基于排污量分配的流域生态补偿标准研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (445 KB) HTML (0 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to reflected "difference fairness", we used the information entropy method to build the pollutant allocation index system and allocation model of a basin. Based on the allocation ratio of different areas and the total pollutant allocation in a basin, the quantity of pollutant allocation in different areas within a basin were determined. Taking the Minjiang River Basin as a case study, the ecological compensation standards values of the water environment from 2010 to 2019 were calculated based on the pollutant allocation in different areas of the Minjiang River Basin. The results showed that the actual COD discharges in Fuzhou city were higher 871 to 20857t than the theoretical COD discharges. Except for 2010, the value of COD discharges in Nanping city were lower than the theoretical COD discharges. The COD discharges in Sanming city were lower than the theoretical COD discharges, and the quantity of emission loss ranged from 1479 to 12507t. From 2010 to 2019, the number of ecological compensations in Fuzhou were 1175×10⁴~28139×10⁴ Yuan. Except for 2010, Nanping needed to pay ecological compensation (the compensation value was 821×10⁴ Yuan). In other years, Nanping should receive ecological compensation from other areas with the compensation values ranged from 1253 to 13157×10⁴ Yuan. Sanming should receive a ecological compensation values, ranging from 1996×10⁴ to 16874×10⁴ Yuan.

Key words： pollution discharge pollutant allocation ecological compensation Minjiang River basin

Received: 30 November 2021

PACS:

X32

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	RAO Qing-hua
	LIN Xiu-zhu
	CHEN Fang
	CHEN Wen-hua
	LIN Yun-shan
	ZENG Yu

Cite this article:

RAO Qing-hua,LIN Xiu-zhu,CHEN Fang等. Research on the ecological compensation standard for river basin based on pollutant allocation[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2022, 42(6): 2828-2834.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2022/V42/I6/2828

