厨余垃圾厌氧消化反应器起泡的驱动因子

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1206 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract To investigate the driving factors of foaming in anaerobic digestion (AD) of food waste, overloading, ammonia inhibition, and long-chain fatty acid inhibition were introduced into three semi-continuous anaerobic digesters to induce foaming incidents, during which the responses of process parameters, the variations of digestate' rheological properties, surface properties, foaming potential and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) concentration were explored. The results showed that with the disturbance enhanced, the three digesters all produced foam with a height of 150~300mm. The volatile fatty acids (VFAs), surface activity (SA), foaming potential, surface tension, and viscosity were 1948~5978mg/L, 8.28~30.15, 312.5~350mL, 37.89~41.04mN/m, and 120~183.6mPa×s, respectively, in the three digesters during the initial stage of foaming. These variations suggested that their foaming thresholds were different, and even the variation trends of some parameters were inconsistent with the development trend of the foaming. In contrast, the EPS-related parameters were significantly correlated with the heights of the foam observed in different reactors. The soluble EPS and its protein concentrations, the polysaccharide concentrations of tightly bound EPS, and the polysaccharide concentrations of total EPS were positively correlated with the foam heights in three reactors (P<0.01, R²:0.64~0.81). Also, tightly bound EPS and total EPS concentrations were significantly (P < 0.05) or highly significantly (P < 0.01) related to the foaming heights in three reactors (R²:0.61~0.81). The interaction analysis of those parameters showed that in the overloaded and long-chain fatty acid inhibition reactors, the increased EPS concentrations were attributed to the accumulated VFAs, while in the ammonia inhibition reactor, free ammonia was the main reason for the increase of EPS concentration. Though the internal causes of EPS accumulation in test reactors were different, the increased EPS always significantly increased the viscosity of the digestates, and even reduced their surface tension, which eventually hindered the elimination of biogas from the liquid phase and resulted in foaming incidents. Further research on the EPS elimination technology may be expected to solve the AD foaming in situ with a high efficiency.

Key words： anaerobic digestion food waste foaming EPS driving factors

Received: 04 August 2022

PACS:

X705

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Lei
	ZHANG Zhi
	HUANG Qian
	YANG Ping-jin
	WANG Xiao-ming
	PENG Xu-ya

Cite this article:

LI Lei,ZHANG Zhi,HUANG Qian等. Driving factors of foaming in anaerobic digestion of food waste[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2023, 43(3): 1244-1255.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V43/I3/1244

