|
|
Effect of biochar-loaded sodium anthraquinone-2-sulfonate on anaerobic digestion |
ZHANG Yu-lei1,2, MA Jun-yi2, AI Ping1, ZHAO Li-xin2, YAO Zong-lu2, YU Jia-dong2, LIANG Yi2 |
1. College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Green and Low Carbon Agriculture in North China Plain, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Agricultural Environment and Sustainable Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to improve the efficiency of anaerobic digestion system, biochar (BC) was used as a carrier of anthraquinone-2-sulfonate (AQS) for the preparation of composite mediator (BC/AQS) that can be applied in anaerobic digestion system. The batch anaerobic digestion experiment was carried out at mesophilic condition (35℃) to explore the effect of BC/AQS on anaerobic digestion of corn straw. The results showed that when the AQS loading concentration was 1mmol/L, BC/AQS performed best in enhancing methane production efficiency. On this condition, the maximum methane production rate (Rmax) reached 10.64mL/(d·g), the maximum cumulative methane production (Pmax) reached 240.41mL/g, and the cumulative methane production per unit volatile solid (VS) respectively increased by 20.60% and 12.11% compared to the control and treatment solely added BC (P<0.05). The archaea enriched by BC/AQS were Methanosarcina and Methanofollis. In addition, BC/AQS promoted the generation of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) in the early stage of digestion, resulting in an increase of 7.73% to 18.54% in total VFAs concentration onday 10 compared with the control. In the middle and later stages, BC/AQS promoted the degradation of VFAs. BC/AQS-1mmol/L induced the largest decrease in total VFAs concentration, with a decrease of 77.43%. The potential mechanism may be BC/AQS increased the abundance of hydrolytic acid-producing bacteria including Ruminofilibacter, Proteiniphilum, Fermentimonas and Acinetobacter.
|
Received: 07 March 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
霍丽丽,赵立欣,孟海波,等.中国农作物秸秆综合利用潜力研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019,35(13):218-224. Huo L L, Zhao L X, Meng H B, et al. Research on the comprehensive utilization potential of crop straw in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2019,35(13):218-224.
|
[2] |
朱俊兆,卓杨,华飞虎,等.提高污泥含固率对高温厌氧消化互营产甲烷特性影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023:1-13. Zhu J Z, Zhuo Y, Hua F H, et al. Effects of increasing sludge solids content on the methane production characteristics of high-temperature anaerobic digestion with mutualization [J]. China Environmental Science, 2023:1-13.
|
[3] |
张立国,艾冰凌,李建政,等.氧化还原介体强化厌氧活性污泥发酵产氢特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021,41(5):2196-2202.
|
[4] |
班巧英,岳立峰,李建政,等.萘厌氧降解菌群的富集及氧化还原介体的强化[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020,40(7):3150-3155. Ban Q Y, Yue L F, Li J Z, et al. Enrichment of anaerobic naphthalene degrading bacteria and enhancement of redox mediators [J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(7):3150-3155.
|
[5] |
Cai G, Zhu G, Zhou M, et al. Syntrophic butyrate-oxidizing methanogenesis promoted by anthraquinone-2-sulfonate and cysteine:Distinct tendencies towards the enrichment of methanogens and syntrophic fatty-acid oxidizing bacteria [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021,332:125074.
|
[6] |
班巧英,刘琦,余敏,等.氧化还原介体催化强化污染物厌氧降解研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2019,37(21):88-96. Ban Q Y, Liu Q, Yu M, et al. Progress of redox mediator catalyzed enhanced anaerobic degradation of pollutants [J]. Science and Technology Herald, 2019,37(21):88-96.
|
[7] |
Zhou Y, Lu H, Wang J, et al. Catalytic performance of quinone and graphene-modified polyurethane foam on the decolorization of azo dye Acid Red 18 by Shewanella sp. RQs-106[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018,356:82-90.
|
[8] |
Olivo-Alanis D, Garcia-Reyes R B, Alvarez L H, et al. Mechanism of anaerobic bio-reduction of azo dye assisted with lawsone-immobilized activated carbon [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018,347:423-430.
|
[9] |
Sun Y, Jia J, Huo L, et al. Heteroatom-doped biochar for CO2 adsorption:a review of heteroatoms, doping methods, and functions [J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2023:1-13.
|
[10] |
Ren Z, Ma P, Lv L, et al. Application of exogenous redox mediators in anaerobic biological wastewater treatment:A critical review [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022,372:133527.
|
[11] |
Pan J, Ma J, Zhai L, et al. Achievements of biochar application for enhanced anaerobic digestion:A review [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019,292:122058.
|
[12] |
Wang G, Yang S, Ding J, et al. Immobilized redox mediators on modified biochar and their role on azo dye biotransformation in anaerobic biological systems:Mechanisms, biodegradation pathway and theoretical calculation [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 423:130300.
