基于UMT模型的幸福河绩效评价及障碍因子诊断

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (746 KB) HTML (0 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory, a Happy River evaluation index system involving six levels: healthy river, safe river, enriching people's river, harmonious river, cultural river and livable river was established. Combined with unascertained measurement model and obstacle diagnosis model, Gansu section, Ningxia section and Inner Mongolia section of Yellow River were taken as examples to analyze the construction performance of Happy River from 2015 to 2019 and diagnose the obstacle factors hindering its construction. The Happy River grade index of Gansu province increased from grade IV (unhappy) in 2015to grade II (happy) and the performance index increased from 2.565 in 2015 to 3.471 in 2019. The hierarchy obstacle degree of safe river presented an increasing trend with annual growth rate of 10.94%, while other hierarchy obstacle degrees showed a decreasing trend. Therefore, increasing vegetation coverage rate and soil erosion control ratio should be focused on in the future’s construction. The Happy River grade index of Ningxia region increased from grade III (general) in 2015 to grade II (happiness) and the performance index increased from 2.558 in 2015 to 3.302 in 2019. The hierarchy obstacle degrees of healthy river, livable river and safe river showed an increasing trend with an annual growth rate of 7.29%, 3.60% and 1.98%, respectively. The mean hierarchy obstacle degree of livable river reached 26.870%, which was the biggest obstacle factor restricting the construction of Happy River in Ningxia. As a result, increasing per capita water resources and reducing water consumption of ten thousand yuan of GDP should be focused on in the future’s construction. The Happy River grade index of Inner Mongolia section increased from grade III (general) in 2015to grade II (happiness) and the performance index increased from 2.782in 2015 to 3.387 in 2019. The hierarchy obstacle degrees of livable river, healthy river and safe river showed an increasing trend with the average annual growth rate of 8.93%, 3.91% and 3.71%, respectively. The mean hierarchy obstacle degree of livable river reached 28.90%, which was the biggest obstacle factor restricting the construction of Happy River in Inner Mongolia. Thus, it is necessary to reduce the water consumption of ten thousand yuan of industrial added value and increase the proportion of soil erosion treatment.

Key words： Happy River Maslow's demand theory uncertainty measure obstacle degree Yellow River

Received: 06 August 2021

PACS:

X522

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	JIN Chun-ling
	LI Yan
	GONG Li
	TIAN Jie
	ZHANG Xin

Cite this article:

JIN Chun-ling,LI Yan,GONG Li等. Performance evaluation and obstacle factor diagnosis of Happy River based on UMT[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2022, 42(3): 1466-1476.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2022/V42/I3/1466

