|
|
Discussion of the measurement method of ambient bioaerosols based on fluorescent signal |
REN Yi1, HUANG Xiao-feng1, WANG Zhi-bin2, SUN Tian-le3, SUN Jie3, ZHANG Ming-di3, HE Ling-yan1 |
1. Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Environment and Energy, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China;
2. Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max-Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, Germany;
3. Shenzhen Environmental Monitoring Center, Shenzhen 518049, China |
|
|
Abstract A Wideband Integrated Bioaerosol Spectrometer (WIBS) was operated continuously from August 1to August 31 in 2015 at an urban sampling site in Shenzhen, China. The average number concentrations of the three fluorescent channels, i.e., FL1, FL2 and FL3, were 0.41, 0.61 and 0.24cm-3, respectively. The fluorescent aerosol particles (FAPs) was further divided into seven types according to their fluorescence thresholds. The mean number concentrations of the two dominant types, i.e., Type B and Type BC, were 0.214cm-3 and 0.202cm-3. Different diurnal variations of fluorescent particles was also observed, but they generally showed a low value in the daytime and a high value at night. Most of the number size distributions of FAPs showed a peak at 1.1μm except Type ABC, whose peak was at 2.2μm. In order to discuss the influence of non-biological fluorescence components on bioaerosol measurement, the correlation analysis and principal component analysis among black carbon, acetonitrile, m/z44, and different FAP types were applied. The results showed that most of the FAP types were interfered by different non-biological components, but Type C showed a weak correlation with all the pollution source markers. The mean number concentration of Type C was 0.016cm-3, which could be a more reliable value for the real bioaerosols. This study found that non-biological fluorescent components had a large influence on the measurement of bioaerosols based on the fluorescence detection in urban environment.
|
Received: 26 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Després V R, Alex Huffman J, Burrows S M, et al. Primary Biological Aerosol Particles in the Atmosphere:A Review[J]. Tellus B, 2012,64:15598-15655.
|
[2] |
Diehl K, Matthias-Maser S, Jaenicke R, et al. 2002. The ice nucleating ability of pollen:part Ⅱ. Laboratory studies in immersion and contact freezing modes. Atmospheric Research. 61:125133.
|
[3] |
Iannone R, Chernoff D I, Pringle A, et al. 2011. The ice nucleation ability of one of the most abundant types of fungal spores found in the atmosphere. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 11:11911201.
|
[4] |
Delort A M, Vaitilingom M, Amato P, et al. 2010. A short overview of the microbial population in clouds:potential roles in atmospheric chemistry and nucleation processes. Atmospheric Research. 98:249260.
|
[5] |
Sattler B, Puxbaum H, Psenner R, Bacterial growth in supercooled cloud droplets[J]. Geophysical Research Letters. 2001,28:239-242.
|
[6] |
Bauer H, Kasper-Giebl A, Loflund M, et al. The contribution of bacteria and fungal spores to the organic carbon content of cloud water, precipitation and aerosols[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2002,64:109-119.
|
[7] |
Delort A M, Vaitilingom M, Amato P, et al, A short overview of the microbial population in clouds:potential roles in atmospheric chemistry and nucleation processes[J]. Atmospheric Research. 2010,98:249-260.
|
[8] |
Oliver J D. The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria[J]. J. Microbiol., 43,93-100,2005.
|
[9] |
Pöhlker C, Huffman J A, Pöschl U:Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 5,37-71, doi:10.5194/amt-5-37-2012, 2012.
|
[10] |
Gabey A M, Gallagher M W, Whitehead J, et al. Measurements and comparison of primary biological aerosol above and below a tropical forest canopy using a dual channel fluorescence spectrometer[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10,4453-4466,doi:10.5194/acp-10-4453-2010, 2010.
|
[11] |
Gabey A M, Stanley W R, Gallagher M W, et al. The fluorescence properties of aerosol larger than 0.8μm in urban and tropical rainforest locations[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11,5491-5504,doi:10.5194/acp-11-5491-2011,2011.
