基于在线监测的南京仙林PM<sub>2.5</sub>组分特征与来源解析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (38)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2714 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract

In order to study the pollution characteristics and source contribution of PM_2.5 in Nanjing, PM_2.5 and its chemical composition were measured on-line from March 2018 to February 2019 in Xianlin area of Nanjing. The PMF and the CMB models were used to analyze the source contribution of PM_2.5. The resulted show that the average mass concentration of PM_2.5 in Nanjing during the study period was 54.3μg/m³, and the average concentration in winter was 76.4μg/m³. The main chemical components of PM_2.5 were NO₃^-(21.3%~30.8%)、SO₄^2-(18.9%~23.5%)、NH₄⁺(14.3%~16.2%). In terms of annual average, the PMF model showed the source contribution as:secondary inorganic aerosol (54.9%), coal combustion (17.4%), secondary organic aerosol (7.4%), vehicle source (7.1%), industry source (4.9%), dust (4.8%), other sources (3.4%); the CMB model showed the source contribution as:nitrate (33.0%), sulfate (24.0%), coal (16.4%), vehicle source (8.4%), secondary organic aerosol (7.1%), dust (5.7%), other sources (2.9%), and industry source (2.4%). The sources of PM_2.5 in different seasons were slightly different. The proportion of secondary inorganic aerosol in summer and winter was greater than that in spring and autumn. The proportion of coal in spring and winter was the largest, and the proportion of secondary organic aerosol was the largest in autumn. Combined with the 2017 emission inventory of Nanjing, the contribution of secondary aerosol from PMF and CMB was reanalyzed, and it was found that the main contribution of PM_2.5 in Nanjing Xianlin area came from coal combustion (PMF:34.14%, CMB:33.82%), vehicle source (PMF:27.33%, CMB:29.33%) and industrial source (PMF:26.76%, CMB:24.77%). PM_2.5 in Xianlin area of Nanjing was more affected by sources from coal burning, transportation and industry. It could be seen that the results of PM_2.5 source apportionment from PMF and CMB models basing on-line measurement have good consistency.

Key words： PM_2.5 source apportionment receptor model Nanjing on-line measurement

Received: 08 October 2019

PACS:

X513

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LUO Gan
	WANG Ti-jian
	ZHAO Ming
	WANG De-Yi
	CAO Yun-qing
	CHEN Chu

Cite this article:

LUO Gan,WANG Ti-jian,ZHAO Ming等. Chemical composition and source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Xianlin area of Nanjing basing on-line measurement[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2020, 40(5): 1857-1868.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2020/V40/I5/1857

