原水生物膜预处理工艺对有机碳源的响应特征——以脱氮性能与菌群结构为例

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1614 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The operation performance of the raw water pretreatment biofilm system is limited by the water quality of raw water. A laboratory-scale raw water pretreatment biofilm system was constructed with synthetic polluted raw water as the treatment object and comet type fiber filler and activated carbon filler as biofilm carriers. Batch tests were conducted to explore the response characteristics of operation performance and bacterial community structure to different organic carbon sources including sodium acetate and humic acid. Experimental results showed that the raw water pretreatment biofilmsystem operated stably for a long time with the average ammonia nitrogen removal efficiency (ARE) of 90.1%. Sodium acetate had little effect on the ammonia nitrogen removal performance of biofilm attached on two kinds of carriers. Stronger nitrification ability with the highest ARE of 90.5%±5.6% was obtained using humic acid as the organic carbon source. Using comet type fiber filler as biofilm carrier, sodium acetate promoted the formation of extracellular polymer (EPS) in biofilm, and humic acid reduced the PN content in EPS. The usage of activated carbon as the biofilm carrier significantly increased the PN/PS value of EPS, and had higher bacteriall diversity, which was more conducive to the formation of biofilm. In the biofilm samples, the top three phyla are Proteobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Acidobacteria. When comet type fiber filler was used as biofilm carrier, sodium acetate and humic acid enhanced the accumulation of Proteobacteria (53.9%) and Nitrospira (10.7%), respectively. The dominant genera of biofilm samples of comet type fiber filler and activated carbon were Nitrospira and Aridibacter, respectively. Humic acid was more conducive to the enrichment of Nitrospira and Bdellovibrio, and sodium acetate was more conducive to the enrichment of Aridibacter.

Key words： raw water biofilm organic carbon source operation performance bacterial structure extracellular polymers

Received: 26 November 2023

PACS:

X52

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YE Li-hui
	LIU Xin-ling
	LIN Si-hui
	SHI Hai-yang
	ZHAO Yi-chun
	CHEN Dong-zhi
	YANG Guang-feng

Cite this article:

YE Li-hui,LIU Xin-ling,LIN Si-hui等. Characterization of raw water biofilm pretreatment processes in response to organic carbon sources: An example of nitrogen removal performance and bacterial community structure[J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2024, 44(7): 3800-3809.

