碳减排政策组合使用效能差异及提升策略

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2714 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This study creates four scenarios for the employment of carbon emission reduction policy tools, depending on whether the two emission reduction policies of carbon trading and carbon tax are engaged. During this process, evolutionary game theory is applied. The stability analysis of the game system has provided a thorough explanation of the influence mechanism and action mechanism of the combination of carbon emission reduction policies on enterprise carbon emission reduction. On this premise, we conduct sensitivity analysis to discover the primary sensitivity elements that influence the game system's path. In the empirical analysis section, we take the case of national carbon trading market construction as the empirical object, simulate the evolution trajectory of the main body of carbon trading and mixed carbon policy use scenario game, deeply analyze the influence degree of key factors on the system, and put forward the dynamic increasing tax rate and dynamic reward and punishment strategy, optimize the carbon emission reduction efficiency improvement strategy of mixed carb. The study found that: when compared to no carbon trading without carbon tax, carbon trading without carbon tax, and no carbon trading with carbon tax, the mixed carbon policy use scenario has the highest carbon emission reduction efficiency. Second, the current construction of China's carbon trading market need further strengthening. The government and businesses have not achieved the optimal state (supervision, carbon emission reduction). The cost and penalty elements have a clear impact on the game system, however the direction of subsidy factors is unknown. Third, dynamic incentive and punishment schemes are combined with dynamic incremental tax rates in the mixed carbon policy scenario. The system spirals upward and reaches a stable equilibrium position (carbon emission reduction, supervision), where the optimal reward and punishment scheme is dynamic subsidy-dynamic punishment.

Key words： carbon emission reduction policy combination evolutionary game theory efficiency difference dynamic rewards and punishments

Received: 11 August 2024

PACS:

X196

Corresponding Authors: 杨霞,副教授,xyang8731959@163.com E-mail: xyang8731959@163.com

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Xia
	HE Gang
	ZHANG Shi-yu
	JIANG Huai-yin

Cite this article:

YANG Xia,HE Gang,ZHANG Shi-yu等. Research on the efficiency difference and promotion strategy of combining carbon emission reduction policies[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2025, 45(3): 1699-1712.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2025/V45/I3/1699

