人地关系视角下北京市“三生”空间转型及其碳储量效应

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1900 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Since the carbon storage effect and spatial differentiation characteristics of "production-living-ecological" space transformation were the important basis for guiding regional land spatial development and ecological environment protection, the spatial distribution pattern and transformation characteristics of "production-living-ecological" space in Beijing were analyzed by using dynamic attitude model and change trajectory method based on the theory of man-land relationship, while the spatial differentiation characteristics of carbon storage in Beijing from 1980 to 2020 and the influence of "production-living-ecological" space transformation on carbon storage were revealed by means of InVEST model and contribution rate of ecological environment quality. The results showed that: ① In the development stage of human civilization, the two modes of transformation, artificial induction and natural transformation convey a mutual succession trend; ②From 1980 to 2020, the spatial structure of "production-living-ecological" space in Beijing was mainly ecological space, and the agricultural production space was decreasing continuously, while the urban living space was mainly distributed in the six districts of the main city; ③ During the past 40 years, "production-living-ecological" space had undergone drastic spatial transformation, and the transformation and changes caused by human activities accounted for 92.68% of all the transformation and changes; ④ From 1980 to 2020, the high-value areas of carbon storage in Beijing were distributed in ecological conservation areas, and the main reason for the increase of carbon storage was the shift of agricultural production space and grassland ecological space to woodland ecological space. On the contrary, the occupation of ecological space by urban and rural living spaces was the main reason for the decrease of carbon storage.

Key words： production-living-ecological"space transformation carbon storage change trajectory Beijing

Received: 11 October 2023

PACS:

