基于结构方程模型的酚类流域化学完整性评估

王旭升, 王晓南, 刘征涛

中国环境科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2) : 963-971.

PDF(2191 KB)
PDF(2191 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2) : 963-971.
环境生态

基于结构方程模型的酚类流域化学完整性评估

  • 王旭升1,2, 王晓南1, 刘征涛1,2
作者信息 +

Assessment of watershed chemical integrity for phenolic pollutants using structural equation modeling

  • WANG Xu-sheng1,2, WANG Xiao-nan1, LIU Zheng-tao1,2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本研究通过分析长江流域84个地表水采样点168个样品的理化参数和酚类污染物浓度,构建可推广的结构方程模型(SEM),量化酚类污染物对化学完整性的直接与间接影响路径.通过整合常规水质参数、酚类及重金属数据,使用主成分分析(PCA)构建化学压力指数,SEM建模分析环境调节因子的中介效应.结果表明,酚类污染通过直接毒性(路径系数β=-0.55)和环境控制的间接路径(β=-0.14)削弱化学完整性,重金属协同效应显著.本研究提出了化学完整性指数(ICI)的计算公式,为流域污染管控提供定量工具.

Abstract

This study analyzed physicochemical parameters and phenolic pollutant concentrations from 168 water samples collected at 84 surface water sampling sites in the Yangtze River Basin. A structural equation modeling (SEM) framework was constructed to quantify the direct and indirect pathways through which phenolic pollutants impact chemical integrity. The methodology involved the integration of conventional water quality parameters, phenolic compounds, and heavy metal data, with a chemical pressure index being constructed using principal component analysis (PCA). The mediating effects of environmental regulatory factors were analyzed via partial least squares SEM. It was found that phenolic pollution significantly impaired chemical integrity through direct toxic effects (path coefficient β = -0.55) and indirect pathways mediated by environmental controls (β = -0.14), with notable synergistic effects being exhibited by heavy metals. A formula for the Chemical Integrity Index (ICI) was proposed, providing a quantitative tool for watershed pollution management and control.

关键词

酚类化合物 / 长江流域 / 化学完整性 / 环境浓度 / 风险评价

Key words

Phenolic compounds / Yangtze River Basin / chemical integrity / environmental concentration / risk assessment

引用本文

导出引用
王旭升, 王晓南, 刘征涛. 基于结构方程模型的酚类流域化学完整性评估[J]. 中国环境科学. 2026, 46(2): 963-971
WANG Xu-sheng, WANG Xiao-nan, LIU Zheng-tao. Assessment of watershed chemical integrity for phenolic pollutants using structural equation modeling[J]. China Environmental Science. 2026, 46(2): 963-971
中图分类号: X131.2   

