复杂DNAPL污染源区溶解相污染通量的升尺度计算

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (0 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The NAPL phase in the Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) contaminated site are dissolved in the flowing groundwater sustainably, thus a downstream contaminant plume is created, and a threat is posed to human health. It is important to accurately estimate the downstream contaminant mass flux from the DNAPL source zone. Due to the geological heterogeneity, the mass flux of dissolved phase is changed periodically. The dual-domain upscaling model developed by Christ et al. was often used to calculate the mass flux, however, it was only applicable to the DNAPL source zone with weak heterogeneity. Many numerical examples were used for complex DNAPL source zones with strong heterogeneity, to modify the empirical formula for deriving the source zone depletion index in the dual-domain model, thus the application scope of the dual-domain upscaling model were extended to strong heterogeneity. The applicability and accuracy of the modified model was validated based on Monte Carlo synthetical cases and two two-dimensional sandbox experiments. The comparison results showed that the modified model could be widely applied to complex DNAPL source zones with different structures. Compared with the previous, the accuracy of the mass flux calculated by the modified model was increased by about 35%.

Key words： DNAPL mass flux GTP source zone depletion upscaled models

Received: 22 September 2021

PACS:

X703.5

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SONG Mei-yu
	SHI Xiao-qing
	MA Chun-long
	KANG Xue-yuan
	DU Fang-zhou

Cite this article:

SONG Mei-yu,SHI Xiao-qing,MA Chun-long等. Upscaling dissolved phase mass flux for complex DNAPL source zones[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2022, 42(5): 2095-2104.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2022/V42/I5/2095