X171.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2024/V44/I5/2786

[1] 黄金川,林浩曦,漆潇潇.面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J].地理科学进展, 2017,36(3):378-391. Huang J C, Lin H X, Qi X X. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017,36(3):378-391.
[2] 陈美景,王庆日,白中科,等.碳中和愿景下"三生空间"转型及其碳储量效应——以贵州省为例[J].中国土地科学, 2021,35(11):101-111. Chen M J, Wang Q R, Bai Z R, et al. Transition of "production-living-ecological" space and its carbon storage effect under the vision of carbon neutralization:a case study of Guizhou province[J]. China Land Science, 2021,35(11):101-111.
[3] 江曼琦,刘勇."三生"空间内涵与空间范围的辨析[J].城市发展研究, 2020,27(4):43-48,61. Jiang M Q, Liu Y. Discussion on the concept definition and spatial boundary classification of "production-living-ecological" space[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020,27(4):43-48,61.
[4] 徐磊,王建鹏,张贵军,等.环京津地区"三生"功能演化特征及分区调控研究[J].城市问题, 2022,(10):35-44. Xu L, Wang J P, Zhang G J, et al. Functional evolution characteristics and zoning control of the"production-living-ecological"function of the region around Beijing and Tianjin[J]. Urban Problems, 2022,(10):35-44.
[5] 李广东,方创琳.城市生态-生产-生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J].地理学报, 2016,71(1):49-65. Li G D, Fang C L. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces[J]. Geographical Research, Geographical Research, 2016,71(1):49-65.
[6] 武子豪,祖健,史云扬,等.城市职能视角下"三生"空间的识别与评价——以京津冀城市群为例[J].资源科学, 2022,44(11):2247-2259. Wu Z H, Zu J, Shi Y Y, et al. Identification and evaluation of "production-living-ecological" space from the perspective of urban function:taking the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration as an example[J]. Resources Science, 2022,44(11):2247-2259.
[7] 吴艳娟,杨艳昭,杨玲,等.基于"三生空间"的城市国土空间开发建设适宜性评价——以宁波市为例[J].资源科学, 2016,38(11):2072-2081. Wu Y J, Yang Y Z, Yang L, et al. Land spatial development and suitability for city construction based on ecological-living-industrial space-take Ningbo city as an example[J]. Resources Science, 2016,38(11):2072-2081.
[8] Yang Y Y, Bao W K, Liu Y S. Coupling coordination analysis of rural production-living-ecological space in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,117(4):106512.
[9] Xiao P N, Xu J, Zhao C. Conflict Identification and zoning optimization of "production-living-ecological" space[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022,19(13):7990.
[10] 廖李红,戴文远,陈娟,等.平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J].资源科学, 2017,39(10):1823-1833. Liao L H, Dai W X, Chen J, et al. Spatial conflict between ecological-production-living spaces on Pingtan island during rapid urbanization[J]. Resources Science, 2017,39(10):1823-1833.
[11] 陈斌,徐尚昭,周阳阳,等."三生空间"视角下宜昌市景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J].水土保持研究, 2022,29(4):344-351. Chen B, Xu S Z, Zhou Y Y, et al. Evaluation and coupling coordination analysis of landscape ecological security of Yichang from the perspective of production-life-ecological space[J]. Research of soil and water conservation, 2022,29(4):344-351.
[12] 刘金花,丛中笑,王治军.基于三生空间转型的生态环境效应多尺度研究——以黄河流域山东段为例[J].中国环境科学, 2023,43(5):2519-2530. Liu J H, Cong Z X, Zhou Y Y. Ecological effects of production-living-ecological space transformation at multi-scales:a case study on the Shandong section of the Yellow River Basin[J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(5):2519-2530.
[13] 杨清可,段学军,王磊,等.基于"三生空间"的土地利用转型与生态环境效应——以长江三角洲核心区为例[J].地理科学, 2018, 38(1):97-106. Yang Q K, Duan X J, Wang L, et al. Land use transformation based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects:a case study in the Yangtze river delta[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(1):97-106.
[14] 帕茹克·吾斯曼江,郝晋珉,王楠,等.基于"三生"功能的土地利用转型及其生态环境效应——以尉犁县为例[J].干旱区地理, 2021,44(6):1612-1622. Paruke Wusimanjiang, Hao J M, Wang N, et al. Land use transformation based on production-living-ecological functions and associated eco-environment effects:a case study in Yuli county[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2021,44(6):1612-1622.
[15] 戴文远,江方奇,黄万里,等.基于"三生空间"的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究——以福州新区为例[J].自然资源学报, 2018,33(12):2098-2109. Dai W Y, Jiang F Q, Huang W L, et al. Study on transition of land use function and ecosystem service value based on the conception of production,living and ecological space:a case study of the Fuzhou new area[J]. Journal of Nature Resources, 2018,33(12):2098-2109.
[16] 陈田田,彭立,王强.基于生态系统服务权衡的生态安全多情景决策[J].中国环境科学, 2021,41(8):3956-3968. Chen T T, Peng L, Wang Q. Scenario decision of ecological security based on the trade-off among ecosystem services[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,41(8):3956-3968.
[17] 冀正欣,许月卿,卢龙辉,等.乡村聚落空间优化研究进展与展望[J].中国土地科学, 2021,35(6):95-104. Ji Z X, Xu Y Q, Lu L H, et al. Research progress and prospective for spatial optimization of rural settlements[J]. China Land Science, 2021,35(6):95-104.
[18] 李小云,杨宇,刘毅.中国人地关系的历史演变过程及影响机制[J].地理研究, 2018,37(8):1495-1514. Li X Y, Yang Y, Liu Y. The evolution process and its mechanism of man-land relationship in China[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(8):1495-1514.
