|
|
|
| Experiment and numerical simulation of surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation in PCE contaminated laboratory sandbox |
| GUO Qiong-ze1, ZHANG Ye1, JIANG Bei-lei2, ZHENG Fei1, SHI Xiao-qing1, XU Hong-xia1, WU Ji-chun1 |
1. Key Laboratory of Surficial Geochemistry, Ministry of Education, School of Earth Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The experiment of remediating PCE with surfactant (Tween 80) was carried out in two-dimensional sandbox filled with quartz sand, and the removal processes of NAPL phase under different source zone architectures (SZA) were monitored via image analysis technology. Considering the lack of experimental data on dissolved phase NAPL concentration, numerical simulation using UTCHEM software was further performed to understand the mass transfer process between NAPL phase and aqueous phase, and the effects of surfactant concentration and injection rate on the DNAPL remediation efficiency were investigated. Results from Sandbox experiments and numerical simulations confirmed that:subsurface heterogeneity largely governs the DNAPL SZA, resulting discrepancies in ganglia-to-pool (GTP) ratio. Due to the larger contact area of discrete ganglia with surfactant, DNAPL ganglia is preferentially removed. The higher the initial GTP ratio, the higher the remediation rate and the remediate efficiency of DNAPL; Though the DNAPL remediation rate could be increased by increasing the surfactant concentration or the injection rate, the surfactant remediate efficiency was reduced significantly by 93% over the course of the test. The linear driving force dissolution model can effectively simulate the process of surfactant remediation for DNAPL. Numerical simulation is an important quantitative tool for the assessment of SEAR in the field DNAPL-contaminated sites.
|
|
Received: 27 January 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
张凤君,王斯佳,马慧,等.三氯乙烯和四氯乙烯在土壤和地下水中的污染及修复技术[J]. 科技导报, 2012,30(18):67-74.
|
| [2] |
Taylor T P, Pennell K D, Abriola L M, et al. Surfactant enhanced recovery of tetrachloroethylene from a porous medium containing low permeability lenses. 1. Experimental studies[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2001,48(3/4):325.
|
| [3] |
Lee M, Kang H, Do W. Application of nonionic surfactant-enhanced in situ flushing to a diesel contaminated site.[J]. Water Research, 2005, 39(1):139-146.
|
| [4] |
李隋.表面活性剂强化抽取处理修复DNAPL污染含水层的实验研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2008.
|
| [5] |
高士祥,高松亭.表面活性剂清洗法在污染土壤修复中的应用[J]. 环境科学, 2000,21(1):84-86.
|
| [6] |
Abdul A S, Gibson T L, Ang C C, et al. In situ surfactant washing of polychlorinated biphenyls and oils from a contaminated site[J]. Ground Water, 2010,30(2):219-231.
|
| [7] |
Suchomel E J, Ramsburg C A, Pennell K D. Evaluation of trichloroethene recovery processes in heterogeneous aquifer cells flushed with biodegradable surfactants.[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2007,94(3/4):195.
|
| [8] |
Zhou M F, Rhue R D. Screening commercial surfactants suitable for remediating DNAPL source zones by solubilization.[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000,34(10):1985-1990.
|
| [9] |
Kueper B H, Stroo H F, Vogel C M, et al. Chlorinated solvent source zone remediation[M]. New York:Springer, 2014.
|
| [10] |
邓亚平,张烨,施小清,等.非均质裂隙介质中重非水相流体运移[J]. 水科学进展, 2015,26(5):722-730.
|
| [11] |
陈宝梁.表面活性剂在土壤有机污染修复中的作用及机理[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2004.
|
| [12] |
刘银平.混合表面活性剂修复四氯乙烯土壤污染研究[D]. 北京:华北电力大学, 2011.
|
| [13] |
Brown C L. Design of a field scale project for surfactant enhanced remediation of a DNAPL contaminated aquifer[Z]. Electronic, 2004.
|
| [14] |
伍斌,李慧颖,杜晓明,等.表面活性剂增强修复含水层DNAPL污染物过程中污染物扩散面积与抽出浓度的相关关系[C]//中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集, 2015:4340-4345.
