|
|
Compositions of hydrogen and oxygen isotope values of Yellow River water and the response to climate change |
FAN Bai-ling1,2, ZHANG Dong3, TAO Zheng-hua4, ZHAO Zhi-qi2 |
1. Guizhou Minzu University, Guiyang 550025, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, China Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550002, China;
3. Institute of Resources & Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China;
4. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, China Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101 |
|
|
Abstract To better understand the source changes and the response of river water to climate change, waters in mainstream and tributaries in Yellow River Basin were sampled from July to August 2012, and temporal and spatial variations of hydrogen and oxygen isotope values in water samples were analyzed. The results showed that (1) Excluding source water, the values for hydrogen, oxygen isotope, and d excess in mainstream waters in Yellow River ranged from-97.2‰ to-62.9‰ with mean value of-72.2‰, and from-13.0‰ to-8.7‰ with mean value of-9.9‰, and from 4.1‰ to 11.0‰ with mean value of 7.0‰, respectively. For tributary water, the values for hydrogen and oxygen isotope varied from-103.8‰ to-30.5‰ with mean value of-68.9‰ and from-13.7‰ to-1.5‰ with mean value of-9.2‰, respectively, and the d excess varied between-18.5‰ and 13.2‰ with mean value of 4.5‰; (2) The hydrogen and oxygen isotope values in water from the upper-stream of Lanzhou station and middle-stream of Yellow river were more negative than those of water from upper-stream between Lanzhou station and Toudaoguai station and the low-stream, while the d excess values decreased gradually along the flow path; (3) The Na+/Cl- molar ratios varied from 0.94 to 3.02. The mean value of Na+/Cl- molar ratio was 1.02 in source water, and 1.58 in mainstream water above Lanzhou station, and 1.30 in mainstream water between Lanzhou station and Toudaoguai station, and 1.79 in middle-stream water and 1.41 in low-stream water. The negative correlation between Na+/Cl- molar ratio and oxygen isotope values of river water indicated that the Yellow River waters were mainly controlled by atmospheric deposition, groundwater recharge and evaporation; (4) Compared with results of previous studies, it was found that since 2000, the annual water flux of Yellow River increased gradually, the second-evaporation effect on the upper-stream river water decreased, and the evaporation effect on middle and low stream water also decreased, indicating that the climate in Yellow River Basin was becoming less dry.
|
Received: 27 September 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
丁悌平,高建飞,石国钰,等.长江水氢、氧同位素组成的时空变化及其环境意义 [J]. 地质学报, 2013,87(5):661-676.
|
[2] |
李亚举,张明军,王圣杰,等.我国大气降水中稳定同位素研究进展 [J]. 冰川冻土, 2011,33(3):624-633.
|
[3] |
章新平,刘晶淼,田立德,等.亚洲降水中δ18O沿不同水汽输送路径的变化 [J]. 地理学报, 2004,59(5):699-708.
|
[4] |
Craig H. Isotopic variations in meteoric waters [J]. Science, 1961,133(3465):1702-1703.
|
[5] |
陈粉丽,张明军,马 潜,等.兰州及其周边区域大气降水δ18O特征及其水汽来源 [J]. 环境科学, 2013,34(10):3755-3763.
|
[6] |
余武生,马耀明,孙维贞,等.青藏高原西部降水中δ18O变化特征及其气候意义 [J]. 科学通报, 2009,54(15):2131-2139.
|
[7] |
Hoefs J. Stable isotope geochemistry [M]. Springer-Verlag, 1980:102-107.
|
[8] |
Allison G B. The relationship between 18O and deuterium in water in sand columns undergoing evaporation [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1982,55:163-169.
|
[9] |
苏小四,林学钰,廖资生,等.黄河水δ18O、δD和3H的沿程变化特征及其影响因素研究 [J]. 地球化学, 2003,32(4):349-357.
|
[10] |
王文科,孔金玲,段 磊,等.黄河流域河水与地下水转化关系研究 [J]. 中国科学E辑:技术科学, 2004,34(S1):23-33.
|
[11] |
陈静生,王飞越,何大伟.黄河水质地球化学 [J]. 地学前缘, 2006,13(1):58-73.
