FAST宁静区生态系统服务时空分异特征及权衡/协同关系分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (8248 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on the InVEST and CASA models, an assessment was conducted on four ecosystem services—Net Primary Productivity (NPP), water conservation, soil retention, and habitat quality in the FAST Tranquility Zone from 2000 to 2020. This involved calculating these services, analyzing their spatiotemporal variations at different scales, identifying hotspots of ecosystem services, and using tradeoff-synergy index and Random Forest models to reveal the relationships and intensities of tradeoff/synergy among these services and with their driving factors. The results showed that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the overall ecosystem services in the FAST Tranquility Zone demonstrated an increasing trend, with NPP rising by 730.544gC/m², water conservation by 5.925mm, habitat quality score by 0.007, and soil conservation by 0.295t/km². (2) There were notable differences among the circles; the core area showed the fastest increase and had the best service functionality, followed by the remote areas with significant ecological improvement, and lastly the middle area where ecological restoration was relatively slow. (3) Among land use types, woodland and grasslands had the greatest promotional effect on the ecosystem services in the study area. (4) Overall, the ecosystem service hotspots transitioned from class I and II hotspots to non-hotspot areas, class III hotspots, and class IV hotspots. (5) The relationships among the four ecosystem services within the area were predominantly synergistic, with increasing synergy over time, and in some regions, tradeoff effects were evident between water conservation and both soil conservation and NPP. (6) The main driving factors for the tradeoff/synergy relationships among the four ecosystem services in the FAST Tranquility Zone were precipitation, evapotranspiration, sensitivity to rocky desertification, slope, and human activity intensity

Key words： ecosystem services circle differences spatio-temporal evolution tradeoff-synergy InVEST model FAST tranquility zone

Received: 29 February 2024

PACS:

X171

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	QUAN Xiao-ya
	SU Wei-ci
	GOU Rong
	HUANG Xian-feng

Cite this article:

QUAN Xiao-ya,SU Wei-ci,GOU Rong等. Analysis on spatio-temporal distribution characteristics and tradeoff-synergy of ecosystem services in the FAST Tranquility Zone[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2024, 44(9): 5145-5159.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2024/V44/I9/5145

