|
|
Quantifying the uncertainty of farmland soil actual denitrification potential as determined by the acetylene inhibition method |
CAO Wen-chao1,2, WANG Ya-jing3, LI Yan-qing1, PAN Hao-qin1, ZHAO Fei1, XIAO Wan-Li1, WANG Cui-cui1, WANG Jing-guo4, SONG He5 |
1. Shandong Provincial University Laboratory for Protected Horticulture, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Shouguang 262700, China; 2. Shouguang Vegetable Industry Holding Group Company Limited, Shouguang 261000, China; 3. College of Resources and Environment Science, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China; 4. College of Resource and Environment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 5. College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China |
|
|
Abstract This study employed an anaerobic slurry incubation test to evaluate whether the acetylene inhibition method may have led to an underestimation of the denitrification potential in both greenhouse vegetable and grain field soils, using a robotized sampling and analysing system. Soils from greenhouse vegetable fields and adjacent grain fields in the Shouguang region were sampled. The treatments with and without the addition of 10% acetylene were set up respectively. The results showed that the accumulated N2O concentration in the 10% acetylene treatment was significantly higher than those without acetylene after 3hours of anaerobic slurry incubation, while N2 accumulation showed the opposite trend. Moreover, in the presence of acetylene, 7.92% and 34.2% of N2O were reduced to N2 in greenhouse vegetable and grain field soils, respectively, within 63 hours of anaerobic incubation. The actual denitrification potential significantly increased with the addition of 10% acetylene in the greenhouse vegetable and grain field soils, but the respiration of the soils was not significantly affected. Specifically, the acetylene inhibition method overestimated the actual denitrification potential in greenhouse vegetable soil by 22.0%, and underestimated it in grain field soil by 11.4%, as determined by the bias calculated from the acetylene inhibition method (AIT-bias). Overall, the acetylene inhibition method was found to be insufficient in completely suppressing N2O reduction to N2 in greenhouse vegetable and grain field soils. The uncertainty of acetylene inhibition method on the actual denitrification potential of soil is profoundly influenced by the cropping system, which may be related to variations in soil nutrients, types and other factors. Further research is necessary to assess the reliability of this method across different soil conditions.
|
Received: 18 March 2024
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Lycus P, Soriano-Laguna M J, Kjos M, et al. A bet-hedging strategy for denitrifying bacteria curtails their release of N2O [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018,115:1182011825. [2] 曹文超,宋贺,王娅静,等.农田土壤N2O排放的关键过程及影响因素[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(10):1781-1798. Cao W C, Song H, Wang Y J et al. Key production processes and influencing factors of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019,25(10):1781-1798. [3] Philippot L, Andert J, Jones C M, et al. Importance of denitrifiers lacking the genes encoding the nitrous oxide reductase for N2O emissions from soil [J]. Global Change Biology, 2011,17:1497-1504. [4] Bouwman A F, Beusen A H W, Griffioen J, et al. Global trends and uncertainties in terrestrial denitrification and N2O emissions [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013,368:20130112. [5] Scheer C, Fuchs K, Pelster D E, et al. Estimating global terrestrial denitrification from measured N2O:(N2O+N2) product ratios [J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2020,47:72-80. [6] Pan B B, Xia L L, Lam S K, et al. A global synthesis of soil denitrification: Driving factors and mitigation strategies [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2022,327:107850. [7] Xia L L, Li X B, Ma Q Q, et al. Simultaneous quantification of N2, NH3and N2O emissions from a flooded paddy field under different N fertilization regimes [J]. Global Change Biology, 2020,26(4):2292- 2303. [8] Almaraz M, Wong M Y, Yang W H. Looking back to look ahead: a vision for soil denitrification research [J]. Ecology, 2020,101(1): e02917. [9] Ryden J C, Skinner J H, Nixon D J. Soil core incubation system for the field measurement of denitrification using acetylene-inhibition [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987,19(6):753-757. [10] Zhang K, Cheng X, Dang H, et al. Soil nitrogen and denitrification potential as affected by land use and stand age following agricultural abandonment in a headwater catchment [J]. Soil Use and Management, 2012,28(3):361-369. [11] Liu Y, Wang R, Pan Z L, et al. Quantifying in situ N2 fluxes from an intensively managed calcareous soil using the 15N gas-flux method [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022,21(9):2750-2766. [12] Micucci G, Sgouridis F, McNamara N P, et al. The15N-Gas flux method for quantifying denitrification in soil: Current progress and future directions [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023,184: 109108. [13] Scholefield D, Hawkins J M B, Jackson S M. Development of a helium atmosphere soil incubation technique for direct measurement of nitrous oxide and dinitrogen fluxes during denitrification [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1997,29(9/10):1345-1352. [14] Senbayram M, Well R, Shan J, et al. Rhizosphere processes in nitrate-rich barley soil tripled both N2O and N2losses due to enhanced bacterial and fungal denitrification [J]. Plant and Soil, 2020,448:509- 522. [15] 张志君.