|
[12] |
Healy D A, O'Connor D J, Sodeau J R. Measurement of the Particle Counting Efficiency of the "Waveband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor" Model Number 4(WIBS-4)[J]. J Aerosol Science, 2012a,47:94-99.
|
[13] |
Healy D A, O'Connor D J, Burke A M, et al. A Laboratory Assessment of the Waveband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor (WIBS-4) Using Individual Samples of Pollen and Fungal Spore Material[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2012b,60:534-543.
|
[14] |
Toprak E, Schnaiter M:Fluorescent biological aerosol particles measured with the Waveband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor WIBS-4:laboratory tests combined with a one year field study[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13, 225-243, doi:10.5194/acp-13-225-2013,2013.
|
[15] |
David J O'Connor, David A Healy, John R Sodeau. The on-line detection of biological particle emissions from selected agricultural materials using the WIBS-4A (Waveband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor) technique[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013,80:415-425.
|
[16] |
Huffman J A, Treutlein B, Pöschl U:Fluorescent biological aerosol particle concentrations and size distributions measured with an Ultraviolet Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (UVAPS) in Central Europe[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10,3215-3233,doi:10.5194/acp-10-3215-2010, 2010.
|
[17] |
孙平勇,刘雄伦,刘金灵,等.空气微生物的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(11):336-340.
|
[18] |
申芳霞.微生物气溶胶监测新方法及其应用研究[D]. 北京:北京大学, 2014.
|
[19] |
Huffman J A, Sinha B, Garland R M, et al. Size distributions and temporal variations of biological aerosol particles in the Amazon rainforest characterized by microscopy and real-time UV-APS fluorescence techniques during AMAZE-08[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12,11997-12019,doi:10.5194/acp-12-11997-2012, 2012.
|
[20] |
Matthias-Maser S, Jaenicke R:The size distribution of primary biological aerosol particles in the multiphase atmosphere[J]. Aerobiological, 16,207-210,2000.
|
[21] |
Chang J L, Thompson J E:Characterization of colored products formed during irradiation of aqueous solutions containing H2O2 and phenolic compounds[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 44,541-551, 2010.
|
[22] |
Perring A E, Schwarz J P, Baumgardner D, et al. Airborne observations of regional variation in fluorescent aerosol across the United States[J]. J. Geophys. Atmospheric Research, 120,1153-1170,doi:10.1002/2014JD022495, 2015.
|
[23] |
Yue S Y, Ren H, Fan S Y, et al. Springtime precipitation effects on the abundance of fluorescent biological aerosol particles and HULIS in Beijing[J]. Scientific Reports. 6, 29618; doi:10.1038/srep29618(2016).
|
[24] |
Saari S, Niemi J, Rönkkö T, et al. Seasonal and Diurnal Variations of Fluorescent Bioaerosol Concentration and Size Distribution in the Urban Environment[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 15,572-581, 2015.
|
[25] |
陈铭夏,金龙山,孙振海,等.南京市生物气溶胶浓度垂直分布和日变化规律[J]. 中国环境科学, 2001,21(2):2-5.
|
[26] |
Miyakawa T, Kanaya Y, Taketani F, et al. Ground-based measurement of fluorescent aerosol particles in Tokyo in the spring of 2013:Potential impacts of nonbiological materials on autofluorescence measurements of airborne particles[J]. J. Geophys. Atmospheric Research, 120, 1171-1185, doi:10.1002/2014jd022189, 2015.
|
[27] |
Yu X, Wang Z B, Zhang M H, et al. Ambient measurement of fluorescent aerosol particles with a WIBS in the Yangtze River Delta of China:potential impacts of combustion-related aerosol particles[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16,11337-11348, doi:10.5194/acp-16-11337-2016, 2016.
|
|
|
|