受偿意愿在确定生态补偿标准上下限中的作用

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (412 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Willingness to accept (WTA) is one of the common methods to calculate eco-compensation standards. Proper use of WTA method is very critical to reaching the reasonable eco-compensation standards. This study reviewed studies published in Chinese domestic journals associated with WTA during the last 12 years, and found that there was no consensus on whether WTA should be regarded as the upper or lower limit of eco-compensation standards. While the majority of the literature acknowledged that assuming WTA as the lower limit of the compensation standard was not logically rigorous, this article argued that the process of establishing eco-compensation standards can be regarded as a bargaining process between the payee and the payer and the WTA is actually the bid value of the payee. Therefore it should be used as the upper limit of the eco-compensation standard. In addition, it was found that the acceptable range of eco-compensation standards on the basis that WTA and WTP not be a precise amount but an imprecision interval. When the WTA was higher than WTP, there was still possibility for negotiation success; otherwise, the actual eco-compensation standards had wider range and the policy maker had more flexibility for decision.

Key words： ecological compensation conditional valuation method (CVM) willingness to accept (WTA) eco-compensation standards

Received: 01 September 2020

PACS:

X196

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	PAN Mei-chen
	SONG Bo

Cite this article:

PAN Mei-chen,SONG Bo. The role of willingness to accept in determining the upper or lower limit of eco-compensation standard[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2021, 41(4): 1932-1939.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2021/V41/I4/1932

