复合电解液强化改良装置修复铀污染土壤研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1324 KB) HTML (0 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Controlled experiment, single factor experiment and orthogonal experiment were used to study the electrokinetic optimization of uranium contaminated soil. The uranium removal efficiency increased to 55.73%, with an average leaching toxic concentration of uranium of only 0.07mol/L. After applying a composite electrolyte of 0.20mol/L tartaric acid and 0.05mol/L ferric chloride to the optimized device, the energy utilization efficiency increased to 306.21. Meanwhile, uranium mainly exists in the form of positively charged uranyl ion (UO₂²⁺) and a minor amount of neutral uranium-tartrate complex by using Visual MINTEQ software, therefore, due to the synergy of electromigration and forward electrodialysis, the migration direction of uranium is from anode to cathode. Subsequently, the experimental parameters yielding the best removal efficiency in this study were determined to be 0.15mol/L of tartaric acid, 0.08mol/L of ferric chloride, and 1.5V/cm of voltage gradient via orthogonal experiment. In addition, the modified device has the potential to improve the effect of soil remediation by ameliorating soil conductivity, zeta potential and pH levels. Moreover, when utilizing the composite liquid made up of tartaric acid and ferric chloride as the electrolyte in the modified device for repairing soil contaminated with uranium, the energy utilization and removal efficiency were elevated, and the toxicity associated with uranium leaching was substantially reduced. Therefore, an efficient and sustainable in-situ remediation technology for uranium-contaminated soil is provided.

Key words： tartaric acid ferric chloride electric repair uranium

Received: 11 January 2023

PACS:

X53

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHOU Shu-ku
	YAN Jia-qing
	DUAN Yi
	TANG hui
	FANG Yan-ling
	YIN Zhong-quan

Cite this article:

ZHOU Shu-ku,YAN Jia-qing,DUAN Yi等. Research on the remediation of uranium-contaminated soil by composite electrolyte enhancement and improvement device[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2023, 43(8): 4127-4136.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V43/I8/4127

