To explore the relationship between process stability and microbial community in anaerobic digestion, organic loading rate (OLR) disturbances were introduced into an anaerobic digester treating food waste (FW) to induce different process stages. Physico-chemical analysis along with the 454-pyrosequencing microbial technique were performed to monitor the responses of state parameters as well as the dynamics of microbial community. Results showed that balanced community structure ensured the stable operation of the digester. Under steady-state conditions, the methane yield reached (0.50±0.01) LCH4/gVS and volatile solids (VS) removal rate reached (89.58±0.08)%. Under high OLR conditions, the relative abundance of acid-producing bacteria (phyla Tenericutes and Actinobacteria) increased dramatically, which induced the proliferation of syntrophic fatty acid degrading bacteria (class Clostridia), while the abundance and activity of syntrophic hydrogenotrophic methanogens decreased. The imbalance relationship between methanogens and syntrophic fatty acid degrading bacteria caused their inefficient syntrophy, eventually resulting in volatile fatty acid (VFA) accumulation and process deterioration. Moreover, the accumulated VFA and ammonia reduced the specific acetoclastic methanogenic activity (SAMA) and specific methanogenic activity (SMA) by 60.12% and 72.51%, respectively, which further deteriorated the digestion process. Although the digester afterwards recovered to its original operational conditions and process performance, the microbial community profile changed and achieved new steady-state conditions.
李蕾, 何琴, 马垚, 赵小飞, 瞿莉, 王小铭, 彭绪亚. 厌氧消化过程稳定性与微生物群落的相关性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(11): 3397-3404.
LI Lei, HE Qin, MA Yao, ZHAO Xiao-fei, QU Li, WANG Xiao-ming, PENG Xu-ya. Investigation on the relationship between process stability and microbial community in anaerobic digestion. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2016, 36(11): 3397-3404.
Li L, He Q, Ma Y, et al. Dynamics of microbial community in a mesophilic anaerobic digester treating food waste:Relationship between community structure and process stability[J]. Biores. Technol., 2015,189:113-120.
Goux X, Calusinska M, Lemaigre S, et al. Microbial community dynamics in replicate anaerobic digesters exposed sequentially to increasing organic loading rate, acidosis, and process recovery[J]. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 2015,8(1):1-18.
[5]
Guo X, Wang C, Sun F, et al. A comparison of microbial characteristics between the thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digesters exposed to elevated food waste loadings[J]. Biores. Technol., 2014,152:420-428.
[6]
Carballa M, Regueiro L, Lema J M. Microbial management of anaerobic digestion:exploiting the microbiome-functionality nexus[J]. Curr. Opin. Biotech., 2015,33:103-111.
[7]
Regueiro L, Lema J M, Carballa M. Key microbial communities steering the functioning of anaerobic digesters during hydraulic and organic overloading shocks[J]. Biores. Technol., 2015, 197:208-216.
Karakashev D, Batstone D J, Angelidaki I. Influence of environmental conditions on methanogenic compositions in anaerobic biogas reactors[J]. Appl. Environ. Microb., 2005,71(1):331-338.
[11]
Williams J, Williams H, Dinsdale R, et al. Monitoring methanogenic population dynamics in a full-scale anaerobic digester to facilitate operational management[J]. Biores. Technol., 2013,140:234-242.
[12]
Cho S, Im W, Kim D, et al. Dry anaerobic digestion of food waste under mesophilic conditions:Performance and methanogenic community analysis[J]. Biores. Technol., 2013,131:210-217.
[13]
Jang H M, Kim J H, Ha J H, et al. Bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities during the single-stage anaerobic digestion of highstrength food wastewater[J]. Biores. Technol., 2014,165:174-182.
[14]
Polag D, May T, Müller L, et al. Online monitoring of stable carbon isotopes of methane in anaerobic digestion as a new tool for early warning of process instability[J]. Biores. Technol., 2015,197:161-170.
