碳排放权交易政策对上市企业ESG表现的影响机制

顾雨佳, 蒋子恒, 唐杰

中国环境科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2) : 1153-1163.

PDF(1138 KB)
PDF(1138 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2) : 1153-1163.
碳排放控制

碳排放权交易政策对上市企业ESG表现的影响机制

  • 顾雨佳1, 蒋子恒2, 唐杰2,3
作者信息 +

The impact mechanism of carbon emission trading policies on corporate ESG performance

  • GU Yu-Jia1, JIANG Zi-Heng2, TANG Jie2,3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

以2012~2022年A股上市公司为样本,采用双重差分法研究碳排放权交易政策对企业ESG表现的影响及作用机制.研究发现,碳排放权交易政策能显著提升试点区域企业的ESG表现,该结论经平行趋势假设估计、安慰剂检验、改变样本区间与倾向匹配得分等稳健性检验后依然成立.异质性分析表明,政策对高能耗地区企业和高资产规模企业的ESG表现提升效应更显著,且两者交集组的提升效果最为突出.机制检验显示,政策通过促进企业增加长期资产投资,推动其技术改造与绿色转型,进而提升ESG表现.据此,提出完善碳市场制度、创新碳金融产品、推动企业将碳排放管理纳入ESG战略以及强化金融激励导向等政策建议.

Abstract

Using A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2022 as the sample, this study employs the difference-in-differences method to examine the impact of carbon emission trading policies on corporate ESG performance and its underlying mechanisms. The findings reveal that the carbon emission trading policy significantly improves the ESG performance of enterprises in pilot regions. This conclusion remains robust after a series of tests, including parallel trend estimation, placebo tests, changes in the sample period, and propensity score matching. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy has a more pronounced effect on enhancing ESG performance for firms in high-energy-consumption regions and those with larger asset scales, with the most substantial improvement observed in the intersection group of these two categories. Mechanism tests show that the policy promotes ESG performance by encouraging enterprises to increase long-term asset investment, thereby driving technological upgrades and green transformation. Based on these findings, policy recommendations are proposed, including improving the carbon market system, innovating carbon financial products, integrating carbon management into corporate ESG strategies, and strengthening financial incentive mechanisms.

关键词

碳排放权交易政策 / 企业ESG表现 / 双重差分 / 倾向匹配得分

Key words

carbon emission trading policy / corporate ESG performance / difference-in-differences(DID) / propensity score matching (PSM)

引用本文

导出引用
顾雨佳, 蒋子恒, 唐杰. 碳排放权交易政策对上市企业ESG表现的影响机制[J]. 中国环境科学. 2026, 46(2): 1153-1163
GU Yu-Jia, JIANG Zi-Heng, TANG Jie. The impact mechanism of carbon emission trading policies on corporate ESG performance[J]. China Environmental Science. 2026, 46(2): 1153-1163
中图分类号: X196   

