左右岸跨界水污染治理演化博弈与政策路径研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1691 KB) HTML (0 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The contradictions between upstream and downstream have been primarily focused on things other than the "tragedy of the commons" on the left and right banks when referring to the problem of transboundary water pollution in river basins. The tripartite evolutionary game model between the left bank, the right bank, and the government of the river basin was constructed to analyze the strategic choices of all parties and the difference of the evolution pattern under the reward and punishment mechanism, the compensation mechanism and the combined mechanism. Coupled with the simulation experiment, the policy strategy to promote collaborative governance of the left and right banks is presented. It was the key to achieve the standardized discharge on the left and right banks through the explicit gains of the standard discharge and the unequivocal loss of excessive discharge. The government of the river basin favored a single mechanism regarding the reward and punishment mechanism or the compensation mechanism other than the combined mechanism. The reward and punishment mechanism displayed its necessity in different policy combinations. The compensation mechanism was a positive step in catalyzing the convergence rate of standard discharge decisions and reducing the convergence rate of excessive discharge decisions. Firstly, the policy strategy referred to the "stepped penalty policy" that should be implemented, including increasing the fines for severe violations. The rewards and penalties should be subsequently increased in turn to enhance the reward and punishment mechanism, or the reward and the compensation between left and right banks should be increased in turn to promote the compensation mechanism. The quantitative expression of the above quota was concluded as well.

Key words： left and right banks boundary rivers transboundary water pollution tripartite game numerical simulation

Received: 13 March 2021

PACS:

X522

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Zhi
	NIU Gui-min
	LAN Zi-rui

Cite this article:

YANG Zhi,NIU Gui-min,LAN Zi-rui. Policy strategy of transboundary water pollution control in boundary rivers based on the evolutionary game[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2021, 41(11): 5446-5456.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2021/V41/I11/5446

