典型荧光示踪剂在包气带中的迁移、吸附特性

赵阳, 雷国元, 徐亚, 刘玉强, 董路, 刘景财, 黄启飞

中国环境科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9) : 3842-3848.

PDF(478 KB)
PDF(478 KB)
中国环境科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9) : 3842-3848.
水污染与控制

典型荧光示踪剂在包气带中的迁移、吸附特性

  • 赵阳1,2, 雷国元1, 徐亚2, 刘玉强2, 董路2, 刘景财2, 黄启飞2
作者信息 +

Migration, adsorption characteristics of typical fluorescent tracer in vadose zone

  • ZHAO Yang1,2, LEI Guo-yuan1, XU Ya2, LIU Yu-qiang2, DONG Lu2, LIU Jing-cai2, HUANG Qi-fei2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为研究荧光示踪剂在包气带土壤中的迁移-吸附特性,指导填埋场渗漏检测过程的示踪剂选择、投加和采样.采用土柱实验、参数反演手段,研究3种典型荧光示踪剂在包气带中的吸附、滞后和穿透规律,确定其迁移表征方法、表征参数和最佳模型.结果表明:在土壤有机碳相对较高和较低时,分别可用非线性平衡和线性平衡模型准确拟合罗丹明B在其中的穿透数据,而非线性平衡模型同时准确拟合了荧光素和荧光素钠在两种有机碳土壤中的穿透数据.基于最优反演模型,在低有机碳土壤中示踪剂迁移参数为:罗丹明B、荧光素和荧光素钠的分配系数分别为84.99,1.80,1.48cm3/g,滞后因子分别为393.27,8.18,7.81,吸附容量分别为6.14×10-3,0.15×10-3,0.14×10-3mg/g,均出现罗丹明B>荧光素>荧光素钠的顺序.荧光素钠在包气带中迁移时固相吸附浓度最小、迁移速率最快、吸附消耗量最小,建议在进行填埋场渗漏示踪中选用.

Abstract

Adsorption and transport properties of the fluorescent tracer in vadose zone soil system were investigated to guide the choice, addition, sampling of tracer during landfill leakage detection process. To determine the characterization method, characterization parameters and best model of tracers, soil column experiments and parameter inversion method were used to study the law of adsorption, retention, and breakthrough of 3typical fluorescent tracers in vadose zone soil. Results showed that in higher and lower organic carbon soil, Rhodamine B breakthrough data by soil were fitted well with the Non-Linear Equilibrium (NE) model and the Linear Equilibrium (LE) model respectively, but breakthrough data of fluorescein and Sodium fluorescein were fitted well with NE model. Based on the best inversion model, the tracer migration parameters in lower organic carbon soil were: The distribution coefficients of Rhodamine B, Fluorescein, and Sodium fluorescein were respectively 84.99, 1.80, 1.48cm3/g; The retardation factors of them were respectively 393.27, 8.18, 7.81; The adsorption capacity of them were respectively 6.14×10-3, 0.15×10-3, 0.14×10-3mg/g. It was shown that the three parameters of tracers were ranked in descending order as follows: Rhodamine B> fluorescein>Sodium fluorescein. Sodium fluorescein showed the properties of least adsorption concentration, the fastest migration rate, the least adsorption capacity when transported at vadose zone in our study, we recommend to use Sodium fluorescein as a conservative tracer during landfill leakage tracing.

关键词

包气带 / 溶质运移参数 / 渗漏检测 / 污染预警

Key words

leakage detection / pollution warning / solute transport parameters / vadose zone

引用本文

导出引用
赵阳, 雷国元, 徐亚, 刘玉强, 董路, 刘景财, 黄启飞. 典型荧光示踪剂在包气带中的迁移、吸附特性[J]. 中国环境科学. 2020, 40(9): 3842-3848
ZHAO Yang, LEI Guo-yuan, XU Ya, LIU Yu-qiang, DONG Lu, LIU Jing-cai, HUANG Qi-fei. Migration, adsorption characteristics of typical fluorescent tracer in vadose zone[J]. China Environmental Science. 2020, 40(9): 3842-3848
中图分类号: X523   

