|
|
Research on the impact mechanism of property right division on the integrity of forest ecosystem |
ZENG Xian-gang, DUAN Cun-ru |
School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 10872 |
|
|
Abstract Excessive property right division leads to fragmentation of forest ecosystem, resulting in "fence effect" and reducing the integrity of forest ecosystem. Based on the data of the 6th, 7th and 8th national forest resources inventory, this study takes Shanxi Province, Jilin Province and Jiangxi Province as the research objects, and uses the generalized progressive DID method to analyze the impact mechanism of property right division on forest ecosystem integrity. The level of forest ecosystem integrity in each province is not high, and the regional difference is obvious. The property right division has a negative effect on the forest ecosystem integrity, which leads to a significant decline in the community composition and structure index, but will have a positive impact on the landscape pattern. Biodiversity plays an intermediary role between property right division and forest ecosystem integrity. Property right division has a negative impact on biodiversity, and has a negative impact on ecosystem integrity by changing biodiversity. This study provides a practical reference for further innovation of the property rights system of natural resources.
|
Received: 13 February 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
何文剑,王于洋,江民星.集体林产权改革与森林资源变化研究综述[J]. 资源科学, 2019,41(11):2083-2093. He W J, Wang Y Y, Jiang M X. A review on the collective forestland tenure reform and changes in forest resources[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(11):2083-2093.
|
[2] |
Zelený J, Mercado-Bettín D, Müller F. Towards the evaluation of regional ecosystem integrity using NDVI, brightness temperature and surface heterogeneity[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2021,796:148994.
|
[3] |
Unnasch R S, Braun D P, Comer P J, et al. The ecological integrity assessment framework:A framework for assessing the ecological integrity of biological and ecological resources of the national park system[R]. Report to National Park Service, 2018.
|
[4] |
曾贤刚,唐宽昊,卢熠蕾."围栏效应":产权分割与草原生态系统的完整性[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014,24(2):88-93. Zeng X G, Tang K H, Lu Y L. Fence effect:Property division and integrity of grassland ecosystem[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014,24(2):88-93.
|
[5] |
Xu J T, Hyde W F. China's second round of forest reforms:Observations for China and implications globally[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019,98:19-29.
|
[6] |
Zhang D, Owiredu E A, Land tenure, market, and the establishment of forest plantations in Ghana[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2007,6:602-610.
|
[7] |
刘璨,吕金芝.中国森林资源环境库兹涅茨曲线问题研究[J]. 制度经济学研究, 2010,(2):138-161. Liu C, Lv J Z. On China's forest resource environmental Kuznets Curve[J]. Research of Institutional Economics, 2010,(2):138-161.
|
[8] |
Liu C, Wang S, Liu H, et al. Why did the 1980s'reform of collective forestland tenure in southern China fail?[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019,98:8-18.
|
[9] |
罗永仕."谣言"与转变:地方政府环境治理的风险平衡逻辑——基于广西速生桉种植政策的分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020,37(2):75-83. Luo Y S. "Rumor" and policy shift:Risk-balanced logic of the local governments' environmental management-analysis based on the eucalyptus planting policy in Guangxi[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University (Social Sciences), 2020,37(2):75-83.
|
[10] |
李永安.森林资源产权的伦理维度与我国森林旅游开发对策[J]. 世界林业研究, 2022,35(5):130-135. Li Y A. Ethical dimension of forest resource property rights and countermeasures for forest tourism development in China[J]. World Forestry Research, 2022,35(5):130-135.
|
[11] |
陈凯,陈求稳,于海燕,等.应用生物完整性指数评价我国河流的生态健康[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(4):1589-1600. Chen K, Chen Q W, Yu H Y, et al. Methods and prospects of index of biological integrity used for China river ecological health assessment[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018,38(4):1589-1600.
|
[12] |
黄宝荣,欧阳志云,郑华,等.生态系统完整性内涵及评价方法研究综述[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006,(11):2196-2202. Huang B R, Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, et al. Connotation of ecological integrity and its assessment methods:A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006,(11):2196-2202.
|
[13] |
Lin Y, Qu M, Liu C, et al. Land tenure, logging rights, and tree planting:Empirical evidence from smallholders in China[J]. China Economic Review, 2020,60,C.
