|
|
An empirical study on the effect of environmental regulation on total factor energy efficiency——Decomposition verification based on Potter hypothesis |
WANG Teng1,2, YAN Liang1,2, HE Jian-hua2, ZHENG Shi-gang2 |
1. Research Center of Resources and Environmental Economics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China |
|
|
Abstract The total factor energy efficiency of China's 30provincial administrative regions during 2000~2014was estimated based on DEA-Malmquist index. Then the total factor energy efficiency was decomposed into technical level, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency. To testify the Potter hypothesis, the panel threshold regression model was adopted to simulate the environmental regulation on total factor energy efficiency, technical level, scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency. Results showed that technical level regression constituted a major cause for the decline of total factor energy efficiency in China. Environmental regulation exerted a negative influence on the scale efficiency, indicating Potter hypothesis as invalid. Single threshold existed between environmental regulation and pure technical efficiency, and there was a positive impact at different intervals, revealing the existence of Porter hypothesis. The impact of environmental regulation on total factor energy efficiency and technical level was positive when the environmental regulation was less than 0.0002, and the Porter hypothesis was correspondingly valid. Otherwise, it didn't stand. Therefore, government should formulate environmental regulation policy after considering varied effect on technical level, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency.
|
Received: 26 July 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Porter M E, Van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995,9(4):97-118.
|
[2] |
尤济红,高志刚.政府环境规制对全要素能源效率影响的实证研究——以新疆为例[J]. 资源科学, 2013,35(6):1211-1219.
|
[3] |
万伦来,童梦怡.环境规制下中国能源强度的影响因素分析——基于省际面板数据的实证研究[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2010,32(2):6-7.
|
[4] |
王艳丽,钟 奥.工业行业环境规制、创新能力与全要素能源效率的实证检验[J]. 统计与决策, 2015,(15):139-142.
|
[5] |
张 华,王 玲,魏晓平.能源的"波特假说"效应存在吗?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014,24(11):33-41.
|
[6] |
高志刚,尤济红.环境规制强度与中国全要素能源效率研究[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2015,(6):111-123.
|
[7] |
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, et al. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries[J]. The American Economic Review, 1994,84(1):66- 83.
|
[8] |
刘丹丹,赵颂扬旸,郭 耀.全要素视角下中国西部地区能源效率及影响因素[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(6):1911-1920.
|
[9] |
张 军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952-2000[J]. 经济研究, 2004,(10):35-44.
|
[10] |
吴延瑞.生产率对中国经济增长的贡献:新的估计[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2008,7(3):827-842.
|
[11] |
曾贤刚.我国能源效率、CO2减排潜力及影响因素分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2010,30(10):1432-1440.
|
[12] |
汪克亮,杨宝臣,杨 力.考虑环境效应的中国省际全要素能源效率研究[J]. 管理科学, 2010,23(6):100-111.
|
[13] |
Li L B, Hu J L. Ecological total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2012,46(6):216-224.
|
[14] |
吴 琦,武春友.基于DEA的全要素能源效率评价模型研究[J]. 管理科学, 2009,22(1):103-112.
|
[15] |
臧传琴,刘 岩.山东省全要素能源效率及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012,22(8):107-113.
|
[16] |
Hu J L, Wang S C. Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2006,34(17):3206-3217.
|
[17] |
Hansen B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels:Estimation, testing, and inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999,93(2):345-368.
|
[18] |
胡援成,肖德勇.经济发展门槛与自然资源诅咒——基于我国省际层面的面板数据实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2007,(4):15-23.
|
|
|
|