PDF(509 KB)
基于压差的二氧化碳垂直采样分析技术
梁苗, 方双喜, 刘毅, 姚波, 王勇, 马千里, 易游, 郭敏锐
中国环境科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10) : 4117-4124.
PDF(509 KB)

PDF(509 KB)
基于压差的二氧化碳垂直采样分析技术
A balloon-borne sampler system based on the pressure gradient for vertical profile measurements of CO2
本研究开发了一套基于直接采样技术的二氧化碳(CO2)垂直廓线采样分析系统,分析近地面至25km高空CO2浓度的垂直分布.系统通过压差实现垂直方向连续采样,利用CRDS高精度分析技术对不同高度样品进行定量分析,计算得到采样区域CO2浓度廓线.于2018年6月13~14日,在内蒙古锡林浩特国家气候观象台利用平流层探空气球平台进行了观测实验.实验室测试显示,CO2分析准确度优于0.06×10-6,精度优于0.08×10-6.外场实验获得区域近地面至25km高空CO2浓度的高分辨率垂直廓线,显示CO2在不同高度的分层结构.考虑不同高度样品扩散作用,系统垂直分辨率在10km高度以下优于580m,在10~20km高度优于3.3km.研究表明:分析系统可搭载在合适探空平台上进行CO2垂直观测,获取浓度廓线,可为传输模式提供数据,并为碳卫星遥感数据提供实测数据校验.
A balloon-borne sampling system for vertical profile of atmospheric CO2 from the surface to 25 km was developed and field-tested. The sampler is deployed on a stratospheric balloon and relies on passively collecting air using the atmospheric pressure gradient during descent. The atmospheric sample through continuous sampling is measured by a cavity ring-down spectrometer (CRDS) for CO2 upon recovery. Field campaigns were conducted for the first time on June 13th and 14th, 2018 at Xilinhaote Observatory. Measurements of CO2 mole fractions in laboratory tests indicated a repeatability of 0.08×10-6 and bias to better than 0.06×10-6 (1σ) for CO2 under various conditions. The vertical resolution with our configuration was determined to be 580m up to 10km and better than 2.0km up to 20km respectively according to the molecular diffusion of the sample. The system provides an in situ method of greenhouse gas measurements for validation of satellite data and estimation of regional flux.
垂直采样 / 垂直分辨率 / 二氧化碳 / 浓度廓线 / 平流层
CO2 / sampling system / stratosphere / vertical profiles / vertical resolution
[1] IPCC. Climate Change 2014:Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[R]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
[2] Biraud S C, Torn M S, Smith J R, et al. A multi-year record of airborne CO2 observations in the US Southern Great Plains[J]. Atmosphric Measurement Techniques, 2013,6:751-763.
[3] GCOS:Systematic observation requirements for satellite-based data products for climate, Global Climate Observing System-154[R]. avialable at:http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/ (last access:15 October 2016), 2011.
[4] Sweeney C, Karion A, Wolter S, et al. Seasonal climatology of CO2 across North America from aircraft measurements in the NOAA/ESRL Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 2015,120(10):5155-5190.
[5] Zhang H, Chen B, van der Laan-Luijkx, et al. Estimating Asian terrestrial carbon fluxes from CONTRAIL aircraft and surface CO2 observations for the period[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions, 2013,3,27597-27639.
[6] Gurney K R, Law R M, Denning A S, et al. Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models[J]. Nature, 2002,415:626.
[7] Peters W, Miller J B, Whitaker J, et al. An ensemble data assimilation system to estimate CO2 surface fluxes from atmospheric trace gas observations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 2005, 110(D24).
[8] Crisp D, Atlas R M, Breon F M, et al. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2004, 34:700-709.
[9] Butz A, Guerlet S, Hasekamp O, et al. Toward accurate CO2 and CH4 observations from GOSAT[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38:L14812.
[10] Frankenberg C, Aben I, Bergamaschi P, et al. Global column-averaged methane mixing ratios from 2003 to 2009 as derived from SCIAMACHY:Trends and variability[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Biogeosciences, 2011,116:D04302.
[11] Warneke T R, de Beek1, Buchwitz M, et al. Shipborne solar absorption measurements of CO2, CH4, N2O and CO and comparison with SCIAMACHY WFM-DOAS retrievals[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 2005,5(8):2029-2034.
[12] Washenfelder R A, Toon G C, Blavier, J F, et al. Carbon dioxide column abundances at the Wisconsin Tall Tower site[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 2006,111(D22),D22305.
[13] Gerbig C, Lin J C, Wofsy S C, et al. Toward constraining regional-scale fluxes of CO2 with atmospheric observations over a continent:1. Observed spatial variability from airborne platforms[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 2003,108(D24).
[14] Tans P P, System and method for providing vertical profile measurements of atmospheric gases[P]. U.S. Patent 7597014, 2009.
[15] Fnag S X, Zhou L X, Zang K P, et al. Measurement of atmospheric CO2 mixing ratio by cavity ringdown spectroscopy (CRDS) at the 4background stations in China[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2011,3:624-629.
[16] Morguí J A and Rodó X. Physical atmospheric structure and tropospheric mixing information in vertical profiles of atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres, 2010,115(D19).
[17] Tans P P, Fung P I, Takahashi T. Observational contrains on the global atmospheric CO2 budget[J]. Science, 1990,247:1431-1438.
[18] Nakazawa T, Miyashita K, Aoki S, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric carbon dioxide[J]. Tellus, 2010,43(2):106-117.
[19] Karion A, Sweeney C, Tans P, et al. AirCore:an innovative atmospheric sampling system[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2010,27(11):1839-1853.
[20] Taylor G. Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society:A, 1953, 219(1137):186-203.
[21] Aris R. On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society:A, 1999,1:109-120.
科技部国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB0504000);国家自然科学基金资助项目(41805129&41730103)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |