In this study, adsorption behaviour of humic acid (HA) on Ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) ultrafiltration membrane surface and HA adsorbed layer structure were determined in the different concentration of Mg2+, combined with the interaction forces of EVOH-HA and HA-HA, and HA fouling experiments to unravel the influence mechanism of Mg2+ on natural organic matter fouling of ultrafiltration membrane. According to the results, the effects of Mg2+ on HA fouling were in two stages: at the lower Mg2+ range, the net charges of EVOH and HA surface were reduced because of the charge screening and complex bridge and this weaken the electrostatic repulsion of EVOH-HA and HA-HA, thus a higher deposition rate of HA was accumulated and a denser HA layer was formed on the membrane surface, so the membrane fouling aggravated. However, when Mg2+ dosage above a critical value, the hydration repultion forces were provoked effectivity, which caused a decrease in the deposition rate and extent of HA onto the membrane surface, and more nonrigid HA layer was formed, corresponding membrane fouling was mitigated.
王磊, 李松山, 苗瑞, 朱苗, 邓东旭. Mg2+对腐殖酸在EVOH膜面微观作用过程的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(4): 1380-1385.
WANG Lei, LI Song-shan, MIAO Rui, ZHU Miao, DENG Dong-xu. The influence mechanism of Mg2+ to the microcosmic process of humic acid on EVOH membrane surface. CHINA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCECE, 2017, 37(4): 1380-1385.
Qu F S, Liang H. Ultra-filtration membrane fouling by extracellular oragnic matters (EOM) of Microcystis aerugioain stationary phase:Influences of interfacial characteristicsof foulants and fouling mechanisms[J]. Water Research, 2012,46:1490-1500.
Hoon Y S, Hak L C, Jin K K, et al. Effect of calcium ion on the fouling of nanofilter by humic acid in drinking water production[J]. Water Research, 1998,32:2180-2186.
[5]
Tang C Y, Fu Q S, Criddle C S, et al. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2007,41:2008-2014.
[6]
Nanci K, Maxililiano B, Graciela Z, et al. Aggregation kinetics of humic acids in the presence of calcium ions[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2013,427:76-82.
[7]
Hao Y, Moriya A, Maruyama T H, et al. Effect of metal ions on humic acid fouling of hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011,376:247-253.
[8]
Zularisam A W, Ahmad A, Sakinah M, et al. Role of natural organic matter (NOM), colloidal particles, and soluti-on chemistry on ultrafiltration performance[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2011,78:189-200.
[9]
Jarusutthirak, C. Fouling and flux decline of reverse osmosis (RO), nanoflitration (NF) and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes associated with effluent organic matter (EfOM) during wastewater reclamation/reuse[D]. Boulder:University of colorado boulder, 2002.
[10]
Michael B J D, Tracy B L, Rossman G F, et al. Nanoscale forces of interaction between glass in aqueous andnon-aqueous media:a theoretical and empirical study[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2010,362:90-96.
[11]
L. Feng, L.X. Fen, D.G. Cheng, et al. Adsorption and fouling characterization of Klebsiella oxytoca to microfiltration membranes[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2009,44:1289-1292.
[12]
Lee N, Amy G. Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter[J]. Water Research, 2006,40:2357-2368.
[13]
Katsoufidou K, Yiantsios S G, Karabelas A J. A study of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acids and flux recovery by backwashing:Experiments and modeling[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005,266:40-50.
[14]
Katsoufidou K, Yiantsios S G, Karabelas A J. An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodiumalginate solutions:the effect of backwashing on flux recovery[J]. Desalination, 2008,220:214-227.
[15]
Zhou M H, Meng F G. Using UVevis absorbance spectral parameters to characterize the fouling propensity of humicsubstances during ultrafiltration[J]. Water Research, 2015,87:311-319.
[16]
Basri H, Ismail A F, Aziz M. Microstructure and anti-adhesion properties of PES/TAP/Ag hybrid UF membrane[J]. Desalination, 2012,287:71-77.
Quevedo I R, Tufenkji N. Influence of solution chemistry on the deposition and detachment kinetics of a CdTe Quantum Dot examined using a quartz crystal microbalance[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2009,43(9):3176-3182.
[19]
Chowdhury I, Duch M C, Mansukhani N D, et al. Deposition and release of Grephene oxide nanomaterias using a quartz crystal microbalance[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2014,48:961-969.
[20]
Feiler A A, Sahllhplm A, Sandberg T, et al. AdsoMin (BSM) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) studied with quartz crystal microbalance (QCM-D)[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2007,315(2):475-481.
[21]
Shao J, Hou J, Song H. Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negativly charged and uncharged filtration membrane[J]. Water Research, 2011,45(2):473-482
[22]
Kwon K D, Green H, Bjoorn P, et al. Model bacterial extracellular polysaccharide adsorption onto silica and alumina:quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring of dextran adsorption[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2006,40(24):7739-7744.
