This paper used the contaminant fate and transport multimedia model (EPACMTP model) to assess the risk classification method for a national soil quality survey program. Regional sensitivity analysis, global sensitivity analysis and empirical verification were conducted. The work focused on the completeness of indicators, credibility of classification and robustness of weighting and scoring. The result showed that almost all (13in total) sensitive parameters were covered by the risk classification method, except for leachate concentration. Parameters with high sensitivity and importance were usually given relatively high weights. The scores for site area and distance to receptor were shown to be reasonable. The classification for low-risk sites were generally accurate. This study recommended that more attention should be paid to contaminant transport process. Suggestions were given on indicator weighting and scoring. We also suggested focusing on medium-and high-risk sites, as well as arsenic contaminated sites.
李天魁, 刘毅, 谢云峰. 关闭搬迁企业地块风险筛查方法评估——基于EPACMTP模型的研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(10): 3985-3992.
LI Tian-kui, LIU Yi, XIE Yun-feng. Assessment of the risk classification method for closed industrial contaminated sites-A study based on EPACMTP model. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2018, 38(10): 3985-3992.
Liu S, Lu Y, Wang T, et al. Using gridded multimedia model to simulate spatial fate of Benzo[α] pyrene on regional scale[J]. Environment International, 2014,63:53-63.
[6]
Tobiszewski M, Namie?nik J, Pena-Pereira F. Environmental risk-based ranking of solvents using the combination of a multimedia model and multi-criteria decision analysis[J]. Green Chemistry, 2017, 19(4):1034-1042.
[7]
Asif Z, Chen Z. Examining screening-level multimedia models through a comparison framework for landfill management[J]. Environmental Management, 2016,57(1):229-236.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA's composite model for leachate migration with transformation products (EPACMTP)[EB/OL]. https://www.epa.gov/smm/epas-composite-model-leachate-migration-transformation-products-epacmtp, 2018-02-27.
[12]
Yang Y, Jiang Y H, Xi B D, et al. Risk-based prioritization method for the classification of groundwater pollution from hazardous waste landfills[J]. Environmental Management, 2016,58(6):1046-1058.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Parameters/data background document for EPACMTP[EB/OL]. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-03/documents/v2_pd.pdf, 2018-02-27.
[17]
Spear R C, Hornberger G M. Eutrophication in peel inlet-Ⅱ. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis[J]. Water Research, 1980,14(1):43-49.
[18]
Young P C, Hornberger G M, Spear R C. Modelling badly defined systems-some further thoughts[C]//Proceedings SIMSIG simulation conference, Canberra:Australian National University, 1978:24-32.
[19]
Petropoulos G, Srivastava P K. Sensitivity analysis in earth observation modelling[M]. United Kingdom:Elsevier, 2016:125-144.
[20]
Hoffman F O, Miller C W. Uncertainties in environmental radiological assessment models and their implications[R]. TN (USA):Oak Ridge National Lab, 1983:57.
[21]
Chen J, Beck M B, Barnwell T O. Quality assurance of multi-media model for predictive screening tasks[M]. USA:USEPA, 1999:98-106.
[22]
Song X, Zhang J, Zhan C, et al. Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling:Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015,523:739-757.
[23]
DZ/T 0290-2015地下水水质标准[S].
[24]
United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA's composite model for leachate migration with transformation products (EPACMTP):background document for EPACMTP:metals transport in the subsurface[EB/OL]. https://www.lic.wisc.edu/glifwc/PolyMet/FEIS/reference/USEPA1996.pdf.