[1] Duan H, Zhou S, Jiang K, et al. Assessing China's efforts to pursue the 1.5℃ warming limit[J]. Science, 2021,372:378-385.
[2] Luo R, Zhou L, Song Y, et al. Evaluating the impact of carbon tax policy on manufacturing and remanufacturing decisions in a closed-loop supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022,(245):108408.
[3] Goto N. Macroeconomic and sectoral impacts of carbon taxation[J]. Energy Economics, 1995,17(4):277-292.
[4] Hagmann D, Ho E H, Loewenstein G. Nudging out support for a carbon tax[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2019,9(6):484-489.
[5] Ahmad M, Li X F, Wu Q. Carbon taxes and emission trading systems:Which one is more effective in reducing carbon emissions?-A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024,(476):143761.
[6] 蔡栋梁,闫懿,程树磊.碳排放补贴、碳税对环境质量的影响研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2019,29(11):59-70. Cai D L, Yan Y, Chen S L. Research on the impact of carbon emission subsidies and carbon taxes on environmental quality[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019,29(11):59-70.
[7] Xia X, Li C, Zhu Q. Game analysis for the impact of carbon trading on low-carbon supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,276(3):123220.
[8] 邢会,姜影,陈园园."双碳"目标下碳交易与制造业绿色全要素生产率--基于异质性技术创新模式的机制检验[J].科技进步与对策, 2022,39(23):76-86. Xing H, Jiang Y, Chen Y Y. Carbon trading and green total factor productivity in manufacturing industry under the"double carbon" goal:A mechanism test based on heterogeneous technology innovation model[J]. Science& Technology Progress and Policy, 2022,39(23):76-86.
[9] Zhang X F, Fan D C. Research on the synergistic emission reduction effect of carbon emission trading and green financial policy[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024,(367):121924.
[10] Li W, Jia Z. Carbon tax, emission trading, or the mixed policy:Which is the most effective strategy for climate change mitigation in China?[J]. Mitigation& Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2017,22(6):973-992.
[11] 石敏俊,袁永娜,周晟吕,等.碳减排政策:碳税、碳交易还是两者兼之?[J].管理科学学报, 2013,16(9):9-19. Shi M J, Yuan Y N, Zhou S L, et al. Carbon tax, cap-and-trade or mixed policy:Which is better for carbon mitigation?[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2013,16(9):9-19.
[12] 翁智雄,吴玉锋,李伯含,等.征收差异化行业碳税对中国经济与环境的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2021,31(3):75-86. Weng Z X, Wu Y F, Li B H, et al. Impact of differentiated industrial carbon taxes on China's economy and environment[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021,31(3):75-86.
[13] 张宇翔,谭德庆.双重碳政策对制造型企业决策影响及政府调控策略研究[J].管理评论, 2022,34(2):303-314. Zhang Y X, Tan D Q. The optimal decision-making of monopoly manufacturer under the mixed carbon policy and government regulation policy[J]. Management Review, 2022,34(2):303-314.
[14] Chai S L, Huo W J, Li Q, et al. Effects of carbon tax on energy transition, emissions and economy amid technological progress[J]. Applied Energy, 2025,(377):124578.
[15] Mildenberger M, Lachapelle E, Harrison K, et al. Limited evidence that carbon tax rebates have increased public support for carbon pricing[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2022,12(2):121-122.
[16] Linghu D, Wu X, Lai K H, et al. Implementation strategy and emission reduction effectiveness of carbon cap-and-trade in heterogeneous enterprises[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022,(6):248.
[17] Zhu C, Xi X, Goh M. Differential game analysis of joint emission reduction decisions under mixed carbon policies and CEA[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024,358:120913.
[18] 崔宁,周宇,赵晓亮.四方主体参与碳减排的演化博弈研究[J].中国环境科学, 2023,43(12):6788-6802. Cui N, Zhou Y, Zhao X L. Research on the evolutionary game of carbon emission reduction involving four entities[J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(12):6788-6802.
[19] 高旭阔,席子云.组合措施下政府与企业排污行为演化博弈[J].中国环境科学, 2020,40(12):5484-5492. Gao X K, Xi Z Y. Evolutionary game of government and enterprise pollution discharge behavior under combined measures[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(12):5484-5492.
[20] 方国昌,何宇,田立新.碳交易驱动下的政企碳减排演化博弈分析[J].中国管理科学, 2024,32(5):196-206. Fang G C, He Yu, Tian L X. Evolutionary game analysis of government and enterprises carbon-reduction under the driven of carbon trading[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024,32(5):196-206.