辛炔和乙炔作为选择性抑制剂在测定土壤硝化-反硝化速率时的误差研究[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2019. Zhang Z J. Biases of acetylene and octyne as selective inhibitors for determining soil nitrification and denitrification rates [D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2019. [16] Nadeem S, Dörsch P, Bakken L R. Autoxidation and acetylene- accelerated oxidation of NO in a 2-phase system: Implications for the expression of denitrification in ex situ experiments [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013,57:606-614. [17] Stevens R J, Laughlin R J. Measurement of nitrous oxide and di-nitrogen emissions from agricultural soils [J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1998,52:131-139. [18] Felber R, Conen F, Flechard C R, et al. Theoretical and practical limitations of the acetylene inhibition technique to determine total denitrification losses [J]. Biogeosciences, 2012,9(10):4125-4138. [19] Yu K, Seo D C, DeLaune R D. Incomplete acetylene inhibition of nitrous oxide reduction in potential denitrification assay as revealed by using 15N-nitrate tracer [J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2010,41(18):2201-2210. [20] Qin S P, Hu C S, Oenema O. Quantifying the underestimation of soil denitrification potential as determined by the acetylene inhibition method [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012,47:14-17. [21] Butterbach-Bahl K, Baggs E M, Dannenmann M, et al. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013,368(1621):20130122. [22] Friedl J, Cardenas L M, Clough T J, et al. Measuring denitrification and the N2O:(N2O+N2) emission ratio from terrestrial soils [J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2020,47:61-71. [23] Hazard C, Prosser J I, Nicol G W. Use and abuse of potential rates in soil microbiology [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021,157: 108242. [24] Molstad L, Dörsch P, Bakken L R. Robotized incubation system for monitoring gases (O2, NO, N2O, N2) in denitrifying cultures [J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2007,71(3):202-211. [25] Yuan H J, Zhang Z J, Qin S P, et al. Effects of nitrate and water content on acetylene inhibition technique bias when analysing soil denitrification rates under an aerobic atmosphere [J]. Geoderma, 2019,334:33-36. [26] Baumgärtner M, Conrad R. Role of nitrate and nitrite for production and consumption of nitric oxide during denitrification in soil [J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 1992,101(1):59-65. [27] Yan X Y, Cai Z C, Yang R, et al. Nitrogen budget and riverine nitrogen output in a rice paddy dominated agricultural watershed in eastern China [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2011,106:489-501. [28] She D L, Sun X Q, Xia Y Q. Combining N2:Ar and Bayesian Methods to Quantify Underestimation and Uncertainty of Sediment Denitrification Determined by the Acetylene Inhibition Method [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2019,30:1-9. [29] Fan Z B, Lin S, Zhang X M, et al. Conventional flooding irrigation causes an overuse of nitrogen fertilizer and low nitrogen use efficiency in intensively used solar greenhouse vegetable production [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014,144:11-19. [30] Yang L, Huang B, Mao M, et al. Sustainability assessment of greenhouse vegetable farming practices from environmental, economic, and socio-institutional perspectives in China [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016,23:17287-17297. [31] Zhou J, Gu B, Schlesinger W H, et al. Significant accumulation of nitrate in Chinese semi-humid croplands [J]. Scientific Reports, 2016,6(1):25088. [32] Hu W, Zhang Y, Huang B, et al. Soil environmental quality in greenhouse vegetable production systems in eastern China: current status and management strategies [J]. Chemosphere, 2017,170:183- 195. [33] Geng Y, Wang J, Sun Z, et al. Soil N-oxide emissions decrease from intensive greenhouse vegetable fields by substituting synthetic N fertilizer with organic and bio-organic fertilizers [J]. Geoderma, 2021, 383:114730. [34] Qasim W, Zhao Y, Wan L, et al. The potential importance of soil denitrification as a major N loss pathway in intensive greenhouse vegetable production systems [J]. Plant and Soil, 2022,471:157-174. [35] Lin W, Li Q Z, Zhou W L, et al. Insights into production and consumption processes of nitrous oxide emitted from soilless culture systems by dual isotopocule plot and functional genes [J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2023,856:159046. [36] Mukumbuta I, Uchida Y, Hatano R. Evaluating the effect of liming on N2O fluxes from denitrification in an Andosol using the acetylene inhibition and 15N isotope tracer methods [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2018,54:71-81. [37] FAO. FAO/Unesco Soil map of the world: revised legend [Z]. World Soil Resources Report 60, FAO, Rome, 1988. [38] Lin W, Li Q Z, Zhou W L, et al. Insights into production and consumption processes of nitrous oxide emitted from soilless culture systems by dual isotopocule plot and functional genes [J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2023,856:159046. [39] Qin S, Yuan H, Dong W, et al. Relationship between soil properties and the bias of N2O reduction by acetylene inhibition technique for analyzing soil denitrification potential [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013,66:182-187. [40] Edwards J D, Pickering S F. Permeability of rubber to gases [J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 1920,190(2):253-254. [41] Polotskaya G A, Andreeva D V, El’yashevich G K. Investigation of gas diffusion through films of fullerene-containing poly (phenylene oxide) [J]. Technical Physics Letters, 1999,25:555-557. [42] Qin S P, Yuan H J, Hu C S, et al. Determination of potential N2O- reductase activity in soil [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 70:205-210. [43] Pan Y, Sun R Z, Wang Y, et al. Carbon source shaped microbial ecology, metabolism and performance in denitrification systems [J]. Water Research, 2023,243:120330. [44] Akob D M, Sutton J M, Fierst J L, et al. Acetylenotrophy: a hidden but ubiquitous microbial metabolism? [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2018,94(8):fiy103. [45] Zaman M, Nguyen M L, Matheson F, et al. Can soil amendments (zeolite or lime) shift the balance between nitrous oxide and dinitrogen emissions from pasture and wetland soils receiving urine or urea-N? [J]. Soil Research, 2007,45(7):543-553. [46] Senbayram M, Chen R, Budai A, et al. N2O emission and the N2O/(N2O+N2) product ratio of denitrification as controlled by available carbon substrates and nitrate concentrations [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2012,147:4-12. [47] Han L, Huang W, Yuan X. et al. Denitrification potential and influencing factors of the riparian zone soils in different watersheds, Taihu Basin [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2017,228:108. |
[1] |
. [J]. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2000, 20(5): 0-0. |
|
|
|
|