|
|
|
| Effects of compound microbial agents on anaerobic treatment of food waste at low temperature |
| WANG Yu-chen1,2, SU Cheng-yuan1,2, WANG Qin2, DING Feng-xiu2, LIANG Zhu2, WEN Shi-tong2, CHEN Meng-lin2, HUANG Zhi2 |
1. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection, Ministry of Education, Guilin 541004, China;
2. School of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In order to improve the efficiency of the anaerobic reactor in the low temperature environment, different volumes of compound microbial agents (0, 1, 2, 5mL) were added to the upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactor, and the removal rates of COD and NH3-N, key enzyme activities, microbial community structure and function during the anaerobic digestion process were analyzed. The results showed that the optimum removal rates of COD (42.47%) and NH3-N (63.93%) were obtained in the UASB reactor with 2mL of compound microbial agents. And the relative activities of acetate kinase (AK) and coenzyme F420 in anaerobic sludge were increased by (120.39±4.14)% and (148.63±4.32)% compared with the control group. In addition, the abundance and diversity of microorganisms reached the highest, and the relative abundance of Proteobacteria (15.30%) and Thermotogae (1.13%) were the highest, which played an important role in organic acid production and maintaining the stability of anaerobic digestion process. Meanwhile, compared with the dominant archaea Methanobacterium (30.51%) and Methanothrix (32.80%) in the control group, the relative abundance of Methanobacterium (18.93%) was decreased by adding 2mL compound microbial agents. The relative abundance of Methanothrix (34.32%) was increased, which was favorable for the acetic acid type methanogenesis process.
|
|
Received: 05 September 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
Dahiya S, Mohan S V. Synergy of selective buffering, intermittent pH control and bioreactor configuration on acidogenic volatile fatty acid production from food waste[J]. Chemosphere, 2022,302:134755.
|
| [2] |
Li Y, Jin Y, Borrion A, et al. Current status of food waste generation and management in China[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019,273:654-665.
|
| [3] |
Jin C, Sun S, Yang D, et al. Anaerobic digestion:An alternative resource treatment option for food waste in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021,779:146397.
|
| [4] |
Lin L, Xu F, Ge X, et al. Improving the sustainability of organic waste management practices in the food-energy-water nexus:A comparative review of anaerobic digestion and composting[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018,89:151-167.
|
| [5] |
Cecconet D, Mainardis M, Callegari A, et al. Psychrophilic treatment of municipal wastewater with a combined UASB/ASD system, and perspectives for improving urban WWTP sustainability[J]. Chemosphere, 2022,297:134228.
|
| [6] |
Lew B, Lustig I, Beliavski M, et al. An integrated UASB-sludge digester system for raw domestic wastewater treatment in temperate climates[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011,102:4921-4924.
|
| [7] |
León E S, Vargas-Machuca J A P, Corona E L, et al. Anaerobic digestion of municipal sewage under psychrophilic conditions[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,198:931-939.
|
| [8] |
Safitri A S, Kaster K M, Kommedal R. Effect of low temperature and municipal wastewater organic loading on anaerobic granule reactor performance[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022,360:127616.
|
| [9] |
Kim M S, Kim D H, Yun Y M. Effect of operation temperature on anaerobic digestion of food waste:Performance and microbial analysis[J]. Fuel, 2017,209:598-605.
|
| [10] |
Hu Y, Kobayashi T, Qi W, et al. Effect of temperature and organic loading rate on siphon-driven self-agitated anaerobic digestion performance for food waste treatment[J]. Waste Management, 2018, 74:150-157.
|
| [11] |
张天益.复合菌剂/导电材料强化餐厨垃圾厌氧消化机制研究[D]. 贵州:贵州大学, 2021. Zhang T Y. Study on mechanism of anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste enhanced by compound microbial agents/conductive materials[D]. Guizhou:Guizhou University, 2021.
|
| [12] |
Jiang J, Li L, Li Y, et al. Bioaugmentation to enhance anaerobic digestion of food waste:Dosage, frequency and economic analysis[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,307:123256.
|
| [13] |
Li Y, Yang G, Li L, et al. Bioaugmentation for overloaded anaerobic digestion recovery with acid-tolerant methanogenic enrichment[J]. Waste Management, 2018,79:744-751.
|
| [14] |
Zhao W, Huang J J, Hua B, et al. A new strategy to recover from volatile fatty acid inhibition in anaerobic digestion by photosynthetic bacteria[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,311:123501.
|
| [15] |
Hua B, Cai Y, Cui Z, et al. Bioaugmentation with methanogens cultured in a micro-aerobic microbial community for overloaded anaerobic digestion recovery[J]. Anaerobe, 2022,76:102603.
|
| [16] |
Raut M P, Pandhal J, Wright P C. Effective pretreatment of lignocellulosic co-substrates using barley straw-adapted microbial consortia to enhanced biomethanation by anaerobic digestion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021,321:124437.
|
| [17] |
Tale V P, Maki J S, Zitomer D H. Bioaugmentation of overloaded anaerobic digesters restores function and archaeal community[J]. Water Research, 2015,70:138-147.
