基于局部-全局混合自适应替代模型的地下水污染源反演识别

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (979 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract A local-global hybrid adaptive surrogate model was proposed based on optimal solution criterion and cross validation- Voronoi (CV-Voronoi) criterion to improve the inversion accuracy and computational efficiency of groundwater pollution source. The local-global hybrid adaptive surrogate model combined with genetic algorithm was applied to groundwater pollution sources inversion case. The inversion results were compared with those of the local and the global adaptive surrogate model. The comparison results reveal that the local-global hybrid adaptive surrogate model combined genetic algorithm had the highest inversion accuracy and the lowest computational cost. The pollution sources inversion results can identify the actual pollution source characteristics, and the maximum relative error was only 3.51%. The results of the paper prove the robustness of the proposed local-global hybrid adaptive surrogate model in improving the accuracy and computational efficiency of groundwater pollution sources inversion.

Key words： hybrid adaptive surrogate model groundwater pollution sources inversion cross validation-Voronoi optimal solution

Received: 05 December 2022

PACS:

X523

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LUO Jian-nan
	LI Xue-li
	WANG He
	MA Xi
	SONG Zhuo

Cite this article:

LUO Jian-nan,LI Xue-li,WANG He等. Groundwater pollution sources inversion based on local-global hybrid adaptive surrogate model[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2023, 43(7): 3664-3671.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V43/I7/3664

[1]	Li J, Lu W, Wang H, et al. Groundwater contamination sources identification based on kernel extreme learning machine and its effect due to wavelet denoising technique [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020,27:34107-34120.
[2]	Prakash O, Datta B. Multiobjective monitoring network design for efficient identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources incorporating genetic programming-based monitoring [J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2014,19(11):04014025.
[3]	王景瑞,胡立堂.地下水污染源识别的数学方法研究进展 [J]. 水科学进展, 2017,28(6):943-952. Wang J R, Hu L T. Advances in mathematical methods of groundwater pollution source identification [J]. Advances in Water Science, 2017, 28(6):943-952.
[4]	Queipo N V, Haftka R T, Shyy W, et al. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization [J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005,41(1):1-28.
[5]	Razavi S, Tolson B A, Burn D H, Review of surrogate modeling in water resources [J]. Water Resources Research, 2012,48(7):07401.
[6]	Asher M J, Croke W, Jakeman A J, et al. A review of surrogate models and their application to groundwater modeling [J]. Water Resources Research. 2015,51(8):5957-5973.
[7]	Luo J, Lu W. Comparison of surrogate models with different methods in groundwater remediation process [J]. Journal of Earth System Science, 2014,123(7):1579-1589.
[8]	Xiong Y, Luo J, Liu X, et al. Machine learning-based optimal design of groundwater pollution monitoring network [J]. Environmental Research, 2022,211:113022.
[9]	Forrester A I J,Keane, A J. Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization [J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2009,45(1-3):50-79.
[10]	徐良.基于自适应代理员模型的高超飞行器多学科优化设计 [D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2018. Xu L. Multi-disciplinary optimization design of hypersonic vehicle based on adaptive surrogate model [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018.
[11]	Jin R, Chen W, Sudjianto A. On sequential sampling for global metamodeling in engineering design [C]//Proceedings of Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computer and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2002:1-10.
[12]	Xu Q, Wehrle E, Baier H, Adaptive surrogate-based design optimization with expected improvement used as infill criterion [J]. Optimization, 2012,61(6):661-684.
[13]	Eason J, Cremaschi S. Adaptive sequential sampling for surrogate model generation with artificial neural networks [J]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2014,68:220-232.
[14]	魏文张.自适应代理模型的研究及优化应用 [D]. 成都：电子科技大学, 2022. Wei W Z. Research and optimization application of the adaptive surrogate model [D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2022.
[15]	McBride K, Sundmacher K. Overview of surrogate modeling in chemical process engineering [J]. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 2019, 91(3):228-39.
[16]	张志华,白金锋,周洋,等.基于交叉验证和Voronoi图的煤气化过程优化 [J]. 高校化学工程学报, 2020,34(5):1274-1282. Zhang Z H, Bai J F, Zhou Y, et al. Coal gasification process optimization based on cross validation and Voronoi diagram [J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities, 2020,34(5): 1274-1282.
[17]	初海波.基于自适应替代模型的DNAPLs污染地下水修复优化设计及其不确定性分析 [D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2015. Chu H B. The optimization design and uncertainty analysis of DNAPLs-contaminated groundwater remediation based on the adaptive surrogate model [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2015.
[18]	姜雪.DNAPLs污染含水层修复方案优选及不确定性分析 [D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2016. Jiang X. Optimization design and uncertainty analysis of DNAPLs-contaminated groundwater remediation [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2016.
[19]	Luo J N, Lu W X, Yang Q C, et al. An adaptive dynamic surrogate model using a constrained trust region algorithm: application to DNAPL-contaminated-groundwater-remediation design [J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2020,28:1285-1298.
[20]	Mo S, Lu D, Shi X, et al. A taylor expansion-Based adaptive design strategy for global surrogate modeling with applications in groundwater modeling [J]. Water Resources Research, 2017,53(12): 10802-10823.
[21]	李正良,彭思思,王涛.基于混合加点准则的代理模型优化设计方法 [J]. 工程力学, 2022,39(1):27-33. Li Z L, PENG S S, WANG T. A surrogate-based optimization design method based on hybrid infill sampling criterion [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022,39(1):27-33.
[22]	Xu S, Liu H, Wang X, et al. A robust error-pursuing sequential sampling approach for global metamodeling based on voronoi diagram and cross validation [J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2014,136(7): 69-74.
[23]	Jiang C, Cai X, Qiu H, et al. A two-stage support vector regression assisted sequential sampling approach for global metamodeling [J]. Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018,58:1657-1672.
[24]	Ayvaz M T, A linked simulation-optimization model for solving the unknown groundwater pollution source identification problems [J], Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2010,117(1-4):46-59.
[25]	邢贞相,曲睿卓,赵莹,等.不同替代模型在地下水污染源释放历史反演中适用性研究 [J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2018,49(12):59-68. Xing Z X, Qu R Z, Zhao Y, et al. Applicability study of different surrogate models in retrieving release history of groundwater contaminant sources [J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2018,49(12):59-68.
[26]	李久辉,卢文喜,常振波,等.考虑参数不确定性的地下水污染源识别 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2021,41(4):1711-1722. Li J H, Lu W X, Chang Z B, et al. Identification of groundwater contamination sources considering parameter uncertainty [J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(4):1711-1722.
[27]	Todaro V, D'oria M, Tanda M G, et al. Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation to simultaneously estimate the source location and the release history of a contaminant spill in an aquifer [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021,598:126215.
[28]	Jin R, Chen W, Simpson T W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001,23(1):1-13.
[29]	Loeppky J L, Sacks J, Welch W J. Choosing the sample size of a computer experiment: A practical guide [J]. Technometrics, 2009: 51(4):366-376.
[30]	Østergård T, Jensen R L, Maagaard S E. A comparison of six metamodeling techniques applied to building performance simulations [J]. Applied Energy, 2018,211(6):89-103.