|
|
Comparative analysis on the boundary layer features of haze processes and cleaning process in Guangzhou |
LIAO Bi-ting1, HUANG Jun2, WANG Chun-lin2, WENG Jin-xian1, LI Li-wei1, CAI Huan1, WU Dui3,4 |
1. Guangzhou Huangpu Meteorology, Guangzhou 510530, China;
2. Climatic Center of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510080, China;
3. Jinan University Institute of Mass Spectrometry and Atmospheric Environment, Guangzhou 510630;
4. Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Online Atmospheric Pollution Source Apportionment Mass Spectrometry System, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China |
|
|
Abstract Base on the ground weather data and data of microwave radiometer and wind profile from 2014 to 2016 in Guangzhou national climate observatory, the characteristics of boundary layer structure of the typical during haze processes and cleaning process in Guangzhou are studied. The results are showed as follows:(1) In haze process, the wind speed decreases with height below 270m, but increases with height over 270m, and the increase rate of wind speed below 2000m is lower than that over 2000m. The prevailing wind direction rotates clockwise with height. The wind speed below 510m height is basically less than 3.0m/s, and from 08am to 20pm, the wind speed is less than 2.0m/s below 390m. In cleaning process, there is a speed higher than 5.0m/s zone at 510~1590m and 2790~3000m respectively. Below the height of 1830m, the average wind speed of each layer in the cleaning process is obviously higher than that in haze process. (2) The low temperature inversion was negatively correlated with visibility and positively correlated with concentration of PM2.5, and the correlation coefficients are -0.367 and 0.455respectively. The correlation coefficients is higher when the low temperature inversion and low altitude inversion are simultaneously, and the correlation coefficients are -0.5 and 0.601, respectively. It shows that the existence of multilayer inversion is more prone to haze weather. In haze process, the correlation of low altitude inversion to visibility and PM2.5 was not obvious. In cleaning process, the occurrence of low altitude inversion was mainly related to the cold air coming down from the north, which was positively correlated with visibility (0.217), and negatively correlated with the concentration of PM2.5(-0.64). Low altitude inversion is not conducive to the formation of haze weather. (3) During haze process, the frequency of the low temperature inversion is 60.68%, the average inversion intensity is 1.38℃/100m, and the average inversion layer thickness is 153.2m, which is obviously higher than that of the cleaning process. During cleaning process, the average frequency of occurrence, inversion intensity and inversion layer thickness of low temperature inversion are 64.61%, 0.27℃/100m and 691.07m respectively, which are significantly higher than those of haze process. (4) The mixing layer height of cleaning process is obviously higher than that of the haze process. The daily mixing layer height (958.92m) of cleaning process is 2.4times that of haze process (398.03m).
|
Received: 19 May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
范绍佳,王安宇,樊琦,等.珠江三角洲大气边界层特征及其概念模型[J]. 中国环境科学, 2006,26(增刊):4-6.
|
[2] |
李明华,范绍佳,王宝民,等.珠江三角洲秋季大气边界层温度和风廓线观测研究[J]. 应用气象学报, 2008,19(1):53-60.
|
[3] |
陈训来,冯业荣,范绍佳,等.离岸型背景风和海陆风对珠江三角洲地区灰霾天气的影响[J]. 大气科学, 2008,32(3):530-542.
|
[4] |
李颖敏,范绍佳,张人文.2008年秋季珠江三角洲污染气象分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011,31(10):1585-1591.
|
[5] |
李婷苑,邓雪娇,范绍佳,等.2010年广州亚运期间空气质量与污染气象条件分析[J]. 环境科学, 2012,33(9):2932-2938.
|
[6] |
李浩文,张阿思,步巧利,等.2015年干季佛山一次重空气污染过程形成机理研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017,37(8):3044-3053.
|
[7] |
吴蒙,罗云,吴兑,等.佛山地区干季边界层垂直风温结构对空气质量的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017,37(12):4458-4466.