[1]	Davis R K. Recreation planning as an economic problem[J]. Natural Resources Journal, 1963,3(3):239-249.
[2]	马中.环境与自然资源经济学概论[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006. Ma Z. Introduction of environmental and natural resource economics[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2006.
[3]	马爱慧,李鸿.农户参与耕地保护受偿额度及执行保护意愿影响因素分析[J]. 上海国土资源, 2015,(1):44-48. Ma A H, Li H. Factors influencing farmers' willingness to accept compensation[J]. Shanghai Land & Resources, 2015,(1):44-48.
[4]	Bishop R C, Mitchell R C, Carson R T. Using surveys to value public goods:The contingent valuation method[J]. Contingent Valuation Method, 1989,72(1):153-163.
[5]	曾黎,杨庆媛,廖俊儒,等.基于农户受偿意愿的休耕补偿标准探讨——以河北样本户为例[J]. 资源科学, 2018,40(7):59-70. Zeng L, Yang Q N, Mui J R, et al. Fallow compensation based on farmer willingness to accept in Hebei[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(7):59-70.
[6]	Petrolia D R, Kim T G. Preventing land loss in coastal Louisiana:Estimates of WTP and WTA[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011,92(3):859-865.
[7]	Wang X, Adamowski J F, Wang G, et al. Farmers' willingness to accept compensation to maintain the benefits of urban forests[J]. Forests, 2019,10(8):691.
[8]	余亮亮,蔡银莺.生态功能区域农田生态补偿的农户受偿意愿分析——以湖北省麻城市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2015,35(1):134-140. Yu L L, Cai Y Y. Ecological compensation for farmland based on farmers'willingness to accept in ecological function area:A case study of macheng in Hubei[J]. Economic Geography, 2015,35(1):134-140.
[9]	李海燕,蔡银莺.主体功能区农田生态补偿的农户受偿意愿分析——以重点开发、农产品主产和生态功能区为实证[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2016,37(1):123-129. Li H Y, Cai Y Y. Analysis on farmers' willingness to accept the ecological compensation in those main functional areas:A case study of Hubei Province[J]. 2016,37(1):123-129.
[10]	徐大伟,刘春燕,常亮.流域生态补偿意愿的WTP与WTA差异性研究:基于辽河中游地区居民的CVM调查[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013,28(3):402-409. Cai D W, Liu C Y, Chang L. A study on the disparity of WTP and WTA of the basin's willingness to ompensate:Based on the Residents'CVM investigation in the Middle Liaohe Drainage Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013,28(3):402-409.
[11]	尚海洋,刘正汉,毛必文.流域生态补偿标准的受偿意愿分析以石羊河流域为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2015,31(7):783-786,795. Shang H Y, Liu Z H, Mao B W. Analysis on willingness to accept of compensation standard in watershed the case study of Shiyang River[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2015,31(7):783-786,795.
[12]	周颖,周清波,甘寿文,等.玉米秸秆还田技术支付与受偿意愿差异性研究——以保定市徐水区农户调查为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018,26(5),780-790. Zhou Y, Zhou Q B, Gan H W, et al. Disparity between willingness to pay/accept for corn straw counter-field technology:A case study of farmer survey in Xushui District of Baoding City[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018,26(5):780-790.
[13]	李国志.农户秸秆还田的受偿意愿及影响因素研究——基于黑龙江省806个农户调研数据[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018,32(6):31-36. Li G Z. Factors influencing on farmers' willingness to accept the straw-to-field:Cases in Heilongjiang province[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018,32(6):31-36.
[14]	朱红根,江慧珍,康兰媛,等.基于农户受偿意愿的退耕还湿补偿标准实证分析——来自鄱阳湖区1009份调查问卷[J]. 财贸研究, 2015, 26(5):57-64. Zhu H G, Wang H Z, Kang L N, et al. An empirical analysis of wetland restoration compensation standards based on farmers' WTA:Survey data from 1009 farmers in Poyang Lake[J]. Finance and Trade Research, 2015,26(5):57-64.
[15]	李海燕,蔡银莺.基于帕累托改进的农田生态补偿农户受偿意愿——以湖北省武汉市、荆门市和黄冈市典型地区为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016,23(4):245-250,256. Li H Y, Cai Y Y. Agricultural land ecological compensation standard estimate based on farmers"willingness to accept-A case study of Hubei Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 23(4):245-250,256.
[16]	李国志.农户公益林建设受偿意愿及影响因素研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,12(1):39-44,56. Li G Z. Study on farmers' accepting willingness and influencing factors of public welfare forest construction[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology (Social Sciences), 2018,12(1):39-44,56.
[17]	韦惠兰,祁应军.基于CVM的牧户对减畜政策的受偿意愿分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017,31(3):45-50. Wei H L, Qi Y J. The analysis of herdsmen's willingness to accept the reducing-livestock policy based on the CVM[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017,31(3):45-50.
[18]	皮泓漪,张萌雪,夏建新.退耕还林生态补偿标准研究——基于宁夏泾源县农户调查数据[J]. 林业经济问题, 2018,38(2):39-44,104. Pi H Q, Zhang M X, Xia J X. Ecological compensation standards of the grain for green project:Based on the survey data of farmers in Jingyuan County of Ningxia[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2018, 38(2):39-44,104.
[19]	商慧敏,王庆改,郗敏,等.胶州湾滨海湿地生态补偿标准研究[J]. 湿地科学, 2018,16(3):400-406. Shang H M, Wang Q G, Hao M, et al. Ecological compensation standard for coastal wetlands in Jiaozhou Bay[J]. Wetland Science, 2018,16(3):400-406.
[20]	孙博,谢屹,温亚利.中国湿地生态补偿机制研究进展[J]. 湿地科学, 2016,14(1):89-96. Sun B, Xie Y, Wen Y L. Advance in ecological compensation mechanism for wetlands in China[J]. Wetland Science, 2016,14(1):89-96.
[21]	郭梅,彭晓春,郑延敏,等.东江源受偿意愿调查与跨省生态补偿机制研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2013,5(1):183-187. Guo M, Peng X C, Zheng Y M, et al. Ecological compensation in Dongjiang headwaters based on the survey[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013,5(1):183-187.
[22]	杨浩,曾圣丰,曾维忠,等.基于希克斯分析法的中国森林碳汇造林生态补偿——以"放牧地-碳汇林地"土地用途转变为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016,36(9):221-227. Yang H, Zeng S F, Zeng W Z, et al. Ecological compensation of forest carbon sequestration in China based on hicks analysis-A case study of the land use change from grazing to planting carbon sequestration forest[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2016,36(9):221-227.
[23]	刘鑫,孔祥斌,吴芳芳,等.农户休耕意愿与不同模式的补偿标准——以太行山北麓平原、黑龙港地区为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019,26(5),328-333. Liu X, Kong X B, Wu F F, et al. Farmers' fallow willingness and compensation standard of different models-A case study in the northern foothills plain of Taihang Mountain and Hei-longgang District[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,26(5):328-333.
[24]	赵晓迪,于超,何友均,等.国家公园体制试点区居民支付与受偿意愿研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019,39(11):141-146. Zhao X D, Yu C, Chao Y J, et al. Study on residents' payment and acceptance willingness in the national park system pilot area[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019,39(11):141-146.
[25]	巩芳,王芳,长青,等.内蒙古草原生态补偿意愿的实证研究[J]. 经济地理, 2011,31(1):144-148. Gong F, Wang F, Chang Q, et al. Empirically study on compensation will of grassland ecology in Inner Mongolia[J]. Economic Geography, 2011,31(1):144-148.
[26]	张冰.长白山自然保护区旅游生态补偿支付意愿及受偿意愿的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2013. Zhang B. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept for tourism ecocompensation in Changbai Mountain nature reserve[D]. Haerbing:Northeast Forestry University, 2013.
[27]	王雅敬,谢炳庚.公益林保护区生态补偿标准与补偿方式[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(6):1893-1900. Wang Y Z, Xie B G. Ecological compensation standards and compensation methods of public welfare forest protected area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(6):1893-1900.
[28]	蔡银莺,张安录.武汉城乡人群对农田生态补偿标准的意愿分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011,31(1):170-176. Cai Y Y, Zhang A L. Agricultural land's ecological compensation criteria based on farmers and residents' willingness in Wuhan[J]. China Environmental Science, 2011,31(1):170-176.
[29]	熊凯,孔凡斌.基于生态系统服务功能价值的鄱阳湖湿地生态补偿标准研究[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2014,13(6):669-677. Xiong K, Kong F B. Eco-compensation Standard for Poyang Lake Wetland Based on Ecosystem Services Function Value[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2014,13(6):669-677.
[30]	孙光,罗遵兰,李果,等.衡水湖国家级自然保护区生态补偿标准核算[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2019,40(4):8-13. Sun G, Luo Z L, Li G, et al. Determination of the Ecological Compensation Standard for Hengshui Lake National Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2019,40(4):8-13.
[31]	Butler D J, Loomes G C. Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon[J]. American Economic Review, 2007,97(1):226-232.
[32]	Brebner, Sarah, Sonnemans, et al. Does the elicitation method impact the WTA/WTP disparity?[J]. Journal of behavioral and experimental economics, 2018,73(5):40-45.
[33]	沈根祥,黄丽华,钱晓雍,等.环境友好农业生产方式生态补偿标准探讨——以崇明岛东滩绿色农业示范项目为例[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009,28(5):1079-1084. Shen G X, Huang L H, Qian X Y, et al. Ecological compensation criteria for environmental-friendly agriculture production-case study of green agriculture demonstration project in Dongtan, Chongming Island[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009,28(5):1079-1084.