参考文献

[1] 李永友,沈坤荣.我国污染控制政策的减排效果——基于省际工业污染数据的实证分析[J].管理世界, 2008,(7):7-17. Li Y Y, Shen K R. The emission reduction effects of China's pollution control policies: An empirical analysis based on interprovincial industrial pollution data [J]. Management World, 2008,(7):7-17.
[2] 段茂盛,庞韬.碳排放权交易体系的基本要素[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2013,23(3):110-117. Duan M S, Pang T. Basic elements of emissions trading scheme [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013,23(3):110-117.
[3] 李志学,张肖杰,董英宇.中国碳排放权交易市场运行状况、问题和对策研究[J].生态环境学报, 2014,23(11):1876-1882. Li Z X, Zhang X J, Dong Y Y. Research on China's carbon emissions trading market status, problems and measures [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014,23(11):1876-1882.
[4] 张国兴,樊萌萌,马睿琨,等.碳交易政策的协同减排效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2022,32(3):1-10. Zhang G X, Fan M M, Ma R K, et al. Effects of the carbon emission trading policy on collaborative emission reduction [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2022,32(3):1-10.
[5] 刘传明,孙喆,张瑾.中国碳排放权交易试点的碳减排政策效应研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2019,29(11):49-58. Liu C M, Sun Z, Zhang J. Research on the effect of carbon emission reduction policy in China's carbon emissions trading pilot [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019,29(11):49-58.
[6] 曾诗鸿,李璠,翁智雄,等.我国碳交易试点政策的减排效应及地区差异[J].中国环境科学, 2022,42(4):1922-1933. Zeng S H, Li F, Weng Z X, et al. Study on the emission reduction effect of China's carbon trading pilot policy and regional differences [J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(4):1922-1933.
[7] Cui L B, Fan Y, Zhu L, et al. How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? [J]. Applied Energy, 2014,136:1043-1052.
[8] Porter M. America’s green strategy [J]. Scientific American, 1991,264(4):168.
[9] Gray W B. The cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown [J]. The American Economic Review, 1987,77(5):998- 1006.
[10] 邱士雷,王帆,陈祺,等.结构调整视角下环境规制对工业绿色全要素生产率的影响机制研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2025,39(9): 1-12. Qiu S L, Wang F, Chen Q, et al. Impact mechanism of environmental regulation on industrial green total factorproductivity: A perspective from structural adjustment [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2025,39(9):1-12.
[11] 徐杰,李红晔,韩先锋.市场型环境规制对企业价值的影响效应——来自碳排放权交易试点政策的证据[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2024,34(7):88-100. Xu J, Li H Y, Han X F. Effects of market-based environmental regulations on enterprise value: Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading pilot policy [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2024,34(7):88-100.
[12] 吴雪萍.碳排放权交易价格与全要素生产率:来自中国的证据[J].环境科学, 2024,45(4):1926-1937. Wu X P. Carbon emissions trading prices and total factor productivity: Evidence from China [J]. Environmental Science, 2024,45(4):1926- 1937.
[13] 梅应丹,邓雅芮,马婷.碳交易与企业生产力:来自中国石化企业的证据[J].中国环境科学, 2023,43(5):2583-2589. Mei Y D, Deng Y R, Ma T. Carbon trading and enterprise productivity: Evidence from China's petrochemical enterprises [J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(5):2583-2589.
[14] 戴其文,郝文杰,承忠彬,等.环境规制政策驱动实体经济“脱实向虚”了吗?——基于中国碳排放权交易试点的准自然实验[J].自然资源学报, 2024,39(6):1320-1340. Dai Q W, Hao W J, Cheng Z B, et al. Has environmental regulatory policy driven the financialization of manufacturing enterprises: A quasi-natural experiment from the enactment of China's carbon emission trading pilot policy [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(6):1320-1340.
[15] 吕娟,吕雁琴,杨平,等.碳排放权交易能否促进企业绿色技术创新的“量质齐升”? [J].生态经济, 2025,41(3):75-85. Lv J, Lv Y Q, Yang P, et al. Whether carbon emissions trading policy promotes “quantity and quality upgrading” of green technological innovations by firms? [J]. Ecological Economy, 2025,41(3):75-85.
