|
|
Allocation of carbon emissions right based on the intergenerational equity |
WANG Hui-hui1, LIU Heng-chen1, HE Xiao-jia2, ZENG Wei-hua1 |
1. School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. The Administrative Center for China's Agenda 21, Beijing 100038, China |
|
|
Abstract In this study we used the Gini coefficient optimization model to optimize the allocation of carbon emission quotas in history basing on data of population, GDP and carbon emissions from 132 countries by 1901 to 2005, taking the equity of historical intergenerational and intra-generational into account. We also allocated a equitable distribution of carbon emission permits for various countries in the future. The Gini coefficient value of carbon emission quotas in history were lower than the actual value based on GDP and population from various countries, and were below 0.4 of warning value, and obtained an optimal carbon emission quotas allocation that comprehensively considered the history of various countries' GDP and population. The analysis of carbon emissions remaining quantity and the deficit quantity in history from various countries showed that the United States had the largest historical carbon deficit, India and China had the largest historical carbon remaining quantity. Meanwhile, considering the history of carbon emissions, the future carbon emission permits of various countries showed that China, India and other countries had the largest population, the economic proportion of the world were higher, and thus can get the most carbon emission permits in the future.
|
Received: 02 November 2015
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
彭水军,张文城.国际碳减排合作公平性问题研究 [J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012(1):109-117.
|
[2] |
周 伟,米 红.中国碳排放:国际比较与减排战略 [J]. 资源科学, 2010,32(8):1570-1577.
|
[3] |
Heil M T, Wodon Q T. Inequality in CO2Emissions Between Poor and Rich Countries [J]. Journal of Environment & Development, 1997,6(4):426-452.
|
[4] |
Heil M T, Wodon Q T. Future Inequality in CO2Emissions and the Impact of Abatement Proposals [J]. Environmental & Resource Economics, 2000,17(2):163-181.
|
[5] |
Hedenus F, Azar C. Estimates of trends in global income and resource inequalities [J]. Ecological Economics, 2005,55(3):351-364.
|
[6] |
Duro J A, Padilla E. International inequalities in per capita CO2emissions: A decomposition methodology by Kaya factors [J]. Energy Economics, 2006,28(2):170-187.
|
[7] |
Groot L. Carbon Lorenz curves [J]. Resource & Energy Economics, 2010,32(1):45-64.
|
[8] |
Golombek R, Kittelsen S A C, Rosendahl K E. Price and welfare effects of emission quota allocation [J]. Energy Economics, 2013, 36(3):568-580.
|
[9] |
Paloheimo E, Salmi O. Evaluating the carbon emissions of the low carbon city: A novel approach for consumer based allocation [J]. Cities, 2013,30(30):233-239.
|
[10] |
Chin A T H, Zhang P. Carbon emission allocation methods for the aviation sector [J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2013,28(5):70-76.
|
[11] |
陈文颖,吴宗鑫,何建坤.全球未来碳排放权""两个趋同""的分配方法 [J]. 清华大学学报:自然科学版, 2005,45(6):850-853.
|
[12] |
何建坤.气候变化国家评估报告(第三部分) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007:273-274.
|
[13] |
何建坤,陈文颖,滕 飞,等.全球长期减排目标与碳排放权分配原则 [J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2009,5(6):362-368.
|
[14] |
丁仲礼,段晓男,葛全胜,等.2050年大气CO2浓度控制:各国排放权计算 [J]. 中国科学D辑(地球科学), 2009,39(8):1009-1027.
|
[15] |
潘家华.满足基本需求的碳预算及其国际公平与可持续含义 [J]. 世界经济与政治, 2008,(1):35-42.
|
[16] |
国务院发展研究中心课题组,刘世锦,张永生.全球温室气体减排:理论框架和解决方案 [J]. 经济研究, 2009,(3):4-13.
|
[17] |
王文军,庄贵阳.碳排放权分配与国际气候谈判中的气候公平诉求 [J]. 外交评论:外交学院学报, 2012,29(1):72-84.
|
[18] |
Torvanger A,Godal O. A Survey of Differentiation Methods for National Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets [R]. CICERO Report, 1999.
|
[19] |
陈文颖,吴宗鑫.气候变化的历史责任与碳排放限额分配 [J]. 中国环境科学, 1998,18(6):481-485.
