|
|
Interactions of multiple factors in micro-nano bubbles coagulation process as explored with Response surface methodology |
HUANG Xiao-jiang1, CHEN Kun-yu1, ZHANG Zhi-qiang1,2, LI Ping1, LI Chun-bo1, LU Jin-suo1,2 |
1. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, 710055, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Green Building in West China, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China |
|
|
Abstract The micro-nano bubbles (MNBs)-coagulation process developed to meet the needs of cleaning production has attracted the public's attention, but the interactions between multiple factors in this process has not been fully understood. Box-Behnken design (BBD) and response surface methodology were used to explore interactions between factors in the MNBs-coagulation process by taking polymeric aluminium chloride (PACl), micro-nano bubbles intake (Qg), and solution pH as the influencing factors, and humic acid (HA) removal efficiency and the residual Al3+ concentration in the precipitated water as the response variables. The results show that the PACl dosage, Qg and pH could significantly affect the removal efficiency of HA, however, neither the PACl dosage nor the Qg had a significant effect on the Al3+ concentration in the precipitation effluent except pH's significant influence on the response variable. Compared with the conventional coagulation process, the participation of MNBs in the coagulation process could significantly reduce the residual Al3+ concentration in the precipitated water and improve the utilization efficiency of PACl. Evidently, the MNBs-coagulation process is more suitable for treating pH-neutral raw water, and our study will provide reliable data and theoretical support for the engineering application of the MNBs-coagulation process.
|
Received: 20 June 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Liu L, Lu S, Demissie H, et al. Formation of Al30 aggregates and its correlation to the coagulation effect [J]. Chemosphere, 2021,278:130493.
|
[2] |
Siéliéchi J M, Lartiges B S, Kayem G J, et al. Changes in humic acid conformation during coagulation with ferric chloride:implications for drinking water treatment [J]. Water Research, 2008,42(8/9):2111-2123.
|
[3] |
Wang H, Qu F, Ding A, et al. Combined effects of PAC adsorption and in situ chlorination on membrane fouling in a pilot-scale coagulation and ultrafiltration process [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 283:1374-1383.
|
[4] |
Yu W, Graham N J D, Fowler G D. Coagulation and oxidation for controlling ultrafiltration membrane fouling in drinking water treatment:Application of ozone at low dose in submerged membrane tank [J]. Water Research, 2016,95:1-10.
|
[5] |
Takahashi M, Chiba K, Li P. Free-radical generation from collapsing microbubbles in the absence of a dynamic stimulus [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2007,111(6):1343-1347.
|
[6] |
Atkinson A J, Apul O G, Schneider O, et al. Nanobubble technologies offer opportunities to improve water treatment [J]. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2019,52(5):1196-1205.
|
[7] |
Agarwal A, Ng W J, Liu Y. Principle and applications of microbubble and nanobubble technology for water treatment [J]. Chemosphere, 2011,84(9):1175-1180.
|
[8] |
张志强,常娜,王社评,等.微纳米气泡物化特性及其水处理应用研究进展[J]. 中国给水排水, 2023,39(4):24-30. Zhang Z, Chang N, Wang S, et al. State-of-the-art of the micro-nano bubble physicochemical properties and its applications in water treatment [J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2023,39(4):24-30.
|
[9] |
Hu L, Xia Z. Application of ozone micro-nano-bubbles to groundwater remediation [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018, 342:446-453.
|
[10] |
黄超,刘倪佺,业宇兵,等.高盐有机废水真空膜蒸馏处理膜污染的微纳米气泡控制研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022,12(4):1333-1341. Huang C, Liu N, Ye Y, et al. Study on micro-nanobubble control of membrane fouling in vacuum membrane distillation of high salt organic wastewater [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 12(4):1333-1341.
|
[11] |
Soyluoglu M, Kim D, Zaker Y, et al. Stability of oxygen nanobubbles under freshwater conditions [J]. Water Research, 2021,206:117749.
|
[12] |
Lu J, Huang X, Zhang Z, et al. Co-coagulation of micro-nano bubbles (MNBs) for enhanced drinking water treatment:A study on the efficiency and mechanism of a novel cleaning process [J]. Water Research, 2022,226:119245.
|
[13] |
Wei N, Zhang Z, Liu D, et al.Coagulation behavior of polyaluminum chloride:Effects of pH and coagulant dosage [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015,23(6):1041-1046.
|
[14] |
Watson M A, Tubić A, Agbaba J, et al. Response surface methodology investigation into the interactions between arsenic and humic acid in water during the coagulation process [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016,312:150-158.
|
[15] |
Yue Y, An G, Liu L, et al. Pre-aggregation of Al13 in optimizing coagulation for removal of humic acid [J]. Chemosphere, 2021,277:130268.
|
[16] |
Shen X, Gao B, Guo K, et al. Characterization and influence of floc under different coagulation systems on ultrafiltration membrane fouling [J]. Chemosphere, 2020,238:124659.
|
[17] |
陈卓然,李晨,张怡然,等.聚氯化铝铁处理引江原水试验研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2023,39(3):62-66. Chen Z, LI C, Zhang Y, et al. Polyaluminum ferric chloride for the treatment of raw water from Yangtze River [J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2023,39(3):62-66.
|
[18] |
彭建雄,薛安,赵华章,等.以Al-Ferron逐时络合比色法研究有机硅铝复合絮凝剂中铝的形态分布[J]. 环境科学, 2008,29(9):2513-2517. Peng J, Xue A, Zhao H, et al. Al species distribution of organic silicate aluminum hybrid flocculants by Al-ferron complexation timed spectrophotometric method [J]. Environmental Science, 2008,29(9):2513-2517.
|
[19] |
Wang W, Fan W, Huo M, et al. Hydroxyl radical generation and contaminant removal from water by the collapse of microbubbles under different hydrochemical conditions [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2018,229(3):1-11.
|
[20] |
Jin P, Song J, Yang L, et al. Selective binding behavior of humic acid removal by aluminum coagulation [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018,233:290-298.
|
|
|
|