[16] 崔学刚,毕煜晗,姜鑫,等.碳排放权交易制度的“微观双赢效应”及其机制分析[J/OL].南开管理评论, 1-27[2025-03-31]. Cui X G, Bi Y H, Jiang X, et al. The micro win-win effect of the carbon emission trading system and its mechanism analysis [J/OL]. Nankai Business Review, 1-27[2025-03-31].
[17] 曹翔,苏馨儿.碳排放权交易试点政策是否促进了碳中和技术创新?[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2023,33(7):94-104. Cao X, Su X E. Has the carbon emissions trading pilot policy promoted carbon neutrality technology innovation? [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2023,33(7):94-104.
[18] 张静,申俊,徐梦.碳排放交易是否促进了产业结构转型升级?——来自中国碳排放交易试点政策的经验证据[J].经济问题, 2023,(8):84-91. Zhang J, Shen J, Xu M. Does carbon emission trading promoted the transformation and upgrading of industrial structure?—Empirical evidence from China's carbon emissions trading pilot policy [J]. On Economic Problems, 2023,(8):84-91.
[19] 孙冬,杨硕,赵雨萱,等.ESG表现、财务状况与系统性风险相关性研究——以沪深A股电力上市公司为例[J].中国环境管理, 2019,11(2):37-43. Sun D, Yang S, Zhao Y X, et al. The correlation between ESG, financial performance and systemic risk: Evidence from Shanghai and Shenzhen listed electric power enterprises [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2019,11(2):37-43.
[20] 郭檬楠,贺一凡,牛建业.内部控制、网络媒体报道与企业ESG表现[J].管理学刊, 2023,36(3):103-119. Guo M N, He Y F, Niu J Y. Internal control, network media report and enterprise ESG performance [J]. Journal of Management, 2023,36(3): 103-119.
[21] 胡洁,韩一鸣,钟咏.企业数字化转型如何影响企业ESG表现——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].产业经济评论, 2023,(1):105- 123. Hu J, Han Y M, Zhong Y. How Corporate Digital transformation affects corporate ESG performance [J]. Review of Industrial Economics, 2023,(1):105-123.
[22] 雷雷,张大永,姬强.共同机构持股与企业ESG表现[J].经济研究, 2023,58(4):133-151. Lei L, Zhang D Y, Ji Q. common institutional ownership and corporate ESG performance [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2023,58(4):133- 151.
[23] Barko T, Cremers M, Renneboog L. Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2022,180(2):777-812.
[24] 吴友,刘嘉.资本市场开放是否有利于企业ESG表现[J].上海经济研究, 2024,(3):73-88. Wu Y, Liu J. Does the opening of the capital market promote firm’s ESG [J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2024,(3):73-88.
[25] 徐妍,宋怡瑾,邵帅.低碳转型政策对上市公司环境-社会责任-公司治理的影响及作用机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2024,34(4): 60-75. Xu Y, Song Y J, Shao S. Low-carbon transition policy and the ESG quality of listed companies: Evidence from low-carbon city pilots [J]. China population, resources and environment, 2024,34(4):60-75.
[26] 王禹,王浩宇,薛爽.税制绿色化与企业ESG表现——基于《环境保护税法》的准自然实验[J].财经研究, 2022,48(9):47-62. Wang Y, Wang H Y, Xue S. Greening of tax system and corporate ESG performance: A quasi-natural experiment based on the environmental protection tax law [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2022,48(9):47-62.
[27] 郑春美,吕佳睿,李文耀.政府环境关注度与企业ESG表现——高管团队环保意识与企业创新的机制作用[J/OL].科技进步与对策, 1-10[2025-08-03]. Zheng C M, Lv J R, Li W Y. Government environmental attention and corporate ESG performance: The mechanism roles of the environmental awareness of executive teams and corporate innovation capability [J/OL]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 1-10[2025-08-03].
[28] 贾智杰,林伯强,温师燕.碳排放权交易试点与全要素生产率——兼论波特假说、技术溢出与污染天堂[J].经济学动态, 2023,(3): 66-86. Jia Z J, Lin B Q, Wen S Y. Carbon trading pilots and total factor productivity—With discussions on Porter Hypothesis, technology diffusion and pollution Paradise [J]. Economic Perspectives, 2023,(3): 66-86.
[29] 王芳.企业ESG表现与低碳绿色转型——基于金融政策工具支持的效应评估[J].当代财经, 2024,(1):152-164. Wang F. Enterprise ESG performance and low-carbon green transformation: Effect evaluation based on the support of financial policy instrument [J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2024,(1): 152-164.
[30] Coase R H. The problem of social cost [J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960,3:1.
[31] Chen F, Chen Z, Zhang X. Belated stock returns for green innovation under carbon emissions trading market [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2024,85:102558.