[1]	董战峰,郝春旭,璩爱玉,等.黄河流域生态补偿机制建设的思路与重点[J].生态经济, 2020,36(2):196-201.Dong Z F, Hao C X, Qu A Y, et al. Orientation and focus on construction of the ecological compensation mechanism in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Ecological Economy, 2020,36(2):196-201.
[2]	刘聪,张宁.新安江流域横向生态补偿的经济效应[J].中国环境科学, 2021,41(4):1940-1948.Liu C, Zhang N. Study on the economic effects of Xin'an river basin horizontal ecological compensation[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(4):1940-1948.
[3]	穆贵玲,汪义杰,李丽,等.水源地生态补偿标准动态测算模型及其应用[J].中国环境科学, 2018,38(7):2658-2664.Mu G L, Wang Y J, Li L, et al. Development and application of the dynamic calculation model for proposing a water source eco-compensation standard[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018, 38(7):2658-2664.
[4]	石晓然,张彩霞,殷克东.中国沿海省市海洋生态补偿效率评价[J].中国环境科学, 2020,40(7):3204-3215.Shi X R, Zhang C X, Yin K D. Evaluation of Marine ecological compensation efficiency in coastal provinces and cities of China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(7):3204-3215.
[5]	Aguilar F X, Obeng E A, Cai Z. Water quality improvements elicit consistent willingness-to-pay for the enhancement of forested watershed ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,30:158-171.
[6]	潘美晨,宋波.受偿意愿在确定生态补偿标准上下限中的作用[J].中国环境科学, 2021,41(4):1932-1939.Pan M C, Song B. The role of willingness to accept in determining the upper or lower limit of eco-compensation standard[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(4):1932-1939.
[7]	李盼道,黄锐.排污权交易制度中初始排污权的分配模式与方法研究[J].重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2020,34(8):17-28.Li P D, Huang R. On allocation mode and method of initial emission rights in emission trading system[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Social Science), 2020,34(8):17-28.
[8]	徐晓梅,王太山,梁莹,等.基于SWAT模型的大沽河流域排污权交易率体系不确定性估算[J].环境工程, 2022,40(2):177-183.Xu X M, Wang T S, Liang Y, et al. Uncertainty estimation for trading rate system for effluent trading in Dagu River basin based on SWAT model[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2022,40(2):177-183.
[9]	林高松,李适宇,江峰.基于公平区间的污染物允许排放量分配方法[J].水利学报, 2006,37(1):52-57.Lin G S, Li S Y, Jiang F. Allocation method of allowable waste load in river based on the principle of equitable interval[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006,37(1):52-57.
[10]	邱宇,陈英姿,饶清华,等.基于排污权的闽江流域跨界生态补偿研究[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2018,27(12):2839-2847.Qiu Y, Chen Y Z, Rao Q H, et al. Trans-regional eco-compensation research of Minjiang River Basin based on pollution rights[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018,27(12):2839-2847.
[11]	Gert T S, Morten V. How to design greenhouse gas trading in the EU?[J]. Energy Policy, 2003,31(14):1531-1539.
[12]	张兴榆,黄贤金,赵小风,等.水功能区划在流域排污权初始分配中的应用——以沙颖河流域为例[J].生态环境学报, 2009,18(1):116-121.Zhang X Y, Huang X J, Zhao X F, et al. Initial allocation of emission permits based on the water function planning:A case study of Shaying River Basin[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2009,18(1):116-121.
[13]	徐继先,倪吴忠,林阳春.基于排放绩效的浙江省火电行业NOx总量控制研究[J].环境污染与防治, 2017,39(6):696-698.Xu J X, Ni W Z, Lin Y C. Research on NOx total emission control in thermal power industry in Zhejiang Province based on emission performance[J]. Environmental Pollution& Control, 2017,39(6):696-698.
[14]	段海燕,王培博,蔡飞飞,等.省域污染物总量控制指标差异性公平分配与优化算法研究——基于不对称Nash谈判模型[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2018,28(8):56-57.Duan H Y, Wang P B, Cai F F, et al. Difference fairness allocation and the optimization algorithm of the provincial total amount control index of pollutant emissions:based on Nash Negotiation Model[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018,28(8):56-57.
[15]	Zhou Jia, Wang Jinnan, Jiang Hongqiang, et al. A review of development and reform of emission permit system in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019,247:561-569.
[16]	饶清华,林秀珠,邱宇,等.基于机会成本的闽江流域生态补偿标准研究[J].海洋环境科学, 2018,37(5):655-662.Rao Q H, Lin X Z, Qiu Y, et al. Research on ecological compensation standard in Minjiang River basin based on opportunity cost[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2018,37(5):655-662.
[17]	Rao Q H, Qiu Y, Li J B. Water quality assessment and variation trends analysis of the Min River sea-entry section, China[J]. Water, Air,& Soil Pollution, 2019,230:272.
[18]	耿翔燕,葛颜祥.基于水量分配的流域生态补偿研究——以小清河流域为例[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2018,39(4):36-44.Geng X Y, Ge Y X. Study on ecological compensation of watershed based on water distribution:a case study of Xiaoqing River basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018,39(4):36-44.
[19]	饶清华,林秀珠.基于水环境容量的闽江流域跨界生态补偿标准研究[J].中国农村水利水电, 2017,(11):73-77.Rao Q H, Lin X Z. Research on ecological compensation standard for trans-regional in Minjiang River basin based on water environmental capacity[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2017,(11):73-77.
[20]	卢爱桐.江苏省工业COD排放与经济发展关系及影响因素分解研究[D].南京大学, 2018:37-38.Lu A T. An analysis on industrial COD discharge in Jiangsu province based on semi-parametric model and LMDI method[D]. Nanjing University, 2018:37-38.
[21]	庄汝龙,宓科娜,梁龙武.中国工业废水排放格局及其驱动因素[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2018,27(8):1765-1775.Zhuan R L, Mi K N, Liang L W. China's industrial wastewater discharge pattern and its driving factors[J]. Resources and Environment in The Yangtze Basin, 2018,27(8):1765-1775.