[1]	施小清,姜蓓蕾,吴吉春,等.非均质介质中重非水相污染物运移受泄漏速率影响数值分析 [J]. 水科学进展, 2012,23(3):376-382. SHI X Q, JIANG B L, WU J C, et al. Numerical analysis of the effect of leakage rate on dense non-aqueous phase liquid transport in heterogonous porous media [J]. Advances in Water Science, 2012,23 (3):376-382.
[2]	郑菲,高燕维,孙媛媛,等.污染源区结构特征对Tween 80去除DNAPL效果的影响 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(7):2035-2042. ZHENG F, GAO Y W, SUN Y Y, et al. The influence of source-zone architecture on DNAPL removal by Tween 80 flushing [J]. China Environmental Science, 2016,36(7):2035-2042.
[3]	Kueper B H, Redman D, Starr R C, et al. A field experiment to study the behavior of tetrachloroethylene below the water table: Spatial distribution of residual and pooled DNAPL [J]. Groundwater, 1993, 31(5):756-766.
[4]	Mercer J W, Cohen R M. A review of immiscible fluids in the subsurface: Properties, models, characterization and remediation [J]. Journal of contaminant hydrology, 1990,6(2):107-163.
[5]	王慧婷,徐红霞,郭琼泽,等.饱和多孔介质中DNAPL污染源区结构及质量溶出 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(8):3474-3483. WANG H T, XU H X, GUO Q Z, et al. Dense non-aqueous phase liquid source zone architecture and dissolution in saturated porous media [J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(8):3474-3483.
[6]	Christ J A, Ramsburg C A, Abriola L M, et al. Coupling aggressive mass removal with microbial reductive dechlorination for remediation of DNAPL source zones: a review and assessment [J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2005,113(4):465-477.
[7]	郭琼泽,张烨,姜蓓蕾,等.表面活性剂增强修复地下水中PCE的砂箱实验及模拟 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(9):3398-3405. GUO Q Z, ZHANG Y, JIANG B L, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation in PCE contaminated laboratory sandbox [J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(9):3398-3405.
[8]	Lemke L D, Abriola L M, Goovaerts P. Dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source zone characterization: Influence of hydraulic property correlation on predictions of DNAPL infiltration and entrapment [J]. Water Resources Research, 2004,40(1):198-213.
[9]	Gehlhaus III M W, Gift J S, Hogan K A, et al. Approaches to cancer assessment in EPA's Integrated Risk Information System [J]. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2011,254(2):170-180.
[10]	Koch J, Nowak W. Predicting DNAPL mass discharge and contaminated site longevity probabilities: Conceptual model and high-resolution stochastic simulation [J]. Water Resources Research, 2015,51(2):806-831.
[11]	边淑贞.氯代烃污染地下水中重质非水相液体通量估算研究 [D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2015. BIAN S Z. Research on contaminant mass flux of dense non- aqueous phase liquids in chlorinated hydrocarbon contaminated site [D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2015.
[12]	Integrated DNAPL Site Strategy Team. Use and measurement of mass flux and mass discharge [J]. The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2014,2010:154.
[13]	Einarson M D, Mackay D M. Peer Reviewed: Predicting Impacts of Groundwater Contamination [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2001,35(3):66A-73A.
[14]	Soga K, Page J W E, Illangasekare T H. A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004,110(1-3):13-27.
[15]	Zhang Z, Brusseau M L. Nonideal transport of reactive solutes in heterogeneous porous media: 5. Simulating regional-scale behavior of a trichloroethene plume during pump‐and‐treat remediation [J]. Water Resources Research, 1999,35(10):2921-2935.
[16]	Karaoglu A G, Copty N K, Akyol N H, et al. Experiments and sensitivity coefficients analysis for multiphase flow model calibration of enhanced DNAPL dissolution [J]. Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2019,225:103515.
[17]	郭芷琳,马瑞,张勇,等.地下水污染物在高度非均质介质中的迁移过程:机理与数值模拟综述 [J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2021,51(11): 1817-1836. Guo Z L, Ma R, Zhang Y, et al. Contaminant transport in heterogeneous aquifers: A critical review of mechanisms and numerical methods of non-Fickian dispersion [J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2021,51(11):1817-1836.
[18]	Zhu J, Sykes J F. Simple screening models of NAPL dissolution in the subsurface [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2004,72(1-4): 245-258.
[19]	Falta R W, Rao P S, Basu N. Assessing the impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: I. Analytical modeling of source strength functions and plume response [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2005,78(4):259-280.
[20]	Falta R W, Basu N, Rao P S. Assessing impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: II. Coupling source strength functions to plume evolution [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2005,79(1/2):45-66.
[21]	Parker J C, Park E. Modeling field‐scale dense nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution kinetics in heterogeneous aquifers [J]. Water Resources Research, 2004,40(5):147-158.
[22]	Christ J A, Ramsburg C A, Pennell K D, et al. Estimating mass discharge from dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zones using upscaled mass transfer coefficients: An evaluation using multiphase numerical simulations [J]. Water Resources Research, 2006,42(11): 48-60.
[23]	Saenton S, Illangasekare T H. Upscaling of mass transfer rate coefficient for the numerical simulation of dense nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution in heterogeneous aquifers [J]. Water Resources Research, 2007,43(2):6-20.
[24]	Kokkinaki A, Werth C J, Sleep B E. Comparison of upscaled models for multistage mass discharge from DNAPL source zones [J]. Water Resources Research, 2014,50(4):3187-3205.
[25]	Agaoglu B, Scheytt T, Copty N K. Impact of NAPL architecture on interphase mass transfer: A pore network study [J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2016,95:138-151.
[26]	Trulli E, Morosini C, Rada E C, et al. Remediation in situ of hydrocarbons by combined treatment in a contaminated alluvial soil due to an accidental spill of LNAPL [J]. Sustainability, 2016,8(11): 1086.
[27]	Yang M, Annable M D, Jawitz J W. Field-scale forward and back diffusion through low-permeability zones [J]. Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2017,202:47-58.
[28]	Shafieiyoun S, Thomson N R. The role of intra-NAPL diffusion on mass transfer from MGP residuals [J]. Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2018,213:49-61.
[29]	Christ J A, Ramsburg C A, Pennell K D, et al. Predicting DNAPL mass discharge from pool-dominated source zones [J]. Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2010,114(1-4):18-34.
[30]	Guo Z, Russo A E, DiFilippo E L, et al. Mathematical modeling of organic liquid dissolution in heterogeneous source zones [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2020,235:103716.
[31]	DiGiano F A, Weber Jr W J. Sorption kinetics in finite-bath systems [J]. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, 1972,98(6):1021- 1036.
[32]	Guilbeault M A, Parker B L, Cherry J A. Mass and flux distributions from DNAPL zones in sandy aquifers [J]. Groundwater, 2005,43(1): 70-86.
[33]	Park E, Parker J C. Evaluation of an upscaled model for DNAPL dissolution kinetics in heterogeneous aquifers [J]. Advances in water resources, 2005,28(12):1280-1291.
[34]	Brooks R H, Corey A T. Hydraulic properties of porous media and their relation to drainage design [J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1964, 7(1):26-0028.
[35]	Kang X, Kokkinaki A, Kitanidis P K, et al. Improved characterization of DNAPL source zones via sequential hydrogeophysical inversion of hydraulic-head, self-potential and partitioning tracer data [J]. Water Resources Research, 2020,56(8):809-831.
[36]	Koch J, Nowak W. Identification of contaminant source architectures—A statistical inversion that emulates multiphase physics in a computationally practicable manner [J]. Water Resources Research, 2016,52(2):1009-1025.
[37]	DiFilippo E L, Carroll K C, Brusseau M L. Impact of organic-liquid distribution and flow-field heterogeneity on reductions in mass flux [J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2010,115(1-4):14-25.