[1]	史真超,葛恩燕,何品晶,等.基于碳氮平衡模型评价厨余垃圾厌氧消化工程[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022,42(8):3804-3811. Shi Z C, Ge E Y, He P J, et al. Evaluating the operation efficiency of kitchen waste anaerobic digestion with carbon and nitrogen balance model.[J]. Chinese Environmental Science, 2022,42(8):3804-3811.
[2]	Wu D, Li L, Peng Y, et al. State indicators of anaerobic digestion:A critical review on process monitoring and diagnosis[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021,148:111260.
[3]	李蕾,黄茜,杨屏锦,等.有机垃圾厌氧消化泡沫产生机理及控制方法[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(8):3475-3485. Li L, Huang Q, Yang P J, et al. Occurrence mechanisms and control methods of foaming in anaerobic digesters treating organic wastes[J]. Chinese Environmental Science, 2020,40(8):3475-3485.
[4]	黄安寿,何永全,曾祖刚.餐厨垃圾高温厌氧消化过程参数研究[J]. 中国沼气, 2019,37(2):34-39. Huang A S, He Y Q, Zeng Z G. Study on parameters of high temperature anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste[J]. China Biogas, 2019,37(2):36-41.
[5]	林保华,赵海鹏,王洁,等.餐厨垃圾厌氧消化泡沫产生及处理的研究[J]. 广东化工, 2019,46(15):141-142. Lin B H, Zhao H P, Wang J, et al. Study on the generation and treatment of anaerobic digestion foam in kitchen waste[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2019,46(15):141-142.
[6]	Kong X, Liu J G, Yue X P, et al. Fe0inhibits bio-foam generating in anaerobic digestion reactor under conditions of organic shock loading and re-startup[J]. Waste Management, 2019,92:107-114.
[7]	Yang P J, Peng Y, Tan H Y, et al. Foaming mechanisms and control strategies during the anaerobic digestion of organic waste:A critical review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021,779:146531.
[8]	Kougias P G, Boe K, O-Thong S, et al. Anaerobic digestion foaming in full-scale biogas plants:a survey on causes and solutions[J]. Water Sci Technol, 2014,69(4):889-895.
[9]	Ao T J, Yi R, Chen Y C, et al. Effect of viscosity on process stability and microbial community composition during anaerobic mesophilic digestion of Maotai-flavored distiller's grains[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,297:122460.
[10]	El-Sayed S, Saha S, Kurade M B, et al. Recent trends in anaerobic co-digestion:Fat, oil, and grease (FOG) for enhanced biomethanation[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2019,70:22-42.
[11]	Jiang C J, Jon M S, Qi R, et al. Identification of microorganisms responsible for foam formation in mesophilic anaerobic digesters treating surplus activated sludge[J]. Water Research, 2021,191:116779.
[12]	何琴,李蕾,瞿莉,等.餐厨垃圾干式厌氧消化污泥膨胀微生态特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(3):1010-1017. He Q, Li L, Qu L, et al. Microbial characteristics of bulking sludge in high-solids anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste[J]. Chinese Environmental Science, 2018,38(3):1010-1017.
[13]	Kougias P G, De Francisci D, Treu L, et al. Microbial analysis in biogas reactors suffering by foaming incidents[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014,167:24-32.
[14]	Silvia S, Papa G, Adani F. Perspective on the use of humic acids from biomass as natural surfactants for industrial applications[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2011,29(6):913-922.
[15]	张星星,焦彭博,杨汇莹,等.剩余污泥与餐厨垃圾协同厌氧消化研究进展[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022,42(5):2179-2194. Zhang X X, Jiao P B, Yang H Y, et al. Recent advances in anaerobic co-digestion of excess sludge and food waste[J]. Chinese Environmental Science, 2022,42(5):2179-2194.
[16]	国家环境保护总局水与废水监测分析方法编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002. State Environmental Protection Administration. Determination methods for examination of water and wastewater[M]. Beijing:China Environmental Science Press, 2002.
[17]	Zhang H, Yuan W D, Dong Q, et al. Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal the key microbial phylotypes affecting anaerobic digestion performance under ammonia stress[J]. Water Research, 2022,213:118152.
[18]	Peng Y, Pingjin Yang P J, Zhang Y Y, et al. Consecutive batch anaerobic digestion under ammonia stress:Microbial community assembly and process performance[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021,9(5):106061.
[19]	Alfaro N, Cano R, Fdz-Polanco F. Effect of thermal hydrolysis and ultrasounds pretreatments on foaming in anaerobic digesters[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014,170:477-482.
[20]	Wang X T, Yang H, Su Y, et al. Effects of sludge morphology on the anammox process:Analysis from the perspectives of performance, structure, and microbial community[J]. Chemosphere, 2022,288:132390.
[21]	Tang Y F, Dai X H, Bin D, et al. Humification in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) dominates methane release and EPS reconstruction during the sludge stabilization of high-solid anaerobic digestion[J]. Water Research, 2020,175:115685.
[22]	Suhartini S, Sonia H, Yue Z, et al. Antifoam, dilution and trace element addition as foaming control strategies in mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pulp[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2019,145:104812.
[23]	Lienen T, Kleyböcker A, Brehmer M, et al. Floating layer formation, foaming, and microbial community structure change in full-scale biogas plant due to disruption of mixing and substrate overloading[J]. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 2013,3(1):1-14.
[24]	Martins A M P, Pagilla K, Heijnen J J, et al. Filamentous bulking sludge-a critical review[J]. Water Research, 2004,38(4):793-817.
[25]	Tanimu M I, Idaty M G T, Razif H M, et al. Effects of feedstock carbon to nitrogen ratio and organic loading on foaming potential in mesophilic food waste anaerobic digestion[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015,99:4509-4520.