[32] 熊航,静峥,展进涛.不同环境规制政策对中国规模以上工业企业技术创新的影响[J].资源科学, 2020,42(7):1348-1360. Xiong H, Jing Z, Zhan J T. Impact of different environmental regulatory tools on technological innovation of Chinese industrial enterprises above designated size [J]. Resources Science, 2020,42(7): 1348-1360.
[33] 姜英兵,张伟杰,李星辰.碳排放权交易试点政策对新能源企业创新的激励效应——基于创新投入的证据[J].数量经济研究, 2024,15(3):41-71. Jiang Y B, Zhang W J, Li X C. Incentive effect of carbon emissions trading pilot policy on innovation of new energy enterprises— Evidence based on innovation investment [J]. The Journal of Quantitative Economics, 2024,15(3):41-71.
[34] 霍启欣,方慧.创造还是破坏:碳排放权交易与企业就业变动[J].财贸经济, 2025,46(1):151-168. Huo Q X, Fang H. Creation or destruction: Carbon emissions tradingand firms’ employment dynamics [J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2025,46(1):151-168.
[35] Samuelson P A. A theory of induced innovation along Kennedy- Weisäcker lines [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1965: 343-356.
[36] Du K, Cheng Y, Yao X. Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities [J]. Energy Economics, 2021,98: 105247.
[37] Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, et al. The environment and directed technical change [J]. American economic review, 2012,102(1): 131-166.
[38] 邓慧慧,杨露鑫.雾霾治理、地方竞争与工业绿色转型[J].中国工业经济, 2019,(10):118-136. Deng H H, Yang L X. Haze governance, local competition and industrial green transformation [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019, (10):118-136.
[39] 唐将伟,黄燕芬,张祎.国内碳排放权交易市场价格机制存在的问题、成因与对策[J].价格月刊, 2024,(2):1-10. Tang J W, Huang Y F, Zhang Y. The existing problems, causes and countermeasures of the price mechanism of domestic carbon emission rights trading market [J]. Prices Monthly, 2024,(2):1-10.
[40] 江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济, 2022,(5):100-120. Jiang T. Mediating effects and moderating effects in causal inference [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022,(5):100-120.
[41] 刘胜,温锡峰,陈秀英.循环经济政策与中国企业环境绩效:助推器抑或绊脚石?[J].经济学报, 2023,10(2):175-210. Liu S, Wen X F, Chen X Y. Circular economy policy and enterprises' environmental performance: Booster or stumbling block? [J]. China Journal of Economics, 2023,10(2):175-210.
[42] Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A. Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States [J]. The journal of finance, 2010,65(5):1637-1667.
[43] 唐浩丹,方森辉,蒋殿春.数字化转型的市场绩效:数字并购能提升制造业企业市场势力吗? [J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2022,39(12): 90-110. Tang H D, Fang S H, Jiang D C. Market performance in digital transformation: Can digital M&As enhance manufacturing firm's market power? [J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2022,39(12):90-110.
[44] 余东升,余娟娟,陈梦园.我国新质生产力与碳排放耦合协调水平时空演进及影响因素[J].中国环境科学, 2025,45(7):4107-4113. Yu D S, Yu J J, Chen M Y. The spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of the coupling coordination level between China's new quality productivityand carbon emissions [J]. China Environmental Science, 2025,45(7):4107-4113.
[45] 崔和瑞,徐昭.考虑省份特征变量的火电行业碳达峰预测模型[J].电力科学与工程, 2024,40(5):28-37. Cui H R, Xu Z. Prediction model of carbon peak in thermal power industry considering provincial characteristic variables [J]. Electric Power Science and Engineering, 2024,40(5):28-37.
[46] 温慧愉,杜佳月,高昊宇,等.碳市场激励下的企业ESG表现——来自中国碳排放权交易试点的经验证据[J].金融研究, 2024,(10):95- 112. Wen H Y, Du J Y, Gao H Y, et al. Carbon emissions trading regulation and ESG performance: Evidence from carbon emissions trading pilots in China [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2024,(10):95-112.
[47] 王锋,葛星.低碳转型冲击就业吗——来自低碳城市试点的经验证据[J].中国工业经济, 2022,(5):81-99. Wang F, Ge X. Can low-carbon transition impact employment— Empirical evidence from low-carbon city pilot policy [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022,(5):81-99.

基金

中国人民大学习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究工程项目(22XNQ004)

PDF(1138 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/