|
|
Investigation on OBD monitoring frequency characteristics of China V in-use LDV in Beijing. |
LIU Jun-Nü1, WEN Yi2, LIU Xian1, YANG Zheng-Jun2 |
1. Beijing Vehicle emission management center, Beijing 100176, China;
2. China Automotive Technology and Research Center, Tianjin 300300, China |
|
|
Abstract The IUPR (OBD monitoring frequency) data of 200 in-use China V cars were randomly collected in Beijing. And the characteristic distributions of the IUPR monitoring values were tested by driving four kinds of typical cars on actual road, then the results were compared with experimental tests under New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). The results showed that the catalytic converter and oxygen sensor of OBD system could be monitored for collection vehicle, and the monitoring rates of EGR and secondary oxygen sensor could reach 74% and 91%respectively. At present, 3.9timesignition cycles could meet an IUPR monitoring conditions on average. The IUPR average values for each monitoring items were far greater than the China V limit value of 0.10. However, there were some differences for monitoring value distribution. Catalytic converter and oxygen sensor monitoring rates were both 92%. And the monitoring of the vehicle emissions could be realized basically under indoor NEDC, but the test results on 4 actual road indicated that different vehicles had different IUPR monitoring results for molecule adding 1. OBD system was difficult to achieve effective monitoring of vehicle exhaust emission for the traffic jams and low speed. Therefore, it is necessary to combine the actual conditions in Beijing to further improve the monitoring conditions of the vehicle OBD system, and the effective control of the vehicle emission control system will be achieved in Beijing.
|
Received: 28 December 2015
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
北京市环境保护局.2014北京市环境状况公报 [R]. 2015.
|
[2] |
王凌慧,曾凡刚,向伟玲,等.空气重污染应急措施对北京市PM2.5的削减效果评估 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(8):2546-2553.
|
[3] |
Guan B, Zhan R, Lin H, et al. Review of the state-of-the-art of exhaust particulate filter technology in internal combustion engines [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015,154: 225-258.
|
[4] |
Supnithadnaporn A, Noonan D S, Samoylov A, et al. Estimated validity and reliability of on-board diagnostics for older vehicles: comparison with remote sensing observations [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2011,61(10):996-1004.
|
[5] |
赵 燕,李 君,张磊磊.轻型汽油车OBD法规分析和技术对策研究 [J]. 上海汽车, 2013,5:57-62.
|
[6] |
陆 军,郑红武.汽车OBD系统简述 [J]. 装备制造技术, 2012, 8:135-138.
|
[7] |
王东亮,黄开胜.汽油车OBD在用核心技术及其发展方向 [J]. 汽车技术, 2011,11:1-10.
|
[8] |
GB 18352.3-2013 轻型汽车污染物排放限值及测量方法(中国Ⅴ阶段) [S].
|
[9] |
Gardetto E, BagianT, Lindner J. High-mileage study of on-board diagnostic emissions [J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2005,55(10):1480-1486.
|
[10] |
高 炜.催化器OBD诊断监测频率功能的研究与验证 [J]. 农业装备与车辆工程, 2014,52(7):13-16.
|
[11] |
于津涛,田冬莲,杨正军. EOBD监测频率技术研究及实车验证 [J]. 汽车技术, 2013,4:50-53.
|
[12] |
Mentink P, Nieuwenhof R, Kupper F, et al. Robust emission management strategy to meet real-world emission requirements for HD diesel engines [J]. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2015,8(3):1168-1180.
|
[13] |
Samuel S, Austin L, Morrey D. Automotive test drive cycles for emission measurement and real-world emission levels-a review [J]. Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2002,216(7):555-564.
|
[14] |
Nanjundaswamy H K, Tomazic D, Dahodwala M, Koehler E. Road Map for Addressing Future On-Board-Diagnostic Challenges in Light and Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines [J]. SAE International, 2012,doi:10.4271/2012-01-0895.
|
[15] |
Daniel R, Brooks T, Pates D. Analysis of US and EU Drive Styles to Improve Understanding of Market Usage and the Effects on OBD Monitor IUMPR [J]. SAE Technical Paper, 2009,doi: 10.4271/2009-01-0236.
|
[16] |
?l?zak M. Methodology of operation verification on board diagnostics systems (OBD) in Polish conditions [J]. Journal of KONES, 2004,11(3/4):268-279.
|
|
|
|