[21] 李晨光,王帅,郭雨蕙.碳中和背景下钢铁行业低碳转型发展政策工具与路径分析--基于动态CGE模型的模拟研究[J].经济问题探索, 2023,(1):34-59. Li C G, Wang S, Guo Y H. Analysis of policy tools and pathways for low-carbon transformation development of iron and steel industry--A simulation study based on dynamic CGE model[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2023,(1):34-59.
[22] Weibull J W. Evolutionary game theory[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press, 1995.
[23] 杨松,庄晋财,孟祥海,等.不同奖惩机制下食品企业行为与政府监管演化博弈[J].管理评论, 2022,34(3):314-324. Yang S, Zhuang J C, Meng X H, et al. The evolutionary game between enterprise behavior and government regulation under various subsidy and punishment mechanisms[J]. Management Review, 2022,34(3):314-324.
[24] 杨雪,田阳,宋爱峰,等.Bradley Curve视角下矿工违章行为的惩罚机制分析[J].管理学报, 2021,18(8):1238-1244. Yang X, Tian Y, Song A F, et al. Analysis on punishment mechanism of miners'violation behavior from the perspective of bradley curve[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2021,18(8):1238-1244.
[25] 王江,王鹏.流域府际生态协同治理优于属地治理的证成与实现--基于动态演化博弈模型[J].自然资源学报, 2023,38(5):1334-1348. Wang J, Wang P. The justification of inter-government ecological collaborative governance in the river basin better than territorial governance and its realization path:Based on the dynamic evolutionary game model[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023,38(5):1334-1348.
[26] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk[J]. 1979,47(2):263-292.
[27] 田方钰,刘海英,刘达禹.动态最优碳税、适度减排关注与经济绿色转型[J].财经科学, 2024,(3):73-88. Tian F Y, Liu H Y, Liu D Y. Dynamic optimal carbon tax, appropriate concern of carbon emission reduction and the green transition of economy[J]. Finance& Economics, 2024,(3):73-88.
[28] 史学瀛,杨博文.我国碳排放权交易处罚规则与履约风险规制路径[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2020,41(1):39-47. Shi X Y, Yang B W. The penalty rules of carbon emissions trading and the path of performance risk regulation in China[J]. Journal of Jishou University (Social Sciences), 2020,41(1):39-47.
[29] 周迪,蔡晓婷,张达泉,等.基于CGE模型的碳税政策模拟--以广东省为例[J].气候变化研究进展, 2020,(4):516-525. Zhou D, Cai X T, Zhang D Q, et al. Carbon tax policy simulation based on CGE model:A case study of Guangdong Province[J]. Climate Change Research, 2020,(4):516-525.
[30] 陆春华,李晨光,李虹.基于动态CGE模型的碳税政策促进江苏省低碳发展研究[J].科学决策, 2022,(6):54-72. Lu C H, Li C G, Li H. Research on carbon tax policy to promote low-carbon transformation and development of Jiangsu Province:based on dynamic CGE model[J]. Scientific Decision Making, 2022,(6):54-72.
[31] 王育宝,樊鑫.电力行业碳强度配额交易市场与可再生能源支持政策协同减碳机制研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2024,38(8):31-41. Wang Y B, Fan X. Carbon emission reduction through the synergy between carbon intensity quota trading market and renewable energy support policy in electric power industry[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2024,38(8):31-41.
[32] 魏宁,刘胜男,李桂菊,等.CCUS对中国粗钢生产的碳减排潜力评估[J].中国环境科学, 2021,41(12):5866-5874. Wei N, Liu S N, Li G J, et al. Mitigation potential evaluation of CO₂capture and storage in crude steel industries of China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(12):5866-5874.
[33] 方婷.燃煤电厂环境成本确认及计量研究[D].保定:华北电力大学, 2021. Fang T. Research on the recognition and measurement of environmental costs in coal-fired power plants[D]. Baoding City:North China Electric Power University, 2021.
[34] 许文博,许恒周.中央、地方政府与企业低碳协同发展的实现策略--以京津冀地区为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2021,31(12):23-34. Xu W B, Xu H Z. Strategies for achieving low-carbon coordinated development of central government Strategies for achieving low-carbon coordinated development of central government[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021,31(12):23-34.
[35] 范庆泉,刘净然,王竞达.清洁生产补贴、收入分配失衡与碳排放权再分配机制研究[J].世界经济, 2022,45(7):50-72. Fan Q Q, Liu J R, Wang J D. Cleaner production subsidies, imbalance in income distribution and carbon emissions permit reallocation mechanism[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2022,45(7):50-72.
[36] 孙嘉轶,杨露,滕春贤.政府补贴与股权合作下低碳闭环供应链决策与协调[J].系统工程学报, 2023,38(4):540-554. Sun J Y, Yang L, Teng C X. Decision and coordination of low-carbon closed-loop supply chain considering government subsidies and equity cooperation[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2023,38(4):540-554.
[37] 焦建玲,陈洁,李兰兰,等.碳减排奖惩机制下地方政府和企业行为演化博弈分析[J].中国管理科学, 2017,25(10):140-150. Jiao J L, Chen J, Li L L, et al. A study of local governments'and enterprises'actions in the carbon emission mechanism of subsidy or punishment based on the Evolutionary Game[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017,25(10):140-150.