[1] Costanza R, D’Arge R,De Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. [J]. Nature, 1997,387:253-260.
[2] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J]. 地理研究, 2013,32(8):1379-1390. Li S C, Zhang C Y, Liu J L, rt al. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography [J]. Geographical Research, 2013,32(8):1379-1390.
[3] Rodríguez J P,Beard Jr T D, Bennett E M, et al. Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services[J]. Ecology and Society, 2006,11(1):28.
[4] Feng Q, Zhao W, Fu B, et al. Ecosystem service trade-offs and their influencing factors: A case study in the Loess Plateau of China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,607-608:1250-1263.
[5] Daily G C, Polasky S, Goldstein J, et al. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver [J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009,7(1):21-28.
[6] 冉凤维,罗志军,吴佳平,等.鄱阳湖地区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系的时空格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(3):995-1004. Ran F W, Luo Z J, Wu J P, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of the trade-off and synergy relationship among ecosystem services in Poyang Lake Region, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019,30(3):995-1004.
[7] 马月伟,潘健峰,蔡思青,等.生态系统服务社会价值与生态价值的权衡与协同关系——以普达措国家公园为例[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(7):1283-1294. Ma Y W, Pan J F, Cai S Q, et al. Trade-offs and synergies between social value and ecological value of ecosystem services: A case study of the Potatso National Park [J]. Scien tia Geographica Sinica, 2022,42(7):1283-1294.
[8] 张文静,孙小银,周俊.南四湖流域关键生态系统服务的时空权衡关系[J]. 生态学报, 2021,41(20):8003-8015. Zhang W J, Sun X Y, Zhou J. Spatio-temporal dynamics of tradeoffs between crucial ecosystem services in Nansihu Lake Basin [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(20):8003-8015.
[9] 汪晓珍,吴建召,吴普侠,等.2000~2015年黄土高原生态系统水源涵养、土壤保持和NPP服务的时空分布与权衡/协同关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021,35(4):114-121,128. Wang X Z, Wu J Z, Wu P X, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution and trade-off of water conservation, soil conservation and NPP services in the ecosystems of the Loess Plateau from 2000 to 2015[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(4):114-121,128.
[10] 杨强强,章翩,邱小琮,等.宁夏回族自治区生态系统服务时空变化及其权衡研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023,43(10):5453-5465. Yang Q Q, Zhang P, Qiu X Z, et al. Spatiotemporal changes and trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region [J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(10):5453-5465.
[11] 李成,赵洁,庄智程,等.长三角城市群生态系统服务权衡强度时空演变及影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2022,42(14):5708-5720. Li C, Zhao J, Zhuang Z C, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and influencing factors of ecosystem service trade-offs in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(14):5708-5720.
[12] 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J]. 地理学报, 2018,73(5):868-879. Qian C Y, Gong J, Zhang J X, et al. Change and tradeoffs-synergies analysis on watershed ecosystem services: A case study of Bailongjiang Watershed, Gansu [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5):868-879.
[13] 钟绍卓,孙浩源.不同情景下祁连山国家级自然保护区生态系统服务时空变化及权衡与协同关系[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023,30(5): 358-369. Zhong S Z, Sun H Y. Assessment on spatiotemporal variation and synergies/tradeoffs relationships of ecosystem services in Qilian Mmountain National Nature Reserve under different scenarios [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(5):358-369.
[14] 祝汉收,翟俊,侯鹏,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同视角下的重点生态功能区保护特征[J]. 地理学报, 2022,77(5):1275-1288. Zhu H S, Zhai J, Hou P, et al. The protection characteristics of key ecological functional zones from the perspective of ecosystem service trade-off and synergy [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022,77(5):1275-1288.
[15] 张静静,朱文博,朱连奇,等.伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020,75(5):975-988. Zhang J J, Zhu W B, Zhu L Q, et al. Multi-scale analysis of trade-off/synergy effects of forest ecosystem services in the Funiu Mountain Region [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(5):975-988.
[16] 潘明欣,张力小,胡潭高,等.城市湿地生态系统服务动态演化及其权衡关系——以杭州西溪湿地为例[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022,58(6):893-900. Pan M X, Zhang L X, Hu T G, et al. Temporal and spatial changes and trade-offs analysis of urban wetland ecosystem services: a case study of Xixi wetland in Hangzhou [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science), 2022,58(6):893-900.
[17] 李倩茹,贾彦龙,王慧军,等.基于生态功能区的河北省生态系统服务权衡与协同分析[J]. 地理学报, 2023,78(11):2833-2849. Li Q R, Jia Y L, Wang H J, et al. Analysis of trade-off and synergy effects of ecosystem services in Hebei Province from the perspective of ecological function area [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023,78(11): 2833-2849.
[18] Jia X, Fu B, Feng X, et al. The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,43:103-113.