URL:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/EN/Y2024/V44/I7/3800

[1] Cai L T, Li Q S, Ma X Y, et al. Study on the fluorescence characteristics and DBPs FP based on EEMs and fraction of DOM—— a case of source water in a southern city [J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(4):1745-1753.
[2] Zhou Z, Hu F P, Wei C P, et al. Influence of bioelectrical integrated activated carbon ultrafiltration system for micro polluted surface water treatment [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2020,40(7):2427-2437.
[3] Camargo J A, Alonso A. Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment [J]. Environment Internayional, 2006,32(6):831-849.
[4] Heredia C, Guédron S, Point D, et al. Anthropogenic eutrophication of Lake Titicaca (Bolivia) revealed by carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes fingerprinting [J]. Science of the total environment, 2022,845: 157286.
[5] Schindler D W. Recent advances in the understanding and management of eutrophication [J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2006,51:356-363.
[6] Yang G F, Feng L J, Yang Q, et al. Startup pattern and performance enhancement of pilot-scale biofilm process for raw water pre-treatment [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014,172:22-31.
[7] Yang H L, Ye S J, Wang J J, et al. The approaches and prospects for natural organic matter-derived disinfection byproducts control bycarbon-based materials in water disinfection progresses [J]. Clean Production, 2021,311:127799.
[8] Benner J, Helbling D E, Kohler H P, et al. Is biological treatment a viable alternative for micropollutant removal in drinking water treatment processes? [J]. Water Research, 2013,47(16):5955-5976.
[9] Feng L J, Chen K, Han D D, et al. Comparison of nitrogen removal and microbial properties in solid-phase denitrification systems for water purification with various pretreated lignocellulosic carriers [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017a,224:236-245.
[10] Yang G F, Feng L J, Guo C R, et al. Performance improvement of source water pretreatment process with pre-inoculation biofilm: Feasibility and limiting factors [J]. Biodegradation, 2017,28(1):1-13.
[11] Lv Z H , Wang J, Yang G F, et al. Underestimated effects of sediments on enhanced startup performance of biofilm systems for polluted source water pre-treatment [J]. Biodegradation, 2018,29:89-103.
[12] Xiang S, Han Y T, Jiang C, et al. Composite biologically active filter (BAF) with zeolite, granular activated carbon, and suspended biological carrier for treating algae-laden raw water [J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2021,42:102188.
[13] Zhang S, Wang Y, He W, et al. Responses of biofilm characteristics to variations in temperature and NH₄⁺-N loading in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating micro-polluted source water [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013,131(3):365-373.
[14] Jiang S S, Wang Z Y, Gao Q, et al. Factor analysis of disinfection byproduct formation in drinking water distribution systems through the bayesian network [J]. Environmental Science, 2022,43(3):1512- 1520.
[15] Gao X D, Feng J W, Li C H, et al. Research progress on types of external carbon sources in water treatment process and their influencing factors [J]. Modern Chemical Industry, 2020,40(S1): 26-32.
[16] Ma Y, Peng Y Z, Wang S Y. Sludge denitrification characteristics with different external carbon source [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2009,35(6):820-824.
[17] Cao X, Su K X, Song X S, et al. Different fillers loaded with microorganisms to remove ammonia nitrogen in surface water [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2022,42(1):213-221.
[18] Feng L J, Mu J, Sun J Y, et al. Kinetic characteristics and bacterial structures in biofilm reactors with pre-cultured biofilm for source water pre-treatment [J]. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 2017b,121:26-34.
[19] Yang G F, Feng L J, Wang S F, et al. Performance and enhanced mechanism of a novel bio-diatomite biofilm pretreatment process treating polluted raw water [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015,191: 271-280.
[20] Yang K L, Liao D X, Ma Y, et al. Rapid start-up and microbial community structure of canon process [J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2020,36(23):1-7.
[21] Egli T. How to live at very low substrate concentration. Water Reseach, 2010,44(17):4826-4837.
[22] APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [M]. 21th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
[23] Froelund B, Griebe T, Nielsen P H. Enzymatic activity in the activated-sludge floc matrix [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1995,43:755-761.
[24] DuBois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, et al. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances [J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1956,28(3):350-356.
[25] Liu X F, Du Y, Hu W X, et al. influence of carbon source on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (snd) in urban rivers [J]. Environmental Engineering, 2019,37(2):73-78.
[26] Meng Q J, Zhang Y, Feng Q Y, et al. Effect of humic acids on migration and transformation of NH₄⁺-N in saturated aquifer [J]. Environmental Science, 2011,32(11):3357-3364.
[27] Wang J H, Ren Y X, Dou J W, et al. Effect of organic matter in micro-polluted source water on morphological structure of schmutzdecke and nitrification efficiency in slow sand filter [J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2018,34(17):9-14.
[28] Qiu S J, Liu J J, Li X Y, et al. Effect of alkaline sludge fermentation products on the nitrification process and performance [J]. Environmental Science, 2020,41(3):1418-1424.
[29] Hu X B, Lin R, Zhang L, et al. Effect of carrier micropore diameter on biofilm characteristics and wastewater treatment performance [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2020,14(12):3329- 3338.
[30] Comte S, Guibaud G, Baudu M. Biosorption properties of extracellular polymeric substances(EPS) resulting from acti- vated sludge according to their type: Soluble or bound [J]. Process Biochemistry, 2006,41(4): 815-823.
[31] Wu YP, Lu J F, Li Y J, et al. Research progress of extracellular polymers in environmental engineering [J]. Journal of Tianjin Chengjian University, 2021,27(4):258-264.
[32] Chen N, Liu C, Li Y G, et al. Characteristics of extracellular polymer substances and signal molecule function in autotrophic nitrifying granular sludge [J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(9):4666- 4675.
[33] Dong J, Zhang Z, Yu Z, et al. Evolution and functional analysis of extracellular polymeric substances during the granulation of aerobic sludge used to treat p-chloroaniline wastewater [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017,330:596-604.
[34] Qi P, Li T, Hu C, et al. Effects of cast iron pipe corrosion on nitrogenous disinfection by-products formation in drinking water distribution systems via interaction among iron particles, biofilms, and chlorine [J]. Chemosphere, 2022,292:133364.
[35] Zhang D J, Li W, Hou C, et al. Aerobic granulation accelerated by biochar for the treatment of refractory wastewater [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016,314:88-97.
[36] Zhou X L, Sun Y X, Shi N, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances in a denitrification biological filter [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017,11(5):2836- 2844.
[37] Hao X D, Ye J Z, Liu R B, et al. Production and effect of soluble microbial product(smp) in effluent of wastewater treatment plant [J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2020,36(12):37-44.
[38] Wang Z P, Zhang T. Characterization of soluble microbial products (SMP) under stressful conditions [J]. Water Research, 2010,44(18): 5499-5509.
[39] Yi J, Yang G, Pan H W, et al. Parafac and fri preferred 3d fluorescence extraction time of dissolved organic matter [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2022,42(8):2444-2451.
[40] Zhuang K, Hu X J, Cao Y C, et al. Bacterial community structure and its utilization characteristics of carbon sources in water of South China Sea under different low-nutrient culture conditions [J]. Microbiology China, 2020,47(9):2697-2710.
[41] Hai Y, Zhou X, Li Y. Rapid start-up performance of mainstream Anammox in a single-stage fixed-bed biofilm reactor [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024,43(4):2201-2209.
[42] Xu Y L, Lu D H, Yang G F, et al. Bacterial community structure of a full-scale biofilm system for raw water pretreatment [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2019,25(2):351-357.
[43] Wang G H, Liu J J, Yu Z H, et al. Research progress of acidobacteria ecology in soils [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2016,32(2):14-20.
[44] Suto R, Ishimoto C, Chikyu M, et al. Anammox biofilm in activated sludge swine wastewater treatment plants [J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 167:300-307.
[45] Chen J F, Yang Y W, Liu Y Y, et al. Bacterial community shift in response to a deep municipal tail wastewater treatment system [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019,281:195-201.
[46] Vojtech K, Dana V, Eva P, et al. High-rate partial nitritation of municipal wastewater after psychrophilic anaerobic pre-treatment [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017,51(19):11029-11038.