1. Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;
2. Jilin Forest Industry Development and Construction Group Corporation Limited, Changchun 130000, China
A total of 10 quaternary loose rock pore water samples were collected from Suizhong County, Liaoning. The pH, Cl-, SO42-, NH4+, NO2-, NO3-, F-, total hardness, total dissolved solids, iron, manganese, zinc, cyanide and volatile phenols were considered as the water quality parameters. Rough set theory was employed for data reduction. Meanwhile, to find attribute reduction set, the attribute dependence degree and information entropy heuristic algorithms were combined. Support vector machine was employed to evaluate groundwater quality for all parameters before and after reduction, respectively. The results showed that rough set theory reduced the number of chemical parameters from 14 to 8, and assessment results with attribute reduction were the same as those without attribute reduction. The groundwater quality in the study area was mainly class II and III, which meets the permissible limits. However, iron and three nitrogen were exceeded drinking water quality standard. Although the combination of rough set and support vector machine reduced redundant indices, the accuracy of water quality classification remained effective, while the complexity of calculation was reduced and the rationality of assessment results was guaranteed.
Viala E. Water for food, water for life a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture[J]. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 2008,22(1):127-129.
[2]
Shrestha S, Kazama F. Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques:A case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2007, 22(4):464-475.
Dahiya S, Singh B, Gaur S, et al. Analysis of groundwater quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007,147(3):938-946.
[6]
Maier H R, Morgan N, Chow C W K. Use of artificial neural networks for predicting optimal alum doses and treated water quality parameters[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2004,19(5):485-494.
[7]
Huang H, Liang XJ, Xiao CL, et al. Analysis and assessment of confined and phreatic water quality using a rough set theory method in Jilin City, China[J]. Water Science and Technology:Water Supply, 2015,15(4):773-783.
Pai P F, Lee F C. A rough set based model in water quality analysis[J]. Water Resources Management, 2010,24(11):2405-2418.
[11]
Li Peiyue, Wu Jianhua, Qian Hui. Groundwater quality assessment based on rough sets attribute reduction and TOPSIS method in a semi-arid area, China[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2012,184(8):4841-4854.
Zhang D Z; Xia B K. Soft measurement of water content in oil-water two-phase flow based on RS-SVM Classifier and GA-NN Predictor[J]. Measurement Science Review, 2014,14(4):219-226.
[16]
Liu Shuangyin, Xu Longqin, Li Daoliang. Water quality earlywarning model based on support vector machine optimized by rough set algorithm[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice, 2015,35(6):1617-1624.
[17]
Pawlak Z, Skowron A. Rudiments of rough sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2007,177(1):3-27.
[18]
Swiniarski R W, Skowron A. Rough set methods in feature selection and recognition[J]. Pattern recognition letters, 2003, 24(6):833-849.
[19]
Vapnik V N. The nature of statistical learning theory[M]. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 1995.