|
[12] |
李春晖,郑小康,杨志峰,等.黄河天然径流量变化趋势及其影响分析 [J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2009,45(1):80-85.
|
[13] |
穆兴民,李 靖,王 飞,等.黄河天然径流量年际变化过程分析 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2003,17(2):1-5.
|
[14] |
苏小四,吴晓芳,林学钰,等.黄河水主要化学组分与δ13C的沿程变化特征 [J]. 人民黄河, 2006,28(5):29-31,80.
|
[15] |
高建飞,丁悌平,罗续荣,等.黄河水氢、氧同位素组成的空间变化特征及其环境意义 [J]. 地质学报, 2011,85(4):596-602.
|
[16] |
苏小四,林学钰.包头平原地下水水循环模式及其可更新能力的同位素研究 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2003,33(4):503-508,529.
|
[17] |
汪敬忠,吴敬禄,曾海鳌,等.内蒙古河套平原水体同位素及水化学特征 [J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2013,35(4):104-112.
|
[18] |
高 晶,郝爱兵,魏亚杰,等.河套平原中东部地下水的环境同位素特征分析 [J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2009,36(3):55-58.
|
[19] |
王 健,王 亮,张龙军.地下水灌溉回水对黄河流域化学风化CO2消耗估算的影响 [J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,44(9):89-97.
|
[20] |
Wang L, Hu F, Yin L, et al. Hydrochemical and isotopic study of groundwater in the Yinchuan plain, China [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013,69(6):2037-2057.
|
[21] |
曹金亮,韩 颖,袁新华,等.天桥泉域岩溶水系统水动力场、水化学场特征分析 [J]. 中国岩溶, 2005,24(4):312-317.
|
[22] |
韩 颖.晋陕蒙接壤地区岩溶地下水与黄河水环境同位素特征分析 [J]. 中国岩溶, 2002,21(4):52-58.
|
[23] |
林良俊,王金生.晋陕峡谷地区岩溶地下水的同位素及水化学分析 [J]. 工程勘察, 2004,(4):27-30.
|
[24] |
林良俊,王金生,林学钰.晋陕峡谷地区北段岩溶地下水流特征分析 [J]. 地球学报, 2004,25(6):665-670.
|
[25] |
张江华,梁永平,王维泰,等.硫同位素技术在北方岩溶水资源调查中的应用实例 [J]. 中国岩溶, 2009,28(3):235-241.
|
[26] |
臧红飞,贾振兴,郑秀清,等.柳林泉域岩溶水水化学及碳硫同位素特征 [J]. 水电能源科学, 2013,31(12):28-32.
|
[27] |
Fan B L, Zhao Z Q, Tao F X, et al. Characteristics of carbonate, evaporite and silicate weathering in Huanghe River basin: A comparison among the upstream, midstream and downstream [J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014,96:17-26.
|
[28] |
张 东,刘丛强,汪福顺,等.农业活动干扰下地下水无机碳循环过程研究 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(11):3359-3370.
|
[29] |
李孝廉,郝俊卿,王雁林.黄河流域三水转化关系及其模式探讨 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2010,33(4):607-614.
|
[30] |
Yao Z, Liu J, Huang H, et al. Characteristics of isotope in precipitation, river water and lake water in the Manasarovar basin of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Environmental Geology, 2009,57(3): 551-556.
|
[31] |
Cui B L, Li, X Y. Stable isotopes reveal sources of precipitation in the Qinghai Lake Basin of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau [J]. Science of Total Environment, 2015,527-528:26-37.
|
[32] |
李小飞,张明军,王圣杰,等.黄河流域大气降水氢、氧稳定同位素时空特征及其环境意义 [J]. 地质学报, 2013,87(2):269-277.
|
[33] |
Li F, Pan G, Tang C, et al. Recharge source and hydrogeochemical evolution of shallow groundwater in a complex alluvial fan system, southwest of North China Plain [J]. Environmental Geology, 2007,55(5):1109-1122.
|
[34] |
Froehlich K, Gibson J J, Aggarwal P. Deuterium excess in precipitation and its climatological significance [C]//Study of Environmental Change Using Isotope Techniques. Proc. Intern. Conf. 2001:54-66.
|
|
|
|