|
| [18] |
Abbas Y, Yun S, Wang Z, et al. Recent advances in bio-based carbon materials for anaerobic digestion:A review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021,135:110378.
|
| [19] |
Paritosh K, Yadav M, Chawade A, et al. Additives as a support structure for specific biochemical activity boosts in anaerobic digestion:a review[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2020,8:88-104.
|
| [20] |
Yang M, Lu D, Qin B, et al. Highly efficient nitrogen removal of a coldness-resistant and low nutrient needed bacterium, Janthinobacterium sp. M-11[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018,256:366-373.
|
| [21] |
Song A, Zhang J, Xu D, et al. Keystone microbial taxa drive the accelerated decompositions of cellulose and lignin by long-term resource enrichments[J]. Science of the Total Environment 2022,842:156814.
|
| [22] |
Kumari K, Suresh S, Arisutha S, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of different wastes in a UASB reactor[J]. Waste Management, 2018,77:545-554.
|
| [23] |
吴 婧,钟翔锦.假单胞菌复合菌剂对高浓度废水中氨氮总氮浓度降解的研究[J]. 云南化工, 2022,49(1):25-27. Wu J, Zhong X J. Study on the degradation of total nitrogen concentration of ammonia nitrogen in high concentration wastewater by Pseudomonas complex bacteria[J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2022,49(1):25-27.
|
| [24] |
Shao Y, Zhang H, Buchanan I, et al. Comparison of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) in nitrification and nitritation bioreactors[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2019,143:104713.
|
| [25] |
Ge M, Shen Y, Ding J, et al. New insight into the impact of moisture content and pH on dissolved organic matter and microbial dynamics during cattle manure composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 344:126236.
|
| [26] |
Li X, Dai X, Takahashi J, et al. New insight into chemical changes of dissolved organic matter during anaerobic digestion of dewatered sewage sludge using EEM-PARAFAC and two-dimensional FTIR correlation spectroscopy[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014,159:412-420.
|
| [27] |
Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer J A, et al. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003,37:5701-5710.
|
| [28] |
Li J, Hao X, van Loosdrecht M C M, et al. Effect of humic acids on batch anaerobic digestion of excess sludge[J]. Water Research, 2019, 155:431-443.
|
| [29] |
Wang X, LYU T, Dong R, et al. Revealing the link between evolution of electron transfer capacity of humic acid and key enzyme activities during anaerobic digestion[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022,301:113914.
|
| [30] |
Zhang S, Xiao M, Liang C, et al. Multivariate insights into enhanced biogas production in thermophilic dry anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with kitchen waste or garden waste:Process properties, microbial communities and metagenomic analyses[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022,361:127684.
|
| [31] |
Li Y, Chen Z, Peng Y, et al. Deeper insights into the effects of substrate to inoculum ratio selection on the relationship of kinetic parameters, microbial communities, and key metabolic pathways during the anaerobic digestion of food waste[J]. Water Research, 2022,217:118440.
|
| [32] |
Borth P L B, Perin J K H, Torrecilhas A R, et al. Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of food and garden waste:Methane potential, performance and microbial analysis[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2022, 157:106331.
|
| [33] |
Zhou L, Gao Y, Yu K, et al. Microbial community in in-situ waste sludge anaerobic digestion with alkalization for enhancement of nutrient recovery and energy generation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,295:122277.
|
| [34] |
Liu Y, Wei D, Xu W, et al. Nitrogen removal in a combined aerobic granular sludge and solid-phase biological denitrification system:system evaluation and community structure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019,288:121504.
|
| [35] |
Pervin H M, Dennis P G, Lim H J, et al. Drivers of microbial community composition in mesophilic and thermophilic temperature-phased anaerobic digestion pre-treatment reactors[J]. Water Research, 2013,47:7098-7108.
|
| [36] |
Li Y, Ni J, Cheng H, et al. Methanogenic performance and microbial community during thermophilic digestion of food waste and sewage sludge in a high-solid anaerobic membrane bioreactor[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021,342:125938.
|
| [37] |
Lin M, Ren L, Wandera S M, et al. Enhancing pathogen inactivation in pig manure by introducing thermophilic and hyperthermophilic hygienization in a two-stage anaerobic digestion process[J]. Waste Management, 2022,144:123-131.
|
| [38] |
McAteer P G, Trego A C, Thorn C, et al. Reactor configuration influences microbial community structure during high-rate, low-temperature anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,307:123221.
|
| [39] |
Yang Z, Wang W, Liu C, et al. Mitigation of ammonia inhibition through bioaugmentation with different microorganisms during anaerobic digestion:Selection of strains and reactor performance evaluation[J]. Water Research, 2019,155:214-224.
|
| [40] |
Linsong H, Lianhua L, Ying L, et al. Bioaugmentation with methanogenic culture to improve methane production from chicken manure in batch anaerobic digestion[J]. Chemosphere, 2022,303:135127.
|
|
|
|