[26]	Li D, Liu S C, Mi L, et al. Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and pig manure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015,187:120-127.
[27]	Vasileios D, Alexandros E, Katerina S, et al. Bioenergy in the era of circular economy:Anaerobic digestion technological solutions to produce biogas from lipid-rich wastes[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 168:438-447.
[28]	张虹,李蕾,彭韵,等.氨氮对餐厨垃圾厌氧消化性能及微生物群落的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(8):3465-3474. Zhang H, Li L, Peng Y, et al. Effects of ammonia on anaerobic digestion of food waste:Process performance and microbial community[J]. Chinese Environmental Science, 2020,40(8):3465-3474.
[29]	何琴.餐厨垃圾厌氧消化起泡及其机理的多尺度研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2017. He Q. Multiscale study on foaming and its mechanism in anaerobic digestion of food waste[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2017.
[30]	Boe K, Kougias P G, Pacheco F, et al. Effect of substrates and intermediate compounds on foaming in manure digestion systems[J]. Water Science and Technology:A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2012,66(10):2146-2154.
[31]	Alexandros E, Vasileios D, Christos M, et al. Comparison of anaerobic digesters performance treating palmitic, stearic and oleic acid:Determination of the LCFA kinetic constants using ADM1[J]. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2020,43(7):1329-1338.
[32]	Lienen T, Kleyböcker A, Verstraete W, et al. Foam formation in a downstream digester of a cascade running full-scale biogas plant:Influence of fat, oil and grease addition and abundance of the filamentous bacterium Microthrix parvicella[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014,153:1-7.
[33]	何琴,李蕾,彭爽,等.餐厨垃圾厌氧消化起泡现象研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(3):1040-1050. He Q, Li L, Peng S, et al. Foaming phenomenon in anaerobic digestion system treating food waste[J]. Chinese Environmental Science, 2017,37(3):1040-1050.
[34]	Kougias P G, Tsapekos P, Boe K, et al. Antifoaming effect of chemical compounds in manure biogas reactors[J]. Water Research, 2013, 47(16):6280-6288.
[35]	Kougias P G, Boe K, Einarsdottir E S, et al. Counteracting foaming caused by lipids or proteins in biogas reactors using rapeseed oil or oleic acid as antifoaming agents[J]. Water Research, 2015,79:119-127.
[36]	秦帅.餐厨垃圾厌氧消化反应器的消泡效果及机理试验研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2021. Qin S. Experimental study on defoaming performance and mechanism in anaerobic digestion of food waste[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2021.
[37]	Moeller L, Herbes C, Müller R, et al. Formation and removal of foam in the process of anaerobic digestion[J]. Landtechnik, 2010,65:204-207.
[38]	Ganidi N, Tyrrel S, Cartmell E. The effect of organic loading rate on foam initiation during mesophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal wastewater sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011,102(12):6637-6643.
[39]	杨敏,胡学伟,宁平,等.废水生物处理中胞外聚合物(EPS)的研究进展[J]. 工业水处理, 2011,31(7):7-12. Yang M, Hu X W, Ning P, et al. Research progress in extracellular polymeric substances applied to biological wastewater treatment[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2011,31(7):7-12.
[40]	Kunacheva C, Soh Y N A, Stuckey D C. Identification of soluble microbial products (SMPs) from the fermentation and methanogenic phases of anaerobic digestion[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,698:134117.
[41]	Laspidou C S, Rittmann B E. A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass[J]. Water Research, 2002,36(11):2711-2720.
[42]	Yu W B, Wang Y L, Wang Y, et al. Enhancing waste activated sludge dewaterability by reducing interaction energy of sludge flocs[J]. Environmental Research, 2021,196:110328.
[43]	Faye M, Sene C A, Zhang K K, et al. Sludge dewaterability:The variation of extracellular polymeric substances during sludge conditioning with two natural organic conditioners[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019,251:109559.
[44]	Dong Y T, Shen Y W, Ge D D, et al. A sodium dichloroisocyanurate-based conditioning process for the improvement of sludge dewaterability and mechanism studies[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021,284:112020.
[45]	Kunacheva C, Stuckey D C. Analytical methods for soluble microbial products (SMP) and extracellular polymers (ECP) in wastewater treatment systems:Areview[J]. Water Research, 2014,61:1-18.
[46]	Di Bella G, Torregrossa M, Viviani G. The role of EPS concentration in MBR foaming:Analysis of a submerged pilot plant[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011,102(2):1628-1635.
[47]	Kamali M, Suhas D P, Costa M E, et al. Sustainability considerations in membrane-based technologies for industrial effluents treatment[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019,368:474-494.
[48]	Lu X Q, Zhen G Y, Estrada A L, et al. Operation performance and granule characterization of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating wastewater with starch as the sole carbon source[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015,180:264-273.
[49]	Musa I T, Tinia I M G, Mohd R H, et al. Effects of feedstock carbon to nitrogen ratio and organic loading on foaming potential in mesophilic food waste anaerobic digestion[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015,99:4509-4520.
[50]	Subramanian B, Pagilla K R. Anaerobic digester foaming in full-scale cylindrical digesters-Effects of organic loading rate, feed characteristics, and mixing[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014,159:182-192