|
[13] |
周伟竹.醌改性壳聚糖强化印染废水中偶氮染料厌氧生物降解[D]. 上海:东华大学, 2022. Zhou W Z. Quinone-modified chitosan for enhanced anaerobic biodegradation of azo dyes in printing and dyeing wastewater [D]. Shanghai:Donghua University, 2022.
|
[14] |
Chi M, Su X, Sun X, et al. Microbial analysis and enrichment of anaerobic phenol and p-cresol degrading consortia with addition of AQDS [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2021,84(3):683-696.
|
[15] |
APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [M]. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 2005.
|
[16] |
杨芳,简宏先,高越,等.基于细菌学研究改性生物炭对抗生素的降解机制[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021,41(4):1723-1731. Yang F, Jian H X, Gao Y, et al. Bacteriological study on the degradation mechanism of antibiotics by modified biochar [J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(4):1723-1731.
|
[17] |
Bu J, Hu B, Wu H, et al. Improved methane production with redox-active/conductive biochar amendment by establishing spatial ecological niche and mediating electron transfer [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022,351.
|
[18] |
Sun Y, Yu I K M, Tsang D C W, et al. Multifunctional iron-biochar composites for the removal of potentially toxic elements, inherent cations, and hetero-chloride from hydraulic fracturing wastewater [J]. Environment International, 2019,124:521-532.
|
[19] |
刘朝霞,牛文娟,楚合营,等.秸秆热解工艺优化与生物炭理化特性分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018,34(5):196-203. Liu C X, Niu W J, Chu H Y, et al. Optimization of straw pyrolysis process and physicochemical characterization of biochar [J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2018,34(5):196-203.
|
[20] |
许晴,侯正浩,田秀蕾,等.醌基功能型高分子生物载体(PET-AQS)制备及催化生物反硝化特性研究[J]. 环境科学, 2015,36(4):1374-1378. Xu Q, Hou Z H, Tian X L, et al. Preparation of quinone-based functional polymer biocarrier (PET-AQS) and characterization of catalytic biological denitrification [J]. Environmental Science, 2015,36(4):1374-1378.
|
[21] |
Chacón F J, Sánchez-Monedero M A, Lezama L, et al. Enhancing biochar redox properties through feedstock selection, metal preloading and post-pyrolysis treatments [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 395:125100.
|
[22] |
Hamedi S, Shojaosadati S A. Preparation of antibacterial ZnO NP-containing schizophyllan/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite for wound dressing [J]. Cellulose, 2021,28(14):9269-9282.
|
[23] |
Zhang L, Han D, Tao Y, et al. Dense organic molecules/graphene network anodes with superior volumetric and areal performance for asymmetric supercapacitors [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2020,8(1):461-469.
|
[24] |
Zhang X, Zhang J, Chen Y, et al. Freestanding 3D Polypyrrole@reduced graphene oxide hydrogels as binder-free electrode materials for flexible asymmetric supercapacitors [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2019,536:291-299.
|
[25] |
赵敏,张小平,王梁嵘.硅改性花生壳生物炭对水中磷的吸附特性[J]. 环境科学, 2021,42(11):5433-5439. Zhao M, Zhang X P, Wang L R. Adsorption characteristics of silica-modified peanut shell biochar on phosphorus in water [J]. Environmental Science, 2021,42(11):5433-5439.
|
[26] |
赵思钰.椰壳生物炭负载纳米零价铁对土霉素和铅的去除性能与机理研究[D]. 西安:西北大学, 2022. Zhao S Y. Study on the removal performance and mechanism of hygromycin and lead by coconut shell biochar loaded with nano zero-valent iron [D]. Xi'an:Northwest University, 2022.
|
[27] |
潘君廷,马俊怡,邱凌,等.生物炭介导鸡粪厌氧消化性能研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(9):2716-2721. Pan J T, Ma J Y, Qiu L, et al. Study on anaerobic digestion performance of chicken manure mediated by biochar [J]. China Environmental Science, 2016,36(9):2716-2721.
|
[28] |
Van der Zee F P, Cervantes F J. Impact and application of electron shuttles on the redox (bio)transformation of contaminants:A review [J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2009,27(3):256-277.
|
[29] |
Hernández-Montoya V, Alvarez L H, Montes-Morán M A, et al. Reduction of quinone and non-quinone redox functional groups in different humic acid samples by Geobacter sulfurreducens [J]. Geoderma, 2012,183-184:25-31.
|
[30] |
Liu G, Dong B, Zhou J, et al. Facilitated bioreduction of nitrobenzene by lignite acting as low-cost and efficient electron shuttle [J]. Chemosphere, 2020,248:125978.
|
[31] |
胡金梅,虞磊,黄天寅.蒽醌-2-磺酸钠促进Klebsiella oxytoca GS-4-08脱色产氢机制与产能分析[J]. 环境科学, 2016,37(10):3891-3898. Hu J M, Yu L, Huang T Y. Analysis of the mechanism and energy production of sodium anthraquinone-2-sulfonate to promote the decolorization and hydrogen production of Klebsiella oxytoca GS-4-08[J]. Environmental Science, 2016,37(10):3891-3898.
