张萌,周慜,等.大型深水湖库溶解氧时空变化及驱动因素:以江西仙女湖为例[J]. 湖泊科学, 2023,35(3):874-885.Xia W, Zhang M, Zhou M, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamic of dissolved oxygen and its influencing factors in lake Xiannv Jiangxi, China [J]. Journal of Lake Science, 2023,35(3):874-885.
[41] Zang C, Huang S, Wu M, et al. Comparison of relationships between pH, dissolved oxygen and chlorophyll for aquaculture and non- aquaculture waters [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2011,219(1):157- 174.
[42] 汪伯伦,陈然,罗毅,等.横江流域pH值时空变化特征与浮游植物关系研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2024,49(5):107-112.Wang B L, Chen R, Luo Y, et al. Relationship between pH spatio- temporal variation and phytoplankton in Hengjiang River Basin [J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2024,49(5):107-112.
[43] Peng X, Lin Q, Liu B, et al. Effect of submerged plant coverage on phytoplankton community dynamics and photosynthetic activity in situ [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022,301:113822.
[44] Lewis E L, Perkin R. Salinity: Its definition and calculation [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1978,83(C1):466-478.
[45] Onabule O A, Mitchell S B, Couceiro F. The effects of freshwater flow and salinity on turbidity and dissolved oxygen in a shallow Macrotidal estuary: A case study of Portsmouth Harbour [J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2020,191:105179.
[46] 徐闯,刘广州,陈晓宏.珠江流域东江(东莞段)溶解氧时空变化及其影响因素[J]. 湖泊科学, 2022,34(5):1540-1549.Xu C, Liu G Z, Chen X H. Spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of river dissolved oxygen in Dongguan section of Dongjiang River, Pearl River Basin [J]. Journal of Lake Science, 2022,34(5): 1540-1549.
[47] 王文才,杜薇,范中亚,等.基于EFDC模型的长江江苏段水流输运时间研究[J]. 人民长江, 2019,50(5):70-75.Wang W C, Du W, Fan Z Y, et al. Study on transport timescale in Jiangsu reach of Yangtze River based on EFDC model [J]. Yangtze River, 2019,50(5):70-75.

基金

国家重点研发计划资助项目(2022YFC3202200);国家自然科学基金资助项目(42177264,42403057);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金资助项目(2023A1515110183)

PDF(1987 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