[1]	敖浚轩.新型高性能铀酰离子吸附材料制备及应用研究[D].上海:中国科学院大学(中国科学院上海应用物理研究所), 2020. Ao J X. Preparation and application of novel high-performance uranyl ion adsorption materials[D]. Shanghai:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2020.
[2]	扶海鹰.红壤中铀的迁移转化规律及控制方法研究[D].衡阳:南华大学, 2019. Fu H Y. Study on migration and transformation of uranium in red soil and its control methods[D]. Hengyan:University of South China, 2019.
[3]	Xin W H, Yong D W, Nan H, et al. Bioremediation of effluent fr om a uranium mill tailings repository in South China by Azolla-Anabaena[J]. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2018,317(2):739-746.
[4]	Dai X, Wu X, Hong Y, et al. Safety and stability evaluation of the uranium tailings impoundment dam:Based on the improved AHP-cloud model[J]. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 2022,15(1):21-31.
[5]	Li M, Gao F, Zhang X, et al. Recovery of uranium from low-grade tailings by electro-assisted leaching[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,271:122639.
[6]	Chen J Y, Qiu Z M, Gao B. Morphological distribution characteristics and bioavailability of radionuclide uranium of farmland soil in a uranium deposit area[J]. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 2018, 27(4):1979-1988.
[7]	贺卫国.老化对铀在铀尾矿库区土壤垂向各层中的赋存形态及迁移规律研究[D].衡阳:南华大学, 2021. He W G. Study on the occurrence form and migration rule of uranium in vertical layers of soil in uranium tailings area by aging[D]. Hengyang:University of South China, 2021.
[8]	Lv Y, Tang C, Liu X, et al. Optimization of environmental conditions for microbial stabilization of uranium tailings, and the microbial community response[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2021,12:770206.
[9]	Selvakumar R, Ramadoss G, Menon M P, et al. Challenges and complexities in remediation of uranium contaminated soils:A review[J]. Journal of environmental radioactivity, 2018,192:592-603.
[10]	Lyu P, Wang G, Cao Y, et al. Phosphorus-modified biochar cross-linked Mg-Al layered double-hydroxide composite for immobilizing uranium in mining contaminated soil[J]. Chemosphere, 2021,276:130116.
[11]	肖江,周书葵,李智东,等.电动-螯合技术修复重金属污染土壤的现状与展望[J].应用化工, 2019,48(3):632-638. Xiao J, ZHOU S K, LI Z D et al. Current situation and prospectof electrochelation technology for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2019,48(3):632-638.
[12]	Millán M, Bucio-Rodríguez P Y, Lobato J, et al. Strategies for powering electrokinetic soil remediation:A way to optimize performance of the environmental technology[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020,267:110665.
[13]	Ng Y S, Gupta B S, Hashim M A. Remediation of Pb/Cr co-contaminated soil using electrokinetic process and approaching electrode technique[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016,23(1):546-555.
[14]	Nasiri A, Jamshidi-Zanjani A, Darban A K. Application of enhanced electrokinetic approach to remediate Cr-contaminated soil:effect of chelating agents and permeable reactive barrier[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020,266:115197.
[15]	佘文杰.四川某地Cd污染土壤的修复[D].绵阳:西南科技大学, 2017. She W J. Remediation of CD-contaminated soil in Sichuan[D]. Mianyang:Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2017.
[16]	Meng F, Xue H, Wang Y, et al. Citric-acid preacidification enhanced electrokinetic remediation for removal of chromium from chromium-residue-contaminated soil[J]. Environmental Technology, 2018,39(3):356-362.
[17]	陈春乐,王果,王珺玮.3种中性盐与HCl复合淋洗剂对Cd污染土壤淋洗效果研究[J].安全与环境学报, 2014,14(5):205-210. Chen C L, Wang G, Wang J W. Study on the leaching effect of three kinds of neutral salt and HCl compound leaching agents on Cd-contaminated soil[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2014, 14(5):205-210.
[18]	Yoo J C, Shin Y J, Kim E J, et al. Extraction mechanism of lead from shooting range soil by ferric salts[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016,103:174-182.
[19]	Xiao J, Zhou S, Chu L, et al. Electrokinetic remediation of uranium (VI)-contaminated red soil using composite electrolyte of citric acid and ferric chloride[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020,27(4):4478-4488.
[20]	李玉姣.有机酸和无机盐复合淋洗修复Cd､Pb污染农田土壤的研究[D].南京:南京农业大学, 2015. Li Y J. Study on remediation of Cd and Pb contaminated farmland soil by combined leaching of organic acids and inorganic salts[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University, 2015.
[21]	Song Y, Cang L, Zuo Y, et al. EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of aged electroplating contaminated soil assisted by combining dual cation-exchange membranes and circulation methods[J]. Chemosphere, 2020,243:125439.
[22]	Ma Y, Li X, Mao H, et al. Remediation of hydrocarbon-heavy metal co-contaminated soil by electrokinetics combined with biostimulation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018,353:410-418.
[23]	Lee H H, Yang J W. A new method to control electrolytes pH by circulation system in electrokinetic soil remediation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000,77(1-3):227-240.
[24]	赵德志.螯合纤维及其水泥基材料重金属离子吸附固化性能研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2021. Zhao D Z. Study on adsorption and curing properties of chelatedfibers and cement-based materials with heavy metal ions[D]. Harbin:HarbinInstitute of Technology, 2021.
[25]	Fu R, Wen D, Xia X, et al. Electrokinetic remediation of chromium (Cr)-contaminated soil with citric acid (CA) and polyaspartic acid (PASP) as electrolytes[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017,316:601-608.
[26]	Santos E V D, Sáez C, Cañizares P, et al. Reversible electrokinetic adsorption barriers for the removal of atrazine and oxyfluorfenfrom spiked soils[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017,322(PtB):413-420.
[27]	ahladakis J N, Lekkas N, Smponias A, et al. Sequential application of chelating agentsand innovative surfactants for the enhanced electroremediation of real sediments fromtoxic metals and PAHs[J]. Chemosphere, 2014,105(4):44-52.
[28]	Kada K, Abdi A, Djelloul Sayah Z B, et al. Modeling and optimizing by the response surface methodology of the Pb (II)-removing effectiveness from a soil by electrokinetic remediation[J]. Soil and Sediment Contamination:An International Journal, 2023,32(3):305-319.
[29]	Kim K J, Cho J M, Baek K, et al. Electrokinetic removal of chloride and sodium from tidelands[J]. Journal of applied electrochemistry, 2010,40(6):1139-1144.
[30]	Ma C, Li J, Xia W, et al. Effect of additives on the remediationof arsenic and chromium co-contaminated soil by an electrokinetic-permeablereactive barrier[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022,29(8):11966-11975.
[31]	Gu Y Y, Yeung A T, Koenig A, et al. Effects of chelating agentson zeta potential of cadmium-contaminated natural clay[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2009,44(10):2203-2222.
[32]	Wu Y, Wang S, Cheng F, et al. Enhancement of electrokinetic-bioremediation by ryegrass:sustainability of electrokinetic effect andimprovement of n-hexadecane degradation[J]. Environmental Research, 2020,188:109717.
[33]	肖江.铀尾矿库区土壤中铀的电动修复技术优化研究及机理分析[D].衡阳:南华大学, 2020. Xiao J. Research on optimization and mechanism analysis of electrokinetic remediation technology for uranium in soil of uranium tailings reservoir[D]. Hengyang:University of South China, 2020.
[34]	Jo S U, Shin Y J, Yang J S, et al. Enhanced electrokinetic transport of sulfate in saline soil[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2015,226(6):1-8.
[35]	刘志涛.铅污染高岭土电动修复与反向电渗流机理研究[D].武汉:武汉大学, 2019. Liu Z T. Study on electrokinetic remediation and reverse electroseepage mechanism of lead-contaminated kaolin[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2019.