|
|
|
| Analysis of industries' environmental pressure and economic benefits based on income principle |
| YU Xiao-hong, ZHAN Xia-yan, LIANG Zi-fen, CHEN Yan |
| Department of Applied Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract While making economic benefits, taking into account sustainable development has become a necessity for promoting the new normal development of the industry. This paper firstly adopted the multi-regional input-output model of Ghosh, and calculated the total carbon emission coefficient and the induction coefficient of the income side of various industries in China in 2009 from the aspect of industry. Then, according to the size of the two coefficients, 34industrial sectors are divided into four categories. The empirical results showed that the first category of industries has better economic driving capacity and has a negative impact on the environment. Class Ⅱ industries need to be promoted integration within the industry to improve energy efficiency. Class Ⅲ industries are welfare industries and should be protected and supported. Class IV industries with a high coefficient of induction and a low full-return-side carbon emission coefficient, both industry-friendly and economical benefit, satisfy the inherent requirements of the current supply-side of internal need of structural reform and need encouragement and development.
|
|
Received: 11 February 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
Wyckoff A W, Roop J M. The embodiment of carbon in imports of manufactured products:Implications for international agreements on greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Energy Policy, 1994,22(3):187-194.
|
| [2] |
Babiker M H, Reilly J M, Jacoby H D, et al. The evolution of a climate regime:Kyoto to Marrakech[J]. Mit Joint Program on the Science & Policy of Global Change, 2002,28(8):525-536.
|
| [3] |
Marques A, Rodrigues J, Domingos T. International trade and the geographical separation between income and enabled carbon emissions[J]. Ecological Economics, 2013,89:162-169.
|
| [4] |
Marques A, Rodrigues J, Lenzen M, et al. Income-based environmental responsibility[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012,84(2):57-65.
|
| [5] |
Proops J L R, Atkinson G, Schlotheim B F, et al. International trade and the sustainability footprint:A practical criterion for its assessment[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,28(1):75-97.
|
| [6] |
Ferng J J. Allocating the responsibility of CO2 over-emissions from the perspectives of benefit principle and ecological deficit[J]. Ecological Economics, 2003,46(1):121-141.
|
| [7] |
余晓泓,詹夏颜.全球碳排放责任划分原则研究述评[J]. 科技和产业, 2016,16(5):137-143.
|
| [8] |
闫云凤,赵忠秀.中国对外贸易隐含碳的测度研究——基于碳排放责任界定的视角[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2012,1(3):131-142.
|
| [9] |
刘轶芳,蒋雪梅,祖垒.低碳约束下我国贸易结构的合理性研究[J]. 管理评论, 2010,22(6):106-113.
|
| [10] |
Zhang Y. Provincial responsibility for carbon emissions in China under different principles[J]. Energy Policy, 2015,86:142-153.
|
| [11] |
张友国.经济发展方式变化对中国碳排放强度的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2010,45(4):120-133.
|
| [12] |
籍艳丽,郜元兴.二氧化碳排放强度的实证研究[J]. 统计研究, 2011,28(7):37-44.
|
| [13] |
雷厉,仲云云,袁晓玲.中国区域碳排放的因素分解模型及实证分析[J]. 当代经济科学, 2011,33(5):59-65.
|
| [14] |
鲁万波,仇婷婷,杜磊.中国不同经济增长阶段碳排放影响因素研究[J]. 经济研究, 2013,48(4):106-118.
|
| [15] |
肖皓,杨佳衡,蒋雪梅.最终需求的完全碳排放强度变动及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014,24(10):48-56.
|
| [16] |
肖皓,杨佳衡,乔晗.需求侧全球碳排放强度的度量及分解[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015,35(7):1646-1656.
|
| [17] |
Lenzen M, Murray J. Conceptualising environmental responsibility[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,70(2):261-270.
|
| [18] |
彭水军,张文城,卫瑞.碳排放的国家责任核算方案[J]. 经济研究, 2016,51(3):137-150.
|
| [19] |
赵素萍,林玲,葛明.中国产业间关联程度及经济距离分析[J]. 产经评论, 2014,16(5):27-37.
|
| [20] |
刘起运.关于投入产出系数结构分析方法的研究[J]. 统计研究, 2002,10(2):40-42.
|
| [21] |
中国投入产出学会课题组.我国能源部门产业关联分析——2002年投入产出表系列分析报告之六[J]. 统计研究, 2007,24(5):3-6.
|
| [22] |
林甦,任泽平,曲晓燕.我国房地产业及建筑业、金融保险业的产业地位研究——基于影响力系数和感应度系数改进式的实证研究[J]. 金融与经济, 2009,10(10):28-32.
|
|
|
|