[19] 陈心盟,王晓峰,冯晓明,等.青藏高原生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J]. 地理研究, 2021,40(1):18-34. Cheng X M, Wang X F, Feng X M, et al. Ecosystem service trade-off and synergy on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Geographical Research, 2021,40(1):18-34.
[20] 易武英,苏维词,贾真真,等.射电望远镜项目周边地区土地利用结构合理度评价[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2020,32(1):28-31,71. Yi W Y, Su W C, Jia Z Z, et al. Evaluation of land use structure reasonable degree in the surrounding area of radio telescope [J]. The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring, 2020, 32(1):28-31,71.
[21] 刘金环,李威,吴建峰.中国天眼工程周边地区土地利用时空演变与生态环境效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021,41(6):327-335. Liu J H, Li W, Wu J F. Spatiotemporal land use change and its effects on ecco-environment in area surrounding Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,41(6):327-335.
[22] 辛亮,苏维词.基于景观格局的FAST宁静区生态风险时空演变分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023,43(10):5475-5487. Xin L, Su W C. Spatial and temporal evolution of ecological risk in FAST Radio Quiet Zone based on landscape pattern [J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(10):5475-5487.
[23] 朱文泉,潘耀忠,张锦水.中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007,(3):413-424. Zhu W Q, Pan Y Z, Zhang J S. Estimation of net primary productivity of Chinese terrestrial vegetation based on remotesensing [J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007,(3):413-424.
[24] 张昌顺,谢高地,刘春兰,等.基于水源涵养参照系的中国生态系统水源涵养功能优劣评估[J]. 生态学报, 2022,42(22):9250-9260. Zhang C S, Xie G D, Liu C L, et al. Evaluation of water conservation of China’s ecosystems based on benchmark. Acta Ecologica Sinica [J]. 2022,42(22):9250-9260.
[25] 龚诗涵,肖洋,郑华,等.中国生态系统水源涵养空间特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(7):2455-2462. Gong S H, Xiao Y, Zheng H, et al. Spatial patterns of ecosystem water conservation in China and its impact factors analysis [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(7):2455-2462.
[26] Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss [J]. Transactions-American Geophysical Union, 1958,39: 285-291.
[27] Williams J R. The erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: a case history [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 1990,329(1255): 421-428.
[28] 蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2000,(2):19-24. Cai C F, Ding S W, Shi Z H, et al. Study of applying USLE and geographical information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, (2):19-24.
[29] 汤剑秋.2000~2018年贵州省土壤侵蚀时空变化及其驱动力分析[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2022. Tang J Q. Analysis on temporal and spatial changes and driving forces of soil erosion in Guizhou Province from 2000 to 2018[D]. ShanXi: Chang’an University, 2022.
[30] 尚二萍,许尔琪.黔桂喀斯特山地主要生态系统服务时空变化[J]. 资源科学, 2017,39(10):2000-2015. Shang E P, Xu E Q. Temporal and spatial variation of main ecosystem services in Guizhou and Guangxi Karst Mountainous region [J]. Resources Science, 2017,39(10):2000-2015.
[31] 苗培培,赵祖军,赵筱青,等.云南典型石漠化区生态系统服务权衡与协同研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021,28(4):366-374. Miao P P, Zhao Z J, Zhao X Q, et al. Study on trade-off and cooperation of ecosystem service space in rocky desertification area of Yunnan Province [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,28(4):366-374.
[32] 裴渊杰,罗漫雅,赵永华,等.多尺度生态系统服务权衡与协同关系——以延安市为例[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022,41(7):1351-1360. Pei Y J, Luo M Y, Zhao Y H, et al. Trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services at multiple scales: A case study of Yan’an City [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022,41(7):1351-1360.
[33] Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. What factors affect the synergy and tradeoff between ecosystem services, and how, from a geospatial perspective? [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,257:120454.
[34] Zhao T, Pan J H. Ecosystem service trade-offs and spatial non-stationary responses to influencing factors in the Loess hilly-gully region: Lanzhou City, China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022,846(10):20-22.
[35] Xue C L, Chen X H, Xue L R, et al. Modeling the spatially heterogeneous relationships between tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services and potential drivers considering geographic scale in Bairin Left Banner, China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023,855:158834.
[36] 徐小任,徐勇.黄土高原地区人类活动强度时空变化分析[J]. 地理研究, 2017,36(4):661-672. Xu X R, Xu Y. Analysis of spatial-temporal variation of human activity intensity in Loess Plateau region [J]. Geographical Research, 2017,36(4):661-672.
[37] 吴成永,曹广超,陈克龙,等.黄河上游地区土壤保持服务时空变化及归因[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022,36(4):143-150. Wu C Y, Cao G C, Chen K L, et al. Spatio-temporal variation in soil conservation service and its influencing factors in the upper reaches of the Yellow River [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(4):143-150.