土壤和地下水污染的监控自然衰减修复技术研究进展

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (468 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要我国土壤和地下水污染形势严峻，污染场地数量巨大、类型复杂，相应的管理和修复技术体系仍然滞后.监控自然衰减（MNA）作为一种基于污染风险管控的场地修复和长期监测方法，是土壤和地下水污染修复中较为经济和有效的方法之一，可以实现修复的成本效益最大化.近几年来MNA在美国污染场地修复中的应用比例约占30%左右，场地修复的平均成本为数十万美元.本文介绍了MNA方法的来源和发展，总结了MNA的国内外研究应用进展和相关的核心技术手段，与典型修复方法的成本进行了比较，以期为MNA相关的研究和应用提供参考借鉴.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李元杰
	王森杰
	张敏
	何泽
	张巍

关键词 ：污染场地, 土壤, 地下水, 监控自然衰减, 修复技术

Abstract：Severe and widespread pollution of soil and groundwater in China has caused intensive concerns,with great number of contaminated sites and diversified pollution types,for which there is a development lag in site management and remediation technologies.As a non-invasive long-term management approach based on risk control over contaminated sites,Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) turns out as an effective and economic strategy for soil and ground water pollution management with the potential for maximized cost-effectiveness.In the United States,application of MNA in contaminated site remediation accounts for about 30%,and the cost is about several hundred thousand dollars.This article gives a brief on the origination and evolution of MNA,followed with a summary of progress and highlights in research on MNA as well as their recent applications,both domestic and overseas.A comparison between MNA and typical remedial technologies is made,and this is expected to serve as a reference for the research and applications of MNA-related technologies.

Key words： contaminated sites soil groundwater monitored natural attenuation remediation technologies

收稿日期: 2017-08-17

X144

基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目（41671492）

通讯作者: 张巍,副教授,zhw326@ruc.edu.cn E-mail: zhw326@ruc.edu.cn

作者简介: 李元杰(1989-),男,河南信阳人,中国人民大学硕士研究生,主要从事环境政策与管理研究.

引用本文:

李元杰, 王森杰, 张敏, 何泽, 张巍. 土壤和地下水污染的监控自然衰减修复技术研究进展[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(3): 1185-1193. LI Yuan-jie, WANG Sen-jie, ZHANG Min, HE Ze, ZHANG Wei. Research progress of monitored natural attenuation remediation technology for soil and groundwater pollution. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2018, 38(3): 1185-1193.

链接本文:

http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/ 或 http://www.zghjkx.com.cn/CN/Y2018/V38/I3/1185