参考文献

[1] Zhang J W, Shi J H, Ge H, et al. Tiered ecological risk assessment of nonylphenol and tetrabromobisphenol A in the surface waters of China based on the augmented species sensitivity distribution models [J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2022,236:113446.
[2] Zhu A X, Liu P Y, Gong Y C, et al. Residual levels and risk assessment of tetrabromobisphenol A in Baiyang Lake and Fuhe river, China [J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020,200:110770.
[3] Guo J H, Mo J Z, Zhao Q, et al. De novo transcriptomic analysis predicts the effects of phenolic compounds in Ba River on the liver of female sharpbelly (Hemiculter lucidus) [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020,264:114642.
[4] Jiang J Q, Zhao J, Zhao G F, et al. Recognition, possible source, and risk assessment of organic pollutants in surface water from the Yongding River Basin by non-target and target screening [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2023,331:121895.
[5] Liao C Y, Liu F, Moon H B, et al. Bisphenol Analogues in Sediments from Industrialized Areas in the United States, Japan, and Korea: Spatial and Temporal Distributions [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012,46(21):11558-11565.
[6] Carballeira C, Villares R, Mata-rivas B, et al. The cotton-strip assay as an environmental surveillance tool for ecological integrity assessment of rivers affected by WWTP effluents [J]. Water Research, 2020,169:115247.
[7] Borja A, Bricker S B, Dauer D M, et al. Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide [J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2008,56(9):1519-1537.
[8] 程佩瑄.典型流域水化学完整性评价研究——以松花江为例[D]. 2020. Cheng P X. Water chemical integrity assessment in a typical watershed --a case study of Songhua River [D]. 2020.
[9] 王迪,刘智,刘冬冬,等.辽河干流河流化学完整性评价方法对比研究[J].生态科学, 2022,41(4):129-141. Wang D, Liu Z, Liu D D, et al. Comparison of river chemical integrity evaluation methods in Liaohe River Main Stream [J]. Ecological Science, 2022,41(4):129-141.
[10] GB 3838-2002地表水环境质量标准[S]. GB 3838-2002 Environmental quality standards for surface water [S].
[11] Bhandari G, Bagheri A R, Bhatt P, et al. Occurrence, potential ecological risks, and degradation of endocrine disrupter, nonylphenol, from the aqueous environment [J]. Chemosphere, 2021,275:130013.
[12] Chen Y, Zhang L, Hu H, et al. Neonicotinoid pollution in marine sediments of the East China Sea [J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2022,842:156658.
[13] Li Y, Zhang H, Rashid A, et al. Bisphenol A attenuation in natural microcosm: Contribution of ecological components and identification of transformation pathways through stable isotope tracing [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020,385:121584.
[14] Schmidt T S, Van Metre P C, Carlisle D M. Linking the Agricultural Landscape of the Midwest to Stream Health with Structural Equation Modeling [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019,53(1):452-462.
[15] Adeyeye O A, Hassaan A M, Yonas M W, et al. Integrating partial least square structural equation modelling and machine learning for causal exploration of environmental phenomena [J]. Environmental Research, 2025,274:121358.
[16] Henseler J, Sarstedt M. Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling [J]. Computational Statistics, 2013,28(2):565-580.
[17] Firpo S, Fortin N M, Lemieux T. Unconditional Quantile Regressions [J]. Econometrica, 2009,77(3):953-973.
[18] Schmidt T S, Clements W H, Cade B S. Estimating risks to aquatic life using quantile regression [J]. Freshwater Science, 2012,31(3):709-723.
[19] Cade B S, Noon B R. A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists [J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2003,1(8): 412-420.
[20] Singh N K, Basu N B. The human factor in seasonal streamflows across natural and managed watersheds of North America [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2022,5(5):397-405.
[21] Chen R, Yin P H, Zhao L, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution and potential ecological risk assessment of nonylphenol and octylphenol in riverine outlets of Pearl River Delta, China [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014,26(11):2340-2347.
[22] Li Z H, Zhang W Q, Shan B Q. The effects of urbanization and rainfall on the distribution of, and risks from, phenolic environmental estrogens in river sediment [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2019,250: 1010-1018.
[23] Li B, Liu R, Gao H, et al. Spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment of phthalic acid esters and phenols in surface sediment from urban rivers in Northeast China [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016,219:409-415.
[24] Song Y, Ji J, Mao C, et al. Heavy metal contamination in suspended solids of Changjiang River — environmental implications [J]. Geoderma, 2010,159(3/4):286-295.
[25] Fan J, Jian X, Shang F, et al. Underestimated heavy metal pollution of the Minjiang River, SE China: Evidence from spatial and seasonal monitoring of suspended-load sediments [J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2021,760:142586.
[26] Li X, Liu L, Wang Y, et al. Heavy metal contamination of urban soil in an old industrial city (Shenyang) in Northeast China [J]. Geoderma, 2013,192:50-58.
[27] Kirk M A, Maitland B M, Rahel F J. Spatial scale, reservoirs and nonnative species influence the homogenization and differentiation of Great Plains—Rocky Mountain fish faunas [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2019, 847(18):3743-3757.
[28] Huber P, Metz S, Unrein F, et al. Environmental heterogeneity determines the ecological processes that govern bacterial metacommunity assembly in a floodplain river system [J]. The ISME Journal, 2020,14(12):2951-2966.
[29] Luo M, Yu H, Liu Q, et al. Effect of river-lake connectivity on heavy metal diffusion and source identification of heavy metals in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. J Hazard Mater, 2021,416:125818.
[30] Yang H, Sun F, Liao H, et al. Pollution characterization and multi-index ecological risk assessment of microplastics in urban rivers from a Chinese megacity [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 480:136145.
[31] Ladeia R R, Rezende M V, Santos A M C. Phenolic compounds in water: Review of occurrence, risk, and retention by membrane technology [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024,351:119772.
[32] Melo J S, Kholi s, Patwardhan A W, et al. Effect of oxygen transfer limitations in phenol biodegradation [J]. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(2):625-628.
[33] Motamedi M, Yerushalmi L, Haghighat F, et al. Recent developments in photocatalysis of industrial effluents : A review and example of phenolic compounds degradation [J]. Chemosphere, 2022,296:133688.
[34] Mikkonen A, Ylaranta K, Tiirola M, et al. Successful aerobic bioremediation of groundwater contaminated with higher chlorinated phenols by indigenous degrader bacteria [J]. Water Research, 2018, 138:118-128.
[35] Mozaffari M H, Shafiepour E, Mirbagheri S A, et al. Hydraulic characterization and removal of metals and nutrients in an aerated horizontal subsurface flow "racetrack" wetland treating primary- treated oil industry effluent [J]. Water Research, 2021,200:117220.
[36] 王秀璞,张慧,王语萱,等.水生植物-微生物联合去除水体有机污染物的研究进展[J].微生物学通报, 2021,48(12):4918-4931. Wang X P, Zhang H, Wang Y X, et al. Application of aquatic plant-microbe association in removal of organic pollutants in water bodies: a review[J]. Microbiology China, 2021,48(12):4918-4931.
[37] Esplugas S, Giménez J, Contreras S, et al. Comparison of different advanced oxidation processes for phenol degradation [J]. Water Research, 2002,36(4):1034-1042.

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC3201005);国家自然科学基金资助项目(42107303)

PDF(2191 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/