|
|
The pollution characteristics and source apportionment of regional atmospheric fine particles |
CHEN Duo-hong1, LI Mei2, HUANG Bo3, JIANG Bin2, ZHANG Tao1, JIANG Ming1, XIE Min1, ZHONG Liu-ju1, BI Xin-hui4, LV Xiao-ming1, ZHANG Gan4, ZHOU Zhen2 |
1. Guangdong Environmental Monitoring Center, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Air Quality Monitoring, Guangdong Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Secondary Pollution, Guangzhou 510308, China;
2. Institute of Technology on Atmospheric Environmental Safety and Pollution Control, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;
3. HeXin Mass Spectrometry Guangzhou 510530, China;
4. State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China |
|
|
Abstract Single particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SPAMS) was used to analyze the single particle characteristics of aerosols in Heshan, in December 2012. Two typical pollution processes were captured during the sampling period. The fine particles were dominated by elemental carbon (EC), which accounted for 56.8% of total particles. Organic carbon (OC) and heavy metal (HM) accounted for 12.7% and 10.1% of sampled particles, respectively. Different particle types showed different temporal profiles during the two pollution processes, indicating the characteristics of the two processes were different. The source apportionment results showed that the most important PM2.5 sources in this region were vehicle emission and coal combustion, accounting for 24.8% and 22% of PM2.5, respectively. Industry emission and biomass burning were also important, contributing 16.4% and 10.3% to total PM2.5 particles, respectively. During the first pollution process, industry emission was the most important source, and the contribution of coal combustion and secondary inorganic aerosol were found to be increasing with PM2.5 concentration, implying that primary emission as well as enhanced secondary photochemical reaction played important roles in the increasing of PM2.5 concentration. However, vehicle emission was the most important source during the secondary pollution process, and the proportion of each source was stable during the whole pollution process, indicating this process was induced by the accumulation of pollutants under unfavorable meteorological conditions.
|
Received: 24 June 2015
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
唐孝炎,张远航,邵 敏.大气环境化学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006,274.
|
[2] |
孙兆彬,陶 燕,崔甍甍,等.北京地区奥运会期间PM2.5对心脑血管疾病的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(11):3481-3488.
|
[3] |
李友平,刘慧芳,周 洪,等.成都市PM2.5中有毒重金属污染特征及健康风险评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(7):2225-2232.
|
[4] |
Huang X F, Sun T L, Zeng L W, et al. Black carbon aerosol characterization in a coastal city in South China using a single particle soot photometer[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2012,51: 21-28.
|
[5] |
陈仁杰,陈秉衡,阚海东.大气细颗粒物控制对我国城市居民期望寿命的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2014,34(10):2701-2705.
|
[6] |
张衍燊,马国霞,於 万,等.2013年1月灰霾污染事件期间京津冀地区PM2.5污染的人体健康损害评估[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2013,93(34):2707-2710.
|
[7] |
王苏蓉,喻义勇,王勤耕,等.基于PMF模式的南京市大气细颗粒物源解析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(12):3535-3542.
|
[8] |
牟莹莹,楼晟荣,陈长虹,等.利用SPAMS研究上海秋季气溶胶污染过程中颗粒物的老化与混合状态[J]. 环境科学, 2013,34(6): 2071-2080.
|
[9] |
李 磊.单颗粒气溶胶质谱仪的性能表征及应用研究[D]. 上海:上海大学, 2011.
|
[10] |
何俊杰,张国华,王伯光,等.鹤山灰霾期间大气单颗粒气溶胶特征的初步研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2013,33(8):2098-2104.
|
[11] |
Li L, Huang Z, Dong J, et al. Real time bipolar time-of-flight mass spectrometer for analyzing single aerosol particles[J]. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 2011,303(2):118-124.
|
[12] |
李 梅,李 磊,黄正旭,等.运用单颗粒气溶胶质谱技术初步研究广州大气矿尘污染[J]. 环境科学研究, 2011,24(6):632-636.
|
[13] |
Song X H, Hopke P K, Fergenson D P, et al. Classification of single particles analyzed by ATOFMS using an artificial neural network, ART-2a[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1999,71:860-865.
|
[14] |
陈多宏,何俊杰,张国华,等.不同天气类型广东大气超级站细粒子污染特征初步研究[J]. 地球化学, 2014,43(3):217-223.
|
[15] |
Spencer M T, Prather K A. Using ATOFMS to determine OC/EC mass fractions in particles[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2006,40(8):585-594.
|
[16] |
Hudson P K, Murphy D M, Cziczo D J, et al. Biomass-burning particle measurements: Characteristic composition and chemical processing[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 2004,109(D23):2890-2898.
|
[17] |
Schauer J J, Kleeman M J, Cass G R, et al. Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 3. C1-C29organic compounds from fireplace combustion of wood[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2001,35(9):1716-1728.
|
[18] |
Bi X H, Zhang G H, Li L, et al. 2011. Mixing state of biomass burning particles by single particle aerosol mass spectrometer in the urban area of PRD, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011,45(20):3447-3453.
|
[19] |
Bein K J, Zhao Y, Johnston M V, et al. Interactions between boreal wildfire and urban emissions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 2008,113(D7):1829-1836.
|
[20] |
Silva P J, Prather K A. Interpretation of mass spectra from organic compounds in aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2000,72(15):3553-3562.
|
[21] |
Dall'Osto M, Beddows D, Kinnersley R P, et al. Characterization of individual airborne particles by using aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry at Mace Head, Ireland[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 2004, 109(D21).
|
[22] |
Dall'Osto M, Harrison R M. Chemical characterization of single airborne particles in Athens (Greece) by ATOFMS[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2006,40(39):7614-7631.
|
[23] |
Moffet R C, de Foy B, Molina L T, et al. Measurement of ambient aerosols in northern Mexico City by single particle mass spectrometry[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2008,8(16): 4499-4516.
|
[24] |
Zhang X Y, Gong S L, Arimoto R, et al. Characterization and temporal variation of Asian dust aerosol from a site in the northern Chinese deserts[J]. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2003,44(3):241-257.
|
[1] |
JIANG Bin, CHEN Duo-hong, WANG Bo-guang, ZHANG Tao, LI Mei, GAN Ting, ZHOU Yan, ZHONG Liu-ju, BI Xin-hui. Single-particle chemical characterization of aerosols at the Heshan atmospheric supersite during the dry season[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2016, 36(3): 670-678. |
|
|
|
|