|
| [15] |
Saenton S, Illangasekare T H, Soga K, et al. Effects of source zone heterogeneity on surfactant-enhanced NAPL dissolution and resulting remediation end-points.[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2002,59(1/2):27.
|
| [16] |
Basu N B, Rao P, Falta R W. Temporal evolution of DNAPL source and contaminant flux distribution:impacts of source mass depletion.[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2008,95(3/4):93.
|
| [17] |
支银芳,陈家军,杨官光,等.表面活性剂冲洗法治理非水相流体污染多相流研究进展[J]. 环境工程学报, 2006,7(3):25-29.
|
| [18] |
尚光旭,陈家军,支银芳.表面活性剂冲洗修复土壤油污染多相运移数值模型研究[J]. 水动力学研究与进展, 2011,26(5):614-622.
|
| [19] |
Ming W, Cheng Z, Wu J, et al. Precise simulation of long-term DNAPL migration in heterogeneous porous media based on light transmission micro-tomography[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2016.
|
| [20] |
杨宾.饱和多孔介质中典型DNAPLs污染物的表面活性剂强化抽出处理特征[D]. 北京:中国环境科学研究院, 2013.
|
| [21] |
Liang C, Hsieh C L. Evaluation of surfactant flushing for remediating EDC-tar contamination[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2015, s177-178(10):158-166.
|
| [22] |
李韵,李薇,王冰,等.混合表面活性剂修复四氯乙烯土壤污染[J]. 科技通报, 2016,32(2):218-223.
|
| [23] |
白静,赵勇胜,周冰,等.非离子表面活性剂Tween80增溶萘实验模拟[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013,33(11):1993-1998.
|
| [24] |
白静,赵勇胜,陈子方,等.孔隙介质特性影响Tween80溶液冲洗修复NAPL污染含水层模拟实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地), 2012,(s3):239-244.
|
| [25] |
程洲,吴吉春,徐红霞,等.DNAPL在透镜体及表面活性剂作用下的运移研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2014,34(11):2888-2896.
|
| [26] |
卢文喜,罗建男,辛欣,等.表面活性剂强化的DNAPLs污染含水层修复过程的数值模拟[J]. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 2012, 37(5):1075-1081.
|
| [27] |
Zheng F, Gao Y W, Sun Y, et al. The influence of source-zone architecture on DNAPL removal by Tween 80flushing[J]. China Environmental Science, 2016,36:2035-2042.
|
| [28] |
Ye S, Sleep B E, Chien C. The impact of methanogenesis on flow and transport in coarse sand[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2009, 103(1/2):48-57.
|
| [29] |
高燕维,郑菲,施小清,等.基于透射光法探讨水流流速对DNAPL运移分布的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2015,36(7):2532-2539.
|
| [30] |
郑菲,高燕维,徐红霞,等.非均质性对DNAPL污染源区结构特征影响的实验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2016,43(5):140-148.
|
| [31] |
Austin U O T. Volume 2Technical Documentation for UTCHEM-9.0A Three-Dimensional Chemical Flood Simulator. University of Texas, Austin, USA, 1st edition,[M]. 2000.
|
| [32] |
Austin U O T. Volume 1User's Guide for UTCHEM-9.0A Three-Dimensional Chemical Flood Simulator. University of Texas, Austin, USA, 1st edition,[M]. 2000.
|
| [33] |
Jin M, Hirasaki G J, Jackson R E, et al. Control of downward migration of dense nonaqueous phase liquid during surfactant flooding by design simulations[J]. Water Resources Research, 2007,43(1):223-228.
|
| [34] |
Brooks R H. Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow[J]. Journal of the Irrigation & Drainage Division Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1964,92(2):61-88.
|
| [35] |
Delshad M, Pope G A. Comparison of the three-phase oil relative permeability models[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 1989,4(1):59-83.
|
| [36] |
邓亚平,郑菲,施小清,等.多孔介质中DNAPLs运移行为研究进展[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学), 2016,52(3):409-420.
|
| [37] |
Moulu J C. Behaviour of oil ganglia displaced by a surfactant solution in a porous medium[J]. Journal De Physique Lettres, 1985,46(3):1400-1403.
|
|
|
|