[1]	习近平.在黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展座谈会上的讲话[J].中国水利, 2019,(20):1-3. Xi J P. Speech at the symposium on ecological protection and high——quality development of the Yellow River Basin[J]. China Water Resources, 2019,(20):1-3.
[2]	张金良,陈凯,张超,等.基于熵权的黄河流域生态环境演变特征[J].中国环境科学, 2021,41(8):3767-3774. Zhang J L, Chen K, Zhang C, et al. The change characteristics of eco-environment in the Yellow River Basin based on entropy weights[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(8):3767-3774.
[3]	谷树忠.关于建设幸福河湖的若干思考[J].中国水利, 2020,(6):13-14,16. Gu S Z. Thoughts on the building of the happy rivers and lakes[J]. China Water Resources, 2020,(6):13-14,16.
[4]	唐克旺.对"幸福河"概念及评价方法的思考[J].中国水利, 2020,(6):15-16. Tang K W. Thinking on the concept and evaluation method of the"Happy River"[J]. China Water Resources, 2020,(6):15-16.
[5]	陈茂山,王建平,乔根平.关于"幸福河"内涵及评价指标体系的认识与思考[J].水利发展研究, 2020,20(1):3-5. Chen M S, Wang J P, Qiao G P. Understanding and thinking about the connotation of the"Happy River"and the evaluation index system[J]. Water Resources Development Research, 2020,20(1):3-5.
[6]	左其亭,张云,林平.人水和谐评价指标及量化方法研究[J].水利学报, 2008,39(4):440-447. Zuo Q T, Zhang Y, Lin P. Index system and quantification method for human-water harmony[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 39(4):440-447.
[7]	韩宇平,夏帆.基于需求层次论的幸福河评价[J].南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2020,18(4):1-7,38. Han Y P, Xia F. Evaluation of Xingfu river based on demand level theory[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science& Technology, 2020,18(4):01-07,38.
[8]	王子悦,徐慧,黄丹姿,等.基于熵权物元模型的长三角幸福河层次评价[J].水资源保护, 2021,37(4):69-74. Wang Z Y, Xu H, Huang D Z, et al. Hierarchy evaluation of Happy River in the Yangtze River Delta based on entropy weight and matter element model[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2021,37(4):69-74.
[9]	贡力,田洁,靳春玲,等.基于ERG需求模型的幸福河综合评价[J/OL].水资源保护,1-12[2021-12-29]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1356.tv.20210423.1702.002.html. Gong L, Tian J, Jin C L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of Happy River Based on ERG demand model[J/OL]. Water Resources Protection,1-12[2021-12-29].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1356.tv.20210423.1702.002.html.
[10]	Hale A J, Ricotta D N, Freed J A, et al. Comparing 2 adapted Maslow's hierarchy of needs frameworks on physician wellness[J]. The American Journal of Medicine, 2020,133(9):e532-e533.
[11]	侯保灯,高而坤,吴永祥,等.水资源需求层次理论和初步实践[J].水科学进展, 2014,25(6):897-906. Hou B D, Gao E K, Wu Y X, et al. Water resources demand hierarchy theory and preliminary practice[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2014,25(6):897-906.
[12]	SL/Z 738-2016水生态文明城市建设评价导则[S]. SL/Z 738-2016 Evaluation guide of water ecological civilization construction[S].
[13]	SL/T 793-2020河湖健康评估技术导则[S]. SL/T 793-2020 Technical guidelines for river and lake health assessment[S].
[14]	幸福河研究课题组.幸福河内涵要义及指标体系探析[J].中国水利, 2020,(23):1-4. Research group of the happy river. Analysis of the connotation and index system for the Happy River[J]. China Water Resources, 2020,(23):1-4.
[15]	张民强,董良,郑巧西,等.关于浙江省幸福河湖建设总体思路的探讨[J].浙江水利科技, 2021,49(2):1-4. Zhang M Q, Dong L, Zheng Q X, et al. Discussion on general ideas of construction of Happy Rivers and Lakes in Zhejiang Province[J]. Zhejiang Hydrotechnics, 2021,49(2):1-4.
[16]	Rudenko T, Nazarov A, Barraud S, et al. A method for threshold voltage extraction in junctionless MOSFETs using the derivative of transconductance-to-current ratio[J]. Solid-State Electronics, 2020,168:107723.
[17]	陆丽丽,靳春玲,贡力,等.基于改进G2-AEW-UMT模型的引水隧洞结构安全评价[J].水资源与水工程学报, 2020,31(1):172-178. Lu L L, Jin C L, Gong L, et al. Structure safety evaluation of diversion tunnel based on improved G2-anti-entropy weight and unascertained measure theory[J]. Journal of Water Resources& Water Engineering, 2020,31(1):172-178.
[18]	李燕,靳春玲,贡力,等.基于熵理论-可拓云模型的引水隧洞塌方风险评价[J/OL].长江科学院院报:1-10[2021-07-29]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1171.tv.20210611.0929.002.html. Li Y, Jin C L, Gong L, et al. Risk assessment of diversion tunnel collapse based on entropy theory-Extension cloud model[J/OL]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute:1-10[2021-07-29].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1171.tv.20210611.0929.002.html.
[19]	马纪,刘希喆.基于G-2-熵权法的低压配网台区状态特性评估[J].电力自动化设备, 2017,37(1):41-46. Ma J, Liu X Z. Conditional characteristic evaluation based on G2-entropy weight method for low-voltage distribution network[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2017,37(1):41-46.
[20]	Agarwal R, Aggarwal S G. Absorption efficiency assessment and uncertainty measurement of the sodium arsenite method for ambient NO2 determination[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2021,21.
[21]	胡悦,马静,李雪燕,等.京津冀地区生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J].环境污染与防治, 2021,43(2):206-210,236. Hu Y, Ma J, Li X Y, et al. Ecological security evaluation and obstacle factor diagnosis for Beijing-Tian jin-Hebei region.[J]. Environmental Pollution& Control, 2021,43(2):206-210,236.
[22]	钞小静,周文慧.黄河流域高质量发展的现代化治理体系构建[J].经济问题, 2020,(11):1-7. Chao X J, Zhou W H. The Construction of Modernized Management System for High-quality Development of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Economic Problems, 2020,(11):1-7.