[15]
Razaviarani V, Buchanan I D. Reactor performance and microbial community dynamics during anaerobic co-digestion of municipal wastewater sludge with restaurant grease waste at steady state and overloading stages[J]. Biores. Technol., 2014,172:232-240.
[16]
Regueiro L, Veiga P, Figueroa M, et al. Relationship between microbial activity and microbial community structure in six full-scale anaerobic digesters[J]. Microbiol. Res., 2012,167(10):581-589.
Heo N H, Park S C, Kang H. Effects of mixture ratio and hydraulic retention time on single-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge[J]. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. A., 2004,39(7):1739-1756.
[19]
Nagao N, Tajima N, Kawai M, et al. Maximum organic loading rate for the single-stage wet anaerobic digestion of food waste[J]. Biores. Technol., 2012,118:210-218.
[20]
Yenigün O, Demirel B. Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion:A review[J]. Process Biochem., 2013,48(5/6):901-911.
[21]
Palatsi J, Illa J, Prenafeta-Boldú F X, et al. Long-chain fatty acids inhibition and adaptation process in anaerobic thermophilic digestion:Batch tests, microbial community structure and mathematical modelling[J]. Biores. Technol., 2010,101(7):2243-2251.
[22]
Kim S, Bae J, Choi O, et al. A pilot scale two-stage anaerobic digester treating food waste leachate (FWL):Performance and microbial structure analysis using pyrosequencing[J]. Process Biochem., 2014,49(2):301-308.
[23]
Lerm S, Kleyböcker A, Miethling-Graff R, et al. Archaeal community composition affects the function of anaerobic co-digesters in response to organic overload[J]. Waste Manage., 2012,32(3):389-399.
[24]
Schauer-Gimenez A E, Zitomer D H, Maki J S, et al. Bioaugmentation for improved recovery of anaerobic digesters after toxicant exposure[J]. Water Res., 2010,44(12):3555-3564.
[25]
Shigematsu T, Era S, Mizuno Y, et al. Microbial community of a mesophilic propionate-degrading methanogenic consortium in chemostat cultivation analyzed based on 16S rRNA and acetate kinase genes[J]. Appl. Microbiol. Biot., 2006,72(2):401-415.
[26]
Franke-Whittle I H, Walter A, Ebner C, et al. Investigation into the effect of high concentrations of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion on methanogenic communities[J]. Waste Manage., 2014,34(11):2080-2089.
[27]
Lerm S, Kleyböcker A, Miethling-Graff R, et al. Archaeal community composition affects the function of anaerobic co-digesters in response to organic overload[J]. Waste Manage., 2012,32(3):389-399.
[28]
Li A, Chu Y N, Wang X, et al. A pyrosequencing-based metagenomic study of methane-producing microbial community in solid-state biogas reactor[J]. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 2013,6(1):3.
[29]
Ziganshin A M, Liebetrau J, Pröter J, et al. Microbial community structure and dynamics during anaerobic digestion of various agricultural waste materials[J]. Appl. Microbiol. Biot., 2013, 97(11):5161-5174.
[30]
Wang W, Xie L, Luo G, et al. Performance and microbial community analysis of the anaerobic reactor with coke oven gas biomethanation and in situ biogas upgrading[J]. Biores. Technol., 2013,146:234-239.
[31]
Wirth R, Kovács E, Maróti G, et al. Characterization of a biogasproducing microbial community by short-read next generation DNA sequencing[J]. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 2012,5(1):41.
[32]
Siriwongrungson V, Zeng R J, Angelidaki I. Homoacetogenesis as the alternative pathway for H2sink during thermophilic anaerobic degradation of butyrate under suppressed methanogenesis[J]. Water Res., 2007,41(18):4204-4210.
[33]
Luo G, De Francisci D, Kougias P G, et al. New steady-state microbial community compositions and process performances in biogas reactors induced by temperature disturbances[J]. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 2015,8(1):1-10.