|
[20] |
何建坤,刘 滨.作为温室气体排放衡量指标的碳排放强度分析 [J]. 清华大学学报:自然科学版, 2004,44(6):740-743.
|
[21] |
陈文颖.关于温室气体限排目标的确定:巴西提案 [J]. 上海环境科学, 1999,18(1):5-7.
|
[22] |
潘家华,陈 迎.碳预算方案:一个公平、可持续的国际气候制度框架 [J]. 中国社会科学, 2009,(5):83-98.
|
[23] |
Bohm P, Larsen B. Fairness in a tradeable-permit treaty for carbon emissions reductions in Europe and the former Soviet Union [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1994,4(3): 219-239.
|
[24] |
Kverndokk S. Tradeable CO2Emission Permits: Initial Distribution as a Justice Problem [J]. Environmental Values, 1992,4(2):129-148.
|
[25] |
潘家华,郑 艳.基于人际公平的碳排放概念及其理论含义 [J]. 世界经济与政治, 2009(10):6-16.
|
[26] |
Baer P. The greenhouse development rights framework for global burden sharing: reflection on principles and prospects [J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2013,4(1):61-71.
|
[27] |
徐玉高,郭 元,吴宗鑫.碳权分配:全球碳排放权交易及参与激励 [J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 1997(3):72-77.
|
[28] |
赵 雪,钟定胜,俞俏翠.基尼系数法在全球碳排放权分配中的应用研究 [J]. 环境科学与技术, 2015,01(38):195-204.
|
[29] |
樊 纲,苏 铭,曹 静.最终消费与碳减排责任的经济学分析 [J]. 经济研究, 2010,(1):4-14.
|
[30] |
Population Statistics [EB/OL]. http: //www.populstat.info.
|
[31] |
GGDC. Historical Statistics of the World Economy: 1-2006AD [EB/OL]. www.ggdc.net/.
|
[32] |
CDIAC. Global, Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions [EB/OL]. http://cdiac.ornl.gov.
|
[33] |
吴悦颖,李云生,刘伟江.基于公平性的水污染物总量分配评估方法研究 [J]. 环境科学研究, 2006,19(2):66-70.
|
[34] |
.孟祥明,张宏伟,孙 韬,等.基尼系数法在水污染总量分配中的应用 [J]. 中国给水排水, 2008,24(23):105-108.
|
[35] |
张有贤,李炳红,荀彦平.西部地区SO2总量控制指标分配合理性研究 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2009,23(6):44-47.
|
[36] |
肖伟华,秦大庸,李 玮,等.基于基尼系数的湖泊流域分区水污染物总量分配 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2009,29(8):1765-1771.
|
[37] |
钱 骏,肖 杰,蒋 厦.四川省水污染物总量分配测算研究 [J]. 西华大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,06:16-18+121.
|
[38] |
王金南,逯元堂,周劲松,等.基于GDP的中国资源环境基尼系数分析 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2006,26(1):111-115.
|
[39] |
刘恒辰.兼顾代际与代内公平的碳排放权分配研究 [D]. 北京:北京师范大学, 2012.
|
[40] |
邱俊永,钟定胜,俞俏翠,等.基于基尼系数法的全球CO2排放公平性分析 [J]. 中国软科学, 2011(4):14-21.
|
[41] |
董战峰.国家水污染物排放总量分配方法研究 [D]. 南京:南京大学, 2010.
|
[42] |
徐万坪.基尼系数的算法 [J]. 统计与决策, 2004(9):121-122.
|
[43] |
王丽琼.基于公平性的水污染物总量分配基尼系数分析 [J]. 生态环境, 2008,17(5):1796-1801.
|
[44] |
宋德勇,刘习平.中国省际碳排放空间分配研究 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013,23(5):7-13.
|
[45] |
滕 飞,何建坤,潘勋章,等.碳公平的测度:基于人均历史累计排放的碳基尼系数 [J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2010,6:449-455.
|
[46] |
苏利阳,王 毅,汝醒君,等.面向碳排放权分配的衡量指标的公正性评价 [J]. 生态环境学报, 2009,4:1594-1598.
|
[1] |
. [J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 1997, 17(1): 0-0. |
|
|
|
|