[19] 郝晋珉.土地利用规划学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2008.
[20] 杨娟.人类文明发展视域下人与自然关系的历史演进[J].实事求是, 2019,268(3):32-37. Yang J. The historical evolution of the relationship between man and nature in the perspective of human civilization development[J]. Seek Truth from Facts, 2019,268(3):32-37.
[21] 彭红松,郭丽佳,章锦河,等.区域经济增长与资源环境压力的关系研究进展[J].资源科学, 2020,42(4):593-606. Peng H S, Guo L J, Zhang J H, et al. Research progress and implication of the relationship between regional economic growth and resource environmental pressure[J]. Resources Science, 2020,42(4):593-606.
[22] 刘彦随.现代人地关系与人地系统科学[J].地理科学, 2020,40(8):1221-1234. Liu Y S. Modern human-earth relationship and human-earth system science[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020,40(8):1221-1234.
[23] Chang X Q, Xing Y Q, Wang J Q, et al. Effects of land use and cover change (LUCC) on terrestrial carbon stocks in China between 2000 and 2018[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022,182,106333.
[24] Liu J Y, Kuang W H, Zhang Z X, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014,24(2):195-210.
[25] 黄安,许月卿,郝晋珉,等.土地利用多功能性评价研究进展与展望[J].中国土地科学, 2017,31(4):88-97. Huang A, Xu Y Q, Hao J M, et al. Progress review on land use functions evaluation and its prospects[J]. China Land Science, 2017,31(4):88-97.
[26] 王世东,冯正英,余洋,等.基于改进稳定映射法的土地利用/覆被变化轨迹分析[J].农业机械学报, 2020,51(8):152-162. Wang S D, Feng Z Y, Yu Y, et al. Land use/cover change trajectory analysis based on improved stable mapping method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020,51(8):152-162.
[27] 刘金雅,汪东川,孙然好,等.基于变化轨迹分析方法的生态用地流失空间关联研究[J].地理研究, 2020,39(1):103-114. Liu J Y, Wang D C, Sun R H, et al. Study on spatial relevance of ecological-land loss based on change trajectory analysis method[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(1):103-114.
[28] He C Y, Zhang D, Huang Q X, et al. Assessing the potential impacts of urban expansion on regional carbon storage by linking the LUSD-urban and InVEST models[J]. Environmental Modelling&Software, 2016,75:44-58.
[29] 孔祥斌,胡莹洁,李月,等.北京市耕地表层土壤有机碳分布及其影响因素[J].资源科学, 2019,41(12):2307-2315. Kong X B, Hu Y J, Li Y, et al. Distribution and influencing factors of soil organic carbon of cultivated land topsoil in Beijing[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(12):2307-2315.
[30] 邵壮,陈然,赵晶,等.基于FLUS与InVEST模型的北京市生态系统碳储量时空演变与预测[J].生态学报, 2022,42(23):9456-9469. Shao Z, Chen R, Zhao J, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and prediction of carbon storage in Beijing's ecosystem based on FLUS and InVEST models[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(23):9456-9469.
[31] 郭旭东,常青,刘筱,等.基于碳储量视角的城镇土地利用模式与生态效益分异特征[J].中国土地科学, 2017,31(4):61-70. Guo X D, Chang Q, Liu X, et al. Urban land use pattern and its ecological benefit from the perspective of carbon storage[J]. China Land Science, 2017,31(4):61-70.
[32] 任胤铭,刘小平,许晓聪,等.基于FLUS-InVEST模型的京津冀多情景土地利用变化模拟及其对生态系统服务功能的影响研究[J].生态学报, 2023,(11):1-15. Ren Y M, Liu X P, Xu X C, et al. Multi-scenario simulation of land use and its impact on ecosystem services in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on the FLUS-InVEST model[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2023,(11):1-15.
[33] 周杰,张学儒,牟凤云,等.基于CA-Markov的土壤有机碳储量空间格局重建研究——以泛长三角地区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2018,27(7):1565-1575. Zhou J, Zhang X R, Mou F Y, et al. Spatial pattern reconstruction of soil organic carbon storage based on CA-Markov——a case study in Pan-Yangtze river delta[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018,27(7):1565-1575.
[34] 夏楚瑜,国淏,赵晶,等.京津冀地区生态系统服务对城镇化的多空间尺度动态响应[J].生态学报, 2023,43(7):2756-2769. Xia C Y, Guo H, Zhao J, et al. Dynamic responses of ecosystem services to urbanization at multi-spatial scales in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2023,43(7):2756-2769.
[35] 张平平,李艳红,殷浩然,等.中国南北过渡带生态系统碳储量时空变化及动态模拟[J].自然资源学报, 2022,37(5):1183-1197. Zhang P P, Li Y H, Yin H R, et al. Spatio-temporal variation and dynamic simulation of ecosystem carbon storage in the north-south transitional zone of China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(5):1183-1197.
[36] Alam S A, Starr M, Clark B J F, et al. Tree biomass and soil organic carbon densities across the sudanese woodland savannah:A regional carbon sequestration study[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2013, 89:67-76.
[37] Giardina C P, Ryan M G, Hubbard R M, et al. Tree species and soil textural controls on carbon and nitrogen mineralization rates[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2001,65(4):1272-1279,doi:10.2136/sssaj2001.6541272x.
[38] 陈光水,杨玉盛,谢锦升,等.中国森林的地下碳分配[J].生态学报, 2007,(12):5148-5157. Chen G S, Yang Y S, Xie J S, et al. Total below ground carbon allocation in China's forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007,(12):5148-5157.
[39] 孔冬艳,陈会广,吴孔森.中国"三生空间"演变特征、生态环境效应及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报, 2021,36(5):1116-1135. Kong D Y, Chen H G, Wu K S. The evolution of "production-living-ecological" space, eco-environment effects and its influencing factors in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021,36(5):1116-1135.