[1]	Madsen E L. Determining in situ biodegradation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1991,25:10(10):1662-1673.
[2]	Madsen E L. Epistemology of environmental microbiology[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998,32(4):429-439.
[3]	U.S. EPA. Monitored Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents[R]. U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/F-98/022Washington DC:1999.
[4]	Zobell C E. Assimilation of hydrocarbons by microorganisms[J]. Advances in Enzymology & Related Subjects of Biochemistry, 1950,10(10):443.
[5]	应用监测式自然衰减整治法之可行性评估准则、设计及成效评估等规范建置计划[R]. 台北:台湾行政院环境保护署, 2009.
[6]	National Research Council. Natural attenuation for groundwater remediation[M]. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press, 2000.
[7]	U.S. EPA. Superfund remedy report, 13th edition[R]. U.S. EPA, Office of solid waste and emergency response, EPA-542-R-10-004, Washington DC:2010.
[8]	U.S. EPA. Monitored natural attenuation of petroleum hydrocarbons[R]. U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/F-98/021, Washington DC:1999.
[9]	Wilson K, Sewell G, Kean J A, et al. Enhanced attenuation:Its place in the remediation of chlorinated solvents[J]. Remediation Journal, 2007,17(2):39-49.
[10]	污染场地修复技术目录(第一批)[R]. 北京:中华人民共和国环境保护部, 2014.
[11]	U.S. EPA. Use of monitored natural attenuation at superfund, RCRA, corrective action and UST sites[R]. U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA-9200.4-17, Washington DC:1999.
[12]	U.S.EPA. Monitored natural attenuation of MTBE as a risk management option at leaking underground storage tank sites[R]. U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-04/179, Washington DC:2005.
[13]	Sinke A, Heimovaara T, Tonnaer H, et al. Decision support system natural attenuation[R]. CUR-NOBIS Report 97-1-02, 1998.
[14]	尹勇,戴中华,蒋鹏,等.VOCs污染场地地下水监测式自然衰减法可行性评估程序研究[J]. 江西化工, 2013,(3):28-31.
[15]	陈然然.监控自然衰减技术在氯代有机物污染场地的应用探究[D]. 南京:东南大学, 2016.
[16]	Amin M M, Khanahmad H, Teimouri F, et al. Effect of monorhamnolipid contribution on anaerobic-natural attenuation of explosives in contaminated soils[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017,143(8):04017035.
[17]	Kohli P, Richnow H H, Lal R. Compound-specific stable isotope analysis:implications in hexachlorocyclohexane in-vitro and field assessment[J]. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 2017,57(1):11-22.
[18]	Neuhauser E F, Ripp J A, Azzolina N A, et al. Monitored natural attenuation of manufactured gas plant tar mono and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ground water:a 14-year field study[J]. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 2009,29(3):66-76.
[19]	U.S. EPA. Superfund remedy report, 15th edition[R]. U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA-542-R-17-001, Washington DC:2017.
[20]	Declercq I, Cappuyns V, Duclos Y. Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) of contaminated soils:State of the art in Europe-A critical evaluation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2012,426(2):393-405.
[21]	李小平,程曦.场地污染土壤和地下水修复中受监控的自然修复/恢复技术的应用与研究进展[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2013, 35(8):73-78.
[22]	吕晓建.非正规垃圾填埋场地下水监控自然衰减效果评价研究[D].石家庄:河北地质大学, 2016.
[23]	王威,陈社明,马震,等.浅层地下水中石油类污染物监测自然衰减(MNA)预测与适宜性评价研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2014,(8):29-33.
[24]	An D, Xi B, Ren J, et al. Sustainability assessment of groundwater remediation technologies based on multi-criteria decision making method[J]. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 2016,119(4):36-46.
[25]	赵勇胜,王冰,屈智慧,等.柴油污染包气带砂层中的自然衰减作用[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2010,40(2):389-393.
[26]	谢云峰,曹云者,柳晓娟,等.地下水挥发性有机污染物自然衰减能力评价方法[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2013,3(2):104-112.
[27]	李洋.浅层地下水石油类污染物自然衰减评价与预测[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2012.
[28]	张文静.垃圾渗滤液污染物在地下环境中的自然衰减及含水层污染强化修复方法研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2007.
[29]	王冰.柴油在地下环境中的自然衰减研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2011.
[30]	贾慧,武晓峰,胡黎明,等.基于现场试验的石油类污染物自然衰减能力研究[J]. 环境科学, 2011,32(12):3699-3703.
[31]	蒋灵芝,陈余道,邓超联,等.应用质量通量评估地下水中BTEX和乙醇的自然衰减[J]. 高校地质学报, 2016,22(2):395-400.
[32]	张翠云,张胜,殷密英,等.地下水污染自然衰减研究进展[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2010,8(6):50-52.
[33]	曹政.槐房地块水土"原地"清污告捷[N]. 北京日报, 2017-07-03(006).
[34]	焦殉.地下水土有机污染MNA修复研究综述[J]. 上海国土资源, 2011,32(2):30-35.
[35]	张敏,王森杰,陈素云,等.地下水苯系物微生物降解及其碳同位素标记[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2017,44(2):129-136.
[36]	New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Monitored natural attenuation technical guidance[R]. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Site Remediation Program. Trenton:2012.
[37]	姜林,钟茂生,张丽娜,等.基于风险的中国污染场地管理体系研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2014,36(8):1-10.
[38]	杨维汉,崔静."土十条"今年出台,"十三五"最严格环保制度值得期待[N]. 新华社, 2016-01-12(c).
[39]	徐亚,朱雪梅,刘玉强,等.基于随机-模糊耦合的污染场地健康风险评价及案例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2014,34(10):2692-2700.
[40]	武晓峰,谢磊,赵洪阳.土壤及地下水污染点不同暴露途径的健康风险比较[J]. 中国环境科学, 2012,32(2):345-350.
[41]	蒋栋,路迈西,李发生,等.决策支持系统在污染场地管理中的应用[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2011,34(5):170-174.
[42]	张红振,董璟琦,吴舜泽,等.某焦化厂污染场地环境损害评估案例研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(10):3159-3165.
[43]	谷庆宝,郭观林,周友亚,等.污染场地修复技术的分类、应用与筛选方法探讨[J]. 环境科学研究, 2008,21(2):197-202.
[44]	U.S. EPA. Technical protocol for evaluating natural attenuation of chlorinated solvents in groundwater[R]. U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development EPA/600/R-98/128Washington DC:1998.
[45]	U.S. EPA. Superfund remedy report, 14th edition[R]. U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA-542-R-13-016, Washington DC:2013.
[46]	王文坦,李社锋,朱文渊,等.我国污染场地土壤修复技术的工程应用与商业模式分析[J]. 环境工程, 2016,34(1):164-167.
[47]	Radian International. Eastern groundwater plume naval air station Brunswick remedial action operation (RAO) optimization case study[R]. Radian International, Site Specific Report SSR-2537-ENV Morrisville, NC:2000.
[48]	李玮,王明玉,韩占涛,等.棕地地下水污染修复技术筛选方法研究——以某废弃化工厂污染场地为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2016,43(3):131-140.