|
[8] |
吴兑,廖国莲,邓雪娇,等.珠江三角洲霾天气的近地层输送条件研究[J]. 应用气象学报, 2008,19(1):1-9.
|
[9] |
吴蒙,范绍佳,吴兑,等.广州地区灰霾与清洁天气变化特征及影响因素分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2012,32(8):1409-1415.
|
[10] |
廖碧婷,吴兑,陈静,等.灰霾天气变化特征及垂直交换系数的预报应用[J]. 热带气象学报, 2012,(3):417-424.
|
[11] |
吴蒙,吴兑,范绍佳.基于风廓线仪等资料的珠江三角洲污染气象条件研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015,35(3):619-626.
|
[12] |
陈晓阳,冯旭,范绍佳,等.回流指数在空气质量变化研究中的应用[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016,36(3):1032-1041.
|
[13] |
吴兑,吴晟,李海燕,等.穗港晴沙两重天-2010年3月17-23日珠三角典型灰霾过程分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2011,31(4):695-703.
|
[14] |
吴兑,吴晟,李菲,等.粗粒子气溶胶远距离输送造成华南严重空气污染的分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011,31(4):540-545.
|
[15] |
李菲,吴兑,谭浩波,等.广州地区旱季一次典型灰霾过程的特征及成因分析[J]. 热带气象学报, 2012,28(1):113-122.
|
[16] |
杨武,罗秋红,李晓娜,等.2006~2008年秋季广州市重大气污染过程特征研究[J]. 热带气象学报, 2012,(1):123-133.
|
[17] |
董春卿,郑有飞,武永利,等.边界层方案对山西冬季一次静稳天气PM2.5浓度模拟的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(6):1669-1680.
|
[18] |
杨鹏,朱彬,高晋徽,等.一次以南京为中心的夏季PM2.5污染岛污染事件的数值模拟[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(2):321-330.
|
[19] |
邓涛,吴兑,邓雪娇,等.广州地区一次严重灰霾过程的垂直探测[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2014,44(10):2307-2314.
|
[20] |
高晓荣,谭浩波,邓涛,等.三种激光雷达监测污染物分布和输送对比[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(2):444-454.
|
[21] |
廖碧婷,黄俊,邓雪娇,等.基于微波辐射计分析低能见度的液态含水量特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(10):3673-3682.
|
[22] |
国家环境保护局.(GB/T13201-91)制定地方大气污染物排放标准的技术方法[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 1991:3-4.
|
[23] |
杜川利,唐晓,李星敏,等.城市边界层高度变化特征与颗粒物浓度影响分析[J]. 高原气象, 2014,33(5):1383-1392.
|
[24] |
张人文,范绍佳.珠江三角洲风场对空气质量的影响[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,(6):130-134.
|
[25] |
梁碧玲,张丽,钟雪平.边界层风场对深圳秋冬季灰霾天气的影响[J]. 广东气象, 2017,39(6):15-18.
|
[26] |
范绍佳,祝薇,王安宇,等.珠江三角洲地区边界层气象特征研究[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2005,44(1):99-102.
|
[27] |
吴兑,陈位超,游积平,等.海口西郊海岸地带低层大气结构研究[J]. 热带气象学报, 1995,11(2):123-132.
|
[28] |
吴祖常,董保群,任阵海,等.内伶仃岛及其附近海面低层大气的平均结构[J]. 热带气象, 1991,7:162-169.
|
[29] |
徐虹,肖致美,孔君.天津市冬季典型大重污染过程特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(4):1239-1246.
|
[30] |
刘建,范绍佳,吴兑,等.珠江三角洲典型灰霾过程的边界层特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(6):1664-1674.
|
[31] |
刘超,花丛,张恒德,等.L波段探空雷达秒数据在污染天气边界层分析中的应用[J]. 气象, 2017,43(5):591-597.
|
|
|
|