|
[32] |
Cervantes F J, van der Velde S, Lettinga G, et al. Competition between methanogenesis and quinone respiration for ecologically important substrates in anaerobic consortia [J]. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 2000, 34(2):161-171.
|
[33] |
Del Angel Y A, Garcia-Reyes R B, Celis L B, et al. Quinone-reducing enrichment culture enhanced the direct and mediated biotransformation of azo dye with soluble and immobilized redox mediator [J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2021,44.
|
[34] |
董姗燕,罗进财,王欣芸,等.pH调控方法对剩余污泥与柑橘废渣厌氧共发酵产酸性能影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023,DOI:10.19674/j. cnki.issn1000-6923.20230823004. Dong S Y, Luo J C, Wang X Y, et al. Effect of pH regulation methods on the acid production performance of anaerobic co-fermentation of residual sludge and citrus waste residue [J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,DOI:10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20230823004.
|
[35] |
Xue S, Wang Y, Lyu X, et al. Interactive effects of carbohydrate, lipid, protein composition and carbon/nitrogen ratio on biogas production of different food wastes [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,312:123566.
|
[36] |
Meegoda J N, Li B, Patel K, et al. A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018,15(10):2224.
|
[37] |
Paritosh K, Yadav M, Chawade A, et al. Additives as a Support Structure for Specific Biochemical Activity Boosts in Anaerobic Digestion:A Review [J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2020,8:88.
|
[38] |
Janssen P H, Kirs M. Structure of the Archaeal Community of the Rumen [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008,74(12):3619-3625.
|
[39] |
Lu H, Wang J, Huang L, et al. Effect of immobilized anthraquinone-2-sulfonate on antibiotic resistance genes and microbial community in biofilms of anaerobic reactors [J]. Journal Of Environmental Management, 2021,282:111967.
|
[40] |
Zhang L, Ban Q, Li J, et al. An enhanced excess sludge fermentation process by anthraquinone-2-sulfonate as electron shuttles for the biorefinery of zero-carbon hydrogen [J]. Environmental Research, 2022,210:113005.
|
[41] |
Dai R, Chen X, Xiang X, et al. Understanding azo dye anaerobic bio-decolorization with artificial redox mediator supplement:Considering the methane production [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018,249:799-808.
|
[42] |
Riviere D, Desvignes V, Pelletier E, et al. Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge [J]. ISME Journal, 2009,3(6):700-714.
|
[43] |
Burns A S, Pugh C W, Segid Y T, et al. Performance and microbial community dynamics of a sulfate-reducing bioreactor treating coal generated acid mine drainage [J]. Biodegradation, 2012,23(3):415-429.
|
[44] |
Hatamoto M, Kaneshige M, Nakamura A, et al. Bacteroides luti sp. nov., an anaerobic, cellulolytic and xylanolytic bacterium isolated from methanogenic sludge [J]. International Journal of Systematic And Evolutionary Microbiology, 2014,64:1770-1774.
|
[45] |
Nelson M C, Morrison M, Yu Z. A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011,102(4):3730-3739.
|
[46] |
Rabelo C A B S, Camargo F P, Sakamoto I K, et al. Metataxonomic characterization of an autochthonous and allochthonous microbial consortium involved in a two-stage anaerobic batch reactor applied to hydrogen and methane production from sugarcane bagasse [J]. Enzyme And Microbial Technology, 2023,162:110119.
|
[47] |
Zhang C, Yang R, Sun M, et al. Wood waste biochar promoted anaerobic digestion of food waste:focusing on the characteristics of biochar and microbial community analysis [J]. Biochar, 2022, 4(1):1-12.
|
[48] |
Weiss S, Zankel A, Lebuhn M, et al. Investigation of mircroorganisms colonising activated zeolites during anaerobic biogas production from grass silage [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011,102(6):4353-4359.
|
[49] |
Jiang X, Lyu Q, Bi L, et al. Improvement of sewage sludge anaerobic digestion through synergistic effect combined trace elements enhancer with enzyme pretreatment and microbial community response [J]. Chemosphere, 2022,286:131356.
|
[50] |
Song W, Wang X, Gu J, et al. Effects of different swine manure to wheat straw ratios on antibiotic resistance genes and the microbial community structure during anaerobic digestion [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017,231:1-8.
|
[51] |
Aydin S, Ince B, Ince O. Assessment of anaerobic bacterial diversity and its effects on anaerobic system stability and the occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016,207:332-338.
|
[52] |
Xu L, Peng S, Dong D, et al. Performance and microbial community analysis of dry anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure with added limonite [J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2019,126:41-46.
|
[53] |
Shen R, Jing Y, Feng J, et al. Performance of enhanced anaerobic digestion with different pyrolysis biochars and microbial communities [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,296.
|
[54] |
Fitamo T, Treu L, Boldrin A, et al. Microbial population dynamics in urban organic waste anaerobic co-digestion with mixed sludge during a change in feedstock composition and different hydraulic retention times [J]. Water Research, 2017,118:261-271.
|
|
|
|