Environmental tax and SO2 and NOx emissions-a sector level decomposition analysis
LIU Yu1, HU Xiao-hong2
1. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Based on environmental CGE model, the SO2 and NOx emissions reduction of sectors were decomposed into output scale effect, process emission effect, intermediate input substitution effect, energy substitution effect (emissions intensity effect and emissions base effect), and import substitution effect. It was showed by analytical results that SO2 and NOx emissions were decreased by 290 000 tons and 130 000 tons, respectively, in which, the reduction of coal use as intermediate inputs accounted for 57% and 99%, respectively. Besides, it was showed by our decomposition analysis that energy substitution effects made the strongest contribution, SO2 and NOx emissions were reduced by 270 000 tons and 120 000 tons, respectively. This was followed by output scale effects, contributing 20 000 tons and 8579 tons of emissions cut, respectively. On the sector level, the largest emissions reduction was contributed by the electric power sector, to which energy substitution effects made the greatest contribution. The main factors for SO2 and NOx emissions reduction varied significantly across sectors. Therefore, when levying environmental tax, sectors' idiosyncrasies in reducing SO2 and NOx emissions should be considered by the government.
Bovenberg A L. Environmental taxes and the double dividend[J]. Empirica, 1998,125(1):15-35.
[9]
Fullerton D, Metcalf G. Environmental taxes and the double dividend hypothesis:Did you really expect something for Nothing[J]. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 1998,73(1):221-256.
[10]
Fullerton D, Heutela G. The general equilibrium incidence of environmental taxes[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2007, 91(3):571-591.
[11]
Terkla D. The efficiency value of effluent tax revenues[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1984, 11(2):107-123.
[12]
Mooij R A de. Environmental taxation and the double dividend[M]. Netherlands:Elsevier, 2000.
[13]
Takedaa S. The double dividend from carbon regulations in japan[J]. Journal of the Japanese and International economies, 2007,21(3):336-364.
[14]
Kumbaro?glu GS. Environmental taxation and economic effects:a computable general equilibrium analysis for Turkey[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2014,25(8):795-810.
He J. What is the role of openness for China's aggregate industrial SO2 emission? A structural analysis based on the Divisia decomposition method[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69(4):868-886.
Liu Q L, Wang Q. Pathways to SO2 emissions reduction in China for 1995~2010:Based on decomposition analysis[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2013,33(11):405-415.
Burniaux J M, Truong T. GTAP-E:An energy-environmental version of the GTAP Model[EB/OL]. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=923,2002.