[1]	Li H Q, Guo G L. A differential game analysis of multipollutant transboundary pollution in river basin[J]. Physica A, 2019,535(12):122484.
[2]	水利部海河水利委员会.海河流域省界水体水环境质量状况通报[EB/OL]. http://www.hwcc.gov.cn/wwgj/xxgb/.2011-2018. Haihe River Water Conservancy Commission, MWR. Report on water environment quality of provincial boundary in Haihe River Basin[EB/OL]. http://www.hwcc.gov.cn/wwgj/xxgb/.2011-2018.
[3]	贾腾飞.漳河省际边界河流区水资源分配与公平性研究[D]. 河北:河北工程大学, 2019.Jia T F. Study on water resources allocation and equity of the Zhang Transboundary River[D]. Hebei:Hebei University of Engineering, 2019.
[4]	高旭阔,席子云.组合措施下政府与企业排污行为演化博弈[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(12):5484-5492.Gao X K, Xi Z Y. Evolutionary game of government and enterprise pollution discharge behavior under combined measures[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(12):5484-5492.
[5]	李雪,曹芳芳,陈先春,等.敏感区域目标污染物空间溯源分析——以新安江流域跨省界断面为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013,33(9):1714-1720.Li X, Cao F F, Chen X C, et al. Spatial source apportionment analysis of target pollutant for sensitive area-A case study in Xin'anjiang River Basin for interprovincial assessment section[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013,33(9):1714-1720.
[6]	穆贵玲,汪义杰,李丽,等.水源地生态补偿标准动态测算模型及其应用[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(7):2658-2664.Mu G L, Wang Y J, Li L, et al. Development and application of the dynamic calculation model for proposing a water source eco-compensation standard[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018, 38(7):2658-2664.
[7]	陈艳萍,程亚雄.水环境严重破坏流域的生态补偿策略研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,(1):121-128,162.Chen Y P, Cheng Y X. The eco-Compensation tactics of basin with seriously disrupted water environment[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agri-cultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2018,(1):121-128,162.
[8]	许君雨,康峤,段海燕,等.左右岸省界缓冲区水质达标评价方法研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2014,(11):64-67.Xu Y J, Kang Q, Duan H Y, et al. Study on water quality assessment method of left and right provincial boundary buffering area[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2014,(11):64-67.
[9]	郑苏平,黄立春,何佳颖.浙南县域间横向生态补偿机制研究——以鳌江流域为例[J]. 环境与发展, 2020,32(8):4-6.Zheng S P, Huang L C, He J Y. Study on the horizontal ecological compensation scheme between southern Zhejiang counties-Take Aojiang river basin as an example[J]. Environment and Development, 2020,32(8):4-6.
[10]	Seidakhmetov M, Alzhanova A, Baineeva P, et al. Mechanism of trans boundary water resources management for central Asia countries[J]. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014,143:604-609.
[11]	Wang X, Zhang Y, Zeng Y, et al. Resolving trans-jurisdictional water conflicts by the Nash bargaining method:a case study in Zhangweinan Canal Basin in north China[J]. Water Resour Manage, 2013,27:1235-1247.
[12]	范虹,牛文娟,牛富.基于行为地理的跨界水资源冲突研究[J]. 现代电子技术, 2014,37(10):15-19,23.Fan H, Niu W J, Niu F. Study on trans-boundary water resource conflict based on behavioral geography[J]. Modern Electronics Technique, 2014,37(10):15-19,23.
[13]	孙冬营,王慧敏,牛文娟.基于图模型的流域跨界水污染冲突研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013,22(4):455-461.Sun D Y, Wang H M, Niu W J. Research on transboundary water pollution conflicts in basin based on graph model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2013,22(4):455-461.
[14]	Jiang K, Merrill R, You D M, et al. Optimal control for transboundary pollution under ecological compensation:A stochastic differential game approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,241(12):118391.
[15]	Javier D F, Guiomar M H. Spatial vs. non-spatial transboundary pollution control in a class of cooperative and non-cooperative dynamic games[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 276(1):379-394.
[16]	Yaqoob A. Shared river basins in disputed territories:A case study of Indus and Brahmaputra. World Water Policy, 2019,5(1):36-42.
[17]	Hou D, Sun P, Yang G. Sharing the costs of cleanup polluted river:Upstream compensation method[J]. Economics Letters, 2020,195(10):109473.
[18]	Laan G V D, Moes N. Collective decision making in an international river pollution model[J]. Natural Resource Modeling, 2016,29(3):374-399.
[19]	徐松鹤,韩传峰.基于微分博弈的流域生态补偿机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019,(8):199-207.Xu S H, Han C F. Study on basin ecological compensation mechanism based on differential game theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019,(8):199-207.
[20]	Herzog L M, Ingold K. Threats to common-pool resources and the importance of forums:On the emergence of cooperation in CPR problem settings[J]. Policy Studies Journal, 2019,47(1):77-113.
[21]	杨梦杰,杨凯,李根,等.博弈视角下跨界河流水资源保护协作机制——以太湖流域太浦河为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019,(6):1232-1244.Yang M J, Yang K, Li G, et al. The cooperation mechanism of water resources protection in trans-boundary river based on game theory:A case study of the Taipu River in the Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,(6):1232-1244.
[22]	Qin T B, Gu J. Payments for ecosystem services in transboundary water allocation cases:An approach for China and its neighbours[J]. Reciel, 2020,29(3):417-429.
[23]	王红梅,谢永乐,孙静.不同情境下京津冀大气污染治理的"行动"博弈与协同因素研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019,29(8):20-30.Wang H M, Xie Y L, Sun J. Study on the ‘action’ game and synergy factors of air pollution control in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei under different situations[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019,29(8):20-30.
[24]	柏明国,史竹生,何志.长江三角洲地区雾霾协同治理仿真研究[J]. 系统科学学报, 2020,28(2):58-63.Bai M G, Shi Z S, He Z. Simulation research on collaborative governance haze in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of Systems Science, 2020,28(2):58-63.
[25]	聂丽,张宝林.大气污染府际合作治理演化博弈分析[J]. 管理学刊, 2019,32(6):18-27.Nie L, Zhang B L. An analysis of inter-government cooperative governance of air pollution based on the evolutionary game theory[J]. Journal of Management, 2019,32(6):18-27.
[26]	Bertinelli L, Marchiori L, Tabakovic A, et al. The impact of unilateral commitment on transboundary pollution[J]. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2018,23:25-37.
[27]	Benchekrouna H, Martin H G. The impact of foresight in a transboundary pollution game[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016,251(1):300-309.
[28]	周迪,刘奕淳.中国碳交易试点政策对城市碳排放绩效的影响及机制[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(1):453-464.Zhou D, Liu Y C. Impact of China's carbon emission trading policy on the performance of urban carbon emission and its mechanism[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(1):453-464.
[29]	Yu Y, Tang P, Zhao J, et al. Evolutionary cooperation in transboundary river basins. Water Resources Research, 2019,55(10):9977-9994.
[30]	高旭阔,严梦婷.基于三方博弈的再生水回用市场演化路径分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(12):5361-5367.Gao X K, Yan M T. Evolution path of reclaimed water reuse based on three-party game[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(12):5361-5367.
[31]	Friedman D. Evolutionary games in economics[J]. Econometrica, 1991,59(3):637-666.
[32]	魏琦,李林静.碳市场发电企业违约分级累进处罚机制研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(2):919-928.Wei Q, Li L J. Research on graded and progressive punishment mechanism for power generation enterprises in carbon market[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(2):919-928.
[33]	李芳,吴凤平,陈柳鑫,等.非对称性视角下跨境水资源冲突与合作的鹰鸽博弈模型[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020,30(5):157-166.Li F, Wu F P, Chen L X, et al. Research on graded and progressive punishment mechanism for power generation enterprises in carbon market[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(5):157-166.