[1]	郑玫,张延君,闫才青,等.中国PM2.5来源解析方法综述[J]. 北京大学学报, 2014,50(6):1141-1154. Zheng J, Zhang Y J, Yan C Q, et al. Review of PM2.5 Source Apportionment Methods in China[J]. Journal of Peking University, 2014,50(6):1141-1154.
[2]	Wang J D, Zhao B, Wang S X, el al. Particulate matter pollution over China and the effects of control policies[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,584-585:426-447.
[3]	Guo S, Hu M, Zamora M L, et al. Elucidating severe Urban haze formation in China[J]. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science, 2014,111(49):17373-17378.
[4]	Li X, Wang Y, Guo X, et al. Seasonal variation and source apportionment of organic and inorganic compounds in PM2.5 and PM10 particulates in Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2013,25(4):741-750.
[5]	张红亮,樊曙先,顾凯华,等.南京冬季市区和郊区气溶胶中PAHs浓度的昼夜特征及粒径分布[J]. 环境科学, 2012,33(7):2172-2179. Zhang H L, Fan S X, Gu K H, et al. Size Distributions and Diurnal Variations in the Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Winter in Urban and Suburban Nanjing, China[J]. Environmental Science, 2012,33(7):2172-2179.
[6]	张莹袁,王式功,贾旭伟,等.气温与PM2.5协同作用对疾病急诊就诊人数的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017,37(8):3175-3182. Zhang Y Y, Wang S G, Jia X W, et al. Synergetic effect of mean temperature and PM2.5 on emergency room visits for different diseases[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017,37(8):3175-3182.
[7]	张延君,郑玫,蔡靖,等.PM2.5源解析方法的比较与评述[J]. 科学通报, 2015,60(2):109-121. Zhang Y J, Zheng M, Cai J, et al. Comparison and overview of PM2.5 source apportionment methods (in Chinese)[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2015,60(2):109-121.
[8]	Watson J G. overview of receptor model principles[J]. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1984,34(6):619-623.
[9]	黄辉军,刘红年,蒋维楣,等.南京市PM2.5物理化学特性及来源解析[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2006,11(6):713-722. Huang H J, Liu H N, Jiang W M, et al. Physical and chemical characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Nanjing[J]. Climatic and Environmental Research, 2006,11(6):713-722.
[10]	王苏蓉,喻义勇,王勤耕,等.基于PMF模式的南京市大气细颗粒物源解析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015,35(12):3535-3542. Wang S R, Xu Y Y, Wang Q G, et al. source apportionment of PM2.5 in Nanjing by PMF[J]. China Environmental Science, 2015,35(12):3535-3542.
[11]	陈璞珑,王体健,谢晓栋,等.基于数值模式的细颗粒物来源解析[J]. 科学通报, 2018,63(18):1829-1838. Chen P L, Wang T J, Xie X D, et al. Source apportionment of fine particles based on combined numerical model and receptor model (in Chinese)[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2018,63(18):1829-1838.
[12]	Zhang X Y, Zhao X, Ji G X, et al. Seasonal variations and source apportionment of water-soluble inorganic ions in PM2.5 in Nanjing, a megacity in southeastern China[J]. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2019,76:73-88.
[13]	Paatero P, Tapper U. Analysis of different modes of factor analysis as least squares fit problems[J]. Chemometrics and intelligent Laboratory Systems. 1993,18(2):183-194.
[14]	Norris G, Duvall R, Brown S, et al. EPA Positive matrix factorization (PMF) 5.0fundamentals and user guide, EPA/600/R-14/108[R]. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, 2014.
[15]	Friedlander S K. Chemical element balances and identification of air pollution sources.[J]. Environmental science & technology, 1973,7(3).
[16]	Cooper J A, Watson J G. Receptor oriented methods of air particulate source apportionment[J]. JAPCA, 1980,30:1116-1125.
[17]	Gordon G E. Receptor models[J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1980,14:792-800.
[18]	Watson J G. Chemical element balance receptor model methodology for assessing the sources of fine and total particulate matter in Portland[D]. Oregon:Oregon Health & Science University, 1979.
[19]	Coulter C. Thomas. EPA-CMB8.2Users Manual[EB/OL]. https://www.epa.gov/scram/chemical-mass-balance-cmb-model.htm, 2004.
[20]	叶文媛,吴彬,冯银厂,等.大气中二次有机气溶胶估算方法研究进展[J]. 安全与环境学, 2011,11(1):127-131. Ye W Y, Wu B, Feng Y C, et al. Advances in the estimation methods of secondary organic aerosol in atmospheric environment[J]. Journal of safety and Environment, 2011,11(1):127-131.
[21]	GB 3095-2012环境空气质量标准[S]. GB 3095-2012 Ambient air quality standards[S].
[22]	郑敬茹,瞿厚淑,付山,等.黄石市大气PM2.5中水溶性离子浓度特征及来源分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019,32(7):1170-1178. Zheng J R, Qu H S, Fu S, et al. Characteristics and source analysis of water-soluble inorganic ions in PM2.5 in Huang shi City[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019,32(7):1170-1178.
[23]	Pathak R K, Yao X H, Chan C K. Sampling artifacts of acidity and ionic species in PM2.5[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004,38(1):254-259.
[24]	高丽波,王体健,崔金梦,等.2016年夏季南京大气污染特征观测分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(1):1-12. Gao L B, Wang T J, Cui J M, et al. Observation and analysis of the characteristics of air pollution in Nanjing in summer 2016[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(1):1-12.
[25]	陈璞珑,王体健,谢旻,等.南京市细颗粒物来源解析研究[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学), 2015,51(3):524-534. Chen P L, Wang T J, Xie M, et al. A study of chemical mass balance source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Nanjing[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Science), 2015,51(3):524-534.
[26]	施双双.长三角典型地区冬季气溶胶来源解析及粒径分布特征[D]. 南京:南京信息工程大学, 2018. Shi S S. Source apportionment and size distribution of aerosol over typical areas of Yangtze River Delta in winter[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Information Engineering University, 2018:6.
[27]	Xie Y L, Hopke P K, Paatero P, et al. Identification of source nature and seasonal variations of arctic aerosol by positive matrix Factorization[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1999,56(2):249-260.
[28]	Han B, Kong S F, Bai Z P, et al. Characterization of elemental species in PM2.5 samples collected in four cities of Northeast China[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2010,209(1):15-28.
[29]	王同桂.重庆市大气PM2.5污染特征及来源解析[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2007. Wang T G. Source apportionment and pollution characteristics of PM2.5 in Chong qing[D]. Chong qing:Chong qing University, 2007.
[30]	杨凌霄.济南市大气PM2.5污染特征,来源解析及其对能见度的影响[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2008. Yang L X. Characteristics, source apportionment and influence on visual range of PM2.5 in Jinan[D]. Jinan:Shandong University, 2008.
[31]	朱先磊,张远航,曾立民,等.北京市大气细颗粒物PM2.5的来源研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2005,18(5):1-5. Zhu X L, Zhang Y H, Zeng L M, et al. Source identification of ambient PM2.5 in Beijing[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2005,18(5):1-5.
[32]	Kong S F, Han B, Bai Z P, et al. Receptor modeling of PM2.5, PM10 and TSP in different seasons and long-range transport analysis at a coastal site of Tianjin, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010,408(20):4681-4694.
[33]	Yu Y, Schleicher N, Norra S, et al. Dynamics and origin of PM2.5 during a three-year sampling period in Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 2011,13(2):334-346.
[34]	王文帅.哈尔滨市采暖期大气颗粒物组分源解析[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2009. Wang W S. Apportionment of air-borne particulate during heating period in Harbin[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009.
[35]	李剑东.长沙市郊区大气可吸入颗粒物化学组分特性及源解析[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2009. Li J D. Chemical compositions and source apportionment of inhalable particulate matter at suburban area of Changsha[D]. Changsha:Central South University, 2009.
[36]	Huang S L, Rahn K A, Arimoto R. Testing and optimizing two factor-analysis techniques on aerosol at Narragansett, Rhode Island[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1999,33(14):2169-2185.
[37]	陈涛.成都市中心城区细粒子来源解析研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2009. Chen T. Analysis on resource apportionment of PM2.5 in the center of Chengdu[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009.
[38]	Watson J G, Chow J C, Lurmann F W, et al. Ammonium nitrate, nitric acid, and ammonia equilibrium in wintertime phoenix[J]. Arizona Air & Waste, 1994,44(4):405-412.