参考文献

[1] Alfaia R, Costa A M, Campos J C. Municipal solid waste in Brazil:A review[J]. Waste Management & Research, 2017,35(12):1195-1209.
[2] Ma H, Cao Y, Lu X, et al. Review of Typical Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Status and Energy Technology[J]. Energy Procedia, 2016,88:589-594.
[3] Hoornweg D, Bhada-tata P. What a waste:a global review of solid waste management[R]. Washington DC:World Bank, 2012:8-12.
[4] Ding Z H, Wang Y F, Patrick X. An agent based environmental impact assessment of building demolition waste management:Conventional versus green management[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 133(oct.1):1136-1153.
[5] US Environmental Protection Agency. Straight Talk on Tanks-Leak Detection Methods for Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks and Piping[R]. Washington DC:Solid Waste And Emergency Response, 5403G,1997:8-10.
[6] Oh M, Seo M W, Lee S, et al. Applicability of grid-net detection system for landfill leachate and diesel fuel release in the subsurface[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2008,96(1-4):69-82.
[7] Laine D L, Darilek G T. Locating leaks in geomembrane liners of landfills covered with a protective soil[J]. In Proceedings of Geosynthetics' 93, 1993:1403-1412.
[8] Pandey L M S, Shukla S K. An insight into waste management in australia with a focus on landfill technology and liner leak detection[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,225(JUL.10):1147-1154.
[9] Aboyeji O S, Eigbokhan S F. Evaluations of groundwater contamination by leachates around Olusosun open dumpsite in Lagos metropolis, southwest Nigeria[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016,183(Part 1):333-341.
[10] Moody C M, Townsend T G. A comparison of landfill leachates based on waste composition[J]. Waste Management, 2017,63:267-274.
[11] Mor S, Ravindra K, Dahiya RP, et al. Leachate Characterization and Assessment of Groundwater Pollution Near Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site[J]. Nature environment and pollution technology, 2011, 10(3):415-418.
[12] Pandey L M S, Shukla S K, Habibi D. Resistivity profiles of Perth soil in leakdetection test[J]. Geotechnical Research, 2017:1-34.
[13] Kapelewska J, Kotowska U, Karpińska J, et al. Water pollution indicators and chemometric expertise for the assessment of the impact of municipal solid waste landfills on groundwater located in their area[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019,359(1):790-800.
[14] Weiss T, Slavík M, Bruthans J. Use of sodium fluorescein dye to visualize the vaporization plane within porous media[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018,565:331-340.
[15] Lange J, Olsson O, Sweeney B, et al. Fluorescent tracers to evaluate pesticide dissipation and transformation in agricultural soils[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018,619-620(APR.1):1682-1689.
[16] Battaglia D, Birindelli F, Rinaldi M, et al. Fluorescent tracer tests for detection of dam leakages:The case of the Bumbuna dam-Sierra Leone[J]. Engineering Geology, 2016,205:30-39.
[17] 魏利刚.荧光示踪剂法在坝体渗漏勘查中的应用[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2018,(10):184-186. Wei L G. Application of fluorescent tracer method in dam body leakage investigation[J]. Water Conservancy Planning and Design, 2018,(10):184-186.
[18] 王佳佳.循环冷却水中荧光示踪剂的研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2017:2-4. Wang J J. Study on Fluorescent Tracer in Circulating Cooling Water[D]. Ji Nan:Shandong University, 2017:2-4.
[19] Zhao Y C. Chapter 1-Leachate Generation and Characteristics[M]. Pollution Control Technology for Leachate from Municipal Solid Waste, 2018:1-30.
[20] 郭婷,张承东,齐建超,等.酵母菌-细菌联合修复石油污染土壤研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2009,22(12):1472-1477. Guo T, Zhang C D, Qi J C, et al. Study on yeast-bacteria Joint remediation of oil-contaminated soil[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2009,22(12):1472-1477.
[21] ZhuN, Ku T, Li G, et al. Evaluating biotoxicity variations of landfill leachate as penetrating through the soil column[J]. Waste Management, 2013,33(8):1750-1757.
[22] Ladu J L, Zhang D R. Modeling atrazine transport in soil columns with HYDRUS-1D[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2011,4(3):258-269.
[23] Dong Z H, Wei L, Xu S W, et al. Transport of imidazolium-based ionic liquids with different anion/cation species in sand/soil columns[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2017,147:480-486.
[24] Smart P L, Laidlaw I M. An evaluation of some fluorescent dyes for water tracing[J]. Water Resources Research, 1977,13(1):15-33.
[25] Yu Z G, Hu L M, Lo I M. Transport of the arsenic (As)-loaded nano zero-valent iron in groundwater-saturated sand columns:Roles of surface modification and As loading[J]. Chemosphere, 2019,216:428-436.
[26] Latrille C, Wissocq A, Beaucaire C, et al. Simulation of Sr Transport in Soil Column[J]. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 2017,17:476-479.
[27] Zakari S, Liu H, Tong L, et al. Transport of bisphenol-A in sandy aquifer sediment:Column experiment[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 144(FEB.):1807-1814.
[28] Mark N, Arthur J, Dontsova K, et al. Column transport studies of 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO) in soils[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 171:427-434.
[29] Sutton D, Kabala Z, Vasudevan D. Rhodamine WT as a reactive tracer:laboratory study and field consequences[J]. Tracers and Modelling in Hydrogeology, 2000,262:201-205.
[30] Šimůnek J, Van M T, Šejna M. Recent developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2016,15(7):1-25.
[31] Simunek J, Huang K, Van M T. The HYDRUS software for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media[R]. US:Department of environmental sciences university of riverside, 2013:49-59.
[32] Sabatinid A, Austint A. Characteristics of rhodamine WT and fluorescein as adsorbing groundwater tracers[J]. GROUND WATER, 1991,29(3):341-349.
[33] Saffron C M, Park J H, Dale B E, et al. Kinetics of contaminant desorption from soil:comparison of model formulations using the Akaike information criterion[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2006,40(24):7662-7667.
[34] Kasnavia T, Vu D, Sabatini D A. Fluorescent dye and media properties affecting sorption and tracer selection[J]. GROUND WATER, 1999, 37(3):376-381.
[35] Di D M. A particle interaction model of reversible organic chemical sorption[J]. Chemosphere, 1985,14(10):1503-1538.
[36] Piwoni M D, Banerjee P. Sorption of volatile organic solvents from aqueous solution onto subsurface solids[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1989,4(2):163-179.
[37] Schwarzenbach R P, Westall J. Transport of nonpolar organic compounds from surface water to groundwater. Laboratory sorption studies[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1981,15(11):1360-1367.
[38] Delle Site A. Factors affecting sorption of organic compounds in natural sorbentwater systems and sorption coefficients for selected pollutants. A review[J]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 2001,30(1):187-439.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1800902);国家自然科学基金资助项目(51708529)

PDF(478 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/