|
[14] |
唐芳林.国家公园理论与实践[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2017. Tang F L. National park theory and practice[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 2017.
|
[15] |
柯水发,纪元,黄雷.新一轮中国集体林权制度改革:演进历程、驱动因素与融合趋势[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2022,21(4):424-432. Ke S F, Ji Y, Huang L. A new round of collective forest tenure reform in China:evolution, driving factors and integration trend[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2022,21(4):424-432.
|
[16] |
乔丹,柯水发,袁婉潼.市场化测度及其对林业经济增长的影响分析:以中国南方集体林区为例[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2021,20(3):337-345. Qiao D, Ke S F, Yuan W T. Analysis of forestry marketization measurement and impacts on forestry economic growth:Evidence from collective forest areas in southern China[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2021,20(3):337-345.
|
[17] |
陈昊,陈海英,王柏皓.市民化能提高地方政府教育投入吗?——以户籍制度改革为例[J]. 财经研究, 2021,47(12):79-92. Chen H, Chen H Y, Wang B H. Can citizenization improve local government education input? Evidence from the household registration system reform[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2021,47(12):79-92.
|
[18] |
Michael A, Schroeder R C, Crawford F J, et al. Ecological integrity assessments:Monitoring and evaluation of wildlife areas in Washington[M]. Washington:Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2011.
|
[19] |
Pan Z Z, He J H, Liu D F, et al. Ecosystem health assessment based on ecological integrity and ecosystem services demand in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021,774:144837.
|
[20] |
张鹏翼,马天啸,刘波,等.长白山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统完整性动态评估[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021,40(7):2251-2262. Zhang P Y, Ma T X, Liu B, et al. Assessment of forest ecosystem integrity dynamics in Changbai Mountain National Nature Reserve[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021,40(7):2251-2262.
|
[21] |
Piedallu C, Chéret V, Denux J P, et al. Soil and climate differently impact NDVI patterns according to the season and the stand type[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2019,651(6):2874-2885.
|
[22] |
Stefanov W L, Netzband M. Assessment of ASTER land cover and MODIS NDVI data at multiple scales for ecological characterization of an arid urban center[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 99(1):31-43.
|
[23] |
Zhang Z M, Fan Y G, Jiao Z J. Wetland ecological index and assessment of spatial-temporal changes of wetland ecological integrity[J]. Science of The Total Environment[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2023,862(9):160741.
|
[24] |
高岚,张自强.产权管制、要素投入与林业经济增长关系的实证分析[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2012,11(1):77-85. Gao L, Zhang Z Q. An empirical analysis on the contribution of regulation of property rights and input factors to forestry economic growth[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2012,11(1):77-85.
|
[25] |
马晓武,徐昔保,李景宜.长三角2000~2018年陆地生态系统完整性动态变化与驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2022,42(9):3738-3748. Ma X W, Xu X B, Li J Y. Changes of terrestrial ecosystem integrity index and driving factors in the Yangtze River Delta from 2000 to 2018[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(9):3738-3748.
|
[26] |
Li P, Lu Y, Wang J. Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2016,123:18-37.
|
[27] |
赵彦云,陆香怡,王汶.低碳城市的CO2与PM2.5减排协同效应分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023,43(1):465-476. Zhao Y Y, Lu X Y, Wang W. Assessment for Co-benefits of low-carbon city on CO2 and PM2.5 in China[J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(1):465-476.
|
[28] |
张莉,皮嘉勇,宋光祥.地方政府竞争与生产性支出偏向——撤县设区的政治经济学分析[J]. 财贸经济, 2018,39(3):65-78. Zhang L, Pi J Y, Song G X. Government competition and preference for productive expenditure:The political economy in county-to-district reforms in China[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2018,39(3):65-78.
|
[29] |
周茂,陆毅,杜艳,等.开发区设立与地区制造业升级[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018,(3):62-79. Zhou M, Lu Y, Du Y, et al. Special economic zones and region manufacturing upgrading[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018,(3):62-79.
|
[30] |
Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1986,51(6):1173-1182.
|
|
|
|