This study focused on the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removal characteristics in simultaneous nitrification-endogenous denitrification and phosphorus removal (SNEDPR) system treating low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio (<3) wastewater. In order to achieve an efficient nutrient removal, an extended anaerobic/low aerobic (dissolved oxygen:0.5~1.0mg/L) sequencing batch reactor (SBR) fed with municipal sewage was started up and optimized by regulating the influent C/N ratio. The population dynamics of functional microorganisms were also analyzed. Results indicated that when the influent C/N ratio raised from 4.3 to 5.15, the N and P removal performance of the system became better with total nitrogen (TN) and PO43--P removal efficiencies up to 89.3% and 90.6%, respectively; with C/N ratio reduced to <3, the nutrient removal performance decreased firstly and then increased in the following operation. However, the effect of low C/N on the phosphorus removal performance of PAOs (phosphorous accumulating organisms) was higher than the endogenous denitrification capability of DGAOs (denitrifying glycogen accumulating organisms), showed as the TN and PO43--P removal efficiency reduced to 21.4% and 3.4% firstly, and lately increased to 92.9% and 94.1% gradually. In the stable phase of the system, the average phosphorus release per COD and SNED efficiency reached to 437.1mg/L and 89.1% respectively, with the average effluent concentration of NH4+-N, NOx--N and PO43--P was 0, 4.4, and 0.2mg/L, respectively. After 136-day operation, PAOs, GAO, AOB (ammonia oxidizing bacteria) and NOB(nitrite oxidizing bacteria) accounted for 16%±3%, 8%±3%, 7%±3% and 3%±1% of total biomass, respectively, which ensured the P uptake, nitrification and denitrification. Additionally, the occurrence of simultaneous partial nitrification-endogenous denitrification at the low aerobic stage of the system interpreted the efficient nutrient removal from low C/N (<3) wastewater.
Zhang W, Peng Y, Ren N, et al. Improvement of nutrient removal by optimizing the volume ratio of anoxic to aerobic zone in AAO-BAF system[J]. Chemosphere, 2013,93(11):2859-2863.
Xu X, Liu G, Zhu L. Enhanced denitrifying phosphorous removal in a novel anaerobic/aerobic/anoxic (AOA) process with the diversion of internal carbon source[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011,102(22):10340-10345.
[4]
Kuba T, Loosdrecht M C M V, Heijnen J J. Phosphorus and nitrogen removal with minimal COD requirement by integration of denitrifying dephosphatation and nitrification in a two-sludge system[J]. Water Research, 1996,30(7):1702-1710.
Jabari P, Munz G, Oleszkiewicz J A. Selection of denitrifying phosphorous accumulating organisms in IFAS systems:Comparison of nitrite with nitrate as an electron acceptor[J]. Chemosphere, 2014,109:20-27.
[7]
Zeng R J, Lemaire R, Yuan Z, et al. Simultaneous nitrification denitrification and phosphorus removal in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor[J]. Biotechnology Bioengineering, 2003,84(2):710-178.
Wang X, Wang S, Zhao J, et al. A novel stoichiometries methodology to quantify functional microorganisms in simultaneous (partial) nitrification-endogenous denitrification and phosphorus removal (SNEDPR)[J]. Water Research, 2016,95:319-329.
Third K A, Burnett N, Cord-Ruwisch R. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification using stored substrate (PHB) as the electron donor in an SBR[J]. Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 2003,83(6):706-720.
Kim D, Ryu K H D, Lee S I. Treatment of low carbon-to-nitrogen wastewater using two-stage sequencing batch reactor with independent nitrification[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2008,43(4):406-413.
Oehmen A, Saunders A M, Vives M T, et al. Competition between polyphosphate and glycogen accumulating organisms in enhanced biological phosphorus removal systems with acetate and propionate as carbon sources[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2006,123(1):22-32.
[18]
Ge, S J, Peng, Y Z, Lu, C C, Wang, S Y. Practical consideration for design and optimization of the step feed process[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2013,7(1):135-142.
Peng Y Z, Ge S J. Enhanced Nutrient Removal in Three Types of Step Feeding Process From Municipal Wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011,102(11):6405-6413.
[21]
Lo I W, Lo K V, Mavinic D S, et al. Contributions of biofilm and suspended sludge to nitrogen transformation and nitrous oxide emission in hybrid sequencing batch system[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2010,22(7):953-960.
Crocetti G R, Hugenholtz P, Bond P L, et al. Identification of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms and design of 16SrRNA-directed probes for their detection andquantitation[J]. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2000,66(3):1175-1182.
[25]
Wang X X, Wang S Y, Zhao J, et al. Combining simultaneous nitrification-endogenous denitrification and phosphorus removal (SNDPR) with post-denitrification in a SBR enriched with PAOs and GAOs for low carbon/nitrogen wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016,220:17-25.
Smolders G J, Van d M J, van Loosdrecht M C, et al. Model of the anaerobic metabolism of the biological phosphorus removal process:Stoichiometry and pH influence[J]. Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 1994,43(6):461-470.
[30]
Kerrn-Jespersen J P, Henze M. Biological phosphorus uptake under anoxic and aerobic conditions[J]. Water Research, 1993,27(4):617-624.
[31]
Moya J, Huili & ntilde;ir C, Peredo K, et al. Modeling of simultaneous denitrification-Anaerobic digestion-Organic matter aerobic oxidation and nitrification in an anoxic-anaerobic-aerobic compact filter reactor[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2012,160(3/4):176.