|
|
Development and application of the dynamic calculation model for proposing a water source eco-compensation standard |
MU Gui-ling, WANG Yi-jie, LI Li, MA Jin-long, WANG Jian-guo, TANG Hong-liang |
The Pearl River Hydraulic Research Institute of Pearl River Water Resources Commission, Guangzhou 510610, China |
|
|
Abstract To follow the government policy and provide environmental-economic measures for protecting the environment at water source regions, the Dynamic Calculation Model was developed for proposing a water source eco-compensation standard by studying and summarizing existing eco-compensation standard accounting methods. The model was applied to establish the standard of water source eco-compensation policy for the Crane Reservoir. The Dynamic Calculation Model divided the ecological compensation process into three stages:trial stage, restoration stage, and stable stage. Depending on the phase characteristics and targets in each stage, respective calculation methods were adopted:the trial stage uses the Contingent Valuation Method, the restoration stage used the Game Model based on the Correction Total Cost Model and the Water Resources Value Method, and the stable stage adopts the Water Pollution Compensation Method. The results show that the trial period of crane reservoir eco-compensation was from 2015 to 2017, and the eco-compensation standard was 1.44billion yuan. The restoration period was 2018~2020, with an eco-compensation standard of 8.94 billion yuan. The eco-compensation standard of stable stage could be calculated annually after 2021. Since the Dynamic Calculation Model proposes water source eco-compensation standards by the dynamic accounting that were with highly recognition, widely application, and simply calculation, this model could be easily promoted.
|
Received: 09 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
张诚谦.论可更新资源的有偿利用[J]. 农业现代化研究, 1987, (5):22-24.
|
[2] |
宗建树.生态与经济都要安全[J]. 环境经济, 2006,(6):7-7.
|
[3] |
Salamon L M, Sokolowski S W, Haddock M A. Measuring the economic value of volunteer work globally:Concepts, estimates, and a roadmap to the future[J]. Annals of Public & Cooperative Economics, 2011, 82(3):217-252.
|
[4] |
Van Hecken G, Bastiaensen J, Vásquez W F. The viability of local payments for watershed services:Empirical evidence from Matiguà s, Nicaragua[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012,74:169-176.
|
[5] |
张化楠,葛颜祥.我国水源地生态补偿标准核算方法研究[J]. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016,18(3):104-109.
|
[6] |
李长健,孙富博,黄彦臣.基于CVM的长江流域居民水资源利用受偿意愿调查分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017,27(6):110-118.
|
[7] |
张盼盼.第一师阿拉尔市居民生态补偿支付意愿和受偿意愿研究[D]. 塔里木大学, 2017.
|
[8] |
李彩红.水源地生态保护成本核算与外溢效益评估研究——基于生态补偿的视角[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2014.
|
[9] |
隋鑫.流域水环境补偿标准框架研究-以哈尔滨磨盘山水库为例[D]. 哈尔滨:黑龙江大学, 2016.
|
[10] |
袁广达,吴杰.环境成本视角下生态污染补偿标准确定的博弈机理研究[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2016,(1):65-74.
|
[11] |
饶清华,颜梦佳,林秀珠,等.基于帕累托改进的闽江流域生态补偿标准研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(4):1235-1241.
|
[12] |
Xiao Y, Hipel K W, Fang L. Incorporating Water Demand Management into a Cooperative Water Allocation Framework[J]. Water Resources Management, 2016,30(9):2997-3012.
|
[13] |
Engel S, Palmer C. Payments for environmental services as an alternative to logging under weak property rights:The case of Indonesia[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(4):799-809.
|
[14] |
Niksokhan M H, Kerachian R, Amin P. A stochastic conflict resolution model for trading pollutant discharge permits in river systems[J]. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 2009,154(1-4):219.
|
[15] |
Tisdell J G, Harrison S R. Estimating an optimal distribution of water entitlements[J]. Water Resources Research, 1992,28(12):3111-3117.
|
[16] |
徐大伟,郑海霞,刘民权.基于跨区域水质水量指标的流域生态补偿量测算方法研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2008,18(4):189-194.
|
[17] |
徐光丽.流域生态补偿机制研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2014.
|
|
|
|