|
|
Synergistic effect of multiple raw materials anaerobic digestion on methane production performances |
LI Jin-ping1,2,3, CUI Wei-dong1,2,3, HUANG Juan-juan1,2,3, WANG Chun-long1,2,3, LÜ Peng-mei4 |
1. Western China Energy & Environment Research Center, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China; 2. China Northwestern Collaborative Innovation Center of Low-carbon Urbanization Technologies, Lanzhou 730050, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Energy Supply System Drived by Biomass Energy and Solar Energy of Gansu Province, Gansu Lanzhou 730050, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to evaluate the synergistic effects of multiple raw materials anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural and livestock wastes on methane production performance,the tests were conducted under the condition of solid-state (12% total solids) and mesophilic (37±1)℃ to investigate multiple raw materials on methane production performances of anaerobic digestion,and then the dynamic characteristics of producing methane process were analyzed by the modified Gompertz equation.The results showed that synergistic effects obviously occured during the anaerobic co-digestion of three substrates,the synergistic effect of co-digestion contributed to methane yield was significantly (P<0.05) increased by 34.85%~70.39%.A 50:20:30VS ratio of cow manure,vegetable waste and corn straw produced the highest methane yield of 286.0mL/g VS,the highest cumulative methane of 20713mL and the highest VS removal efficiency of 65.6% due to the synergistic effect,increased by 32.9%、229.9% and 82.0% comparing with the cow manure,vegetable waste and corn straw mono-digestion of methane production rate respectively.The analysis results of modified Gompertz equation indicated that the model had feasibility to describe the dynamic process of anaerobic digestion,the R2 values of the fitting curves were larger than 0.99.The maximum methane production rate and the shorter lag phase (17.34mL/(d×g) and 2.97d) were achieved from co-digestion of cow manure,vegetable waste and corn straw at mixing ratio of 50:20:30.The experimental study can provide a reference for biogas projects of multiple raw materials anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural and animal husbandry wastes.
|
Received: 04 August 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
刘越,孟海波,沈玉君,等.基于模糊层次分析法的生物燃气产业竞争力评价模型及应用[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016,32(增刊.1):275-283.
|
[2] |
王红彦,王飞,孙仁华,等.国外农作物秸秆利用政策法规综述及其经验启示[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016,32(16):216-222.
|
[3] |
中华人民共和国国家统计局.中华人民共和国2010年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[R]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/qttjgb/qgqttjgb/201002/t20100211_30641.html, 2010-02-11.
|
[4] |
中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2016.
|
[5] |
Ren J, Yuan X, Li J, et al. Performance and microbial community dynamics in a two-phase anaerobic co-digestion system using cassava dregs and pig manure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014,155(4):342-351.
|
[6] |
Prajapati S K, Malik A, Vijay V K. Comparative evaluation of biomass production and bioenergy generation potential of Chlorella spp. through anaerobic digestion[J]. Applied Energy, 2014,114(2):790-797.
|
[7] |
国家能源局.生物质能发展"十三五"规划[EB/OL]. http://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/auto87/201612/t20161205_2328.htm,2016-10-28.
|
[8] |
李海红,巴琦玥,闫志英,等.不同原料厌氧发酵及其微生物种群的研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(5):1449-1457.
|
[9] |
Molinuevosalces B, Gómez X, Morán A, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of livestock and vegetable processing wastes:fibre degradation and digestate stability[J]. Waste Management, 2013,33(6):1332-1338.
|
[10] |
冯亚君,袁海荣,张良,等.玉米秸与鸡粪混合厌氧消化产气性能与协同作用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2013,7(4):1489-1494.
|
[11] |
王晓娇,杨改河,冯永忠,等.牲畜粪便与秸秆混合的厌氧发酵效果及影响因素分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011,30(12):2594-2601.
|
[12] |
Somssich P, Strein K, Schmiedel H. Synergistic effect of alkaline pretreatment and Fe dosing on batch anaerobic digestion of maize straw[J]. Applied Energy, 2015,158(3):55-64.
|
[13] |
Xie S, Wickham R, Long D N. Synergistic effect from anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic wastes[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2017,116:191-197.
|
[14] |
Xie S, Zhan X, Hai F I, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion:A critical review of mathematical modelling for performance optimization[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016,222:498-512.
|
[15] |
罗娟,董保成,陈羚,等.畜禽粪便与玉米秸秆厌氧消化的产气特性试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(10):219-224.
|
[16] |
Ferreira L C, Nilsen P J, Fdzpolanco F, et al. Biomethane potential of wheat straw:influence of particle size, water impregnation and thermal hydrolysis[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014,242(8):254-259.
|
[17] |
Rao M S, Singh S P, Singh A K, et al. Bioenergy conversion studies of the organic fraction of MSW:assessment of ultimate bioenergy production potential of municipal garbage[J]. Applied Energy, 2000,66(1):75-87.
|
[18] |
Kafle G K, Sang H K. Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production:Batch and continuous operation[J]. Applied Energy, 2013,103(1):61-72.
|
[19] |
刘月玲,乔玮,Serena CROCE,等.餐厨垃圾和秸秆混合连续高温甲烷发酵研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(6):2194-2202.
|
[20] |
Zhen G, Lu X, Kobayashi T, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion on improving methane production from mixed microalgae (Scenedesmus sp. Chlorella sp.)and food waste:Kinetic modeling and synergistic impact evaluation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016,299:332-341.
|
[21] |
Brown D, Li Y. Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013,127(1):275-280.
|
[22] |
Astals S, Batstone D J, Mata-Alvarez J, et al. Identification of synergistic impacts during anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014,169(9):421-427.
|
[23] |
Li C, Strömberg S, Liu G, et al. Assessment of regional biomass as co-substrate in the anaerobic digestion of chicken manure:Impact of co-digestion with chicken processing waste, seagrass and Miscanthus[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2017,118:1-10.
|
[24] |
Wang X, Yang G, Feng Y, et al. Optimizing feeding composition and carbon-nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012,120(8):78-83.
|
[25] |
Li D, Liu S, Mi L, et al. Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and pig manure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015,187:120-127.
|
[26] |
Pagés-Díaz J, Pereda-Reyes I, Taherzadeh M J, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse wastes with agro-residues:Synergistic and antagonistic interactions determined in batch digestion assays[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014,245(5):89-98.
|
[27] |
Zhang C, Li J, Liu C, et al. Alkaline pretreatment for enhancement of biogas production from banana stem and swine manure by anaerobic co-digestion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013,149(4):353-358.
|
[28] |
Pang Y Z, Liu Y P, Li X J, et al. Improving biodegradability and biogas production of corn stover through sodium hydroxide solid state pretreatment[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2008,22(4):2761-2766.
|
[29] |
楚莉莉,李轶冰,冯永忠,等.沼液预处理对小麦秸秆厌氧发酵产气特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011,29(1):247-251.
|
[30] |
付善飞,许晓晖,师晓爽,等.酒糟沼气化利用的基础研发[J]. 化工学报, 2014,65(5):1913-1919.
|
[31] |
Abudi Z N, Hu Z, Sun N, et al. Batch anaerobic co-digestion of OFMSW (organic fraction of municipal solid waste),TWAS (thickened waste activated sludge) and RS (rice straw):Influence of TWAS and RS pretreatment and mixing ratio[J]. Energy, 2016,107:131-140.
|
|
|
|